PM Anwar held talks with Macron during brief France stopover, Dewan Rakyat told
He said the leaders of both countries managed to hold discussions on several matters during the Prime Minister's brief stopover in France en route to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to attend the BRICS Summit earlier this month.
'It is inaccurate to say that the Prime Minister's visit was not meaningful.
'It was indeed meaningful, especially because the Prime Minister held two-way talks with French President Emmanuel Macron.
'Both leaders discussed several issues, including bilateral ties. The same applied to the Prime Minister's stopover in Italy,' Mohamad said in the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (July 21), responding to a supplementary question from Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal (PN-Machang).
Wan Ahmad Fayhsal had questioned why Anwar was not accorded full state honours during his visit to France, unlike former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in 1997, former Singapore prime minister Lee Hsien Loong in 2018, and Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto, who was invited to attend the Bastille Day celebrations.
He described Anwar's visit as a 'missed opportunity,' particularly with Malaysia currently chairing Asean.
Mohamad clarified that Anwar's stopover in France was not an official visit.
'It was not an official visit — that would have been an entirely different matter.
'If it had been official, we would have flown directly to the country rather than making a stopover,' he said.
He added that the Prime Minister had accepted invitations from both France and Italy to stop over and was accorded a high level of respect during the visits, including the inspection of a guard of honour.
Earlier, Mohamad emphasised the importance of Asean engaging with countries within the Indo-Pacific region.
'The Asean Outlook on the Indo-Pacific is a framework agreed upon by all Asean members.
'Asean cannot afford to be excluded from participating in such frameworks and developments in the Indo-Pacific,' he said.
He pointed out that other regional frameworks, such as AUKUS and the Quad, also promote a free and open Indo-Pacific.
AUKUS is a trilateral security partnership involving Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, while the Quad comprises India, Australia, Japan and the United States.
Mohamad said the Asean Outlook on the Indo-Pacific framework is designed to ensure Asean remains free, peaceful and neutral.
Regarding the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC), he noted that 57 countries have signed the agreement, with Uruguay and Algeria being the latest signatories.
The TAC, originally drafted in 1976, is a peace treaty initially signed by Asean member states.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
23 minutes ago
- The Star
Comment: A cautionary tale for Asean from the Middle East
(A commentary by Dr Julia Roknifard, a Middle East expert and a Senior Lecturer for the Bachelor's program on Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE) at Taylor's University. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of BERNAMA.) As the Middle East remains in a state of dangerous instability, Asean presented with an opportunity to examine the causes of these conflicts and draw valuable lessons. While taking pride in its longstanding neutrality and consensus-building, which have underpinned its regional stability, Asean must adapt to emerging geopolitical realities. For the grouping to maintain its relevance and agency in a contested multipolar world, it must avoid the strategic fragmentation that has plagued the Middle East and strengthen its own framework for collective security. Asean's fragile consensus Asean, in contrast, has often been lauded for its cautious but sustainable approach to diplomacy, with principles of non-interference, consensus, and neutrality at its core. The "ASEAN Way' of informal dialogue and mutual respect has helped prevent open conflict among its members for decades. There are challenges, however, with great power rivalry over the South China Sea, which has exposed Asean's internal divisions as just one glaring example. While Vietnam and the Philippines seek stronger resistance against encroachments, others like Cambodia and Laos often take a more accommodating stance. This divergence threatens to paralyse the grouping when collective action is most needed. Furthermore, Asean faces growing pressure from external powers such as China, the United States, India, Japan, and the European Union, all vying for influence in the region. The Quad, AUKUS (Australia, the UK, and the US), and increased US military presence signal a securitised Asia-Pacific that could soon drag Asean into rivalries it has long sought to avoid. Without greater strategic cohesion, Asean risks repeating the Middle Eastern pattern of division and dependency, becoming an arena for power projection rather than an actor shaping its own future. Key lessons and the way forward for Asean The Middle East demonstrates that a lack of regional unity leaves individual nations vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation. Asean must recognise that its strength lies not in the sum of its parts, but in its ability to act with a unified voice. While complete consensus may be elusive, a flexible core group of willing states could lead on issues of regional security without waiting for unanimity. Asean's commitment to neutrality has served it well, but in a more polarised world, neutrality must evolve into proactive non-alignment. This means not only avoiding entanglement in great-power blocs but also taking a firmer stand on regional security issues, particularly in maritime disputes, cross-border security, and transnational crime. It is important to note that these very criminal networks that operate along porous borders are often exploited to traffic arms that could be used by non-state actors to create instability. Unlike the Middle East, Asean has an advantage through its institutional foundation, which could facilitate a multilateral defence or security coordination framework. While a full military alliance may be unrealistic, a regional maritime