logo
Trump tariffs: Where do we stand after new levies unveiled – DW – 08/01/2025

Trump tariffs: Where do we stand after new levies unveiled – DW – 08/01/2025

DW20 hours ago
Just hours before an Aug. 1 deadline expired, US President Donald Trump imposed sweeping new tariffs on imports from global trading partners, escalating an aggressive trade policy aimed at reducing the US trade deficit.
In his election campaign, Donald Trump once said that "tariff is the most beautiful word in the dictionary." Now, after six months in office, the US president is eager to turn his very specific vision of global trade into reality.
With a move that shocked both politics and business across the world, Trump announced on April 2 that he would impose a "baseline tariff" of 10% on all goods imported to the United States.
In addition, goods from about 60 other trade partners would face so-called reciprocal tariffs that were even higher and meant as payback for the unfair trade policies of what Trump called "the worst offenders."
However, on July 31 Trump signed an executive order again imposing new, and even higher tariffs on scores of countries, citing emergency powers he said he is using to shrink the country's trade deficits with many of its trade partners.
The executive order lays out rates to be applied against nearly 70 countries, ranging from 10% to 41% for goods transshipped through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties.
In a minor reprieve that opens the door to further negotiations, the White House said the measures will take effect next week for most countries.
The order came after a flurry of tariff-related activity in previous weeks that saw some countries strike more favorable terms for trade with the US.On July 27, the US and the European Union agreed that European goods imported to the US would face a 15% baseline tariff. This includes the EU's crucial automobile sector, which had been subject to a 25% levy since Trump took office earlier in January.
By contrast, the EU will charge US firms no duties at all, and has pledged to buy US energy worth $750 billion (€656 billion), as well as make investments in the US of around $600 billion, according to the White House.
The agreement, which still needs to be signed off by all 27 EU members, has already come under strong criticism. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said this week the EU had capitulated, describing Sunday as a "dark day."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The United Kingdom was the first country to strike a trade deal with Washington in May.
British products will be subject to a 10% base rate, with exceptions for some industries. The UK is still negotiating exemptions for its steel and aluminium products from the 25% rate in force. In return, the UK had to open its market further to US ethanol and beef.
Under a deal struck in July, Japan's exports to the US will be taxed at 15%, including automobiles, an industry accounting for 30% of Japanese exports to the US in 2024.
Tariffs of 50% on Japanese steel and aluminium will continue to apply and the White House said that under the deal, Japan would make an unspecified $550 billion investments in the US.
With regard to South Korea, recent negotiations have resulted in a 15% baseline tariff on all imports from that country — down from a threatened 25% for one of the US's top-10 trading partner and key Asian ally.
Trump said Wednesday that South Korea had also agreed to invest $350 billion in US projects and to purchase $100 billion of liquefied natural gas and other energy products.
Furthermore, South Korea will accept American products, including automobiles and agricultural goods into its markets and impose no import duties on them, he added.
Washington has also concluded trade deals with the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia and Pakistan.
Products from the Philippines — a major exporter of high-tech items and apparel — will face a 19% levy. Vietnam was able to lower a threatened reciprocal tariff of 49% under a deal reached in early July. A main exporter of clothing and shoes to the US, Vietnam will see its shipments subject to a 20% tariff.
Indonesian exports to the US will be taxed at 19% and, according to Washington, nearly all US goods will be able to enter Indonesia tariff-free.
Pakistan, which was facing a potential 29% tariff under Trump's April 2 announcement, said Thursday it had struck a deal that would result in lower tariffs, as well as an agreement in which Washington would help develop the country's oil reserves.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
China — the world's second-largest economy — is a special case. Washington and Beijing had raised tariffs on each other's goods to more than 100% before temporarily lowering rates for a 90-day period. That pause is set to end on August 12.
China has taken an aggressive stance in response to Trump's brief threat of imposing a 145% levy on imports, retaliating with tariffs of its own on US goods and blocking the sale of vital rare earth minerals and components used by American defense and high-tech manufacturers.
Countries without bilateral trade agreements will soon face reciprocal tariffs ranging from 25% to 50%, with a baseline of 15% to 20% for any not making a deal.
Among the tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39% duty. The Swiss government said Friday it would negotiate to avoid the higher levy, which will potentially hammer its key pharmaceutical industry. The new rate is up from the 31% previously threatened.
Brazil is one of the few major economies to run a trade deficit with the United States, meaning Brazil imports more from the US than it exports to the country.
Nevertheless, the US president has threatened to impose a 50% tariff on Brazil's products because of political differences. Trump called a current trial against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro a "witch hunt," and has demanded the release of the ultraconservative politician.
Brazil's current president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has in turn called Trump an "emperor" and said he didn't fear publicly criticizing Trump.
India, meanwhile, has drawn Trump's ire for its huge trade surplus with the US and its trade ties with Russia.
As a result, Trump announced on Wednesday that he would impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods, plus an additional "penalty" because of India's purchase of Russian oil that helps Moscow finance its war in Ukraine.
On his Truth Social platform, Trump also wrote that India "is our friend," but added its tariffs on US products "are far too high."
Canada and Mexico — two of the US' biggest trading partners — haven't been spared Trump's tariff threats either, even though trade between the three neighbors is governed by the US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement, negotiated during Trump's first term in office.
Earlier this month, Trump threatened to raise current tariffs on Mexico from 25% to 30% starting on Aug. 1, saying President Claudia Sheinbaum's government hadn't done enough to help secure their shared border.
Many goods certified under the USMCA free-trade pact, however, have remained exempt.
On Thursday, the US president extended Mexico's current rates for 90 days to allow more time for trade negotiations.
"The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border, Trump said in a Truth Social post, following a call with Sheinbaum.
On Thursday, the US president singled out Canada for a separate tariff hike raising levies for goods from the country fom 25% to 35% starting on Aug. 1.
Trump also warned of more trade consequences for Canada after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state. Trump's order also cited Canada's failure to "cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs" as well as its "retaliation" against his measures.
In March, Washington already imposed a 25% tariff on Canadian cars and auto parts, adding a 50% levy on steel and aluminium imports in June.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colombia: Ex-President Uribe gets 12 years' house arrest – DW – 08/02/2025
Colombia: Ex-President Uribe gets 12 years' house arrest – DW – 08/02/2025

