logo
Colorado joins lawsuit against ATF over deal ending ban on rapid-fire triggers for rifles

Colorado joins lawsuit against ATF over deal ending ban on rapid-fire triggers for rifles

Yahoo10-06-2025
DENVER (KDVR) — Colorado is one of 16 states that have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners.
The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland.
Governor signs bill requiring training for semiautomatic guns, banning rapid-fire conversion devices
'It's hard enough for our local law enforcement officials to protect Colorado communities from gun violence without the federal government willfully ignoring the law,' said Attorney General Weiser. 'The law is clear: machine guns, and devices that turn a semiautomatic weapon into a machine gun, are illegal. We're suing to stop the ATF and the administration from making our communities more dangerous by distributing thousands of devices that turn firearms into weapons of war. These weapons have no place in our communities, and I will continue to fight to keep Coloradans safe from gun violence.'
The Colorado law banning the sale of rapid-fire conversion devices, including forced-reset triggers, was signed into law in April and will go into effect on Aug. 1, 2026. Second Amendment supporters have called on the U.S. Attorney General to investigate the measure as an infringement on the U.S. Constitution.
Weiser said in a release announcing the state's participation in the lawsuit that machine gun conversion devices like the forced-reset triggers are frequently used in violent crimes and mass shootings. The state attorney general said that by using these devices, firearms can exceed the rate of fire of many military machine guns.
'ATF has noted a significant rise in the use of these types of devices, leading to incidents of machine-gun fire increasing by 1,400% from 2019 through 2021,' Weiser said in a press release.
There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. The ATF previously classified the triggers as machine guns, but under a directive from the Trump Administration, the bureau signed the settlement agreement that promises to stop enforcing federal law against the devices.
New requirements begin July 1 for Colorado concealed carry permits
Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration.
The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month with Rare Breed Triggers to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers. The company was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel.
Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government.
The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia. The attorneys general in those states are all Democrats, though the office in Hawaii is technically nonpartisan.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dems at a crossroads as establishment plans 'Project 2029' while socialist candidate wins NYC mayoral primary
Dems at a crossroads as establishment plans 'Project 2029' while socialist candidate wins NYC mayoral primary

Fox News

time26 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Dems at a crossroads as establishment plans 'Project 2029' while socialist candidate wins NYC mayoral primary

Socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani's New York City primary win indicated a generational departure from the establishment Democratic Party that coalesced behind former Gov. Andrew Cuomo's unsuccessful bid. However, the rank-and-file Democrats who catapulted the party into disarray, losing the White House and Congress in 2024, are already laying post-Trump policy groundwork. Neera Tanden, who served in the White House during the Clinton, Obama and Biden administrations and testified to Congress last week about her use of the autopen during former President Joe Biden's presidency, along with Biden's former national security advisor, Jake Sullivan, are on the advisory board for "Project 2029." Andrei Cherny, a former Democratic speechwriter, state party leader and co-founder of a liberal policy journal, is organizing Democratic leaders to create a ready-to-implement agenda for the next Democratic presidential nominee, inspired by the conservative "Project 2025," which was created by the Heritage Foundation ahead of President Donald Trump's 2024 presidential win. The Democrats' marquee legislative framework for their future nominee will be rolled out over the next two years in quarterly installments through Cherny's publication, "Democracy: A Journal of Ideas." The Democrats plan to turn it into a book, just like Project 2025. The details of "Project 2029" were first reported by The New York Times and have since been confirmed by Fox News Digital. As The Times revealed the Democratic Party's political stage-setting for years to come, an intraparty reckoning is unfolding in real time following Mamdani's primary win last Tuesday. The institutional policy agenda has emerged during critical conjecture between the past and the future of the Democratic Party. Mamdani's primary win ignited a progressive buzz reminiscent of "Squad" leader Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's 2018 Democratic primary upset, an excitement that has been on full display during 83-year-old Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' "Fighting Oligarchy" tour this year. Both progressive leaders and self-described Democratic socialists endorsed Mamdani ahead of last Tuesday's primary in New York City. Leading up to Election Day, Ocasio-Cortez's fellow "Squad" members, including Reps. Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, also came out in support of the Mamdani movement. His win shattered expectations and forced Cuomo, who resigned from his governorship in 2021 amid multiple scandals, to concede soon after the polls closed. While Cuomo remains in the race as an independent alongside incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, whose tenure has been plagued by his own scandals, Mamdani's win signaled a departure from the Democratic Party establishment. Meanwhile, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has faced its own reckoning this year after 25-year-old progressive David Hogg announced his multimillion-dollar plan to primary older incumbent Democrats he claimed were "asleep at the wheel." Hogg, who campaigned for Mamdani in New York City, ultimately left his vice chair position at the DNC this year as questions remain about the trajectory of a party struggling to find its footing with Trump dominating American politics. Central to the Democrats' division between its past and future is support for Israel. Moderate New York Democrats have not outright endorsed Mamdani following his primary win last Tuesday. Party leaders, including Gov. Kathy Hochul, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, confirmed they spoke with Mamdani but have continued to hold their endorsements. Aside from his socialist promises and anti-capitalist comments, much of establishment Democrats' discontent with Mamdani is rooted in accusations that he is antisemitic. Rep. Laura Gillen, D-N.Y., said last week that Mamdani is "too extreme to lead New York City." She said he has demonstrated a "deeply disturbing pattern of unacceptable antisemitic comments, which stoke hate at a time when antisemitism is rising." Another New York Democrat, Rep. Tom Suozzi said last week he still has "serious concerns" about Mamdani. The crux of accusations that Mamdani is antisemitic stems from his refusal to condemn the rallying cry, "globalize the intifada." Mamdani has refused to condemn the term, which has been adopted by pro-Palestinian protesters resisting the war in Gaza and, according to the American Jewish Committee, "calls for people from around the globe to participate in rising up against Israel." Mamdani, who would become New York City's first Muslim mayor if elected in November, has said he doesn't support policing language. In multiple interviews since he initially sparked controversy on the campaign trail, he has refused to condemn the language. He has also drawn criticism from Jewish New Yorkers, pro-Israel groups and Democrats for defending the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which calls for consumers, companies and governments to cut ties with Israel in an effort to influence the country's policies toward Palestinians. Mamdani refused to acknowledge, when asked repeatedly on the debate stage, that Israel has the right to exist as a Jewish state. Instead, he said that Israel has the right to exist as "a state with equal rights." On Oct. 13, 2023, six days after the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attacks, Mamdani asked his supporters to join him at a rally outside Schumer's house "to speak out against the indiscriminate killing of Palestinians as we sit on the brink of a genocide." However, despite the criticism, Mamdani has repeatedly condemned antisemitism. "Antisemitism is such a real issue in this city, and it has been hard to see it weaponized by candidates who do not seem to have any real interest in tackling it, but rather in using it as a pretext to make political points," he said on the campaign trail ahead of Election Day. Mamdani did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Watch live: Biden in California speaks on US workforce, economy
Watch live: Biden in California speaks on US workforce, economy

