logo
More Than 1 Million Taiwanese Sign Petitions to Recall Alleged Pro-Communist China Legislators

More Than 1 Million Taiwanese Sign Petitions to Recall Alleged Pro-Communist China Legislators

Epoch Times13-05-2025

News Analysis
An effort in Taiwan to recall politicians seen as selling out the island's interests to communist China is gaining ground, raising the possibility of a major setback for Beijing's hopes of subjugating Taiwan by co-opting its government.
Starting late last year, Taiwanese civic groups initiated a campaign to invoke recall elections targeting opposition legislators as
Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te, elected in January 2024, has advocated tough policies to counter the CCP, including bolstering Taiwan's defensive capabilities and strengthening its alliance with the United States. However, Lai and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have been hard-pressed in implementing their program, as the party holds a minority of seats in Taiwan's parliament, the Legislative Yuan.
As early as May 2024, when Lai assumed office, the opposition Kuomintang (KMT) and Taiwan People's Party (TPP), collectively known as the 'blue-white coalition,' used their majority in the Legislative Yuan to attempt structural reforms that would have greatly empowered the parliament at the expense of the presidency; reforms made to the judicial system have also reduced that institution's effectiveness in checking the legislature.
The blue-white coalition has also leveraged its majority to obstruct the central government budget, order reductions to Taiwan's defense spending, and block bills aimed at stemming political interference from mainland China.
Related Story
5/7/2025
Initially regarded as having little chance of success, the mass recall movement has gathered more than 1 million signatures across Taiwan, targeting 35 legislators affiliated with the KMT and TPP. Twenty-four of these drives have collected enough signatures—at least 25 percent of a given legislator's constituents—for a recall vote, and have been submitted for verification.
While the blue-white coalition has responded with its own recall campaign by initiating petitions against 15 legislators of the DPP camp, none of the petitions has received the signatures needed to proceed to the next phase.
Recalling 'Pro-Communist' Legislators
The recall movement against KMT and TPP legislators was initiated by groups such as the Anti-Communist Taiwan Defense Volunteer Alliance, which, on April 24, held a rally to keep up the signature drive.
A rally to 'Resist the United Front, Protect Taiwan' was held in Taipei, Taiwan's capital, on April 19, gathering around 55,000 people along Ketagalan Boulevard to reject the CCP's influence and support the recalls.
The third and final round of signatures to confirm the recall elections will take place starting on the week of May 12. Those recall races validated by Taiwan's Central Election Commission will be held within 20 to 60 days.
Elected legislators attend a swearing-in ceremony at the chamber of the Legislative Yuan on the first day of session in Taipei, Taiwan, on Feb. 1, 2024.
I-Hwa Cheng/AFP via Getty Images
Akio Yaita, a Japanese journalist who serves as executive director of the Indo-Pacific Strategic Institute, estimates that up to a dozen KMT legislators could be successfully recalled.
Speaking with the Chinese edition of The Epoch Times, Yaita
Speaking at a May 3 recall rally in Keelung, a port city near Taiwan's capital city, Taiwanese businessman Robert Tsao Hsing-cheng warned that the de facto nation of 23 million could suffer the same fate as Hong Kong should 'pro-communist legislators' be permitted to advance their agenda.
Top KMT officials 'not only refused to attend the inauguration ceremony of Taiwan's president [in May 2024], but also went to Beijing to meet with Wang Huning, a senior CCP official,' Tsao noted, referring to a trip that occurred in April last year.
After recovering Hong Kong from British rule in 1997, the CCP spent decades eroding the city's promised political autonomy, eventually imposing an authoritarian national security law in 2020 that quashed Hong Kong's civic freedoms amid
Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC), is the remnant territory of the government that was defeated on the Chinese mainland by the CCP rebels in 1949.
Despite fighting a protracted civil war against the communists when it ruled mainland China, the KMT, or Nationalist Party, has in recent decades adopted a pro-CCP stance, emphasizing cross-strait economic and cultural ties.
'The KMT has expressed opposition to civil defense groups coordinating with the military in the event of a Chinese attack. It has also pushed to roll back anti-infiltration laws, including restrictions on active or retired military personnel saluting the flag of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and singing the PRC national anthem,' a March 19
The Greatest Threat to a Democratic Taiwan
DPP legislator Puma Shen declared at the May 3 Keelung rally that an alliance of the 'pro-red unification Kuomintang' and the CCP constituted the greatest threat to Taiwan's democracy.
Taiwanese legislator Puma Shen (L) and businessman Robert Tsao Hsing-cheng take part in a rally supporting the mass recall petitions in Keelung, Taiwan, on May 3, 2025.
Sun Xiangyi/The Epoch Times
Shen's words echo a March 20
