Australian prime minister indulges in panda diplomacy as state visit in China nears end
The panda diplomacy stop Thursday in the central Chinese city of Chengdu highlighted Australia's special status as the only Southern Hemisphere country to host a pair of the rare Chinese native animals.
Albanese and his fiancée Jodie Haydon visited a pen where they saw Fu Ni, a giant panda who had been on loan to Australia's Adelaide Zoo until last year.
'A great ambassador for China and a great friend of Australia,' Albanese said of Fu Ni as she chomped on bamboo.
China loans Australia pandas
Premier Li Qiang used a visit to the Adelaide Zoo last year to announce Fu Ni and her partner Wang Wang would be replaced by another China-born pair that will hopefully breed.
The new couple, Xing Qiu and Yi Yan, made their public debut in January at the zoo in the South Australia state capital where they are a major tourist attraction.
Albanese's China trip, which began Saturday and ends on Friday, is extraordinarily long compared with Australian state visits over the past decade and marks a normalization of bilateral relations that plumbed new depths under the previous Australian government's nine-year reign.
Albanese said he had visited Chengdu and the Great Wall of China, as well at the usual diplomatic destinations of Beijing and Shanghai, as a show of respect to the Chinese people.
'The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. But you know what it does? It gives you a reward,' Albanese told reporters.
'One of the things that I find about giving countries respect is that you get it back,' he added.
In 2020, Beijing banned minister-to-minister contacts and imposed a series of official and unofficial trade barriers on commodities including wine, beef, coal, barley and lobsters that cost Australian exporters up to 20 billion Australian dollars ($13 billion) a year. This was a response to Australia's previous government demanding an independent inquiry into the cause of and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
While the pandemic was the final straw, relations had been deteriorating for years over issues including laws banning covert foreign interference in Australian politics and Australia barring Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei on security grounds from involvement in the national 5G network rollout.
The trade barriers have all been lifted since Albanese's center-left Labor Party was first elected in 2022. But now, the United States threatens to become a major disruptor to global trade through President Donald Trump's tariff regime.
Chinese president urges Australia to hold course
Chinese President Xi Jinping told Albanese at the outset of their bilateral meeting in Beijing Tuesday that the important thing their two countries had learned in repairing relations was that equal treatment, seeking common ground and pursuing cooperation served the interests of both.
'No matter how the international landscape may evolve, we should uphold this overall direction unswervingly,' Xi said through an interpreter. The comment was widely interpreted as a reference to U.S. tariffs.
Albanese replied that his government welcomed progressing cooperation under their decade-old bilateral free trade agreement.
'Australia will remain a strong supporter of free and fair trade,' Albanese said.
The United States has allocated Australia the minimum 10% tariff on U.S. imports. Australia argues that any tariff cannot be justified and that the U.S. has enjoyed a trade surplus with Australia for decades.
The greater economic damage for Australia would likely be from a Chinese economic downturn caused by its U.S. tariff treatment. Around a third of Australian exports go to China.
Australia shifts away from the US
James Laurenceson, director of the University of Technology Sydney's Australia-China Relations Institute, described China's presentation of itself as Australia's ally in defending free trade as 'self-serving."
'It's not so much Australia aligning with China. It's really just about Australia and China agreeing they've got a shared interest in the existing system, and it's the U.S. that's walking away from that,' Laurenceson said.
'I don't think the big shift this week is Australia getting closer to China. I think the distance with the United States is getting wider and wider,' he added.
Albanese's political enemies have criticised him for now having four face-to-face meetings with Xi – including two in Beijing – while the prime minister has yet to meet Trump in person.
Albanese and Trump were to hold a one-on-one meeting on the sidelines of a Group of Seven summit in Canada last month, but the U.S. president left early.
Albanese said this week he expected to meet Trump this year.
'I look forward to a constructive engagement with President Trump. We have had three constructive phone conversations,' Albanese said.
