What made the cut in Senate's nearly 1,000-page policy megabill?
The nearly 1,000-page package, released Friday, has undergone notable changes since initial pieces of the plan first came into view weeks ago. Republicans have also sought to make several tweaks to the bill in the past several days.
The expansive bill now awaits consideration in the House, where leaders hope to push it across the finish line before a self-imposed July 4 deadline.
Live updates: Senate sends tax bill to House; Trump visits 'Alligator Alcatraz'
Here are some of the most significant changes that made the cut through a frenzied 27-hour debate — and what didn't.
A centerpiece of the legislation is making permanent the expiring provisions in Trump's signature tax law — which nonpartisan scorers and think tanks estimate would cost trillions of dollars over the next decade.
One of the most costly proposals is extending the individual rate reductions in the 2017 law. The bill would also seek to cement existing federal tax brackets, boost the standard deduction and maintain the termination of personal exemptions.
It also seeks to deliver on several key promises the president made on the campaign trail last year. That includes deductions for taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest. However, the measures are not fully deductible.
Republicans setting up tax cliff at end of Donald Trump's term
The final version of the legislation includes restrictions on Medicaid, the joint state-federal program that provides health care for more than 70 million low-income and disabled Americans.
Like the House-passed version, the Senate bill will require beneficiaries to prove they are working or in school at least 80 hours a month to keep their health insurance starting Dec. 31, 2026. The Senate version extends the work requirement to low-income parents of children older than 14, in addition to childless adults without disabilities. It also requires more frequent eligibility checks.
But the Senate parliamentarian said a measure cutting federal funds to states that use their own money to provide health care coverage to immigrants lacking permanent legal status, along with a provision banning Medicaid from covering gender transition services, weren't in compliance with Senate rules.
The steep cuts to taxes levied by Medicaid expansion states on hospitals and other providers remained in the bill despite objections by some Republicans in the Senate and House, though they will now be delayed by a year, to start in 2028.
The bill also requires people above the poverty line to pay out-of-pocket copays for most Medicaid services, like lab tests or doctor visits. States will be allowed to charge up to 5 percent of a person's income per year, though some Democratic-led states may opt for a smaller amount.
The Senate made sweeping cuts to climate-friendly energy tax credits — especially for wind and solar — that were passed as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
The final legislation does not allow a project to get the tax credit if it does not begin producing electricity by 2028. This is stricter than an earlier Senate version, which would have allowed projects that begin construction in the next few years to qualify for the credits.
The bill would require some states for the first time to cover a share of the cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits — which are currently completely funded by the federal government — if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent.
If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent and 15 percent. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent.
Republicans say the proposal is aimed at incentivizing states to get their payment error rates down, while Democrats have argued the measure could lead to states having to cut benefits.
However, last-minute changes have been made to the plan that would allow for delayed implementation for states with the highest payment error rates after concerns from Republican senators in Alaska, which had the highest rate in fiscal 2024.
The final bill would introduce numerous changes to student loans, including limits on borrowing and consolidation into only two repayment plans.
Republicans want to cap graduate-level federal student loans at $20,500 a year, at $50,000 for law or medical school government loans, and at$20,000 for Parent PLUS loans for undergraduate students.
If passed, student loan borrowers will have two repayment options: a new standard plan and a new income-driven repayment plan. Under the latter, starting in 2028, borrowers will have access to the Repayment Assistance Plan and the income-based repayment option.
It would also eliminate economic hardship and unemployment deferments. The bill does allow loans to be rehabilitated twice, up from once before.
Pell Grants would get additional funding in 2026 and exclude students who received full-ride scholarships to a school.
It also establishes workforce Pell Grants offering help to students who enroll in short-term work programs that don't end with a college degree.
The bill would add $5 trillion the nation's debt limit, which caps how much money the Treasury Department can owe to pay the country's bills.
Congress last acted on the debt limit in 2023 as part of a deal that suspended the ceiling through 2024. Since January, the Treasury Department has been implementing 'extraordinary measures' to buy time for lawmakers to raise or suspend the debt limit and stave off the threat of a national default.
The national debt stands at more than $36 trillion.
Republicans passed a tax credit refund that would go to individuals or companies that donate to organizations that provide K-12 school choice scholarships.
The provision is a major win for the school choice movement, as it will create a national program to bypass Democratic states that have been resistant to school choice initiatives.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) had been pushing for a provision that would have required the sale of hundreds of thousands of acres of public land, but he abandoned that effort over the weekend.
In a post on social platform X, he said, 'Because of the strict constraints of the budget reconciliation process, I was unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families — not to China, not to Blackrock and not to any foreign interests.'
'For that reason, I've decided to withdraw the federal land sales provision from the bill,' he added.
