
‘Consent Paramount': Allahabad HC Clears 31-Week Abortion For Minor Rape Survivor Despite Medical Board Warning
The minor, aged 17 and a half, had approached the court through her father, seeking medical termination of pregnancy resulting from sexual assault
Despite a medical board's caution that terminating a 31-week pregnancy could endanger both mother and foetus, the Allahabad High Court has allowed a minor rape survivor to undergo the procedure, underscoring that her consent and reproductive autonomy are constitutionally protected.
The minor, aged 17 and a half, had approached the court through her father, seeking medical termination of pregnancy resulting from sexual assault. A case under the POCSO Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is already underway.
Earlier, the girl had approached the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Agra, who referred the matter to a medical board. The board, after two rounds of examination, concluded that the pregnancy was well past 29 weeks and that abortion posed a threat to both mother and unborn child. By the time the matter came up before the High Court, the foetus was approximately 31 weeks old.
But the court wasn't persuaded by medical caution alone. During a special hearing, Justices Manoj Kumar Gupta and Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra noted that the girl had been through trauma and her mental and physical condition was 'precarious". Counselling sessions conducted by a psychiatrist and clinical psychologist revealed that the minor and her family were fully aware of the risks but remained determined to terminate the pregnancy.
In a sealed report submitted to the court, the counsellors wrote that the petitioner and her family understood all options, yet did not want to carry the pregnancy to term under any circumstance, citing emotional distress, social stigma, and economic hardship.
The state's counsel, Rajiv Gupta, confirmed that the medical college had tried to dissuade the girl, but the team could not alter her decision. 'She is not in a stable mental state and is dealing with deep trauma," he submitted.
Weighing the circumstances, the court relied heavily on recent Supreme Court rulings, including A (Mother of X) v State of Maharashtra (2024) and XYZ v State of Gujarat (2023), where it was held that the right to abortion is part of the fundamental right to dignity, privacy, and bodily autonomy.
'Consent of a pregnant person in decisions of reproductive autonomy and termination of pregnancy is paramount," the Allahabad High Court observed, adding that denial of termination in cases of rape, especially involving minors, may be arbitrary and unreasonable.
Calling it a 'difficult but necessary" decision, the court allowed the termination and directed the principal of SN Medical College, Agra, to form a team of specialists to perform the procedure without delay. It further directed the District Magistrate to ensure all medical and travel expenses of the petitioner are covered by the state. The aborted foetus is to be preserved for forensic examination.
Confidentiality of the victim was ordered to be strictly maintained, and the court acknowledged the medical team's support in handling the sensitive case.
First Published:
News india 'Consent Paramount': Allahabad HC Clears 31-Week Abortion For Minor Rape Survivor Despite Medical Board Warning
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
13 hours ago
- India Today
What's Delhi's dog-bite reality that has alarmed the Supreme Court too
"My parents have stopped going for walks outside society due to aggressive dog gangs," a Delhi resident recently posted on social media, thanking the Supreme Court for stepping in after reports of a disturbing surge in rabies cases and deaths in the national July 28, the Supreme Court termed the rising number of dog-bite cases and deaths as "deeply disturbing", especially among children and the elderly. The bench, led by Justice JB Pardiwala, cited a recent Times of India report titled 'City hounded by strays, kids pay price', which documented the increasing menace of stray dogs and the failure of civic authorities to get the crisis under concern gained urgency after the death of a six-year-old girl, Chavi, after a dog attack. She was on her way to her aunt's house when a stray dog attacked her, biting her repeatedly on her leg, arm and being taken to multiple hospitals for treatment, her condition deteriorated. Less than a month later, she passed away. Her family recalls that she had started attending school just two days before the it a matter that required immediate judicial intervention, Justice Pardiwala remarked, "This is the first matter we should take up on the first day of the week."Taking suo motu cognisance, the Supreme Court ordered its registry to register a public interest writ petition under its own motion and directed that it be placed before Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai for further orders and threat posed by stray dogs is not just in Delhi. In cities like Bengaluru and Srinagar too, dog attacks have spread fear and panic. WHY DOG BITES CAN BE DANGEROUSDog bites can be dangerous for two main reasons: the physical trauma they cause and the risk of a small bite can tear skin, injure muscles or nerves, and lead to bacterial infections if not treated properly. But it is the threat of rabies that makes the situation far more is a viral disease that attacks the brain and nervous symptoms appear, it is almost always fatal. The virus spreads through the saliva of an infected animal, usually via a bite. Because of this, doctors recommend immediate wound cleaning and post-exposure vaccination even in seemingly minor killed approximately 5,700 people in India in 2022-23, according to a Lancet OF DANGER: DATA ON DOG BITES IN DELHIThe scale of the crisis is stark in the numbers. Data from the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) shows that dog bite cases in Delhi rose from 6,691 in 2022 to 17,874 in 2023, and further to 25,210 in 2024. That's an overall increase of nearly 277% in just two surge continues into 2025, with 3,196 cases reported in January have been to data cited by The Indian Express, Safdarjung Hospital, one of the largest government-run centres, reported 63,361 dog bite cases in 2021. By July 2025, the number had already climbed to 91,009, surpassing the earlier annual figures by 43.6%.At Ram Manohar Lohia (RML) Hospital, the cases rose from 39,216 between April 2022 and March 2023 to 45,432 between April 2023 and March 2025, marking a 13% MCD-run Bara Hindu Rao Hospital also saw a spike, with 4,861 cases till July this year, 40% higher than the 3,468 cases