______
McGuirk contributed to this report from Melbourne, Australia
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
In-N-Out owner places order to go − out of California
California's progressive policies have pushed out major employers like Tesla, Chevron and Hewlett Packard. Now, the owner of In-N-Out says she and her family are leaving her home state. One of the simple joys my kids and I experienced when we moved to Texas was finally living near an In-N-Out. We've savored the classic California brand's West Coast vibe, Double-Doubles and Animal Style Fries. Plus, I can feed the five of us for less than $50. Not a bad deal, in this economy. I'm not the only one thinking about the economics of In-N-Out. The burger chain's owner, Lynsi Snyder, has announced she is evacuating from deep blue California for the friendlier environs of red state Tennessee, where the company her grandparents founded in 1948 is building a second corporate headquarters. Snyder said she's leaving the West Coast for the Mid-South for the sake of her family and her business. 'There's a lot of great things about California, but raising a family is not easy here," Snyder told podcaster Allie Beth Stuckey on July 18. "Doing business is not easy here." Opinion: What if I told you conservative women, not liberals, embrace true feminism? I can't blame Snyder for giving up on California. She'll join business leaders like Elon Musk, companies like Chevron and Tesla, and hundreds of thousands of regular people who've fled California for better lives and better business opportunities in other states. California is a bastion of liberalism that's pushed tax rates and the cost of living to ridiculous extremes even as residents' quality of life has declined. In-N-Out owner checks out of her home state The fact Snyder is leaving the state where her family made its fortune nearly 80 years ago is yet another indicator of California's decline. Snyder said state policies, including draconian restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, have made it difficult for businesses to operate. People and companies are not just fleeing California − in many cases, they are relocating to red states with a drastically different approach to politics and policy. My home state of Texas in recent years has become the new home of choice of many former California enterprises such as Hewlett Packard, McAfee, Charles Schwab and Ordinary Californians are leaving en masse too. From July 1, 2023, to July 1, 2024, California lost a net of about 240,000 residents to other states, many to Texas. The state's overall population rose in 2024, after several years of decline, because of immigration from other countries. California, of course, still has extraordinary natural resources, including hundreds of miles of beautiful coastline, majestic mountains, redwood forests, and world-class farmland and vineyards. What it doesn't have are political leaders with economic sense − or common sense. According to Chief Executive magazine's rankings for the best and worst states for business, California landed in last place. A 2021 Cato Institute study of the best and worst states for entrepreneurs found California placed 48th. Gavin Newsom is no moderate. California's progressive failures are on him. | Opinion But California lawmakers still don't understand the assignment. On Jan. 1, the state's minimum wage increased to a whopping $16.50 an hour for all businesses, and fast-food workers are now paid a minimum of $20 an hour. That means business owners either take a pay cut, charge their customers more or eliminate jobs. Or they relocate out of state. The owner of California's iconic burger chain will soon trade the Golden State's beaches for Tennessee's foothills. And if she ever wants to sample the world's best barbecue, she's welcome here in Texas. Nicole Russell is an opinion columnist with USA TODAY. She lives in Texas with her four kids. Sign up for her newsletter, The Right Track, and get it delivered to your inbox.
Business Wire
27 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Sygnia Uncovers Active Chinese-Nexus Threat Actor Targeting Critical Infrastructure
SINGAPORE & TEL-AVIV, Israel & NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Sygnia, the foremost global cyber readiness and response team, today reveals the findings of their investigation into a prolonged espionage campaign by a China-nexus threat actor, targeting critical infrastructure. Named 'Fire Ant' by Sygnia, the adversary is actively leveraging advanced methods to gain access to virtualization and networking environments by creating multi-layer attack kill chains to infiltrate restricted and segmented network assets that were considered to be within isolated environments. Since early 2025, Sygnia has tracked and responded to Fire Ant incidents, primarily targeting VMware ESXi and vCenter environments, as well as network appliances, to establish a foothold for initial access and long-term advanced persistence. Notably, Fire Ant displays high levels of resilience, actively and stealthily adapting to eradication and containment efforts, replacing toolsets, deploying redundant persistence backdoors and manipulating network configurations to re-establish access to compromised devices. 'Fire Ant shows incredible advanced capabilities to infiltrate and conduct espionage campaigns, avoiding detection and multi-layered traditional security measures by targeting infrastructure blind spots. This highlights the level of resilience and danger posed by nation-state threat actors to global critical infrastructure organisations,' said Yoav Mazor, Head of Incident Response, APJ at Sygnia. 'By gaining control over the virtualization management layer, the threat actor was able to extract service account credentials and deploy persistent backdoors on both ESXi hosts and the vCenter to maintain access across reboots.' Fire Ant's activities are characterized by infrastructure-centric tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) enabling activity beneath the detection threshold of traditional endpoint controls, emphasizing critical blind spots of conventional security stacks. The threat actor establishes control over a victim's VMware ESXi hosts and vCenter servers to move laterally across an organization. Additionally, Fire Ant consistently bypassed network segmentation by compromising network appliances and tunneling across segments, enabling the threat actor to bridge and move deeper within an organization's infrastructure through legitimate, approved paths. Mazor adds, 'Fire Ant's method of infiltration places heightened pressure on the cybersecurity community and underscores the importance of visibility and detection within the hypervisor and infrastructure layer where traditional endpoint security tools often struggle to identify malicious activity. Organizations will need to adopt proactive cyber resilience with an advanced multi-layered security approach.' As part of Sygnia's investigation into Fire Ant, the company found the tooling and techniques closely align with prior espionage campaigns conducted by nation-state threat actor, UNC3886, currently active in Singapore. Fire Ant's overlap with UNC3886 includes specific binaries and exploitation of vCenter and ESXi vulnerabilities, as well as similar targeting of critical infrastructure across regions. For a deep dive account of the incident, please see Sygnia's report. About Sygnia Sygnia is the world's foremost cyber response and readiness expert. It applies creative approaches and bold solutions to each phase of an organization's security journey, meeting them where they are to ensure cyber resilience. Sygnia is the trusted advisor and service provider of leading organizations worldwide, including Fortune 100 companies. Sygnia is a Temasek company, part of the ISTARI Collective.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China and America are now locked in a race for the next superweapon
