While secularism is growing in Australia, Anzac commemorations remain fervently Christian
Friday's services across the country are the most profound cases in point even though, after almost 110 years of Anzac Days, many Australians may have become culturally inured to the way our national remembrance has become – and remains – so imbued with religiously inflected rhetoric.
That's why we will hear referenced, repeatedly on Anzac Day, the 'spirit' of Anzac and of those killed on the battlefield, of their 'sacrifice' and how death somehow transforms them into the 'fallen' though not as often these days do you hear them referred to as the 'glorious dead'. Surrounding it all will be Christian prayer.
When previously writing about the politics of commemoration I've referenced an Australian Vietnam veteran Jim Robertson who wrote a submission to the federal government ahead of the centenary of Anzac in 2015. His words are just as salient today.
He took exception to the term 'fallen' (which I agree is something of a sanitisation of battlefield death) as used by politicians when speaking of the war dead. For, Robertson pointed out, they 'did not trip over a stick or a garden hose, they were drowned, burned, shot, gassed and eviscerated to lie face down in mud or sand at the bottom of the ocean'.
To think of the war dead as fallen may once have been comforting to some in the same way that the famous though historically highly dubious Atatürk letter (whereby the 'Johnnies and Mehmets' lay side by side in the earth at Gallipoli) gave solace to the families of those killed on an obscure finger of the Ottoman Empire which must have seemed a world away then.
The Australian War Memorial's Anzac dawn service is popularly revered as a solemn and respectful commemoration of Australia's participation in the Gallipoli invasion in 1915 – an event many still (fallaciously, I've long argued) cling to as the birth of the Australian nation.
But not everyone believes the ceremony ought continue to include elements of traditional Christian worship as it conventionally has, and as it did last year and doubtless will again this year. Last year, again, there were Christian hymns. The Lord's Prayer. A presiding Christian chaplain.
There is no doubt many soldiers of the First Australian Imperial Force took solace in their predominant Christian faiths amid the horrors of Gallipoli, the European western front and the Middle East.
But times change as do religious affiliations, as reflected by the Australian Bureau of Statistics which records that at the last Australian census (2021) the most common religions were Christianity (43.9%), Islam (3.2%), Hinduism (2.7%) and Buddhism (2.4%). Some 38.9% of Australians said they had no religion.
The census found, 'The number of people affiliated with Christianity in Australia decreased from 12.2 million (52.1%) in 2016 to 11.1 million (43.9%) in 2021. This decrease occurred across most ages, with the largest decrease for young adults (18-25 years).'
It can be reasonably assumed the affiliations and beliefs of contemporary Australian service personnel are reflected in these numbers too.
While secularism is growing in Australia, particularly in younger demographics, official Anzac commemorations across the nation (especially the biggest, televised and most observed – that at the war memorial in Canberra) remain fervently Christian.
The memorial, generally slow or resistant to cultural change on a range of salient issues (not least on appropriate commemoration of the Australian frontier wars between First Nations resisters and British troops, settler militias, vigilantes and police) is not, it seems, about to lead the way when it comes to de-Christianising the Anzac Day service. The memorial hosts the annual service on behalf of the Australian Capital Territory Returned and Services League, which apparently remains intransigent on lowering the Christian tempo of the performance.
The Rationalist Society of Australia has been at the forefront of the push to expunge the Christian rites and practices and prayers from the service, complaining to the ACT Human Rights Commission that the service has discriminated against and excluded some Australians who might otherwise commemorate Anzac.
As Australia's first world war veterans (all dead now) fade from living memory, just as those of the second world war will too within a generation, commemoration of Anzac and its profound impact on Australian society and identity must surely evolve with the times. An abundance of Christianity in Anzac Day services stands to emotionally and culturally isolate more and more people.
Many Christians, in their celebration of Jesus as a peacemaker, also feel uncomfortable about the pervasiveness of Christianity in military commemoration, not least Anzac and 11 November, Remembrance Day.
They've got a point: it does seem increasingly anomalous, given the pervasive capacity of religion and its territorial affiliation with land to spark wars. Look at the TV any night. In that, perhaps, might be found a parallel with the war memorial's acceptance of sponsorship funds from weapons manufacturers.