At the Keelung rally, Shen criticized the blue-white camp for blocking more than 40 times a motion in the Legislative Yuan that would have restricted Taiwanese legislators from traveling to mainland China.
He also gave an example of the opposition using procedural methods to obstruct the operations of the parliament.
'One meeting began at 9 a.m. and was dismissed at 9:03 a.m. Nobody was given the opportunity to speak,' he said.
The Anti-Communist Taiwan Defense Volunteer Alliance also warned at its April 24 rally in Taipei about efforts by the KMT–TPP coalition to amend the existing regulations on recall elections to make them harder to initiate.
On April 26, the blue-white camp staged a demonstration to 'oppose green communism, fight dictatorship,' portraying the mass recalls as a move toward authoritarianism. In Taiwanese electoral politics, the DPP and its allies are known as the 'pan-greens.' At the rally, KMT Chairman Eric Chu Li-luan criticized Lai and ended the event by declaring that the party would campaign for Lai's own recall from office.
The KMT's shift toward its current stance came in large measure due to persistent 'united front' tactics employed by the CCP for more than a century to subvert and eliminate its traditional enemy.
A China coast guard ship sails toward the zone where China said it would conduct live fire exercises northeast of Pingtan island, the closest point in China to Taiwan, in southeast Fujian Province, China, on April 10, 2023.
Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images
In addition to ordering frequent naval and aerial patrols to harass and intimidate Taiwan's defenses, the Chinese regime's 'united front' work targets Taiwanese officials, military personnel, business circles, and other important organizations and individuals.
The meeting between the KMT legislators and senior CCP official Wang Huning mentioned by Robert Tsao occurred on April 26, 2024. Fu Kun-chi, majority leader of the Legislative Yuan, led a delegation of 16 KMT legislators to visit Beijing at the time. There, they were granted an audience with Wang, who is a member of the CCP's seven-man leadership body and has spent more than a decade in charge of crafting Beijing's modern ideological doctrine.
Fu, who represents Taiwan's eastern Hualien county and is subject to a recall effort, has been imprisoned three times for economic crimes. He studied at Jinan University in Guangzhou, southern China, but the degree he earned there is not recognized by the Taiwanese education ministry on account of Jinan being run by the CCP's United Front Work Group.
Other prominent KMT officials have expressed support for Beijing, such as former President Ma Ying-jeou, who, ahead of the 2024 presidential election, urged Taiwanese to 'trust' that Chinese leader Xi Jinping would not order a military invasion of the island.
Calls for Solidarity Across Party Lines
The roughly 50 Taiwanese civic groups facilitating the mass recall petitions and efforts to monitor the activities of lawmakers represent 'the democratic will of Taiwanese society and a constitutional battle against the CCP's authoritarian regime,' according to Tseng Chien-yuan, executive director of the New School for Democracy, a nonprofit originally founded in Hong Kong.
Around 55,000 Taiwanese attend a rally to support mass recalls against legislators allegedly linked to communist China, in Taipei, on April 19, 2025.
Sun Xiangyi/The Epoch Times
Speaking on a May 1
Yang Hsien-hung, founding chairman of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights in China, told The Epoch Times that the recall process is an opportunity to walk back 'the mistaken election of CCP collaborators.'
He added that the KMT's declaration of recalling Lai is a non-starter, given that the blue-white coalition only commands a slight majority in the Legislative Yuan, rather than the two-thirds needed to oust a sitting president.
The KMT's pro-Beijing stance has angered some of its own would-be supporters. One group, the 'Chinese Anti-Communist Taiwan Protection National Restoration Party,' has joined the recall movement against the KMT, with its chairman, Cheng Kai-li, calling upon Taiwanese of all political stripes to jointly resist the CCP's designs for taking over the island, according to Taiwan's SET News.
Tseng said in his statements with NTD that the mass recalls were not about the issue of whether Taiwan should pursue formal independence from China or eventually reunite with the mainland, or a partisan struggle, but 'a historic moment where people across Taiwan, transcending party lines, unite to resist the CCP's united front tactics.'
He pointed out that retired military officers and conservative figures from within the KMT establishment, who previously avoided any possible associations with the Taiwan independence movement, have also stepped forward to support the grassroots recall efforts.
Shen, the DPP legislator, emphasized at the May 3 rally in Keelung that the purpose of the recall movement was not to target the KMT specifically but to safeguard Taiwan's political system and sovereignty.
'Even if some of the Kuomintang members retain their seats after the recall, it will still be a good thing for Taiwan as long as they hold democratic values and love Taiwan,' he said.
Fei Zhen, Cheng Mulan, and Luo Ya contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Red states have launched a hostile takeover of public universities
Red states have launched a hostile takeover of public universities