DW

time8 minutes ago

  • DW

Colombia: Ex-President Uribe gets 12 years' house arrest – DW – 08/02/2025

Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe was found guilty of paying militia fighters to withdraw testimony linking him to right-wing paramilitary groups. Colombia's former President Alvaro Uribe was sentenced Friday to 12 years of house arrest for witness tampering and bribery in a case related to the country's prolonged civil war. The conservative politician was found guilty this week of paying jailed paramilitaries to retract testimony which connects Uribe to right-wing militia groups. In the decades since the outbreak of Colombia's civil war in the 1960s, paramilitary groups were responsible for mass killings, forced disappearances, and other atrocities. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The conviction marks the first time a Colombian head of state has been found guilty in a criminal trial. While prosecutors had demanded a 12-year prison term, Uribe was sentenced to 12 years of house arrest, fined $578,000 (€499,000) and barred from public office for more than eight years. The judge ordered Uribe to begin serving his sentence immediately at his rural estate in Rionegro, in northwestern Antioquia province. The ex-president's lawyers said Uribe would appeal the verdict. However, the court rejected Uribe's request to remain free while appealing the verdict, with the judge saying the former president might flee the country to avoid punishment. The 73-year-old politician has denied any wrongdoing. Following the Friday hearing, Uribe said "politics prevailed over the law in sentencing." During a nearly 6-month trial, prosecutors presented evidence that Uribe and his brother had helped found the Bloque Metro paramilitary group in the 1990s. At the time, Uribe was the governor of Antioquia, a key battleground in the civil war. One former paramilitary, who worked on the Uribe family ranch, told the court he was offered bribes and legal favors to retract his testimony. Another testified that Uribe's lawyer offered him money to speak favorably about Uribe. The court found that the ex-president had been trying to discredit a rival who had exposed Uribe's alleged paramilitary ties and had been sued by the then-president for libel. The libel case was dismissed in 2018 and a probe into Uribe's alleged conduct began. Uribe's supporters dismiss the case as a vendetta by leftwing rivals to tarnish his legacy as Colombia's most effective anti-guerrilla leader. This sentiment seems to be echoed by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said the trial was a "weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges." Analysts have said there could be cuts to US aid to Colombia in response. In turn, human rights groups hailed the conviction as a landmark moment for accountability in Colombia's long history of impunity. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The conflict began in 1964 when leftist guerrilla groups like FARC took up arms, demanding land reform and social justice. Fueled by funding from the illegal drug trade, the war involved guerrilla fighters, right-wing paramilitary groups, and government forces, each committing widespread violence and human rights abuses. Under Uribe's rule, the conflict intensified. His hardline tactics against leftist guerrillas led to mass killings, paramilitary abuse, and forced disappearances. During the conflict, an estimated 220,000 people died and millions more were displaced. A truth commission found that over 6,400 civilians were falsely labeled as guerrillas and executed by the military during Uribe's administration — a scandal known as the "false positives." A 2016 peace deal between the government and FARC ended the war officially, transforming the rebels into a political party. However, violence in Colombia persists to this day, driven by fragmented armed groups, drug trafficking, and ongoing struggles over land and power in rural areas.

