Analysis: Both men are constrained by a shared need to please conservative Americans
The war Trump is waging against Murdoch over the Journal's coverage, including a US$10 billion ($16.6b) lawsuit he filed last week, has been billed as a Battle of the Titans.
Given their stature atop conservative politics and media, it is certainly that.
In suing Murdoch, Trump, who has extracted multimillion-dollar settlements in suits against ABC News and CBS News, is taking on the most battle-tested, self-assured, and politically astute mogul in media.
But the continued affection for Trump among Fox News hosts makes it clear that while this is a fight between giants, it is like nothing found in the works of Homer or Hesiod.
That's because the two men are constrained by the one thing that has kept them linked across 10 years of personal comity and conflict: their shared need to please conservative Americans.
For Murdoch, those conservatives are the most important constituency of his empire.
They provide a committed base audience for Fox News — his leading revenue generator — and they expect the network to mirror their own loyalty to Trump in return.
It explains why Fox News largely avoided repeating the Journal's scoop or saying much about Trump's lawsuit against the Journal.
Although loyalty to Trump among Fox viewers has appeared unshakable, Trump clearly wants to keep it that way.
They are his core voters, many of them glued to Fox more than to the Maga multiverse of social media and podcast influencers who make up the harder-edged, ideological wing of his movement.
Trump's appreciation for the Fox audience has been evident in his decision to populate his new Administration with former Fox hosts and contributors.
It has also shown up in the many Truth Social messages he has posted since he sued Murdoch, directing his followers to watch Fox News segments.
Trump's ire is exclusively trained on Murdoch and the Journal for moving ahead with what Trump called a 'fake' story, according to a person with knowledge of Trump's views about the feud.
The article focused on a 'bawdy' birthday message the Journal said Trump sent to Epstein in 2003.
Trump, this person said, considers Fox News — and for that matter, the New York Post, another business owned by Murdoch — to be in a separate, friendlier category, where he has warm relations with various personalities.
That helps explain why even as Trump filed his lawsuit he wrote on Truth Social: 'Everybody should watch Sean Hannity tonight. He really gets it!' What Hannity got that evening: Trump's was 'the single most consequential, transformational presidency in our lifetime.'
Hannity, who is happy to acknowledge his admiration for his friend, has avoided mentioning the Journal article on his show.
But another Murdoch-world friendly, Miranda Devine at the New York Post, went so far as to call the article a 'nothingburger'.
The relationship between Trump and Murdoch has always been complicated.
When Trump first told Murdoch he was running for president, at a lunch at Murdoch's New York offices, Murdoch didn't hide his scepticism. Murdoch did not see Trump as a president.
The Fox News audience thought otherwise, Murdoch soon discovered.
And as someone who built his empire by giving his customers what they want, he came on board as network hosts rallied to help place Trump in the White House in 2016.
An awkward friendship blossomed, as both came to enjoy gossiping and comparing notes over the phone — satisfying Murdoch's thirst for access to the Oval Office and Trump's craving for acceptance from his fellow billionaire conservative.
The 2020 election wedged them apart anew. Trump was furious at Murdoch for refusing to block Fox News' projection that Trump had lost the pivotal state of Arizona.
Murdoch was furious at Trump's stolen-election conspiracies, which drew sympathetic coverage among some Fox hosts and resulted in a US$787.5 million payout to settle a defamation suit from Dominion Voting Systems, a company at the centre of the false narrative.
The two did not speak for a long period after the election as Murdoch's outlets lined up behind a would-be challenger to Trump, Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida. But the audience still wanted Trump, forcing the two back together last year.
Murdoch was on the dais at Trump's second inauguration and appeared with the President before cameras inside the Oval Office in early February. Even then, though, there were some signs of the tension that has exploded into view in the past week.
Speaking with reporters as Murdoch sat nearby, Trump called the media mogul one of the 'most talented people in the world'.
Then a reporter in the room asked the President about an editorial in the Journal that accused him of starting 'The Dumbest Trade War in History'.
It was one of many critical editorials the Journal, whose opinion page has long favoured free trade and an opposition to tariffs, has published on the Administration's economic policy and other topics.
Trump grimaced and said of Murdoch: 'I'm going to have to talk to him about that'. He added, 'I've been right over the Wall Street Journal many times'.
