German immigration clampdown ruled illegal by federal court
's tough new migration approach, which involves turning asylum seekers back at the border, has been described as unlawful by Berlin's federal administrative court.
The ruling, which cannot be appealed, undercuts a pledge by Chancellor
Friedrich Merz
and his government, sworn in last month, to cut immigration numbers.
Monday's case was taken by three Somali nationals, two men and a woman, turned back on May 9th by German border police at the railway station in Frankfurt an der Oder to Poland.
The police, acting under a new regulation passed by the federal interior ministry, refused to allow the three to file for asylum in Germany and returned them to Poland the same day. The police sent them back, the government ruled in court, because they were coming from a safe third country.
READ MORE
On Tuesday the court said the border police actions, and the regulation they were following, ignored necessary legal steps and violated asylum provisions.
[
EU warns Poland for suspending Dublin migrant regulation
Opens in new window
]
'Persons who express the wish to seek asylum while at a border check on German territory may not be sent back,' the court ruled. At least, it added, until it is known which European country has frontline responsibility for their asylum application under the EU's Dublin system.
Until Monday the interior ministry had cited emergency provisions and a danger to public order as its justifications for setting aside EU law. In court it argued that one quarter of the 230,000 asylum applications filed last year in Europe were filed in Germany.
The court dismissed this argument, saying 'it remains open what these numbers mean for public order or security'. It also criticised the unilateral nature of Berlin's new policy as contradicting the 'loyal co-operation' required of EU member states 'to look, in a serious way, for common solutions'.
The opposition Green Party called the ruling as a 'severe defeat' for Chancellor Merz and his interior minister,
Alexander Dobrindt
.
[
Germany increases border checks: Alexander Dobrindt oversees radical policy shift
Opens in new window
]
'Merz and Dobrindt ignored the warnings and broke EU law, and have now run into a brick wall,' said Katharina Dröge, Green co-leader.
Green Bundestag parliamentary floor leader Irene Mihalic called the ruling a warning to the government 'to abide by the law in the future and not to knowingly exceed its own powers for populist purposes'.
Germany's police union also welcomed the ruling, saying 'the approach was legally iffy from the start'.
Immigration lobby group Pro Asyl said an 'unlawful practice of national unilateral action in asylum policy has failed, this nonsense must now come to an end'.
Mr Dobrindt insisted on Monday evening he would stick to his policy.
'There is a legal basis for it, regardless of individual case rulings,' he said, adding that the three plaintiffs had sought to enter Germany three times previously.
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
No increase in aid reaching people of Gaza despite Israel commitment, EU report says
There has been no 'tangible' increase in the amount of humanitarian aid getting to the people of Gaza , despite recent commitments Israel gave to the European Union , an internal report has said. Earlier this month, senior EU politicians said the Israeli government had agreed to let 'substantially' more food and other vital aid into Gaza, to help alleviate the dire conditions facing Palestinian civilians in the besieged enclave. Kaja Kallas, the EU's top foreign affairs envoy, brokered the agreement with Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar. It included commitments to let significantly more aid trucks into Gaza, open extra border crossings and restore power to a plant providing clean drinking water. The deal came days before the EU's 27 foreign ministers were due to consider possible sanctions against Israel, in response to the 22-month war it has waged in Gaza. READ MORE An internal EU report on the situation in Gaza said there had been no improvement on the ground. 'Despite recent agreement with Israel to increase aid delivery to Gaza there is still no tangible increase, with important stocks of relief items stuck and piling up at the borders,' it said. The small flow of trucks carrying food and other supplies faced problems distributing the aid, due to looting and encounters with large crowds desperate for food, it said. Israel, which controls all supplies entering Gaza, denies it is responsible for shortages of food. The report, written by EU officials based in Jerusalem, said the humanitarian situation in Gaza 'continues to be beyond catastrophic'. Ms Kallas and officials from the European Commission have declined to publicly outline key details of the recent aid agreement, such as how many more trucks Israel had committed to allow into Gaza. EU officials believe about 20 aid trucks had been permitted to cross into Gaza each day prior to the agreement. [ Israeli cruise ship turned away from Greek island by Gaza war protest Opens in new window ] Officials working for Ms Kallas briefed diplomats from EU states on Wednesday, stating 132 trucks had been allowed into Gaza by Israeli authorities, over a recent five-day period, two sources said. It is understood officials acknowledged this was