What are microplastics doing to our brains? UN talks will debate the issue next week
The scientists tested brain tissue from 28 people who died in 2016 and 24 who died last year in New Mexico, the United States, finding that the amount of microplastics in the samples increased over time.
The study made headlines around the world when the lead researcher, US toxicologist Matthew Campen, told the media that they detected the equivalent of a plastic spoon's worth of microplastics in the brains.
Campen also told Nature that he estimated the researchers could isolate around 10 grammes of plastic from a donated human brain - comparing that amount to an unused crayon.
Speculation 'far beyond the evidence'
But other researchers have since urged caution about the small study.
'While this is an interesting finding, it should be interpreted cautiously pending independent verification,' toxicologist Theodore Henry of Scotland's Heriot-Watt University told AFP.
'Currently, the speculation about the potential effects of plastic particles on health go far beyond the evidence,' he added.
Oliver Jones, a chemistry professor at Australia's RMIT University, told AFP there was 'not enough data to make firm conclusions on the occurrence of microplastics in New Mexico, let alone globally'.
He also found it 'rather unlikely' that brains could contain more microplastics than has been found in raw sewage - as the researchers had estimated.
Jones pointed out the people in the study were perfectly healthy before they died, and that the researchers acknowledged there was not enough data to show that the microplastics caused harm.
'If (and it is a big if in my view) there are microplastics in our brains, there is as yet no evidence of harm,' Jones added.
The study also contained duplicated images, the neuroscience news website the Transmitter has reported, though experts said this did not affect its main findings.
'Cannot wait for complete data'
Most of the research into the effects microplastics have on health has been observational, which means it cannot establish cause and effect.
One such study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine last year, found that microplastics building up in blood vessels was linked to an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, and death in patients with a disease that clogs arteries.
There have also been experiments carried out on mice, including a study in Science Advances in January which detected microplastics in their brains.
The Chinese researchers said that microplastics can cause rare blood clots in the brains of mice by obstructing cells - while emphasising that the small mammals are very different to humans.
A review by the World Health Organisation in 2022 found that the 'evidence is insufficient to determine risks to human health' from microplastics.
However, many health experts have cited the precautionary principle, saying the potential threat microplastics could pose requires action.
A report on the health risks of microplastics by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health published this week ahead of the treaty talks said that 'policy decisions cannot wait for complete data'.
'By acting now to limit exposure, improve risk assessment methodologies, and prioritise vulnerable populations, we can address this pressing issue before it escalates into a broader public health crisis,' it added.
The amount of plastic the world produces has doubled since 2000 - and is expected to triple from current rates by 2060.
-Agence France-Presse
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Four-day work week benefits
Working less could give us more, a new study suggests. Four-day work weeks without a reduction in income are found to boost workers' job satisfaction and physical and mental health, driven by enhanced work performance, lower levels of fatigue and fewer sleep problems, new research suggests. The findings, published in Nature Human Behaviour , highlight the potential for organisations and policymakers to improve employee well-being by re-evaluating workplace hours. Initiatives that reduce working hours - such as a six-hour workday or a 20% reduction in working time - have recently been trialled around the world. For example, the 4 Day Week Global initiative has run trials in many countries, with participation from about 375 companies, to understand how a shortened work week - without a reduction in pay - can result in a better working environment. To test the effects of the four-day work week (with no reduction in worker pay) intervention, Wen Fan, Juliet Schor and colleagues conducted six-month trials that involved 2896 employees across 141 organisations in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Ireland and the United States. Using survey data, they compared work- and health-related indicators (including burnout, job satisfaction, mental and physical health) before and after the intervention. They also compared these outcomes with those from 285 employees at 12 companies that did not trial the intervention. Fan and colleagues found that after the four-day work week intervention, there was a reduction in average working hours of about five hours per week. Employees with a reduction of eight hours or more per work week self-reported experiencing larger reductions in burnout and improvements in job satisfaction and mental health, as compared with those at companies that maintained a five-day workweek. Similar, though smaller, effects were observed among employees with between one and four hour and five and seven hour reductions in their work week. These benefits were partially explained by a reduced number of sleeping problems and levels of fatigue, and improved individual work ability. The authors suggest that shorter work weeks and reduced working hours without a reduction in salary can help to improve job satisfaction and worker health. They note that a key limitation of the study was companies self-selecting to participate, and resulted in a sample that consists predominantly of smaller companies from English-speaking countries. - Science Media Centre