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Red states have launched a hostile takeover of public universities

Earlier this month, for the first time in its history, the Florida Board of Governors rejected a university's choice of a college president. Despite unanimous approval by the University of Florida's board of trustees, MAGA activists attacked Santa Ono, a former president of the University of Michigan, for his past support of diversity, equity and inclusion programs; his views on admissions, gender-affirming care and climate change; and his handling of pro-Palestinian protesters and the COVID-19 pandemic. Ono's claim that 'I am here to ensure that DEI never returns to the University of Florida' was too little, too late. Florida is at the extreme edge of an unprecedented red-state campaign to reinforce and sometimes outdo the Trump administration's efforts to remake higher education. But Florida is by no means alone. Since 2023, 135 bills have been introduced in 29 states to eliminate DEI offices, ban mandatory diversity training, forbid the use of diversity statements in hiring and promotion and bar colleges and universities from requiring classes that 'promote concepts such as systemic racism, reparations, and racial or gender diversity.' Twenty-seven of those bills have become law. Educational 'gag orders' restricting instruction about race, gender and sexual orientation have also grown increasingly extreme. Ohio limits discussion of 'controversial beliefs or policies,' including 'climate policies, electoral politics, foreign policy, diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, immigration policy, marriage, or abortion,' requires universities to 'ensure the fullest degree of 'intellectual diversity,' and bans or restricts most DEI-related policies and programs. Florida's Stop Woke Act, which sought to regulate how colleges and universities teach 'divisive concepts,' has been blocked by federal courts as a violation of the First Amendment. Nonetheless, Florida's Board of Governors and State Board of Education have eliminated hundreds of general education courses from the state's 40 public institutions to comply with legislation banning instruction based on 'identity politics' or 'theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States.' Last week, following criticism of existing accreditation agencies for supporting DEI, the public university systems in Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee decided to establish their own accreditor. Ohio, Utah and Florida mandate civics instruction focused on a conservative vision of Western civilization. Ohio requires students to read at least five essays from 'The Federalist Papers,' Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'Letter from Birmingham Jail' and the writings of Adam Smith. Multiple states — including Florida, Arizona, Tennessee, Ohio, Texas and Iowa — have established civics institutes intended to be bastions of conservative thought. At least 11 states have passed laws imposing new levels of post-tenure review or making it easier to dismiss tenured faculty. Indiana, for example, prohibited the award of tenure to faculty 'unlikely to foster a culture of free inquiry, free expression, and intellectual diversity,' and authorized the demotion or termination of faculty who do not, in the board's judgment, help create that culture. In several states, proposals to eliminate tenure have only narrowly failed. The academic tradition of shared governance is also under attack. A bill in Arizona, vetoed by its governor, would have stripped faculty of the ability to approve academic degrees or programs. In a law enacted earlier this week that may serve as a model for other states, Texas reserved to the governing board of each public university — whose members are appointed by the governor — the right 'to overturn any decision made by the institution regarding any changes to the general education curriculum'; 'approve or deny the hiring of an individual for the position of provost or deputy, associate, or assistant provost'; 'collaborate with institutions … to set campus admission standards'; and 'overturn any hiring decision for the position of vice president or dean.' Texas also gave university boards exclusive authority to establish faculty senates or councils; prohibited them from issuing statements not directly related to their educational mandate; and limited them to advisory roles, with the presiding officer appointed by the institution's president. Faculty and staff 'may provide recommendations on academic matters,' so long as 'governing boards and institutional leadership retain clear and ultimate decision-making authority.' In another sign of the hyper-politicization of higher education, red states are increasingly using ideological litmus tests for prospective trustees and presidents. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, for example, transformed New College from, in his words, a center of 'woke indoctrination' into a conservative haven by stacking the board with right-wing partisans and naming a conservative president. These campaigns at the federal and state level to undermine academic freedom, weaken faculty authority and impose conservative values are often compared to McCarthy-era initiatives, but what's happening today is far broader and more damaging. McCarthyites focused almost exclusively on a single issue — the perceived spread of communist influence. Mandates were directed principally at faculty and staff who refused to take loyalty oaths. Professors of economics and political science were pressured to teach the virtues of democracy and the 'free enterprise system.' Even when institutions dragged their feet in complying, neither states nor the federal government imposed anything remotely like the punitive and crippling measures employed against educational institutions today. Nonetheless, the McCarthy era fostered a climate of fear and intellectual conformity in higher education that took years to dissipate. When, if ever, will public and private institutions recover from the ongoing all-out assault on the freedom of teaching and learning that made American higher education the envy of the world? It's anyone's guess. Glenn C. Altschuler is the Thomas and Dorothy Litwin Emeritus Professor of American Studies at Cornell University. David Wippman is emeritus president of Hamilton College.