Lee had originally proposed to sell up to 3.3 million acres of land owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Forest Service, but he later revised his proposal to pertain to up to 1.2 million acres of the BLM land.
He said he was pushing the measure to build more affordable housing. He received opposition from not only Democrats but also members of his own party, some of whom said they would vote against the bill if it contained public land sales.
The legislation omits a contentious change that floated over the weekend — an excise tax on new solar and wind projects if they contain Chinese components.
This surprise provision met pushback from moderate lawmakers who did not want to add an additional tax on these industries.
The Senate stripped a provision barring states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI).
The most recent version of the provision would have barred states from regulating AI for five years if they wanted access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment funding. It cut in half the timeline of the original provision, which sought to bar state AI regulation for 10 years.
Tobias Burns and Julia Shapero contributed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
US Immigration Budget Now Bigger Than Israel's Military Spending
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Senate has passed a bill making Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the U.S.'s largest interior law enforcement agency with funding for Donald Trump's immigration enforcement agenda higher than most of the world's militaries, including Israel's. Pending its passage in the House of Representatives, Trump's bill could mean a massive increase in ICE funding as part of an immigration enforcement agenda worth $150 billion over four years. This image from June 12, 2025 shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at Delaney Hall, a migrant detention facility, in Newark, New Jersey. This image from June 12, 2025 shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at Delaney Hall, a migrant detention facility, in Newark, New It Matters If passed by Congress, Trump's 1000-page bill could reshape the U.S. immigration system with a significant increase in funding for expanding law enforcement and detention network while increasing costs to legally immigrate to the U.S. What To Know A revised version of Trump's bill was narrowly voted through the Senate on Tuesday. The estimated price tag of the legislation is around $150 billion between now and 2029—an annual average of $37.5 billion, which is higher than the military expenditure of all but 15 countries. This figure is more than the annual military budget of Italy, which at $30.8 billion, is the world's 16th highest defense spender for this year according to tracker Global Fire Power. It is also higher than military spending for Israel, ($30 billion), the Netherlands ($27 billion) and Brazil ($26.1 billion). Different news outlets have broken down in different ways. The National Immigration Law Center said that ICE's detention budget would increase to $45 billion to build immigration jails for single adults and families, a price tag 13 times more than ICE's 2024 detention budget. The bill also allocates $29.9 billion in additional funding for ICE activities, including hiring new agents and securing transportation contracts to move migrants between detention centers and facilitate deportations, according to Migrant Insider. Meanwhile an assessment by Detention Watch Network said the bill set aside $59 billion to militarize the border which included wall construction, CBP agents and vehicles, and border surveillance technology. It also said that there was $10 billion for grants to reimburse states who enact anti-immigrant policies and another $1 billion to the Department of Defense to deploy military personnel to the border and to detain migrants. What People Are Saying House Speaker Mike Johnson wrote on X that the bill "provides the ESSENTIAL funding needed to secure our nation's borders." Silky Shah, Executive Director of Detention Watch Network said in a statement: "This bill skyrockets ICE's budget to never before seen funding levels and will make it the largest law enforcement agency in the country." "ICE will now have 13 times its current fiscal budget for detention, which is already operating at a historic high, on top of the funding in ICE's annual budget that Congress sets each year." Adam Isacson, a researcher with human rights advocacy organization WOLA per the AP, "One thing about this bill, these sections are super no real specificity in the bill about how it's going to be spent." What Happens Next Trump's bill returns to the House of Representatives on Wednesday after a revised version was narrowly voted through the Senate on Tuesday. The president has set Congress a loose deadline of July 4 but further opposition is expected.


Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Overperform in Major California Election
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republicans scored an unexpectedly strong showing in a closely watched special election in California. Early returns in Tuesday's high-stakes runoff for the San Diego County Board of Supervisors show Republican candidate John McCann running significantly closer than many expected in a Democratic-leaning district that former Vice President Kamala Harris won by 20 points. Newsweek reached out to McCann via email for comment. Why It Matters The special election comes after widespread protests and unrest in nearby Los Angeles over Trump's immigration policies, which have seen Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents carrying out deportation raids in the city. But despite intense anti-ICE protests in California, that wave of activism does not appear to be translating into stronger support for Democrats. Chula Vista Mayor John McCann and Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre, who are running in a special election to fill the District 1 seat on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors.. Chula Vista Mayor John McCann and Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre, who are running in a special election to fill the District 1 seat on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors.. City of Imperial Beach and Mayor McCann via Facebook What To Know As of late Tuesday night, Paloma Aguirre, the Democratic mayor of Imperial Beach, held a narrow 6-point lead over McCann, the Republican mayor of Chula Vista, with 53 percent to 47 percent in the race for the District 1 seat on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors. Newsweek reached out to Aguirre via email for comment. So far, the ballots counted represent about 19 percent of the more than 370,000 registered voters in the district, according to the Registrar of Voters. District 1 includes much of the South Bay and parts of the city of San Diego, and is widely regarded as a pivotal swing seat on the influential five-member Board. Since the sudden resignation of Supervisor Nora Vargas last December, who stepped down citing "personal safety and security reasons," the Board has been split 2–2 between Democrats and Republicans. If Aguirre's early lead holds, she will become the next District 1 supervisor, tipping the balance of power back in favor of Democrats. The last time Republicans dominated the Board was before 2020, when Democrats secured a majority for the first time in a generation. San Diego County supervisors oversee an $8.5 billion budget and play a major role in administering state and federal programs, such as CalFresh and Medi-Cal, while also governing unincorporated communities throughout the region. Aguirre says she is running to "bring change to county government" and to fight for working people by tackling local crises head-on. Aguirre has focused much of her campaign on addressing the issue of sewage pollution at the United States–Mexico border, which has plagued South Bay beaches for years. She has pledged to push for new infrastructure funding, a Superfund designation from the EPA, and to treat the issue as a public health emergency. She's also promised to prioritize an audit of homelessness spending, expand treatment and shelter options, and address crime and high energy costs for residents. McCann, a U.S. Navy veteran, has emphasized his record on emergency response and public safety. His campaign focuses on increasing law enforcement funding, reducing government waste, and opposing new taxes, including the proposed mileage tax. McCann says he'll work to expand health care, job training, and other essential services for veterans, while also helping to secure funding to fix the border sewage crisis and hold responsible parties accountable. What People Are Saying Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre, in a Tuesday statement to KPBS: "Today belongs to the working-class people of District 1, a nuestra gente trabajadora, who now have a fighter at the county Board of Supervisors who will hold the line against the Trump administration." Chula Vista Mayor John McCann told ABC 10 San Diego: "Paloma and I actually went back to Washington, D.C., to help raise money at the White House and Congress together. I'm willing to work with anybody as long as we want to focus on results and having solutions." What Happens Next County officials expect to continue counting ballots throughout the week, with an official update on results scheduled for 6 p.m. Wednesday. The Registrar of Voters' Office has until July 31 to certify the election. The winner will fill the vacant seat for the remainder of the current term that ends in January 2029.


Chicago Tribune
10 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Paramount to pay $16 million in settlement with President Donald Trump over '60 Minutes' interview
In a case seen as a challenge to free speech, Paramount has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump over the editing of CBS' ' 60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris in October. Paramount told media outlets the money will go to Trump's future presidential library, not to the president himself. It said the settlement did not involve an apology. Trump's lawyer said the president had suffered 'mental anguish' over the editing of the interview by CBS News, while Paramount and CBS rejected his contention that it was edited to enhance how Harris sounded. They had sought to get Trump's lawsuit dismissed. There was no immediate word from the White House about the settlement of the case, which Trump filed in Amarillo, Texas. The case has been closely watched by advocates for press freedom and by journalists within CBS, whose lawyers called Trump's lawsuit 'completely without merit' and promised to vigorously fight it after it was filed. In early February, '60 Minutes' released a full, unedited transcript of the interview. Under the settlement reached with help of a mediator, Paramount agreed that '60 Minutes' will release transcripts of future interviews of presidential candidates, 'subject to redactions as required for legal and national security concerns,' CBS News cited the statement as saying. Trump, who did not agree to be interviewed by '60 Minutes' during the campaign, protested editing where Harris is seen giving two different answers to a question by the show's Bill Whitaker in separate clips aired on '60 Minutes' and 'Face the Nation' earlier in the day. CBS said each reply came within Harris' long-winded answer to Whitaker, but was edited to be more succinct. The president's lawyer, Edward Andrew Paltzik, said that caused confusion and 'mental anguish,' misleading voters and causing them to pay less attention to Trump and his Truth Social platform. Paramount and controlling shareholder Shari Redstone were seeking the settlement with Trump, whose administration must approve the company's proposed merger with Skydance Media. CBS News President and CEO Wendy McMahon and '60 Minutes' executive producer Bill Owens, who both opposed a settlement, have resigned in recent weeks. The Freedom of the Press Foundation, a media advocacy group that says it is a Paramount shareholder, has said that it would file a lawsuit in protest if a settlement was reached. In December, ABC News settled a defamation lawsuit by Trump over statements made by anchor George Stephanopoulos, agreeing to pay $15 million toward Trump's presidential library rather than engage in a public fight. Meta reportedly paid $25 million to settle Trump's lawsuit against the company over its decision to suspend his social media accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.