well below the level of aid Israel had promised to allow into the enclave. Ambassadors from France, the Netherlands, Ireland, Luxembourg, Spain, Belgium and Slovenia called for firmer action from the EU during the meeting. The suspension of an EU-Israel free trade deal is one option available to the union, or economic sanctions on Israeli politicians, an arms embargo on weapons sales to Israel, and restrictions on trade coming from illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank and other occupied Palestinian territories. EU negotiators had pressed Israel to commit to allow much more aid into Gaza, in the event of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas militants based in the strip. Humanitarian organisations and aid agencies continued to issue increasingly stark warnings about the lack of food and water on the ground. A recent statement signed by 111 organisations, including Mercy Corps, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Refugees International, said Israel's restriction on aid was seeing mass starvation spread across the enclave. 'The Government of Israel's restrictions, delays and fragmentation under its total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death,' the organisations said. At least 59,000 Palestinians have been killed during Israel's bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza, which began after Hamas militants attacked southern Israel on October 7th, 2023. Israel blocked all deliveries of food, fuel and medicine into Gaza for 11 weeks. This led a growing number of EU states to call for the bloc to put pressure on Israel to change course. A widely condemned system of aid distribution introduced since then has resulted in hundreds of Palestinians being shot and killed by Israeli forces while trying to reach distribution sites.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
What the proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers
The proposed EU budget post-2027 has caused waves in the agricultural sphere, with calls to action and pushback coming from all angles. The main worry is the proposed absorption of the CAP under the National and Regional Partnerships Plans (NRPP). The European Commission advertises this move to be more efficient and have a stronger, impactful use of EU funding with agricultural policy 'at its core'. Concerns have been raised revolving around whether money normally allocated to the CAP will be redirected and funnelled into other sections of the NRPP. Initially proposed for the NRPP is €865bn within the 2028-2034 EU budget. Billy Kelleher, MEP for Ireland South, said: 'The 21% cut in CAP funding will cause havoc among farm families in Ireland and across the [European] Union.' Another concern within the proposal is that the income support of €300bn ringfenced for EU farmers post 2027. This is a drop from the €387bn previously set aside for farmers within the current budget. This would mean the nearly 120,000 farmers who avail of EU-funded supports such as Basic Income Support for Sustainability (BISS) or Complimentary Redistributive Income Support for Sustainability (CRISS) could experience drops in the amount they receive. Billy Kelleher, MEP for Ireland South, said: The 21% cut in CAP funding will cause havoc among farm families in Ireland and across the [European] Union… "Perhaps it's a negotiating tactic to force member states to increase their national contributions or to agree on new own resources. Either way, it will make farmers deeply worried about their future viability,' said . According to the 2024 National Farm Survey conducted by Teagasc, direct payments amounted to 60% contribution to a family farm income in 2024 across the sectors examined (dairy, cattle rearing, cattle other, sheep, and tillage). This cut will have significant effects on farming families' incomes and livelihoods if a ringfence of €300bn is agreed. A 'Unity Safety Net' of €900m per year of the budget — a total of €6.3bn — is proposed for emergencies within the sector. This is meant to help ensure stable markets and to assist in times of crisis such as extreme weather events, geopolitical situations or persistent structural challenges for EU-based farmers. With the proposals of a single 'rule book', streamlined payments and a young and new farmers' 'starter pack' for targeted supports could benefit small enterprise farmers and young farmers entering or inheriting within the industry, reducing administrative burdens and offering lump sums. Overview is vague on eco schemes Notably vague within the proposal overview made public by the EU Commission was any mention of farming sustainability and eco schemes. Mentions of sustainability schemes and practices were made with no clear outline or budget proposed. In contrast, a leaked document that was circulated before the initial official proposal made several mentions of eco and sustainability schemes with recommendations to enhance these and similar areas for farmers to receive support based on uptake of beneficial practices. Areas outlined in this leaked document suggested support be provided for farmers or individuals who commit to climate change adaptations, climate change mitigations, soil health, preservation of biodiversity, and development of organic farming. Ireland's presidency of the EU Council With the uproar surrounding the proposed EU budget post-2027, the Irish presidency of the EU Council, occurring in the second semester of 2026, will take place throughout a period of finalisation of the 2028-2034 EU budget. Ultimately, this will have farmers and their organisations alike watching the Department of Agriculture closely. The Irish presidency of the EU Council will mean Irish ministers chairing council meetings, and our very own agriculture minister will chair talks that will focus on the finalisation of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) in the context of agriculture. 