logo
Trump Sues to Fire Big Bird's Boss

Trump Sues to Fire Big Bird's Boss

Gizmodo16-07-2025
Back in April, Donald Trump fired three Democratic members of the board at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a move similar to his efforts to oust Democrats from the Federal Trade Commission and the Kennedy Center, among others. The board members—Laura Ross, Thomas Rothman, and Diane Kaplan— simply never left. Now, the Trump administration is suing to remove them from their seats.
Trump gave notice of the attempted firings on April 28, which led to the CPB and its would-be unemployed board members suing the administration. In the eyes of the organization, the CPB is not a federal agency in the way the FTC or FCC is. Instead, it is a private corporation and, it argued, its board members 'cannot be affected, controlled, or disturbed by the actions of the government.' Additionally, the CPB added rules to its bylaws that prevent its board members from being removed and ousting any Trump-appointed member whom they do not want.
Unfortunately, it seems the CPB adopted that rule after Trump issued the firing notices. And herein lies the complications around this case. A judge rejected the CPB's request for an injunction to prevent the firings, but said the organization has legal grounds for rejecting the firings based on corporate law. The CPB took that as a win and said the three fired board members would stay in their seats.
Shockingly, the Trump administration has a different view. In its lawsuit, the Department of Justice argues that the three board members 'have been usurping and purporting to exercise unlawfully the office of board member of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting' and accuses them of continuing to operate in office 'despite their removal and subsequent failure to obtain legal relief protecting their old positions.' They are seeking the removal of the board members, as well as trying to claw back salary that they've taken during this purgatory period where they live in limbo of being fired and not fired.
Notably, the DOJ points to a recent Supreme Court ruling as part of its argument that found the President has the power to remove agency heads without cause. The controversial ruling, which was issued in an unsigned order from the court, stemmed from Trump's removal of the heads of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merits Systems Protection Board. Both argued that they could not be fired without good cause under federal law. And that was the case…until now.
The suit may be the first time the Supreme Court's ruling is tested. For now, Big Bird's bosses remain in place—though if Congressional Republicans have their way, they won't have much to oversee once NPR and PBS get defunded.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How the E.U. Wooed Trump With Flashy but Flimsy Numbers
How the E.U. Wooed Trump With Flashy but Flimsy Numbers

New York Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Times

How the E.U. Wooed Trump With Flashy but Flimsy Numbers

When Donald Trump unveiled his trade deal with the European Union on Sunday night, he fixated on its size. And when the White House later released a fact sheet on the agreement, it trumpeted pledges by the Europeans for big investments in the United States. 'The E.U. will purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy and make new investments of $600 billion in the United States, all by 2028,' the document declared. But when the European Union released its own fact sheet on Tuesday, its description of that pledge was more muted — and far more noncommittal on spending outside of energy. 'E.U. companies have expressed interest in investing at least $600 billion' in 'various sectors in the U.S.,' the document explained. There's a reason for the equivocation: The European commitments are more like vague estimates than specific promises. The spending would come from private companies across the 27-nation bloc and would not be directed or enforced by European Union officials. The European Commission, the European Union's executive branch that is responsible for negotiating trade, can play a role in convening, organizing and encouraging big spending, but it cannot compel such outlays. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump administration wants Harvard to pay far more than Columbia as part of settlement
Trump administration wants Harvard to pay far more than Columbia as part of settlement

Associated Press

time30 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Trump administration wants Harvard to pay far more than Columbia as part of settlement

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is pressing for a deal with Harvard University that would require the Ivy League school to pay far more than the $200 million fine agreed to by Columbia University to resolve multiple federal investigations, according to two people familiar with the matter. Harvard would be expected to pay hundreds of millions of dollars as part of any settlement to end investigations into antisemitism at its campus, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Harvard leaders have been negotiating with the White House even as they battle in court to regain access to billions in federal research funding terminated by the Trump administration. The White House's desire to get Harvard to pay far more than Columbia was first reported by The New York Times, which said the school has signaled a willingness to pay as much as $500 million. Harvard did not immediately comment. The Trump administration plans to use its deal with Columbia as a template for other universities, with financial penalties that are now seen as a staple for future agreements. Last week, Columbia leaders agreed to pay $200 million as part of a settlement to resolve investigations into alleged violations of federal antidiscrimination laws and restore more than $400 million in research grants. Columbia had been in talks for months after the Trump administration accused the university of allowing the harassment of Jewish students and employees amid a wave of campus protests over the Israel-Hamas war. Harvard faces similar accusations but, unlike Columbia, the Cambridge, Massachusetts, school challenged the administration's funding cuts and subsequent sanctions in court. Last week, President Donald Trump said Harvard 'wants to settle' but he said Columbia 'handled it better.' The Trump administration's emphasis on financial penalties adds a new dimension for colleges facing federal scrutiny. In the past, civil rights investigations by the Education Department almost always ended with voluntary agreements and rarely included fines. Even when the government has levied fines, they've been a small fraction of the scale Trump is seeking. Last year, the Education Department fined Liberty University $14 million after finding the Christian school failed to disclose crimes on its campus. It was the most the government had ever fined a university under the Clery Act, following a $4.5 million fine dealt to Michigan State University in 2019 for its handling of sexual assault complaints against disgraced sports doctor Larry Nassar. The University of Pennsylvania agreed this month to modify school records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas, but that school's deal with the Trump administration included no fine. The Trump administration has opened investigations at dozens of universities over allegations of antisemitism or racial discrimination in the form of diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Several face funding freezes akin to those at Harvard, including more than $1 billion at Cornell University and $790 million at Northwestern University. Last week, Education Secretary Linda McMahon called the Columbia deal a 'roadmap' for other colleges, saying it would 'ripple across the higher education sector and change the course of campus culture for years to come.' ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store