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Watch live: Biden in California speaks on US workforce, economy

Former President Biden is in San Diego on Wednesday where he will headline the Society for Human Resource Management's (SHRM) annual conference with remarks focused on the U.S. workforce and economy after leaving the White House. According to the press release, Biden is expected to 'provide his unique perspective' on 'leadership, workforce transformation, and the future of work.' SHRM noted that former Presidents Bill Clinton (D) and George W. Bush (R) have also addressed the workers conference in previous years. During his time in the White House, the former president often touted his 'Bidenomics' agenda — including passage of the bipartisan infrastructure framework and Inflation Reduction Act — and strong jobs numbers following the COVID-19 pandemic. He has also criticized President Trump's policy agenda in recent weeks. The event in California is scheduled to begin at noon EDT. Watch the live video above.

Judge blocks Trump administration from speeding end of protections for Haitians
Judge blocks Trump administration from speeding end of protections for Haitians

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Judge blocks Trump administration from speeding end of protections for Haitians

A federal judge in New York blocked the Trump administration from ending deportation protections for Haitians ahead of the date set under the Biden administration, the latest blow to efforts from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to end the legal status. U.S. District Court Judge Brian Cogan ruled Noem could not issue a 'partial vacatur' of a decision by her predecessor that gave Haitians Temporary Protected Status (TPS) until February of next year. In February, Noem signed an order seeking to advance that date, moving to end protections for Haitians this August. 'Plaintiffs' injuries far outweigh any harm to the Government from a postponement. Without a postponement, plaintiffs face the termination of Haiti's TPS designation on September 2, 2025 and the subsequent loss of their legal right to live and work in the United States, despite this Court's finding that Secretary Noem's partial vacatur of Haiti's TPS designation was unlawful,' Cogan wrote. Roughly 350,000 Haitians living in the U.S. have TPS. Noem has also sought to end TPS protections for other countries such as Venezuela and Afghanistan. The Supreme Court in May agreed to lift a lower court ruling that blocked Noem's efforts to end TPS for Venezuela. But amid a series of court rulings questioning the validity of her efforts to vacate designations made under the Biden administration, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has begun following the notice and comment rulemaking process required for terminating TPS designations. That process requires the agency to consider the safety of the country in lifting protections from deportation to those from countries experiencing natural disasters or civil unrest. Last week, Noem formally moved to end TPS protections for Haitians for this September. 'This decision restores integrity in our immigration system and ensures that Temporary Protective Status is actually temporary,' DHS said in a release, noting that Haiti was first designated for TPS due to a devastating earthquake. 'The environmental situation in Haiti has improved enough that it is safe for Haitian citizens to return home. We encourage these individuals to take advantage of the Department's resources in returning to Haiti, which can be arranged through the CBP Home app. Haitian nationals may pursue lawful status through other immigration benefit requests, if eligible.' However, the State Department still lists Haiti as a 'Level 4:Do Not Travel' country due to kidnapping, crime and civil unrest. Under the Biden administration, DHS cited a wide variety of dangerous conditions in Haiti, including as recently as last year. 'Haiti continues to experience simultaneous economic, security, political, and health crises. Haitian gangs are the primary source of violence and instability in Haiti and pose an increasing threat as they continue to escalate and expand their influence and geographic presence…Since early March 2024, the gangs have also attacked the capital's primary airport and major port terminals, and blocked roads to access the city. An ongoing political impasse has left Haiti without a functioning democratically elected national government and hindered Haiti's ability to respond to the gang-driven violence,' the Biden administration wrote in extending the TPS designation for Haiti. 'At the same time, Haiti struggles through a humanitarian crisis, with many citizens having limited access to safety, healthcare, food, water, and economic opportunity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store