
Badenoch ‘looking at Danish ghetto laws' in push for ‘active integration'
Such a declaration can trigger requirements to reduce the amount of social housing in an area, including through evicting residents and demolishing or turning their homes into private housing, and restrictions on who can move there.
Asked whether she would consider a similar policy for the UK, Mrs Badenoch told an audience at the Policy Exchange think tank on Monday she had 'looked at it' and would be talking about it more.
She said: 'I think integration is not enough. I say assimilate, I think assimilation should be the target, and if people don't assimilate, then they integrate.
'But we've had so many, so many people, so high numbers, people from lots of different places, which is not what immigration used to look like, and I think we need to move from passive to active integration.'
Saying this was 'along the lines' of the Danish policy, she added: 'We need to do what works for the UK, it's not exactly the same situation, we have a much bigger population, and so many other things that would require adjustments, but that sort of thing, yes.'
The Danish law is currently being challenged at the European Court of Justice by human rights groups, who argue it discriminates against people based on their ethnicity.
During her appearance at the Policy Exchange event, the Conservative leader went on to say she wanted to see the state doing less, saying she did not want to see an 'active state' in areas outside policing and defence.
She also argued for society to do more to prevent 'unstable' families from being formed.
Asked about the role of personal responsibility in family policy, she said: 'I think that we need to start looking more at the prevention side of it.
'How do we make sure people don't start families that are unstable in the first place? I don't think that government needs to get overly involved in that.
'Society, and there is such a thing as society, needs to have some form of supporting families as well.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Sharp End, July 8th
Cause to celebrate? It's been one year since Labour's landslide election and a wipeout for Conservative MPs in Wales.


NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump administration sued after it ends program for 60,000 Hondurans, Nicaraguans and Nepalese
A group of immigrants with temporary legal status in the U.S. is suing the Trump administration after the Department of Homeland Security terminated the legal protections for some 60,000 people from Nicaragua, Honduras and Nepal. Seven plaintiffs from the affected countries, along with the National TPS Alliance, an advocacy group, have filed the lawsuit against DHS and the agency's secretary, Kristi Noem, alleging that the terminations were, at least in part, motivated by racial animus and violated the Constitution. Nicaragua, Honduras and Nepal have experienced natural disasters that have made it unsafe for their nationals to return home, leading to Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations. On Monday, the Trump administration terminated the designation for those from Nicaragua, with a DHS spokesperson saying in a news release that the status 'never meant to last a quarter of a century.' It also terminated TPS for Honduras, with Noem similarly saying that TPS was designed to be 'just that — temporary.' Just over a month ago, DHS terminated the designation for Nepal. The terminations, the lawsuit said, will impose 'extraordinary and irreparable harm' on TPS holders if the decisions aren't reversed. 'I work in a hospital, caring for cardiac patients. I've been doing it the 'right way' the whole time,' Jhony Silva, a Honduran TPS holder and a plaintiff in the case, said in a release from the ACLU of Southern California, one of the legal groups representing the plaintiffs. 'Now, I am facing losing my job, the ability to care for my family, and the only home I've ever known.' Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said the lawsuit 'ignores the President's constitutionally vested powers.' 'TPS was never intended to be a de facto asylum program, yet that's how previous administrations have used it for decades,' McLaughlin said in a statement. 'The Trump administration is restoring integrity to our immigration system to keep our homeland and its people safe. We have the law, the facts, and common sense on our side.' The lawsuit alleges that Noem, Trump and other officials made 'numerous' statements against non-white, non-European TPS holders based on their perceived race, ethnicity and national origin. In many cases, the suit said, officials disparaged TPS holders as 'criminals.' Under Noem's tenure, DHS has criticized the program for being responsible for, the suit says, allowing 'half a million poorly vetted migrants into this country — from MS-13 gang members to known terrorists and murderers' — referring to a DHS social media post from May after the Supreme Court allowed Trump to revoke TPS from nationals of four countries. However, the suit points out, TPS is available only to those who are already in the U.S. And anyone with more than one misdemeanor conviction does not qualify for the status. The suit also claims that the Trump administration's decision was based on predetermined political decisions and that DHS failed to give TPS holders a sufficient transition period. According to DHS announcements, TPS holders are being given 60 days before they will be stripped of their legal status and work authorizations. This means those from Nepal will have their status until Aug. 5. The lawsuit alleges that DHS violated the Administrative Procedure Act by abandoning the longstanding practice of providing a transition period of at least six months when terminating TPS designations in place for more than three years, as they were in the cases of all three countries. 'This administration is forcing TPS holders — and their U.S. citizen children — to make an impossible choice,' said Ahilan Arulanantham, co-director of the UCLA Center for Immigration Law & Policy (CILP), another group representing the plaintiffs. 'They cannot safely go back to their country of nationality, leaving their families and communities, and yet they will be stripped of the right to live and work in the U.S.' While DHS has determined that the countries are environmentally safe to return to, critics say that the terminations could upend lives and put TPS holders in danger. The State Department has designated Nicaragua as a country Americans should reconsider traveling to, citing crime, the arbitrary enforcement of laws, the risk of wrongful detention and the limited availability of health care. Honduras has received the same designation, and the State Department recommends increased caution when traveling in Nepal because of the potential for political violence. The lawsuit follows several others that have tried to block the Trump administration's attempts to end TPS. The National TPS Alliance, in addition to seven Venezuelan nationals, sued the administration in February after the government rescinded protections for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans living in the U.S.