German police expands use of Palantir surveillance software – DW – 08/02/2025
German police expands use of Palantir surveillance software – DW – 08/02/2025

DW

time8 minutes ago

  • DW

German police expands use of Palantir surveillance software – DW – 08/02/2025

Police and spy agencies are keen to combat criminality and terrorism with artificial intelligence. But critics say the CIA-funded Palantir surveillance software enables "predictive policing." The surveillance software called Gotham, developed by US company Palantir, is billed as an all-rounder: gigantic amounts of data are brought together at lightning speed. It only takes a few seconds to satisfy a police officer's curiosity: name, age, address, fines, criminal record. In combination with selected cellphones and the contents of scanned social media channels, a comprehensive profile of any person appears in an instant. With the help of artificial intelligence (AI), the surveillance program developed by the US technology company seems to make the dreams of police and intelligence agencies come true. Three of Germany's 16 federal states are already using Gotham: Bavaria, Hesse and North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden-Württemberg is planning to implement it soon. However, according to privacy advocates and civil rights organizations, it come with a big problem: Along with those suspected of a crime, it can also ensnare innocent people. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The German nonprofit group Society for Civil Rights (GFF) is fundamentally opposed to the use of programs like Palantir. That's why it has lodged a constitutional complaint against the large-scale data analysis in Bavaria. "Anyone who files a complaint, or who is a victim of a crime, or even just happens to be at the wrong place at the wrong time can attract police attention via this software," said GFF lawyer Franziska Görlitz. According to the Berlin-based organization, such unlimited analysis of data breaches the fundamental right to informational self-determination and the confidentiality of telecommunications, which is guaranteed in the German constitution. Whoever shows up on the police radar via this so-called data mining knows nothing about it. According to current law, police in Bavaria may use the Palantir software even when there is no indication of danger. In doing so, they are ignoring standards which apply in neighboring Hesse following a successful constitutional complaint by the GFF in 2023. The Federal Constitutional Court is yet to rule on a similar complaint against the state of North Rhine-Westphalia. The hacker association Chaos Computer Club supports the constitutional complaint against Bavaria. Its spokesperson, Constanze Kurz, spoke of a "Palantir dragnet investigation" in which police were linking separately stored data for very different purposes than those originally intended. "This is reason enough for this automated mass analysis not to become an everyday tool for police. But the collated data also lands in the deliberately opaque software of the US company Palantir, which the police will become dependent on for years," said Kurz. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The software company owned by US billionaire Peter Thiel made its software available to Bavaria in 2024; in Hesse, it has already been in use since 2017. The entrepreneur with German roots and New Zealand citizenship has a reputation for pursuing authoritarian goals and maintaining close contact with President Donald Trump and his political circle. US intelligence agencies and the military have long worked with the Gotham program. In Germany, the Palantir software goes by various names such as HessenData, or VeRA in Bavaria — an acronym for "overlapping systems research and analysis platform." According to German newspaper and public service broadcasters NDR and WDR, police had already used VeRA in about 100 cases by May 2025. One of these was the attack on the Israeli consulate in Munich in September 2024. The deputy chairman of the Police Union, Alexander Poitz, explained that automated data analysis made it possible to identify certain perpetrators' movements and provide officers with accurate conclusions about their planned actions. "That is how the Munich police were able to take control of the situation relatively quickly and bring it to a conclusion," Poitz told public broadcaster MDR. The broadcaster reported that the US company had been granted unlimited access to the data files of the Bavarian police to merge the systems. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The computer source code is stored on servers in Germany. However, critics point out that there is no guarantee against copies finding their way to the US, according to the media outlets. The obvious and growing dependence on foreign technology giants such as Palantir contradicts Germany's stated aspirations. The new government, comprising the center-right Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), wrote "digital policy is power politics" in its coalition agreement earlier this year, stating its goals: "We want a digitally sovereign Germany. To do this, we will dismantle digital dependencies by developing key technologies, securing standards, protecting and expanding digital infrastructure. We will achieve resilient value chains for key industries which are integrated at the European level, from raw materials to chips to hardware and software." Despite this, German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) seems to be keeping his options open, having so far refused to rule out purchasing Palantir software for the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Federal Police. Dobrindt is breaking with the line of his predecessor Nancy Faeser (SPD), who had rejected the use of these programs in 2023. The GFF's constitutional complaint against the use of Palantir appears to have strong public support. On German online petition platform Campact, an appeal for politicians to stop the use of the software in Germany was signed by more than 264,000 people within a week, as of July you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.