In the weeks that followed, the Journal's editorial board expressed numerous other criticisms of the Administration, even as it offered praise at times, too.
It called Trump's decision to pull security for several former national security officials 'a new low'; gave him a new name, 'Tariff Man'; asked if he would 'please take a summer vacation for the good of the nation'; and suggested the Federal Communications Commission was operating as Trump's 'personal protection racket'.
The two men continued to talk on the phone throughout, trading information and gossip.
A pivotal interaction, though, came last week, with the Journal's reporting on Epstein.
Trump has said he directly asked Murdoch to spike the article, arguing that it wasn't true.
Murdoch, in Trump's telling, said he would 'take care of it'. Murdoch's representatives declined to comment on that assertion.
Murdoch, though, has shown a pattern of refusing to intervene to kill his journalists' stories.
Dow Jones, the Journal's parent company, expressed 'full confidence in the rigour and accuracy of our reporting' and vowed to 'vigorously defend against any lawsuit'.
That leaves many progressives and First Amendment advocates looking to an unlikely protagonist.
'Is this what we have come to,' Tina Brown, the author and former top magazine editor, wrote this week, 'depending on Rupert Murdoch to stand up for press freedom?'
She predicted he would, but the ultimate outcome may depend on the viewers-slash-voters who are so central to Murdoch's and Trump's power.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Jim Rutenberg
Photograph by: Hiroko Masuike
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Role the former adviser took in stoking the controversy shows he's still a political risk for Trump
And even if Musk's goal was merely to stoke the controversy without necessarily settling it, his mission has been accomplished - and then some. Right-wing influencers and conspiracy theorists have alleged without evidence for years that the federal government suppressed information to protect famous associates of Epstein, who they assert may have participated in his sex crimes. The controversy boiled over earlier this month, when Trump's Justice Department announced it would disclose no more documents related to the case. Perhaps most damning of all was a Wall Street Journal report last week that Attorney-General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May that his name appeared in the files multiple times. 'Elon was right,' tweeted financier Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly served as communications director during the first Trump White House. 'He knew it!' Late Show host Stephen Colbert joked. 'I always said. I always said that he's a good guy who's right about everything.' The uncontained controversy threatens to further fray Musk and Trump's torn relationship. And it reveals how Musk remains a potent political risk for Trump months after he publicly left the White House, where he enjoyed unprecedented access and insight into the President's life as the so-called 'first buddy', rarely leaving his side during the transition and early months of his second term. Neither the White House nor Musk immediately responded to a request for comment. White House communications director Steven Cheung called the Wall Street Journal report on the Bondi meeting 'another fake news story'. The Trump Administration also sued the Journal after the outlet reported that Trump submitted a sketch of a naked woman bearing his name as part of a bawdy birthday gift for Epstein. Epstein was found dead in his jail cell before he faced trial on sex-trafficking charges. Officials ruled his death a suicide. Musk has not commented on the Wall Street Journal report, and he deleted the original tweet that claimed Trump appeared in the Epstein files. But he has fanned outrage over Trump's decision to not release the files in posts on X, using his megaphone on a platform he owns to keep the issue in the social media feeds of his 223 million followers, even as Trump unsuccessfully tried to convince his supporters to move on from the case. This month, Musk accused the Trump Administration of engaging in 'a cover up (obviously)'. 'So many powerful people want that list suppressed,' he wrote in a separate post. Musk has also asked Grok, the artificial intelligence chatbot built by his start-up xAI, to weigh in on the matter several times. 'Please make a thorough list of all those who should be investigated for possible rape of underage girls provided by Epstein,' Musk wrote. 