North Wales Live
5 hours ago
- North Wales Live
Llandudno library closure vote unanimous as councillor accused of 'amateur dramatics'
A council cabinet unanimously voted in favour of closing Llandudno's Mostyn Street library today, in a move that will see the service relocated to Venue Cymru. The vote was taken after several cabinet members responded angrily to Cllr Louise Emery's revelation at last week's scrutiny committee that figures representing savings - used to support the library move - were incorrect. Conwy will now look to close Llandudno library in the next two years and target £10 million of UK Government funds to pay for a revamped Venue Cymru, branded as an arts centre. The decision comes despite a public consultation revealing 76% of 999 residents worried about access to the new library location, as well as a petition against the move being signed by around 1,100 people. Last week Cllr Louise Emery told a scrutiny committee that a £46,000 saving, listed as an electricity bill, was incorrect, as Conwy was only liable for 38% of that bill as other tenants are based in the Mostyn Street site. The saving of £126,000 has now dropped to £116,000, with Conwy owed electricity payments for 2023, 2024, and 2025 Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox. But despite Cllr Emery only receiving the figures 'hours' before last week's economy and place scrutiny meeting, some cabinet members criticised her for the manner she delivered the news that the figures were incorrect. Speaking in favour of the revamp, Conwy's Labour deputy leader, Cllr Emily Owen accused Cllr Emery, a Conservative, of 'amateur dramatics'. Cllr Owen said she recognised the strength of feeling towards the library but added: "Whilst there is obviously genuine concern about relocating the library in Llandudno, it would be remiss of me not to point out that this is also being used for political purposes. I do find it a bit of a bizarre situation where we have Tory councillors from Llandudno that now don't want a £10m investment in their own town." She continued: "At scrutiny, Cllr Louise (Cllr Emery) did show her love for the arts and amateur dramatics by pulling out the paper copy of the utility bill for the current library. I am disappointed in the way that was handled and how she treated our finance officer during that meeting and worry that she's withheld information about us being owed money so that we can perform in the chamber." "But despite how it was handled, she did raise a valid point about the utility bills, and after some investigations, I can confirm she was correct in stating that Conwy Council is only responsible for 38% of that energy cost incurred." Councillor Chris Cater said: "This is a modern building which will have a reduced environmental impact and reduce carbon (use). So that is all to be welcomed. So I do support this. I have had letters from constituents against the move, but I don't think they understand fully that there is more to it than just moving the library out of the old building on Mostyn Street.' Cllr Nigel Smith added: 'I was really dismayed on Wednesday. Local members criticised this gift, this improvement, this new library for Llandudno, and the possibility of one, which will be involved in a current bid of £10m or maybe even more to help support an improve one of our biggest assets in the county, the Venue Cymru.' Cllr Smith then waded in on Cllr Emery for questioning the utility bills at the previous meeting and 'trying to embarrass' Conwy's head of finance Ms Amanda Hughes. 'I felt sorry for Amanda (Ms Hughes, head of finance), the fact they were keeping information back and trying to embarrass our head of finance. It is not on,' he said. Cllr Julie Fallon said it was a 'tough one' as she 'completely understood the strength of feeling' in the town towards the library as it had been there a very long time and held a 'special place in her heart'. But she added the council had faced 'cuts after cuts' for years and were trying to make services sustainable, appropriate, and accessible, describing the current library building as beautiful but not fit for purpose. Conservative leader Cllr Cheryl Carlisle stepped in to defend Cllr Louise Emery, who was away on council business representing Llandudno. She said: 'Cllr Louise is currently travelling back from representing Llandudno in town twinning so isn't able to speak today. I do resent Cllr Emily's (Cllr Owen) accusation that it is political. Surely, she realises that these are Llandudno councillors standing up for their high street and their residents. I don't see what is wrong with that. That is democracy, surely. 'That is what we are all here for. To represent our people. And also to accuse Cllr Louise (Emery) of being theatrical, that is also beneath the deputy leader (Cllr Owen). The financial information that Cllr Louise requested was only produced a few hours before the meeting, so she had no time to meet with officers or cabinet members. And what a good job she did challenge the figures and the financial information!' Leader Cllr Charlie McCoubrey, though, said Conwy had been forced to make £26m of savings over the last three years, adding this was not a difficult decision when proposing cabinet backed the report. This was seconded by Cllr Cathy Augustine, and the cabinet voted unanimously in favour of the move. But Cllr David Carr said: 'Local people in Llandudno want the library to stay where it is. Maybe you should have listened to them.'