South Africans face currency shock as rand stays stagnant against US dollar
Image: Armand Hough/Independent Media
South Africans who expected to score massively from the fact that the greenback has lost 10% against every other major currency this year are set for a sore surprise because the rand has barely budged against the dollar year-on-year.
In fact, investors would have been better off putting R10,000 into pounds or even euros, with euros having provided the best return of R555.67 – or 5.6% year-on-year, IOL's calculations show.
Based on a linear equation that doesn't include transaction costs, fees, or reinvestment of gains, the pound would have provided a return of R405.12, or 4.1%.
While the rand had been gaining against the US currency given the greenback's weakness, the exchange rate went over R18 to the dollar again this week – effectively on par with a year ago. As a result, a R10,000 investment into the dollar would provide a negative return.
Andre Cilliers, currency strategist at TreasuryONE, explained that the rand had lost ground as the dollar firmed and there was uncertainty over any US military action against Iran, which is keeping the local currency on the back foot for now.
US President Donald Trump has variously indicated he would support Isreal in its fight against Iran, while also stating that this may not happen.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Bloomberg data indicated that, since Trump was inaugurated for his second term on January 20, the greenback has declined in value against the euro, pound and Swiss franc. This, it stated, was due to Trump's tariffs and his insistence that Federal Reserve Chaiman Jerome Powell lower interest rates. The Fed voted overnight to keep rates unchanged, the same position for all of 2025 so far.
The last time the dollar plunged this much and this fast was in 2010 when the US Federal Reserve pumped more money into the economy to help deal with the ravages of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, Bloomberg data showed.
South Africa's rand is notoriously volatile.
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
REVEALED: Why Kaizer Chiefs can win battle for CT Spurs duo!
Kaizer Chiefs have found themselves in a predicament with regards to an attempt to sign a promising young duo. Chiefs are believed to have agreed terms with Cape Town Spurs duo Asanele Velebayi and Luke Baartman but with complications. The two players were part of the Spurs side that suffered a double relegation in the past two seasons. Both Velebayi and Baartman were seen as promising youngsters and assets to the club after tasting topflight football. Despite attracting a lot of interest upon the first relegation of the Urban Warriors, the duo went down with them to the NFD. Now Chiefs have opportunistically pounced on them. Chiefs were also embroiled in a transfer saga with Spurs for Velebayi in the close season transfer window. The player was reportedly desperate to join Amakhosi last season with the club making several bids. In the end, the Urban Warriors held their ground, demanding R10 million for his services. With the side being relegated to the amateur ranks, under NSL rules, both he and Baartman should be free agents. As Chiefs looked to take advantage of that rule, Spurs have threatened legal. This if Velebayi and Baartman end up joining the Glamour Boys while still having what they feel is a valid contract with them. In fact, the Cape Town side have ordered the duo to report for training. But according to the NSL ruling, Velebayi and Baartman are legally free agents. Even if Spurs were to acquire a professional status, they would not be allowed to change that. This means it is advantage Chiefs. 'Rule 4.3.1.4, in the NSL handbook states; a player may apply to the dispute resolution chamber (DRC) to be declared a free agent in the event of the member club ceasing to exist as a member club falling under the jurisdiction of the NSL rules also state the entity which is the current club and its members current directors cannot within 12 months buy another franchise, which is likely the attempt of the club with keep hold of their key players. Should a potential status purchase transpire – this new entity – under new new directors – would contractually have no hold on the current players.' iDiski Times states. Chiefs fans are you now optimistic that your club will legally win the battle to sign Velebayi and Baartman? Let us know by clicking on the comment tab. Or by emailing info@ or sending a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. You can also follow @TheSAnews on X and The South African on Facebook for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Integrating AI in your business can be a double-edged sword