The last Hong Kong pro-democracy party holding street protests disbands

time4 hours ago

The last Hong Kong pro-democracy party holding street protests disbands

HONG KONG -- Hong Kong pro-democracy political party League of Social Democrats announced on Sunday it had disbanded due to immense political pressure, the latest casualty in a years-long crackdown that has already quieted much of the city's once-vocal opposition. Following massive anti-government protests in 2019, many leading activists were prosecuted or jailed under a 2020 national security law imposed by Beijing. Dozens of civil society groups dissolved. Media outlets critical of the government shuttered. The League of Social Democrats was the only pro-democracy party that still staged small street protests from time to time and held street booth activities to carry on its advocacy despite the risks. Its chairperson, Chan Po-ying, said the disbandment decision was made after careful deliberation, especially taking into account the consequences to its members and comrades. Chan refused to elaborate on the pressure but said she was proud to say that the party had still contributed to the city's pro-democracy movement in these few years. 'We have stayed true to our original aspirations and haven't let down to the trust placed in us by those who went to prison," she said. 'While we are now forced to disband and feel an ache in our conscience, we have no other choice,' she said. Hong Kong, a former British colony, will mark the 28th anniversary of returning to Chinese rule on July 1. The city used to hold annual pro-democracy protests that day and other various demonstrations demanding better policies. But those were ceased after most organizing groups were disbanded and the leading activists were jailed. Critics say the drastic political changes under the security law reflect that the freedoms Beijing promised to keep intact in 1997 are shrinking. The Beijing and Hong Kong governments insist the law is necessary for the city's stability. A Chinese official overseeing Hong Kong affairs in 2023 said protests are not the only way for people to express their views, signaling Beijing's stance toward demonstrations in the city. In April, Hong Kong's biggest pro-democracy party, the Democratic Party, also voted to give its leadership the mandate to move toward a potential disbandment. Party veterans told The Associated Press that some members were warned of consequences if the party didn't shut down. A final vote is expected at a later date. Founded in 2006, the League of Social Democrats was a left-wing political party that opposed collusion between government and business, upheld the principle that people have a say and was firmly committed to the interests of underprivileged residents. It was widely known for its more aggressive tactics when fighting for change. Its members have thrown bananas, eggs and luncheon meat at officials or pro-Beijing lawmakers as a protest gesture. Its party platform said the group advocated non-violent resistance but would not avoid physical confrontations — a stance that set it apart from older, traditional pro-democracy groups. It once had three lawmakers in office. Its longest-serving lawmaker, Leung Kwok-hung — Chan's husband — was disqualified from the legislature due to his manner of taking his oath in office in 2017. On the streets, the group's activism led to the arrests and jailing of its members from time to time. Last year, Leung and prominent LGBTQ+ activist Jimmy Sham, a former party leader, were sentenced to nearly seven years and more than four years over their roles in an unofficial primary election under the sweeping security law. Sham was freed from prison last month. In recent years, the party has had limited political influence, no longer holding any seats in the legislature or local district councils. Even a bank ceased to provide bank account services to the group. But it continued to stage small protests from time to time, despite sometimes those activities leading to arrests. On June 12, Chan and other members were fined after being found guilty over their street booth activities. Undeterred by their convictions, they kept pressing on and protested against the ruling outside the court.

