Trump's spending bill will likely boost costs for insurers, shrink Medicaid coverage
NEW YORK : President Donald Trump's spending bill is set to raise administrative costs and make managing costs more difficult for insurers like UnitedHealthcare and CVS Health's Aetna that operate Medicaid health plans, experts say.
As a result, those insurers will likely pull back their Medicaid coverage and invest more in existing markets to retain their healthier members, experts said.
States contract with insurers, including UnitedHealth Group's UnitedHealthcare, CVS Health's Aetna, Centene and Molina, to operate Medicaid plans that are jointly funded by state and federal governments.
Almost all of Molina's and nearly half of Centene's insurance business is composed of Medicaid members.
That portion is smaller for Aetna and UnitedHealthcare, which operate large commercial businesses.
Seven industry experts say the bill's funding cuts and its stipulation requiring states to verify patients' work status deliver a blow to insurers.
The provision in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act requires low-income adults, in states that have expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act, to prove every six months that they meet work requirements in order to maintain coverage.
'State Medicaid departments, grappling with scant operational teams, will have a difficult time carrying out verification protocols,' five industry experts said.
'The expectation is that states are going to have to be ready by 2026 or 2027, and that's a fast turnaround window,' said Nikita Singareddy, CEO of healthcare platform Fortuna Health.
A spokesman for Centene said it would work with federal and state partners to help patients navigate change.
A spokesman for CVS Health declined to comment. UnitedHealth Group and Molina did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
'For insurers, the disruptions could result in more sick people enrolled in the Medicaid plans they operate on behalf of the government because those who are more ill are likely to complete the verification process because they have an immediate need for healthcare,' industry experts and an investor said.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated Medicaid policy changes in the bill could leave 7.8 million people uninsured by 2034.
Mass disenrollments could begin in 2027 on a rolling basis, according to an expert at a state policy organisation.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
'States may choose to pay companies operating health plans at lower rates due to funding cuts,' said Eric Levine, a principal consultant at Avalere Health.
Following the Covid-19 pandemic, insurers have said the rates they are paid by states have not caught up to actual cost of care.
Disenrollments of healthy people may exacerbate this misalignment, leading to inaccurate rates paid to plans and squeezed profit margins, according to a spokesman for a national insurance trade organisation and an investor.
'Another period of retrenchment'
If insurers find the fallout from these changes daunting, they are likely to exit certain markets or pull back on bidding or competing for footprints in new areas.
'Insurers will continue to be more cautious about not just entering any new states, but retrenching just in the states where they have the highest market share, most scale and more profitable business,' said Jeff Jonas, a portfolio manager at Gabelli Funds, which owns shares of UnitedHealth Group.
In an effort to keep healthier patients that drive profits enrolled, insurers may employ plan design changes ahead of the bill's finalisation, adding perks that can make enrollment more appealing.
This could help insurers retain and attract healthy members, according to Matt Salo, CEO of Salo Health Strategies and founding director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors and two other policy experts.
'Hosting volunteer events and job or educational search services are strategies insurers may use to engage members and reduce losses,' said Levine.
Health plans are also expected to boost transportation benefits and other social-need benefits for low-income Americans.
Jonas and a spokesman for a national health insurer say this programming will boost administrative costs in the short-term.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
a day ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump's spending bill will likely boost costs for insurers, shrink Medicaid coverage
The provision in Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act has required low-income adults to prove that they meet work requirements to maintain coverage. (AP pic) NEW YORK : President Donald Trump's spending bill is set to raise administrative costs and make managing costs more difficult for insurers like UnitedHealthcare and CVS Health's Aetna that operate Medicaid health plans, experts say. As a result, those insurers will likely pull back their Medicaid coverage and invest more in existing markets to retain their healthier members, experts said. States contract with insurers, including UnitedHealth Group's UnitedHealthcare, CVS Health's Aetna, Centene and Molina, to operate Medicaid plans that are jointly funded by state and federal governments. Almost all of Molina's and nearly half of Centene's insurance business is composed of Medicaid members. That portion is smaller for Aetna and UnitedHealthcare, which operate large commercial businesses. Seven industry experts say the bill's funding cuts and its stipulation requiring states to verify patients' work status deliver a blow to insurers. The provision in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act requires low-income adults, in states that have expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act, to prove every six months that they meet work requirements in order to maintain coverage. 'State Medicaid departments, grappling with scant operational teams, will have a difficult time carrying out verification protocols,' five industry experts said. 'The expectation is that states are going to have to be ready by 2026 or 2027, and that's a fast turnaround window,' said Nikita Singareddy, CEO of healthcare platform Fortuna Health. A spokesman for Centene said it would work with federal and state partners to help patients navigate change. A spokesman for CVS Health declined to comment. UnitedHealth Group and Molina did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. 'For insurers, the disruptions could result in more sick people enrolled in the Medicaid plans they operate on behalf of the government because those who are more ill are likely to complete the verification process because they have an immediate need for healthcare,' industry experts and an investor said. The Congressional Budget Office estimated Medicaid policy changes in the bill could leave 7.8 million people uninsured by 2034. Mass disenrollments could begin in 2027 on a rolling basis, according to an expert at a state policy organisation. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'States may choose to pay companies operating health plans at lower rates due to funding cuts,' said Eric Levine, a principal consultant at Avalere Health. Following the Covid-19 pandemic, insurers have said the rates they are paid by states have not caught up to actual cost of care. Disenrollments of healthy people may exacerbate this misalignment, leading to inaccurate rates paid to plans and squeezed profit margins, according to a spokesman for a national insurance trade organisation and an investor. 'Another period of retrenchment' If insurers find the fallout from these changes daunting, they are likely to exit certain markets or pull back on bidding or competing for footprints in new areas. 'Insurers will continue to be more cautious about not just entering any new states, but retrenching just in the states where they have the highest market share, most scale and more profitable business,' said Jeff Jonas, a portfolio manager at Gabelli Funds, which owns shares of UnitedHealth Group. In an effort to keep healthier patients that drive profits enrolled, insurers may employ plan design changes ahead of the bill's finalisation, adding perks that can make enrollment more appealing. This could help insurers retain and attract healthy members, according to Matt Salo, CEO of Salo Health Strategies and founding director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors and two other policy experts. 'Hosting volunteer events and job or educational search services are strategies insurers may use to engage members and reduce losses,' said Levine. Health plans are also expected to boost transportation benefits and other social-need benefits for low-income Americans. Jonas and a spokesman for a national health insurer say this programming will boost administrative costs in the short-term.