Say what you will about the original Cold War, the looming threat of annihilation and the physical border infrastructure that split a continent in two: it was at least relatively easy to disentangle the two main parties. Trade between the Soviet Union and the United States was minimal and movement of people rarer still. The struggle for dominance between China and America is far less clear cut, and attempts to make it more so have proved difficult at best. As Donald Trump's decision to postpone the imposition tariffs – and Treasury secretary Scott Bessent's indication of a likely further deadline extension – have demonstrated, trade between the two powers has become deeply entrenched no matter the policy preferences of those in the White House, or indeed the state of competition between the nations. As Elbridge Colby, now US under secretary of defence for policy, wrote in these pages in 2023, America's priority is making sure it can 'defeat China in a conflict'. Norman Angell's 1911 thesis that interdependence could make war economically irrational was superseded by 1914's demonstration that wars are not necessarily rooted in economic logic, but the coexistence of increasing military risk with large trade flows is curious, and all the more so given the technological arms race taking place in the background. Even focusing on just two fields – AI and quantum computing – the scale of the risk is considerable. Getting to sufficiently powerful AI systems first would be highly economically destabilising, permit massive parallel cyberattacks and information operations efforts, smooth out the operation of domestic systems, and potentially offer a pathway to self-improving systems that might make this advantage permanent. Quantum computing, meanwhile, would undermine the encryption techniques which keep data and systems – from healthcare to banking to messaging apps – secure. As a helpful note from the US National Cybersecurity Centre of Excellence sets out, unnamed 'adversaries' are deploying a 'harvest now, decrypt later' strategy against America, gathering sensitive data today to decode in the near future when viable quantum computing technologies are developed. Investments into quantum technologies are well underway, with $15bn (£11bn) in Chinese state funding announced prior to 2023, against roughly $3.8bn in the United States. Even allowing for a gap between headline figures and reality, and a $1bn-plus private sector investment gap in favour of the US, Beijing is at the least competitive in funding, and looking to consolidate efforts: private sector firms previously conducting quantum research have in recent years transferred assets to 'state-linked institutions'. The risks and advantages of powerful AI systems, meanwhile, have been discussed at length elsewhere. The sight of US firms inching away from sensitive fields in the Chinese market – with Amazon, IBM and Microsoft reducing their presence in the country – is at least an indicator that some private sector firms are uneasy about the coexistence of an intensive race for a technological edge alongside economic cooperation. As much as AI safety advocates might hate the 'arms race' terminology, it still seems to be an accurate description of the world as seen from Washington: JD Vance explicitly referred to an AI arms race with China earlier this year, noting that any unilateral pause in research risking finding 'ourselves all enslaved to PRC-mediated AI'. You don't need to believe in superintelligence, however, to see risks: competent coding agents that work tirelessly, day and night, year-round, in massively parallelised fashion, would confer a deeply intimidating cyber-offensive edge to the Chinese government. The description of the neutron bomb as a weapon that kills people and leaves buildings standing was captivating. Weapons that shut off capabilities without destroying either would be better still. As a Rand report argues, the People's Liberation Army views 'warfare as a confrontation between opposing operational systems rather than between units, arms, services and platforms'; paralyse the command structure, shut down information gathering and distribution, and disrupt infrastructure. It's not particularly hard to see how asymmetric cyberwarfare or one-sided decryption of communications would fit into this model. If there's a pattern to recent Chinese cyberoperations, with malware attacks on US bases in Guam and civilian infrastructure, it's obtaining the 'ability to physically wreak havoc on [US] critical infrastructure at a time of its choosing', in the words of then-FBI director Christopher Wray. Selective US retrenchment should be seen in this light; moving sensitive areas of technology into relatively safe harbours. Whether it will work, however, is a little less clear. Fifteen years ago, an agency within the US Department of Defence produced a report noting that one of the most distinctive features of Chinese intelligence operations was 'ethnic targeting' of Chinese Americans and appeals to 'residual patriotism towards China'. Most Chinese spies in America, at that time, hadn't been bribed or blackmailed. Instead, they were simply profiled by ethnic background, and approached based on obligation to friends, family and nation. This approach had formed the basis for roughly 98pc of the Chinese security service's recruitment efforts, and 'divided loyalty' was the primary motivation in roughly 57pc of espionage cases. Given that US AI firms are increasingly 'dependent on China for top-tier AI researchers', merely shifting location may not be enough to guarantee the security of technologies developed by America's private sector tech giants. And that brings us, again, to the strength of the economic ties between the two rival powers. It's one thing to start winding down economic operations overseas or to start developing alternative supply chains. But what do you do if your fundamental research capabilities are increasingly dependent on bringing in citizens from your rival power? OpenAI already appears to be wrestling with this question, imposing 'controls on sensitive information' and undertaking 'enhanced vetting of staff', which in turn may make hiring researchers harder. The result seems to be an asymmetry that favours China, with the flow of information the other way appearing relatively limited. If America wants to win the race – and retain its lead – it will need to find a way to close its talent gap, or shut off the leaks. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