The last Hong Kong pro-democracy party holding street protests disbands
The last Hong Kong pro-democracy party holding street protests disbands

San Francisco Chronicle​

time5 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

The last Hong Kong pro-democracy party holding street protests disbands

HONG KONG (AP) — Hong Kong pro-democracy political party League of Social Democrats announced on Sunday it had disbanded due to immense political pressure, the latest casualty in a years-long crackdown that has already quieted much of the city's once-vocal opposition. Following massive anti-government protests in 2019, many leading activists were prosecuted or jailed under a 2020 national security law imposed by Beijing. Dozens of civil society groups dissolved. Media outlets critical of the government shuttered. The League of Social Democrats was the only pro-democracy party that still staged small street protests from time to time and held street booth activities to carry on its advocacy despite the risks. Its chairperson, Chan Po-ying, said the disbandment decision was made after careful deliberation, especially taking into account the consequences to its members and comrades. Chan refused to elaborate on the pressure but said she was proud to say that the party had still contributed to the city's pro-democracy movement in these few years. 'We have stayed true to our original aspirations and haven't let down to the trust placed in us by those who went to prison," she said. 'While we are now forced to disband and feel an ache in our conscience, we have no other choice,' she said. Protests became rare under Beijing's grip Hong Kong, a former British colony, will mark the 28th anniversary of returning to Chinese rule on July 1. The city used to hold annual pro-democracy protests that day and other various demonstrations demanding better policies. But those were ceased after most organizing groups were disbanded and the leading activists were jailed. Critics say the drastic political changes under the security law reflect that the freedoms Beijing promised to keep intact in 1997 are shrinking. The Beijing and Hong Kong governments insist the law is necessary for the city's stability. A Chinese official overseeing Hong Kong affairs in 2023 said protests are not the only way for people to express their views, signaling Beijing's stance toward demonstrations in the city. In April, Hong Kong's biggest pro-democracy party, the Democratic Party, also voted to give its leadership the mandate to move toward a potential disbandment. Party veterans told The Associated Press that some members were warned of consequences if the party didn't shut down. A final vote is expected at a later date. A party known for confrontational tactics Founded in 2006, the League of Social Democrats was a left-wing political party that opposed collusion between government and business, upheld the principle that people have a say and was firmly committed to the interests of underprivileged residents. It was widely known for its more aggressive tactics when fighting for change. Its members have thrown bananas, eggs and luncheon meat at officials or pro-Beijing lawmakers as a protest gesture. Its party platform said the group advocated non-violent resistance but would not avoid physical confrontations — a stance that set it apart from older, traditional pro-democracy groups. It once had three lawmakers in office. Its longest-serving lawmaker, Leung Kwok-hung — Chan's husband — was disqualified from the legislature due to his manner of taking his oath in office in 2017. Members arrested and jailed over activism On the streets, the group's activism led to the arrests and jailing of its members from time to time. Last year, Leung and prominent LGBTQ+ activist Jimmy Sham, a former party leader, were sentenced to nearly seven years and more than four years over their roles in an unofficial primary election under the sweeping security law. Sham was freed from prison last month. In recent years, the party has had limited political influence, no longer holding any seats in the legislature or local district councils. Even a bank ceased to provide bank account services to the group.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store