Wrongful death trial begins for ex-KZN rugby player killed by police in Hawaii
Myeni, 29, originally from Empangeni, was unarmed when he was shot four times during a confrontation with police officers in April 2021.
At the time, officers claimed they were responding to a 911 call reporting a suspected burglary.
Myeni's widow, Lindsay Myeni, an American citizen, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the City and County of Honolulu, alleging that police officers failed to identify themselves and that their actions were racially motivated.
Despite public pressure, prosecutors declined to charge the three officers involved, citing that their use of deadly force was justified.
The trial proceeds after the Honolulu City Council opted not to vote on a proposed $1.4 million (R26 million) settlement, following objections from local law enforcement.
According to local outlet Honolulu Civil Beat, the council's decision was delayed after Honolulu police officers expressed strong opposition to the payout.
The case has drawn attention both in the US and South Africa, reigniting debates around racial profiling, police accountability, and justice for victims of police violence.
Myeni was a father of two and had settled in Hawaii with his family before the fatal incident.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Top 5 celebrity court cases give Mamkhize a run for her money
The glamorous lives of celebrities are often tarnished by what happens behind the scenes. From authors to kwaito stars, legal cases with dramatic twists have become all too common in the world of the rich and famous. Businesswoman and reality TV star Shauwn Mkhize's has been one case, with the South African Revenue Services (Sars) pressing charges for her failure to pay the taxman. Her prized fleet of 14 vehicles were individually sold in a Sars-sanctioned auction in Durban and Joburg last year, after she reportedly owed R40m in back taxes. See this list of five other celebrities who have made headlines for their court cases. BONANG MATHEBA According to a TimesLIVE report, in 2018, Sars opened a fraud case against South African television personality, actress and presenter Bonang Matheba for not paying personal tax from 2008-2017 and company tax from 2014-2017. During her case, she appeared at the Johannesburg Specialised Commercial Crimes Court after she paid an admission of guilt fine of R30,000. R22,000 was paid for personal taxes not filed and R8,000 for company taxes, listed under Bonang Matheba Entertainment (Pty) Ltd. JACKIE PHAMOTSE In 2023, Jackie Phamotse was found guilty in a high-profile defamation case brought against her by celebrity couple Basetsana Kumalo and her husband, businessman Romeo Kumalo. The legal saga originated from a controversial tweet posted by Phamotse in 2018, where she made allegations insinuating the existence of a compromising video involving the Kumalos and another male figure. Phamotse was sentenced to a two-year house arrest and was fined R30,000 for defamation. ARTHUR MAFOKATE According to The Citizen, the court agreed with the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) that musician Arthur Mafokate could not show how he purchased properties and cars without a National Lottery Commission grant he had requested for R9.3m. The grant was meant to provide unemployed youth in poor and rural areas with skills in the entertainment industry; instead, R7.5m was used to purchase a guest house, La Villa Rosa in Midrand. During the court proceedings, Mafokate argued that the funds were necessary to help deliver the required services. He appealed against a ruling to have the property released from a preservation order, but it was dismissed. JOHNNY DEPP AND AMBER HEARD Depp's ex-wife and actor Amber Heard accused him of domestic abuse, which she detailed in a 2018 Washington Post essay. Depp denied all allegations and instead claimed that it was Heard who was violent towards him. He filed a suit against her for defamation, for which she filed a countersuit alleging the same. Clips of the trial went viral on social media. Heard was found liable in all three matters of defamation raised and was ordered to pay her ex-husband $10m (R178,991,992) compensatory damages and $5m (R89,506,441) in punitive damages. The latter was reduced to $350,000 (R6,263,018) due to a limit imposed by a state law. Depp was found liable on one charge of defamation and ordered to pay Heard $2m (R35,783,058). Kendall Jenner had to cough up for falsely promoting the fictional Fyre Festival. Image: Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/FilmMagic KENDALL JENNER VS GREGORY MESSER No stranger to lawsuits, Kendall Jenner's most renowned legal troubles came from her and US Bankruptcy Court trustee Gregory Messer for the false promotion of Fyre Festival, a 2017 music event that famously never even happened. Jenner, who was among several celebrities to post about it, was paid $275,000 (R4,919,258) to endorse the event. Messer, who was trying to recover money on behalf of many creditors, argued that Jenner not only failed to disclose to her followers that she was paid for the advertising but also led them to believe the festival would be filled with famous models on an 'exotic private island with first-class culinary experiences and a luxury atmosphere'. She eventually agreed to pay $90,000 (R1,610,523) to settle.