coordination centre, joint patrol arrangements, or a rapid response force for non-traditional threats such as disaster relief, piracy, and cyberattacks would enhance Asean's credibility and security. Asan should adopt a more robust position against the militarisation of its region by external actors. Just as foreign bases and arms deals in the Middle East have entrenched foreign influence, Southeast Asia must guard against becoming a base for great-power military logistics or surveillance. Transparency, dialogue, and clear regional red lines can help manage this risk. Institutions such as the Arab League have been ineffective in part due to a lack of enforcement capability and legitimacy. Asean must avoid the same fate by streamlining decision-making, empowering its secretariat, and reducing the influence of members who act as proxies for external interests. To secure its future, Asean must begin a serious conversation about regional defence autonomy. This doesn't mean cutting ties with the US or China or other blocs, but rather strengthening the grouping's collective bargaining power and ability to shape outcomes in its own neighbourhood. South-East Asia's economic dynamism and strategic location give it leverage, but only if wielded with strategic intent. Asean could develop a code of conduct not only for the South China Sea but for all foreign military activity in Southeast Asia. This would require transparency on base agreements, arms transfers, and intelligence-sharing with external powers. This must be paired by expanding the Asean Défense Ministers' Meeting (ADMM) to include a permanent crisis monitoring centre capable of early warning and real-time coordination. Intelligence sharing and surveillance coordination, which are currently fragmented, will be far more effective and successful through this. The grouping must also reinforce its political values. Non-interference must not become a shield for impunity. Myanmar's crisis is a test of Asean's will to uphold basic norms of governance and order. If unresolved, it threatens to erode the region's moral authority and cohesion. Asean must shape its own trajectory The Middle East did not descend into chaos overnight. It unravelled through decades of missed opportunities, broken alliances, and dependence on foreign patrons. For now, Asean is in a far better position as it can either build on its history of cautious cooperation to become a more resilient, strategic actor, or it can cling to an outdated consensus model and become another arena for global competition. Asean's future as a stable, independent regional bloc depends on whether it can draw the right lessons from the Middle East and act on them before the storm arrives. - Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Litterbugs face 12 hours of community service under proposed law
Housing and local government minister Nga Kor Ming said heavier penalties are needed to combat persistent littering and foster civic responsibility. PETALING JAYA : Litterbugs may soon be slapped with up to 12 hours of court-ordered community service under proposed amendments to the Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Act 2007. Housing and local government minister Nga Kor Ming said the tougher penalty aims to address persistent public littering and instil civic responsibility among Malaysians. 'Based on records of the amount of litter collected, it is clear that the fines imposed by local authorities are no longer a deterrent for offenders from repeating this bad habit. 'Therefore, the courts will have the power to order community service of up to 12 hours, in addition to a fine,' he told the Dewan Rakyat when tabling the Solid Waste and Public Cleansing (Amendment) Bill 2025 today. Nga said the proposed amendments would also cover minor acts of littering, such as throwing cigarette butts, tissues, plastic and drink cans in public spaces or on public roads. The bill will also broaden the definition of solid waste to include reusable items like plastic bags and bottles. He said the stronger laws are necessary as Malaysia takes on a global leadership role in environmental efforts. 'As the president (of the UN-Habitat Assembly), Malaysia must show commitment towards environmental sustainability. We aim for a zero-waste culture that includes recycling, reducing and reusing,' he said. Nga said countries such as the US, UK, Japan, South Korea, the UAE, Australia, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia and Singapore have implemented similar measures. 'Despite our country's progress, there are still many who throw rubbish irresponsibly. We want to shape a society that values cleanliness and is responsible,' he said. The amendments, covering four clauses, apply to Peninsular Malaysia and Labuan. Sabah and Sarawak may adopt them through their own ordinances.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Community service for offences under Local Government Act not slavery, asserts Nga
KUALA LUMPUR: Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming has defended the proposal for community service as a penalty under the Local Government Act, stating it does not equate to slavery. Addressing the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (July 21), Nga emphasised that the Federal Constitution upholds basic human rights. "I beg to differ. The Federal Constitution guarantees basic human rights, but for offences that have been convicted in the court, it is not a form of slavery," he asserted while concluding the debate on amendments to the Local Government Act, which include introducing mandatory community service for littering offences. During the debate, Hassan Abdul Karim (PH-Pasir Gudang) expressed concerns that community service could be seen as a form of slavery and potentially unconstitutional. "According to the Bill, community service is defined as an unpaid job or service. I understand that any work that is not paid can bring an element of forced slavery," he argued, suggesting that some form of allowance be provided to avoid categorisation as slavery. The proposed Bill introduces subsection 104a(1), which empowers courts to issue a community service order for individuals convicted of breaching by-laws under the Act.