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
Thousands of South Korean medical students to return to class after 17-month boycott
SEOUL, July 14 — Thousands of South Korean medical students are set to return to classrooms after a 17-month boycott, an industry body told AFP Monday, ending part of a standoff which also saw junior doctors strike. South Korean healthcare was plunged into chaos early last year when then-president Yoon Suk Yeol moved to sharply increase medical school admissions, citing an urgent need to boost doctor numbers to meet growing demand in a rapidly aging society. The initiative met fierce protest, prompting junior doctors to walk away from hospitals and medical students to boycott their classrooms, with operations cancelled and service provision disrupted nationwide. The measure was later watered down, and the government eventually offered to scrap it in March 2025, after Yoon was impeached over his disastrous declaration of martial law. 'Students have agreed to return to school,' a spokesperson for the Korean Medical Association told AFP Monday, adding that it was up to each medical school to decide the schedule for student returns. The Korean Medical Students' Association said in an earlier statement that the students had reached this decision because a continued boycott 'could cause the collapse of the fundamentals of medical systems'. Some 8,300 students are expected to return to school, but no specific timeline has been provided. Prime Minister Kim Min-seok welcomed the decision, calling it a 'big step forward' in a Facebook post Sunday, adding President Lee Jae Myung was deliberating ways to solve the issue. In addition to the student boycott, some 12,000 junior doctors went on strike last year—with the vast majority of them still declining to return to work. Lee — who took office in June after winning snap elections following Yoon's removal from office — had said on the campaign trail he would seek to resolve the medical strike. The increase in medical school admissions led to a record number of students re-taking the college entrance exam in November in a bid to capitalise on reforms that made it easier to get into coveted majors. — AFP
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
Two-tier healthcare or public lifeline? Unpacking the debate over Rakan KKM
KUALA LUMPUR, July 15 — The Ministry of Health's (MOH) plan to launch its 'Rakan KKM' programme has ignited a fierce public debate. On one side, detractors warn it would create a two-tiered healthcare system that favours wealthier patients using public facilities. On the other, supporters argue the programme could help alleviate the financial strain on government hospitals and clinics while retaining specialist talent. What is Rakan KKM? The programme is a paid-for service envisioned by the MOH to offer 'premium economy' healthcare, encompassing elective procedures and personalised care. According to Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad, Rakan KKM will operate within the public healthcare ecosystem but provide services evocative of yet cheaper than commercial hospitals. The ministry aims to launch Rakan KKM by the third quarter of this year at four pilot locations: Hospital Cyberjaya, Hospital Putrajaya, Hospital Sultan Idris Shah Serdang, and the National Cancer Institute (IKN). Why the controversy? Criticism primarily centres on the argument that Rakan KKM amounts to a 'backdoor privatisation' of healthcare facilities and services funded by taxpayer money. Critics argue this will create a two-tiered system, allowing those with money to 'skip the line' for access to public healthcare services and bypass the long waiting lists that currently plague government hospitals under severe cost and manpower strains. They have also homed in on the salaries offered by Rakan KKM, with many top posts advertised with five-figure pay. Detractors have used this to question the MOH's stated inability to absorb thousands of contract health workers into permanent positions. Rakan KKM has so far received an allocation of RM25 million under Budget 2025, with a second phase of funding expected to come from government-linked investment companies (GLICs). The ministry's defence: Public interest, not profit Responding to the backlash, Dzulkefly has stressed that Rakan KKM's conception is underpinned by public interest. He rejected claims of privatisation by highlighting that Rakan KKM Sdn Bhd will remain fully owned by the Ministry of Finance Incorporated, which would keep the entity aligned with government objectives. 'When a GLIC investor comes in, the GLIC may take an equity stake in Rakan KKM Sdn Bhd. Ownership of Rakan KKM remains with the government, directly or through GLICs, throughout its operations,' the minister said on the social media platform X on Sunday. He then urged the public to look at the programme's key objectives, which he outlined as: Making healthcare more affordable than fully private options. Using any profits to cross-subsidise regular public healthcare services. Providing better income opportunities for specialists to retain them in the public service. Dzulkefly argues that these goals demonstrate that Rakan KKM is rooted in public service, not profit maximisation.