The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
Dead body found in a bush in Umlazi H
A dead body was found on the side of a railway line in a bush in Umlazi H, Durban, on Monday, 14 July 2025. Community members and security officers patrolling the railway discovered the dead body and immediately informed the police, who made their way to the area. Forensics were also summoned to the scene, where they examined the body and discovered that the deceased was a female believed to be in her teenage years. DEAD BODY DISCOVERED IN UMLAZI H The deceased was found half-naked with both her hands and legs tied by a rope. There was also a bruise on her forehead with a pinch of blood drooling down her face. The South African reached out to the police for comment but they were unable to provide feedback at the time. Durban authorities arrive in Umlazi to collect the dead body found in the bush next to the railway line. IMAGE: Nomndeni Ndlovu. Sicelo Ntanzi, a community member who lives nearby, said that he did not hear any noise or see suspicious activity, as there was also load shedding. He says, 'To be honest with you, this comes as a shock because I did not hear anything at all. To make matters worse, there was also load shedding in the area in the past few days, so it was dark and it would have made it challenging for anyone to see anything.' The area has been plagued by a string of crimes in the past few months. Nomzamo Gwala, a resident, says that there was a shooting incident in the area a few months ago. 'This other time at the beginning of the year, there was a group of drunk men who were walking on the railway at night, who started fighting and swearing at each other. Their fight quickly escalated into a deadly gunfight when they started shooting at each other.' 'This area is really bad and we have tried multiple times to protect this area and even tried to form a Community Policing Forum (CPF), but it did not work,' says Gwala. Former security officer and CPF member, Bhekisizwe Mkhabela, said that they did start a policing forum in the area, but it ended up not working as they did not receive enough support. 'You know, when we started this, we had high hopes of bringing change in our community, as many people had lost hope in the police, but then things went astray.' 'There was a meeting held where we were told that we were going to be assisted with vehicles that would patrol in the area, but that did not happen. More and more people started leaving as they felt like they were not receiving support,' Mkhabela explained. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
NPA seeks clarity on Omotoso acquittal, defence objects to ‘fishing expedition'
As the State moves to appeal the acquittal of controversial pastor Timothy Omotoso, his legal team has accused the National Prosecuting Authority of abusing court processes by seeking clarification that they argue is aimed at retrospectively revising the judgment. As the State prepares to appeal the acquittal of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso, his defence counsel has branded their first step as a 'fishing expedition' and an attempt to have the judgment amended in favour of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). The NPA brought an application before the Gqeberha Division of the High Court for Judge Irma Schoeman to provide 'clarification' of the judgment that saw Omotoso acquitted on multiple charges of sexual assault and human trafficking. The application, brought before court on Monday, 14 July 2025, did not single out specific aspects of the judgment, but rather sought clarity on the factual findings of Judge Schoeman's entire judgment. This flies in the face of normal procedure as the prosecution has yet to provide its 'legal question' — the specific aspects of the judgment it does not agree with and believes another court might make a different ruling on. Senior State prosecutor Apla Bodlani SC indicated to the court that the State already had a strong basis for its appeal, but sought a better explanation from Judge Schoeman to 'satisfy [themselves] that [their] approach would be sustainable'. Omotoso and his co-accused, Lusanda Sulani and Zukiswa Sitho, were not in court as their presence was not required for these proceedings. South African immigration authorities served the controversial pastor with a five-year ban from the country as he was flying out of OR Tambo International Airport in May. Omotoso's legal counsel Peter Daubermann called the State's application a 'retrospective fishing expedition' and an abuse of court processes in an attempt for the judge to revise her ruling. He said there was no legal mechanism that allowed for this course of action and accused the State of trying to 'reverse engineer a factual foundation' that would provide it with reasons to appeal. Omotoso, Sulani and Sitho were the subjects of an eight-year trial in which they were accused of multiple counts of sexual assault and human trafficking by members of Omotoso's Jesus Dominion International church. The trial was marred by controversy around the NPA's conduct, and in April Judge Schoeman acquitted them on all the charges. Judge Schoeman in her ruling cited flaws in the prosecution's case, including almost no cross-examination challenging the versions of the accused as well as a lack of corroborating evidence led by the State. Following his acquittal Omotoso embarked on a 'New Dawn crusade' in East London. But on the second last day of the April crusade he was arrested on immigration charges at a church where he was meant to preach. He was then declared a prohibited person. That status, however, stemmed not from the criminal proceedings, but from allegations that he had used fraudulent documentation to enter South Africa. During court proceedings on Monday, Daubermann further argued that Judge Schoeman was ' functus officio ', meaning she had completed her duties with regard to this matter. He said her judgment was final and she 'was not unclear or ambiguous'. 'If this application is entertained it will set a precedent, and an accused will never know if a judgment is final or not,' Daubermann said. Bodlani maintained that the intention of the application was not for Judge Schoeman to alter or supplement her judgment. He reiterated that after studying the judgment, the State was still unclear on what the factual findings were, and for it to better prepare their appeal, it required Judge Schoeman to provide clarity on her findings. The judge said she would need time to consider the opposing arguments, and that the judgment would be delivered on 22 July 2025. DM