Elon Musk's Tesla ordered to pay $243 million over crash  – DW – 08/02/2025
Elon Musk's Tesla ordered to pay $243 million over crash  – DW – 08/02/2025

DW

time6 hours ago

  • DW

Elon Musk's Tesla ordered to pay $243 million over crash – DW – 08/02/2025

A Florida jury found a Tesla vehicle and its Autopilot software responsible for a fatal crash in the Florida Keys in 2019. The electric vehicle company, helmed by CEO Elon Musk, plans to appeal the decision. A jury in Miami on Friday said Tesla was liable in a 2019 fatal crash in the Florida Keys, and ordered the electric vehicle firm to pay $243 million (€209 million) to the family of a deceased victim and her injured boyfriend. In 2019, a driver in a Tesla Model S went through an intersection and drove into a couple who were standing next to their parked Chevrolet Tahoe. Naibel Benavides Leon, who was 22 years old, was killed in the crash, with her boyfriend Dillion Angulo heavily injured in the collision. The jury said Tesla is partly responsible for the death because its Autopilot technology failed. "Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," Brett Schreiber, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said after the verdict. Musk, the world's richest person, is Tesla's CEO and largest shareholder. Schreiber said the order "represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries." Tesla will have to pay $200 million in punitive damages, along with 33% ($43 million) of the $129 million in compensatory damages. The driver of the Tesla was looking for his phone after it had fallen to the floor of the vehicle, when the fatal crash occurred. The court argued that the Autopilot system should have been disabled once the driver was distracted. The driver allegedly did not receive any alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tesla plans to appeal the verdict, and has said the driver is solely responsible for the crash. "Today's verdict is wrong," the electric vehicle company said, while saying it "only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology." Tesla has said that drivers who are using the Autopilot still need to be fully attentive while driving and to keep their hands on the steering wheel. "Autopilot is a driver assistance system that is intended to be used only with a fully attentive driver," Tesla said on its website. "It does not turn Tesla into a fully autonomous vehicle." Tesla stock plunged 1.83% on the NASDAQ after the Miami verdict. It's the first time Tesla was hit with damages after a trial over its vehicles' Autopilot functions, with earlier suits having been dismissed or resolved outside the courtroom.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store