'Think hard and research thoroughly. Order by probable severity and frequency of their crimes.' X has become more popular among conservative users after Musk purchased it in 2022 and unravelled many of the company's defences against disinformation. Some of the most high-profile skirmishes over the Epstein files got their start on the social media platform, originating from Maga influencers such as Laura Loomer, who had been banned from the site but was later restored by Musk. Trending topics on X have included the hashtag '#TrumpIsAPedoRapist'. At some moments, Musk has paused his taunts to defend the President. Following the Journal report on the naked sketch, Musk said: 'It really doesn't sound like something Trump would say tbh'. Yet Musk stoked tensions with the White House as Trump rolled out a raft of AI executive orders and appeared at a conference on Thursday hosted by some of Musk's longtime friends and business partners who co-host the 'All-In' podcast, including AI and crypto tsar David Sacks. Musk had previously acted as a bridge between Trump and the tech world, and his absence was palpable at the event. Allies of Musk serving in the Trump Administration have had to tread carefully, largely declining to comment on the feud between the President and one of the world's most powerful business leaders. In a sign of the awkwardness, the 'All-In' show opted not to discuss the public feud between Musk and Trump in June. The Trump-Musk relationship has long been marked by contradictions and inconsistencies, and that has not changed. Trump signed an executive order that bars federal agencies from using 'woke AI', which appeared to be a boon to Grok, as xAI instructs the agent to prioritise 'truth-seeking' over political correctness. But when asked whether Trump wanted xAI to receive contracts, Leavitt responded, 'I don't think so, no'. Trump on Truth Social appeared to walk back previous threats against Musk's companies and wrote that he would not take away large subsidies from the billionaire's businesses, which include SpaceX and Tesla. 'I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!,' Trump wrote. 'The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us.' Musk did not accept the olive branch, responding that the 'subsidies' Trump was referring to do not exist. He criticised Trump for slashing tax credits for electric vehicle companies in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' while retaining subsidies for the oil and gas industries. He also warned that it would be impossible for the federal Government to cut its ties with SpaceX. 'SpaceX won the Nasa contracts by doing a better job for less money,' Musk wrote. 'Moving those contracts to other aerospace companies would leave astronauts stranded and taxpayers on the hook for twice as much!'
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Not only are rising seas causing people to leave, but warming waters are forcing out tuna
By morning's end, the pair had caught eight tuna - a haul far smaller than when Petaia's father taught him to fish 30 years earlier. 'We have to spend longer and go farther to get them,' the 48-year-old said as the fishermen unloaded their catch. 'I'm not sure there will be any tuna left by the time I'm my uncle's age,' added Smoliner, 22. Tuna is a pillar of life in the Pacific, where for centuries people have braved the ocean to bring back yellowfin, skipjack, bigeye and albacore for their families. In recent decades, as global demand for tuna has soared, Pacific Island nations including Tuvalu have propped up their struggling economies by selling licences to allow international fishing companies to trawl their vast exclusive economic zones. These seas provide as much as one-third of the world's tuna supply. But climate change is warming the world's oceans at an accelerating rate, threatening livelihoods. Scientists predict that climate change will push tuna away from Pacific Island nations and towards the high seas, where wealthier countries with large fishing fleets - China, Japan, South Korea and the United States - will catch them without paying licence fees. It is yet another climate danger for a country - population 10,000 - whose existence is already threatened by rising seas, increasingly powerful storms, and a potential exodus of people. 'It's ironic that the ocean, which has been the sustainer of our livelihood and economy, suddenly poses all these threats to us,' Tuvalu's Prime Minister, Feleti Teo, said in an interview here. Ranol Smoliner, right, and his uncle Kauaka Petaia fish for tuna in the Pacific Ocean near Funafuti, Tuvalu, in early April. Photo / Carolyn Van Houten, the Washington Post This low-lying atoll nation has become a premonition of climate change. Its leaders have made desperate pleas - including one delivered while thigh-deep in water - about the existential threat of rising sea levels. The potential exodus of fish threatens to strip Tuvalu and other Pacific Island nations of the very money they need to fight the impacts of global warming. About 60% of Tuvalu's locally generated government revenue comes from fees foreign countries pay to fish for tuna in its waters, Teo said. That revenue has plunged by about 40% over the past five or so years, denting the tiny nation's overall budget by almost 6%. Scientists say it's hard to know how much of that recent drop is due to climate change as opposed to natural migration linked to ocean cycles. But scientific modelling suggests Tuvalu could lose one-quarter of its tuna by 2050. Efforts are under way to help Tuvalu and 13 of its neighbours track how tuna populations are shifting and to demand remuneration. They were recently awarded more than US$100 million ($166m) from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) to help adapt. 