Glastonbury chanters or the Southport hate-tweeter – throw the book at one, you must throw it at them all
If so, they could put the two nasty idiots from Bob Vylan in it. Obviously all of Kneecap, too. Maybe those guys would have their cell on the same landing as Lucy Connolly, the woman who was imprisoned for two years and seven months for a repulsive tweet in the wake of the Southport child killings. They could be joined by whoever at the BBC didn't pull the Glastonbury live stream on Saturday after Bob Vylan started their repulsive chants, given that Conservative frontbencher Chris Philp is now officially calling for the corporation to be 'urgently' investigated. I see Chris is also calling for the BBC to be prosecuted – so I guess he's already done the police investigation for them, and all at the same time as absolutely aceing his brief as shadow home secretary for where-are-they-now political outfit the Conservative party.
In terms of Spewing Hate Into The Nation's Living RoomsTM, it must be said that the footage of Bob Vylan's offending set is still embedded into multiple stories on the MailOnline website, all containing an exhortation to 'watch the full video'. Should whoever is leaving the videos up on MailOnline also be investigated and prosecuted? Perhaps Chris Philp could adjudicate. Either way, let's keep a cell or five for them in the special new prison. After all, why on earth shouldn't we imprison a few journalists, too? In for a penny, and so on.
Needless to say, embattled prime minister Keir Starmer has made time to have plenty of official views not just on the behaviour of the two bands, but on any future decisions to book them. If all you have is a hammer, everything is a nail – and if your big job before politics was being director of public prosecutions, then I'm sure everything looks like a prosecutable offence.
It certainly did to the prime minister after last summer's riots in the wake of the Southport murders, when Starmer seemed to relish the response happening the best way he knew how: by rushing it through the courts. Connolly was one of those prosecuted, in her case for a manifestly revolting and racist but also clearly tossed-off post responding to a false rumour the killer was an asylum seeker, saying people could set fire to asylum hotels 'for all I care'. She admitted inciting racial hatred in court, but has since become something of a cause celebre for the fact that she is a mother with an otherwise clean record (and one who had lost a young child herself), and that she has got a harsher sentence for this tweet that she later deleted than some convicted rapists.
I wrote in the immediate wake of the riots that it was clear that something big had happened in the UK – though it wasn't yet precisely clear what. Unfortunately, the prime minister seemed to think it was fairly simple. 'Let me also say to large social media companies and those who run them,' he said, albeit to some reporters instead, 'violent disorder clearly whipped up online: that is also a crime. It's happening on your premises, and the law must be upheld everywhere.' Sadiq Khan seemed to think it was something to do with the Online Safety Act not being 'fit for purpose'.
In more successful hot takes, it was also the moment that Elon Musk test-drove his epithet 'two-tier Keir'. That one has stuck, and it will stick even harder if, for example, sublebrity band Bob Vylan don't get the book thrown at them in the same way that no-mark Lucy Connolly did. To be clear, I don't think any of the aforementioned lot ought to be in prison, however vile and unacceptable their behaviour was. But if you don't deal with them in pretty much the same way, then people are going to be talking far more loudly about two-tier justice again.
This type of talk has already reached all the way into the Oval Office where, in February, vice-president JD Vance suggested to Starmer that the UK had a free speech problem. You might have seen that Bob Vylan have just promptly had their US visas revoked for what the deputy secretary of state called 'their hateful tirade'. But we can't expect consistency from the Trump administration.
What we expect of our own country is infinitely more important. I used to think masses of legislation around what horrible things people could or couldn't say was a niche-application civilisational advance, but I have changed my view, and now fear we are sleepwalking towards a society where half the people will think certain incarcerated miscreants are political prisoners, and the other half will think a different bunch of incarcerated miscreants are political prisoners. I am very much for living in a country where we don't think we have political prisoners at all. Getting there isn't simple – but stopping travelling in the wrong direction would be a good start.