recorded in the same period last problem is not limited to Delhi. In neighbouring Uttar Pradesh's Gautam Buddh Nagar district, which borders the capital, 74,550 animal bite incidents, including both stray and pet-related cases, were recorded between January and May this year ARE AUTHORITIES TACKLING THE DOG BITE DANGER?Authorities are attempting to Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), along with the Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying (MoFAHD), has rolled out the National Action Plan for Dog-Mediated Rabies Elimination (NAPRE), with the goal of eliminating rabies by Delhi, the Municipal Corporation has been working with NGOs and veterinary professionals to sterilise and vaccinate stray dogs under the Animal Birth Control (ABC) late 2022 and early 2024, over 1 lakh sterilisation procedures were carried out, against an annual target of 80,000-90, long-term aim is to achieve 70-80% sterilisation coverage in each ward, but progress remains uneven, with only some wards meeting the citizens, the MCD-311 app and the helpline number 155305 have been made available to report stray dog issues and request sterilisation drives. To build public trust, the system allows residents to receive updates and even photos of the dogs once action has been situation of stray dogs and attacks by them in Delhi are scary. With the civic authorities sleeping and people panicking, it is the Supreme Court that had to ultimately step in.- EndsTrending Reel


New Indian Express
17 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Set up ‘smoking zones' in hotels, bars or else lose licence: BBMP
BENGALURU: The BBMP health department has sent notices to 412 establishments like bars, hotels and restaurants and has directed the proprietors to set up smoking zones. The palike has also given one week from the date of notice issued, failing which, the trade licence will be suspended. According to Chief Health Officer (CHO), BBMP, Sirajuddin Madani, the action is following the Supreme Court direction on June 22, 2022 and section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 (COTPA), in which any establishment like bars, hotels and restaurants with 30 or more seats must have a separate area for smokers and it should be identified as 'Smoking Zone'. 'The BBMP Special Commissioner for Health held a meeting with police, excise department and education department on Saturday, and a decision was taken that action will have to be taken against restaurants, bars or hotels violating the rules. The BBMP Health Department officials have been instructed to take action under sections 308 and 314 of the BBMP Act 2020 and suspend the license,' Madani said. The CHO and other officials will revisit the establishments that received notice and if they have not followed the instruction, action will be initiated to to place the trade license under suspension and also impose a penalty. As per the BBMP health officials, the owners of these establishments have been told to comply with the order within seven days' time from the time of notice issued. The officials who held inspections across eight zones to check if the rules are being followed found the highest violation in the South Zone, with 94 violations. Similarly, 72 violations in Bommannahalli, 63 in East were found, and notices were sent to all of them.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
As CM set to unveil scheme, TN moves HC to modify order on use of Stalin's name
Chennai: State govt has moved Madras high court to modify its order restraining govt from launching any welfare scheme in the name of a living political personality, in conformity with the guidelines set by the Supreme Court. Though the first bench of the court, headed by Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, clarified that the state could proceed with the launch of the scheme on Aug 2 while responding to a mention made by advocate-general P S Raman, the state filed a formal petition seeking the modification. The plea is likely to be taken up for hearing on Monday by the first bench. Chief minister M K Stalin will launch specialty health screening camps, Nalam Kaakkum Stalin, on Saturday from St Bede's Anglo Indian Higher Secondary School in Chennai, additional chief secretary J Radhakrishnan, designated as spokesperson for govt, told reporters on Friday. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai The camp aims to target people above 40 years, particularly those with diabetes, hypertension, heart diseases, and mental health conditions, as well as pregnant women, nursing mothers, people with disabilities, and tribal and marginalised populations through 1,256 high-level health camps across the state. Specialists from at least 15 departments, such as cardiology, neurology, ophthalmology, ENT, and dermatology, and experts in AYUSH systems, will offer free consultations. The camp will offer on-site diagnostics, including ECG, ECHO, ultrasound, and X-ray, besides blood tests for early diagnosis of various non-communicable diseases. "Test results will be delivered through WhatsApp," he said. Camps will be organised on all working Saturdays in schools or colleges, Radhakrishnan said. Earlier in the day, Tamil Nadu govt filed the modificiation plea in the high court saying, "the scheme was introduced in the name of the chief minister of the state, who is a constitutional authority, and it cannot be construed to have been introduced in the name of a political personality." The usage of photos of former chief ministers is also not expressly prohibited under the orders passed by the Supreme Court, it added. All the pamphlets, brochures, health camp application forms, and other related documents for the scheme have been printed and distributed throughout the state for the launch of the scheme, the state said. It added that, in addition to the camps, 800 hospitals have been integrated into the scheme to manage the footfall. "If the order of the HC is made applicable immediately, the entire scheme will have to be put on hold, and every material which has been published thus far will have to be redone, which will take several weeks, and all the arrangements made thus far will go to waste," the govt said. The state submitted that the present plea is moved for the limited purpose of seeking clarification from the court so that the same may not be made applicable to the 'Nalam Kaakkum' scheme which is being launched on Aug 2. The issue pertains to an interim order passed by the court on a plea moved by former law minister C Ve Shanmugam of AIADMK, who alleged that the scheme named after Stalin was in violation of the guidelines set by the Supreme Court and the ECI.