NZ Herald
19 hours ago
- NZ Herald
What are microplastics doing to our brains? UN talks will debate the issue next week
The most prominent study looking at microplastics in brains was published in the journal Nature Medicine in February. The scientists tested brain tissue from 28 people who died in 2016 and 24 who died last year in New Mexico, the United States, finding that the amount of microplastics in the samples increased over time. The study made headlines around the world when the lead researcher, US toxicologist Matthew Campen, told the media that they detected the equivalent of a plastic spoon's worth of microplastics in the brains. Campen also told Nature that he estimated the researchers could isolate around 10 grammes of plastic from a donated human brain - comparing that amount to an unused crayon. Speculation 'far beyond the evidence' But other researchers have since urged caution about the small study. 'While this is an interesting finding, it should be interpreted cautiously pending independent verification,' toxicologist Theodore Henry of Scotland's Heriot-Watt University told AFP. 'Currently, the speculation about the potential effects of plastic particles on health go far beyond the evidence,' he added. Oliver Jones, a chemistry professor at Australia's RMIT University, told AFP there was 'not enough data to make firm conclusions on the occurrence of microplastics in New Mexico, let alone globally'. He also found it 'rather unlikely' that brains could contain more microplastics than has been found in raw sewage - as the researchers had estimated. Jones pointed out the people in the study were perfectly healthy before they died, and that the researchers acknowledged there was not enough data to show that the microplastics caused harm. 'If (and it is a big if in my view) there are microplastics in our brains, there is as yet no evidence of harm,' Jones added. The study also contained duplicated images, the neuroscience news website the Transmitter has reported, though experts said this did not affect its main findings. 'Cannot wait for complete data' Most of the research into the effects microplastics have on health has been observational, which means it cannot establish cause and effect. One such study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine last year, found that microplastics building up in blood vessels was linked to an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, and death in patients with a disease that clogs arteries. There have also been experiments carried out on mice, including a study in Science Advances in January which detected microplastics in their brains. The Chinese researchers said that microplastics can cause rare blood clots in the brains of mice by obstructing cells - while emphasising that the small mammals are very different to humans. A review by the World Health Organisation in 2022 found that the 'evidence is insufficient to determine risks to human health' from microplastics. However, many health experts have cited the precautionary principle, saying the potential threat microplastics could pose requires action. A report on the health risks of microplastics by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health published this week ahead of the treaty talks said that 'policy decisions cannot wait for complete data'. 'By acting now to limit exposure, improve risk assessment methodologies, and prioritise vulnerable populations, we can address this pressing issue before it escalates into a broader public health crisis,' it added. The amount of plastic the world produces has doubled since 2000 - and is expected to triple from current rates by 2060. -Agence France-Presse
NZ Herald
21 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Antarctic leopard seals perform unique songs for hours, study finds
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Male leopard seals sing songs structured like nursery rhymes. Photo / Jamie Quirk When male leopard seals dive down into icy Antarctic waters, they sing songs structured like nursery rhymes in performances that can last up to 13 hours, scientists say. An Australian-led team of researchers compared the complexity of the songs composed by the aquatic mammals to those of other animals – as well as human musicians like the Beatles and Mozart. Lucinda Chambers, a bioacoustics PhD student at Australia's University of New South Wales, told AFP that people are often surprised when they hear the 'otherworldly' hoots and trills sung by leopard seals. 'It kind of sounds like sound effects from an 80s sci-fi movie,' said the lead author of a new study in the journal Scientific Reports. During the spring breeding season, male leopard seals dive underwater and perform their songs for two minutes before returning to the surface for air. They then repeat this performance for up to 13 hours a day, according to the study.