'Pacific Island countries are fighting hard to establish our rights to be compensated for fish that are caught in the high seas,' Teo said. 'If we are able to definitively assert that the stock that used to occur in our EEZ is now in the high seas as a result of climate change, then that will strengthen our case.' Warming waters are also bleaching local corals, depleting reef fish that Tuvaluans depend on for food. Some of the fund grant will go towards fish aggregation devices: floating structures that help lure larger ocean fish, including tuna, closer to shore for locals to catch. Coral bleaching also disrupts the natural wave protection of atolls like Tuvalu and the replenishment of their shores, said Arthur Webb, who led the Tuvalu Coastal Adaptation Project to reclaim swathes of desperately needed land in the capital. Each day, a dredging machine in Funafuti's lagoon sucks up sand and pumps it onto reclaimed areas. Sand is also pumped into large bags that are stacked to form protective seawalls. The new land is left to settle before building, which has yet to begin. Tuvalu's ring-shaped land mass covers only 26sqkm and is less than 1.5km across at its widest point, sometimes narrowing to a mere 18m. Photo / Carolyn Van Houten, the Washington Post Tuvalu is roughly 1.5m above mean sea level. Its waters are now rising by about 2.5cm every five years - well above the global average - and estimated to reach 60 to 90cm by 2100, according to Moritz Wandres, an oceanographer with the Pacific Community. By 2060, once-in-50-year floods are predicted to occur every five years, rendering Tuvalu uninhabitable without large-scale adaptation efforts, Wandres said. King tides already routinely inundate much of Funafuti, where motorbikes splash through the water seeping up through the sandy ground. Tuvalu is preparing. It has amended its constitution to protect its statehood and maritime zones, even if it no longer has any land. And it announced a plan to clone itself in the metaverse, preserving its history and culture online. In 2023, Australia provided a more tangible escape plan when it created special visas, at least in part, to help up to 280 Tuvaluans per year escape the wrath of climate change. More than 80% of Tuvalu's population - or 8750 people - has applied for the visa, according to official Australian figures released last week. The predicted decline in tuna will only hasten the outflux. 'This is our only resource,' said Laitailiu Seono, a Fisheries Department officer, as he carved up tuna to be dried and sold. 'That's why we really want to look after them. No fish, no job.' Compounding Tuvalu's anxieties, the US Trump Administration has dealt Pacific Island nations another blow, suspending US$60m per year in South Pacific Tuna Treaty funds for the region - part of a long-standing deal to guarantee US fishing access. During his presidency, Joe Biden promised to double the tuna treaty funds in a bid to counteract China's efforts to woo Pacific Island countries. Instead, Teo said, Tuvalu had yet to receive roughly US$7m it had been counting on: 'A big hole in our projected revenue'. Children play on a seawall surrounding reclaimed land in Funafuti. Tuvalu, a low-lying island nation endangered by rising seas, is building up swathes of land for housing, even as many inhabitants contemplate leaving. Photo / Carolyn Van Houten, the Washington Post At the same time, President Donald Trump's decision to open up the 400,000-square-mile (1,100,000sqkm) Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument to commercial fishing suggested he could scrap the treaty altogether. Like other Trump Administration moves - pulling out of the Paris climate agreement, cutting US Agency for International Development funding and climate financing, and potentially putting travel restrictions on some Pacific countries, including Tuvalu - abandoning the treaty would hurt America's strategic interests and boost that of its stated rival, China, said Alan Tidwell, director of the Centre for Australian, New Zealand, and Pacific Studies at Georgetown University in the US. 'If the US pulls out totally from the Pacific, then someone has to fill that role,' agreed Teo, whose nation is one of only three in the region that still recognise Taiwan instead of China. 'And we know who is eager.' A State Department spokesperson said in an emailed statement that the department 'will continue … to align its activities and programmes with the foreign policy priorities of the president and the secretary.' When Kauaka Petaia returned to shore, his son Siuele was there to help him unload the tuna. The 27-year-old said he had no desire to follow in his father's footsteps. Instead, he would soon head to Australia to work in a meatpacking plant, where the pay is more certain. 'By 2030 or 2050,' he said, 'I don't know if tuna fishing will still be a job in Tuvalu.'
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
US and EU reach trade deal after Trump meets EU chief
world world politics 28 minutes ago The US and EU have just reached a trade deal, after talks between President Trump and the EU president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. Correspondent Nick Harper spoke to Ingrid Hipkiss.