AI promises to transform businesses with smarter systems and personalised customer experiences. But AI, like any tool, requires skill to wield. Without proper scrutiny, these tools can do more harm than good. The AI sales pitch is irresistible: automated customer service, hyper-personalised engagement, razor-sharp inventory forecasting. But AI, like any tool, requires skill to wield. 'AI isn't magic; it's math and data,' said Matthew Elliot, chief delivery officer at tech consultancy CloudSmiths. 'The more visibility you have into how it works and what it's doing, the safer your outcomes will be.' 'Safe' is the key word here. While AI can give any business an edge, it can just as easily entrench inequality, expose private data, or simply, much like humans, make bad calls. Riskier than you think According to Wendy Tembedza, partner at Webber Wentzel, the issue isn't whether or not to use AI – because most businesses already do. The problems creep in when the risks of its usage are not rigorously assessed. 'Businesses must carefully consider the intended use case of any AI tool and conduct a risk assessment prior to implementation,' she advised. 'This helps manage the risks that may arise from incorrect or inappropriate use.' Those risks include exposure to legal liability if systems fail to meet ethical or compliance standards. If an AI tool inadvertently discriminates, say by offering preferential pricing or marketing to customers living in urban areas that shop online, it poses the risk of enforcing bias. 'In a society where South Africans have unequal access to the internet, AI tools that learn only from online behaviour run the risk of generating biased results,' Tembedza warned. 'The resulting insights may fail to reflect the actual behaviours and preferences of the wider customer base.' Bad inputs, bad outcomes Much of the risk begins with the data. AI tools need clean, well-structured, and representative data to train on. 'Bad inputs make bad decisions,' Elliot said. 'If you don't know where your data came from or how your model behaves, you're flying blind.' TymeBank chief technology officer, Bruce Paveley agrees on that point. 'Bank data is carefully selected and scrubbed to ensure we don't put dirty data into our AI tools,' he said. 'We also allow our AI tools to use learning from other reliable sources to avoid bias toward our own ideas.' What is 'dirty' data? This refers to information that is inaccurate, incomplete, or outdated, hindering the performance and reliability of AI models Elliot reckons that bias is a human problem as much as it is a technical issue, and if your model isn't trained on diverse, representative data, it will leave people behind. To mitigate this, CloudSmiths has developed workflows that stress-tests models against real-world scenarios, using tools such as 'Objective Lens' to detect underrepresentation and misclassification. 'If your AI doesn't work for everyone, it doesn't really work,' Elliot said. Inventory gains, infrastructure pains Inventory management is one of AI's most lucrative use cases. Predictive tools can anticipate buying trends and automate restocking, which reduces waste. But again, the model is only as smart as the data it learns from. 'In practice, many retailers do not have centralised or well-organised data sets,' Tembedza said. 'If data used to train AI models are outdated, inconsistent or inaccurate, no level of technical sophistication can compensate.' Even when the data is right, legacy IT systems often aren't. 'Many retailers continue to operate on legacy information technology systems that may not support the integration of the AI tools they intend to implement,' Tembedza added. In Africa, up to 60% of businesses cited IT infrastructure as a major barrier to AI implementation, a survey by cybersecurity company Fortinet found. Modern, cloud-first businesses like TymeBank are less encumbered, but even their barriers are not always technical. 'The challenge was more adoption by our team members rather than a technical limitation,' said Paveley. 'Education and exposure were key enablers to get our team to embrace AI as a productivity tool rather than one that threatens their jobs.' Leak risks of generative AI When it comes to businesses that adopt and use AI, the most insidious risk does not necessarily come from a chatbot gone rogue but rather from employees pasting confidential information into ChatGPT. 'Never assume off-the-shelf AI is private by default,' Elliot said. He sees companies frequently underestimating the risk of intellectual property exposure and data leaks from generative AI tools. His advice: Use air-gapped or private models for anything involving intellectual property. Train staff on what's safe to input. Review AI governance legislation, like the EU's AI Act. Establish monitoring and evaluation frameworks from day one. 'There needs to be a policy to govern, rather than restrict, usage of AI in our business,' Paveley said. 'Our staff need to complete AI training to ensure they understand the power of productivity improvements but also for awareness of the associated risks.' Boost engagement, don't alienate Done right, the shiny promise of personalisation through AI can boost engagement. If not, it reinforces stereotypes and alienates customers and clients. 'The most ethical AI is also the most useful,' Elliot said. 'If users trust the experience, they are more likely to engage with it – and that's good for everyone.' 'Personalisation shouldn't enforce stereotypes; it should surprise you, teach you something new, or reflect who you're becoming, not just who you've been.' Helpful or harmful? For all its potential, AI certainly doesn't solve problems on its own and certainly not by default. 'The questions are similar from what we hear every day from our South African and UK clients,' Elliot said. 'Typically it's concerns around safety, fairness, cost or return on investment. It seems most businesses are desperately trying to minimise AI risk while staying competitive.'