Religious faith, of course, gave considerable succour and comfort to the men in opposing muddy, bloody trenches during the Great War. To have God on one's side was comforting – even when another avowed Christian was shooting at you from the enemy dugout.
Paul Daley is a Guardian Australia columnist
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trade minister to warn Trump's tariff wars could see Australia ‘suffer' for generations
Australia 'will suffer' for generations if Donald Trump's global trade wars persist, Don Farrell warns, as the Albanese government stares down an increasingly challenging economic environment in its second term. In his address to the Lowy Institute on Friday, Australia's trade minister will also say the US is 'seeking to expand domestic manufacturing and influence the policies of its trading partners' as it questions the benefits of open, rules-based trade. On Thursday, the Trump administration claimed a win after restrictions on imports into Australia of meat processed in the US but grown in Mexico and Canada were lifted. 'This is yet another example of the kind of market access the president negotiates to bring America into a new golden age of prosperity, with American agriculture leading the way,' the US agriculture secretary, Brooke Rollins, said. Trade makes up nearly a third of Australia's economic output, and one in four jobs relating to trade – Farrell will note that trade and investment support the Albanese government's three top priorities: productivity, economic resilience, and budget sustainability. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'But these institutions and norms we worked so hard to build are being questioned and the rules we wrote are being challenged,' he will say on Friday. 'One of the chief designers of the global trading system, the United States, is now questioning the benefits of open, rules-based trade. 'The Trump administration is seeking to expand domestic manufacturing and influence the policies of its trading partners.' Farrell will point to Australia's ability to send produce, resources and human capital around the globe as the reason behind the country's high standard of living. But he will flag that the shift in foreign and trade policy under Trump could undermine Australia's prosperity with long-lasting impacts. 'What we risk seeing is a shift from a system based on shared prosperity and interdependence to one based solely on power and size,' the minister will say. 'If our trading partners' growth slows, without doubt we will suffer. 'The costs to consumers and businesses of a global economic slowdown will be felt for generations, and the shock waves of inflation will worsen.' Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion This notably stronger critique of Australia's close partner reflects the government's growing unease with pressure applied by the Trump administration. Australia faces a 10% baseline tariff on all products exported to the US with a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium. There is concern a potential 200% tariff could be planned for pharmaceuticals. On the US president's so-called 'Liberation Day', Trump specifically cited Australia's restrictions on beef imports upon announcing the tariff regime. Farrell has previously said the US tariffs on Australian goods were not the 'act of a friend'. The multibillion-dollar Aukus pact is also under pressure after a snap administration review was announced amid US demands for Australia to increase its defence spending.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Karoline Leavitt sparks speculation that she has DITCHED her religious necklace after brutal Jon Stewart joke
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt appears to have scaled back from wearing her religious cross necklace since she was skewered by Jon Stewart in a brutal late-night joke. Since the 27-year-old assumed her post at The White House, she has been known to wear various large cross necklaces during her press briefings, seemingly sending a clear message about her Christian faith. She has also been known to pray with her team before beginning her briefings. But in an early June episode of Jon Stewart's talk show, The Daily Show, he torched Leavitt and her necklace. 'By the way, I think that the more she lies, the bigger her cross gets. Is that possible? It's like some sort of weird Pinocchio cross,' Stewart chided. However, his jokes didn't stop there. He also posited that Leavitt is likely to be 'the only one' who will be able to leave Trump's second term 'unscathed.' Stewart said that he 'doesn't think that she has any principles in there left to die.' And since the jab, some have taken notice that Leavitt doesn't seem to be wearing her cross necklace as often anymore. Earlier this week, Leavitt left her décolletage bare as she donned a black sleeveless dress while addressing press outside the White House on Wednesday. And its prolonged absence has prompted many to wonder about the accessory. 'Why did Karoline Leavitt stop wearing her cross necklace????' one X (formerly Twitter) user wrote on July 9. 'Karoline Leavitt took her cross necklace off for this press conference,' another observed of her July 7 briefing. Someone else wrote on X on June 23, 'Why did Karoline Leavitt stop wearing her necklace with the cross?' 'Karoline Leavitt was seen without her cross necklace after being mocked by Daily Show host Jon Stewart. Do you think she should keep wearing it?' another posited. However, although the Press Secretary appears to have been wearing her necklace less, she hasn't completely gotten rid of it from her wardrobe rotation. She has been spotted on a handful of occasions since but eagle-eyed fans have identified that it is nowhere near as constant. In the past, Leavitt has spoken about how much her Christian faith means to her. 'My faith is incredibly important to me, I would argue now more than ever,' she told CBN News in a March interview. 'Being in a role that is very demanding and at times, controversial, and there's a lot of public pressure and discussion online about who you are and your family, and you know, it could be difficult for someone who doesn't have faith, but with faith, all things are possible.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Raise jobseeker to 90% of age pension and pay for it by curbing super tax concessions, Vinnies says