'We'll negotiate through this proposal line by line and we'll have a very significant role to play during our EU Presidency in the second half of next year,' said agricultural minister, Martin Heydon, in a recent press release regarding the formation of a CAP consultation committee. The last Irish presidency occurred in 2013, which oversaw the agreement of the MFF of the time. Agreements were also reached on the seventh Environmental Action Programme and the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. Mr Heydon opened the first meeting of the CAP Consultation Committee, made up of key stakeholders, on July 17, to discuss the prospective CAP and EU Budget post-2027. CAP consultation committee The committee contains representatives from: Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine, the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage (including NPWS), the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation, the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment, the Department of Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht; The Agricultural Consultants Association, An Taisce, Bord Bia, the County and City Management Association, the Environmental Pillar, the EPA, Ibec; Irish Cattle & Sheep Farmers Association (ICSA), Irish Co-operative Organisation Society (ICOS), Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA), Irish Farmers Association (IFA), Irish Grain Growers Association, Irish Natura & Hill Farmers Association, Irish Organic Association; Irish Rural Link (also representing National Rural Network), Local Development Company Network, Macra na Feirme, National Biodiversity Data Centre, National CAP Network, academic members (UCD and UCC), Teagasc, and Women in Agriculture Stakeholder Group. Mr Heydon said: 'The committee will play a crucial role in ensuring that the CAP reform process is transparent, inclusive, and responsive to the needs of various stakeholders within the agricultural and rural community.' He concluded: 'The Commission proposals for new CAP structures in a new MFF architecture will require careful analysis. This seems like a very big change, but in fact this announcement marks the starting point in a long negotiating process. "I will continue to work very closely with Commissioner Hansen, the European Parliament, and my EU counterparts to ensure that the end result delivers the best possible outcome for Irish farmers and the rural communities in which they live.' Following the committee's meeting, a spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine informed the Irish Examiner that: 'Committee members were briefed on the European Commission announcements, bearing in mind that the detailed CAP legislative proposals have not yet been published. Committee members gave their initial reactions to the announcements and outlined their priorities for the CAP negotiations. Opening the meeting, Mr Heydon emphasised that the commission proposals are only the first step in a lengthy negotiation process. He emphasised that stakeholders on the committee will be essential partners in the process of working to secure a robust CAP that delivers for Ireland and for all member states.'
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Anti-graft agencies vote 'hampers' Ukraine's EU path, says Germany
Germany has said that a vote by Ukrainian lawmakers to remove the independence of two anti-corruption bodies in the war-torn country "hampers Ukraine's way towards the EU". "I expect Ukraine to continue with determination its efforts in combating corruption," Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said in a post on X. According to Germany's Bild daily, Mr Wadephul spoke on the phone with his Ukrainian counterpart Andriy Sybiha this morning urging him to continue the fight against corruption there. Mr Wadephul also said he had met the heads of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), the two agencies affected, during a recent visit to Kyiv. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signed a bill yesterday, revoking the autonomy of the two anti-corruption agencies, a proposal that has sparked protests in Kyiv and alarm among the country's international backers. Critics say the legislation consolidates power in Mr Zelensky's hands and will allow government meddling in high-profile graft cases. The European Union called the decision a "serious step back", while hundreds gathered in central Kyiv to oppose the measure. Ukraine lodged a bid to join the EU in the aftermath of Russia's assault in February 2022, with accession talks kicking off in June 2024. The country has taken a tough stance on corruption in recent years, both as a prerequisite to joining the EU and to reassure allies who have sent wartime aid, but investigators say it remains a serious problem.