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
How ANC's collusion with big businesses undermines transformation
Nco Dube a political economist, businessman, and social commentator. Image: Supplied South Africa's post-apartheid journey has been marked by a bold constitutional promise: to dismantle the economic structures of racial privilege and build a society where the black majority can share in the country's wealth and opportunities. Central to this promise are the empowerment laws, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) and Affirmative Action (AA), crafted to drive economic inclusion and redress decades of exclusion. Yet, nearly three decades on, the slow pace of transformation and the growing backlash against these laws reveal a darker reality: a coordinated agenda, both local and global, to halt transformation, preserve white privilege, and enrich a narrow elite. At the heart of this crisis lies a deeply troubling collusion between big business and ANC elites. A symbiotic relationship that has subverted the original intent of empowerment laws, turning them into tools for elite enrichment rather than broad-based economic justice. The Promise and the Betrayal of Empowerment When the ANC was unbanned in 1990 and South Africa embarked on its democratic journey, the vision was clear: to dismantle apartheid's economic legacy and create a more equitable society. BEE and AA laws were designed to open doors for black South Africans through ownership, management, employment equity, and skills development. There have been pockets of progress. Black ownership and representation in certain sectors have increased, and a black middle class has emerged. Some black entrepreneurs have thrived, and certain companies have made genuine strides in employment equity. But for the ordinary black South African, the man on the street, these gains have often been invisible or out of reach. Poverty, unemployment, and inequality remain entrenched, and the benefits of transformation have been captured by a small, politically connected elite. This failure is no accident. It is the product of systemic corruption, incompetence, and a political will that has been fatally compromised by the very leaders entrusted with delivering transformation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The Symbiotic Relationship Between Big Business and ANC Elites Since the unbanning of the ANC, a problematic alliance has formed between big business and ANC political elites. White monopoly capital, anxious to protect its interests in the new dispensation, extended lucrative BEE deals to ANC insiders. This was not broad-based empowerment, it was a transactional pact: business secured access to government contracts, regulatory favour, and influence, while ANC elites gained wealth and power. This arrangement has had devastating consequences for genuine transformation: Elite Enrichment Through Selective BEE Deals: Instead of empowering the masses, many BEE deals were structured to benefit a narrow group of ANC-connected individuals. Shares, directorships, and business opportunities were handed to political insiders, creating a black elite that often mirrored the exclusivity of the apartheid-era white elite. The majority of black South Africans saw little direct benefit from these deals. Empirical evidence shows that many beneficiaries of these deals were ANC apparatchiks, with the majority of black South Africans seeing little direct benefit. Board Appointments and Political Influence: At least 56 ANC politicians have held directorships in major JSE-listed companies, blurring the lines between political power and corporate governance. This overlap ensured that business interests were protected and that policies favoured entrenched elites rather than broad economic inclusion. Research shows a significant overlap between ANC politicians and the boards of major JSE-listed companies. Many of them holding multiple directorships across a wide array of companies. This integration allowed big business to secure their interests by aligning with politically influential individuals, ensuring favourable treatment and policy influence, rather than driving genuine transformation. Fronting and Window-Dressing: Many companies engaged in fronting, appointing black individuals to nominal positions to meet BEE requirements without transferring real control or economic benefit. This practice allowed companies to access government contracts and benefits fraudulently, undermining the integrity of empowerment laws. While real control and benefits remain with the original (often white) owners. Examples include listing low-level black employees as company directors without their knowledge or creating side agreements that strip black shareholders of real power. State Capture and Policy Manipulation: The alliance between business and ANC elites facilitated state capture, where government resources and policy were manipulated to serve private interests. The mutually beneficial relationship between business and ANC elites has led to 'state capture,' where business interests influence legislation and procurement processes for their own benefit, often at the expense of the broader public. This has included shaping policies to favour certain companies, securing lucrative government contracts, and manipulating regulatory frameworks to protect established interests. The Bosasa scandal, for example, involved manufacturing BEE credentials and funnelling money to the ANC through corrupt tender processes, with cash bribes and fraudulent invoicing used to secure government business and support election campaigns. This collusion has transformed empowerment laws from instruments of justice into mechanisms for elite enrichment and preservation of privilege. The focus on enriching a politically connected elite, rather than fostering broad-based participation and economic inclusion, has led to widespread public disillusionment and persistent inequality. The original vision of BEE as a tool for mass empowerment has been subverted by collusion between big business and ANC elites, resulting in a narrow base of beneficiaries and limited progress for the majority. The Global Rightward Shift and the Anti-Transformation Agenda Adding fuel to the fire is the global political climate. The rise of right-wing populism in the United States and elsewhere has emboldened anti-transformation forces in South Africa. Figures like Donald Trump and Elon Musk have amplified narratives of white victimhood, including the false and dangerous 'white genocide' myth targeting South Africa. White interest groups such as the Democratic Alliance (DA), Solidarity, and Afriforum have seized this moment to push back against transformation. They cloak their agendas in rhetoric about 'meritocracy' and 'non-racialism,' but their true aim is to preserve apartheid-era privileges and slow the pace of change. Meanwhile, as the ANC faces potential electoral decline, white monopoly capital is already seeking new political partners to maintain its influence, regardless of who governs. The anti-transformation agenda is thus both a local and international phenomenon, threatening to roll back the hard-won gains of the past three decades. Successes, Failures, and the Road Ahead It is important to acknowledge the successes. There are black entrepreneurs, professionals, and leaders who have leveraged empowerment laws to build businesses and create jobs. Some sectors have made genuine progress in diversifying ownership and management. But these successes are exceptions, not the rule. The systemic failures of corruption, elite capture, fronting, and state capture have undermined the transformative potential of empowerment laws. The struggle over South Africa's empowerment laws is a struggle for the soul of the nation. Will the country continue down a path where transformation is hollowed out by corruption and elite collusion, or will it reclaim the constitutional imperative to build an inclusive economy for all its people? The stakes could not be higher.