A welfare reform package that includes raising jobseeker to 90% of the age pension would lift 590,000 Australians out of poverty, with the $11bn price tag paid for by curbing super tax concessions in a way that still leaves the vast majority of savers better off. A new Australian National University paper for the St Vincent de Paul Society, titled A Fairer Tax and Welfare System for Australia, examines a range of options that 'are targeted to benefit persons who have the greatest financial need and would be paid for by those most able to accommodate a modest additional contribution'. In addition to the rise in the main unemployment benefit, the 'major' reform package also includes increases to commonwealth rent assistance and payments to families and single parents. The analysis lands less than a month out from Jim Chalmers' economic reform roundtable, which will bring together representatives from government, business and unions in an attempt to achieve a consensus around concrete measures to lift the country's abysmal productivity performance. But with an estimated one in 10 Australians, or nearly 3 million people, living in households experiencing poverty, the charitable organisation's report highlights the urgent need to make the country more equitable as well as more efficient. Mark Gaetani, Vinnies' national president, said he was hopeful the reforms put forward in the report would be seriously considered at Labor's summit. 'Yes, the government does need to address productivity. But there are two sides to the coin, and the options we put forward will make a really significant difference to those who are doing it really tough and who we see coming through our doors every day,' Gaetani said. 'What we are putting forward is budget neutral. We are simply asking those well off in the community to forgo in the vicinity of $3,000-3,500 a year to offset the cost of assisting those 3 million Australians who live under the poverty line'. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Ben Phillips, an associate professor at the ANU who co-wrote the report with Richard Webster, said increasing the jobseeker benefit for singles and couples was a 'no-brainer'. 'People don't talk about the age pension as a king's ransom, and lifting jobseeker to 90% of that just takes it back to 1990s levels,' Phillips said, noting that it was in line with the recommendation by the government's Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee. The ANU sets the poverty line at $486 a week, or half the median household disposable income of after housing costs. In comparison, the full jobseeker rate for an individual is $390 a week, or about 75% of the $525 rate for a single age pensioner. Lifting it to 90% would involve a weekly rise of about $80. More than half of people on jobseeker or youth allowance are in households experiencing poverty, and the report noted that the balance between avoiding disincentives to work and providing an adequate safety net had become skewed too far in one direction. 'The pendulum needs to swing back towards adequacy,' it said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The ANU's poverty rates are adjusted to exclude those with low income but with high wealth, such as some retirees. Single parents are much more likely to experience severe financial disadvantage, with poverty rates among this group reaching an estimated one in three. The proposed reform would lift youth allowance and the partnered parenting payment by the same proportional amount as jobseeker, and increase the single parenting payment to equal the age pension. The report said the jobseeker rate and related payments should also be increased each year in line with wages, rather than inflation. The family tax benefit part A should be raised to the same as for older eligible children, and the link between wage growth and family payments should also be re-established, it said. With one in five renters estimated to be in poverty, or twice the national average, suggested changes to the welfare system included a 15% increase in commonwealth rent assistance, as well as an additional $100 supplementary payment to those receiving the disability support pension in recognition that an estimated 37% of people on working age pensions are below the poverty line. The measures in the reform proposal would be paid for by replacing the flat 15% tax on super contributions and earnings with a rate set at the saver's marginal tax rate minus 20 percentage points. The reform to superannuation concessions that Phillips modelled would leave 90% of savers no worse off, and in some cases better off, he said. 'The people who it [the super tax change] would impact negatively are those whose income is above the $190,000 level, where the marginal rate is 45 cents in the dollar.'