Marina Hyde is a Guardian columnist
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
This article's URL was amended shortly after publication to remove draft text that was included in error.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Diane Abbott brands IDF the ‘Jewish Defence Force'
The Labour Party is facing calls to once again remove Diane Abbott' s whip after the MP accused the 'Jewish Defence Force' of murdering Palestinians. In a now deleted post on X, the Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington said: 'Beyond horrific that the Jewish Defence Force is gunning down Palestinians as they queue for food #Gaza Genocide.' The Mother of the House had been responding on Tuesday morning to a quote from journalist Chris Hedges from 2001 in which he alleged that Israel Defense Forces (IDF) 'soldiers enticed children like mice into a trap and murdered them for sport'. It is unclear why Ms Abbott used the word 'Jewish' in her post or indeed if she was aware that Hedges's report was from more than two decades ago rather than referring to the recent shootings at aid distribution centres in Gaza. Ms Abbott, who is yet to address the deleted social media post, was suspended by Labour in April 2023 for writing a letter to The Observer in which she claimed that Jews could not be subject to racism. She said 'many types of white people with points of difference' could experience prejudice, but they were not subject to racism 'all their lives'. Sir Keir Starmer condemned her comments as 'anti-Semitic', the MP apologised and an investigation conducted by Labour's National Executive Committee culminated with a 'formal warning'. Ms Abbott was ordered to take a two-hour online anti-Semitism awareness course and was reinstated days before the general election in July 2024. Alex Hearn, co-director of Labour Against Antisemitism, said Ms Abbott's recent post was 'just her latest derogatory comment aimed at Jews'. He told The Telegraph: 'Where is the zero tolerance we were promised when she has previously had the whip removed for a similar offence? 'It is sad to see a groundbreaking MP who was the first black woman to be elected, reduced to not knowing the difference between the Israel Defense Forces and Jewish defence forces.' Mr Hearn said the Labour MP's latest comment 'harks back to deadly mediaeval libels about Jews' and, given that many of her constituents were Jewish, her 'appropriateness as an MP must now be called into question'. 'Sick interplay of misinformation and prejudice' A spokesman for Campaign Against Antisemitism asked how many times Ms Abbott could be accused of anti-Semitism and still remain a Labour MP. He told The Telegraph: 'It is not clear if Diane Abbott deleted this tweet because the post referred to a (contested) incident two decades ago which she was passing off as current, or because she said out loud what so many far-Left activists believe, namely that references to 'Israel', 'Zionists' and so on are euphemisms for 'Jewish', or for some other reason. 'What is clear is that this post exemplifies the sick interplay of misinformation and prejudice so disgustingly prevalent in anti-Israel circles. 'How many strikes is this for Ms Abbott? Will the Labour Party finally expel her?' A spokesman for the Board of Deputies of British Jews described Ms Abbott's social media post as the 'latest in her long line of anti-Jewish offences and provocations'. 'Coming so soon after the appalling scenes at Glastonbury at the weekend, there can be no excuse, and she should now lose the whip as a Labour MP,' he said, adding: 'After a long and trailblazing career, it is tragic that she will end it known mainly for her fomenting of bigotry.' Russell Langer, director of public affairs at the Jewish Leadership Council, urged the Labour Party to act decisively. He said: 'This is the latest in a series of grossly offensive remarks made by Diane Abbott towards the Jewish community. 'As an MP who has already had the whip suspended in the past, we expect a clear message of zero tolerance to be shown.' A Labour Party spokesman said: 'All complaints are taken seriously and assessed in line with the Labour Party's rules and procedures.'
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
The welfare reform vote: All you need to know
MPs have backed a Government proposal to reform welfare payments for sick and disabled people, but only after significant concessions saw much of Sir Keir Starmer's plan abandoned. Below, the PA news agency looks at what happened, what it means for personal independence payment (Pip) and universal credit, and what might come next. – What have MPs agreed to? MPs voted on Tuesday to allow the Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to advance to the next stage in becoming law. Some 126 Labour backbenchers had previously threatened to vote against the legislation, enough to block its passage through the Commons, but in the end only 49 did so. But ministers were forced to offer a series of concessions to persuade the rebels to back the Government. – What concessions did the Government make? Last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced a partial U-turn aimed at heading off the rebellion that included three key points. Firstly, changes to Pip eligibility would only come into effect in November 2026, and anyone claiming the benefit before that date would not be subject to the new rules, instead of imposing the changes on everyone. Secondly, people claiming the health element of universal credit, and new claimants with the most severe conditions, would see their incomes protected in real terms. Thirdly, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms would conduct a review of the Pip assessment, 'co-produced' with disabled people. But during Tuesday's debate, Sir Stephen offered a further concession, saying any changes to Pip eligibility would only be introduced after his review had concluded, further delaying them. – What do the concessions mean for the Government's proposals? The decision to push back Pip changes to an unspecified date, and leave uncertain the details of what those changes will be, removes a major part of the Government's reform plans. The proposed changes to universal credit remain, raising the standard allowance while halving the health element for most new claimants from April 2026. But the concessions will also pose a problem for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will need to find extra money now the expected savings from welfare reform are no longer expected to materialise. Indeed, the Resolution Foundation think tank suggested the concessions meant there would now be no 'net savings' from the reform by 2029/30, a key year for Ms Reeves' fiscal targets. – What happens next? The Government has pledged to make the necessary amendments to remove the Pip changes from the Bill when it returns to the Commons next week. It is then likely to continue through Parliament, becoming law after it has been approved by both MPs and peers. But wider questions remain for the Government. Not only does Ms Reeves face a fiscal headache, but the Prime Minister could face a political one too as he seeks to repair fractured relations with his backbenchers. And uncertainty will continue to surround the Government's plans for welfare reform. Ministers will still want to reduce the cost of the welfare bill and get more people back into work, while Sir Stephen's Pip review could result in another row depending on what it recommends.
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Former Irish swimming coach George Gibney arrested in US
Former Irish swimming coach George Gibney has been arrested in the US on foot of an Irish extradition warrant. Mr Gibney, who had sex offence charges against him dismissed in the 1990s, has lived in the US for years. In 2020, the podcast Where Is George Gibney, produced by Second Captains and the BBC, highlighted allegations of abuse against Mr Gibney and prompted new complainants to come forward. 'An Garda Siochana is aware of the arrest of a male aged in his 70s in the United States on foot of an Irish international arrest warrant,' gardai said in a statement. 'As this is currently a matter for the US authorities, An Garda Siochana will not be commenting further at this time.'
