Man under post-jail supervision order files legal challenge after being blocked from leaving city to study abroad
A Hong Kong man under a post-prison supervision order after being convicted of 2019 protest offences has filed a legal challenge against authorities for barring him from leaving the city to study abroad.
To Kai-wa on Wednesday filed an application for a judicial review at the High Court against the Correctional Services Department's (CSD) decision, which blocked him from leaving Hong Kong during his post-release supervision, according to local media reports.
Judicial reviews are considered by the Court of First Instance and examine the decision-making processes of administrative bodies. Issues under review must be shown to affect the wider public interest.
To, who was jailed for five and a half years in 2021 for biting off part of a police officer's finger during a protest, was released from prison on October 25, 2024. But he remained under the CSD's supervision order, which is effective until August 26, 2026.
He applied in January this year to the CSD's Supervision Case Review Committee to leave for the UK after receiving a conditional offer to study law at the University of Birmingham.
But the committee rejected To's application in April and later rejected his appeal. According to To's court filing, the CSD's committee said To did not 'demonstrate sincere remorse and reflection' and had not undergone 'full rehabilitation and deradicalisation.'
The committee also said that since To holds a British National (Overseas) (BNO) passport, he could apply for British citizenship during his studies there and abscond from the supervision of Hong Kong authorities.
The committee said the British government had interviewed a person who was wanted for endangering national security and breaching a supervision order, an apparent reference to pro-independence activist Tony Chung, who fled to the UK in December 2023 while he was under post-release supervision.
Chung, formerly the convenor of the now-disbanded pro-independence group, was sentenced to three years and seven months in jail in 2021 after pleading guilty to inciting subversion and money laundering. He is among 19 overseas activists wanted by Hong Kong police for alleged national security offences.
The committee said it believed that the British authorities would not extradite To back to Hong Kong in the case of him breaching his supervision order. It said To could remain in Hong Kong to study instead of going abroad.
In his court filing, To's lawyers said the committee's decision had excessively restricted To's freedom of movement protected under the law.
They argued that studying law abroad would improve To's understanding of the rule of law, and therefore would contribute towards the protection of national security and his rehabilitation.
To was not admitted into law programmes in the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong, whereas the City University of Hong Kong had yet to inform him of his application results, his lawyers said.
That means To may not be able to study law if he has to stay in Hong Kong, they added.
The lawyers also argued that To's BNO status and the case of a breach of supervision order by another person were irrelevant considerations for the CSD in To's case.
They asked the court to handle the application before August 22 so that To could confirm his enrolment at the university before September 4.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
2 days ago
- HKFP
Man under post-jail supervision order files legal challenge after being blocked from leaving city to study abroad
A Hong Kong man under a post-prison supervision order after being convicted of 2019 protest offences has filed a legal challenge against authorities for barring him from leaving the city to study abroad. To Kai-wa on Wednesday filed an application for a judicial review at the High Court against the Correctional Services Department's (CSD) decision, which blocked him from leaving Hong Kong during his post-release supervision, according to local media reports. Judicial reviews are considered by the Court of First Instance and examine the decision-making processes of administrative bodies. Issues under review must be shown to affect the wider public interest. To, who was jailed for five and a half years in 2021 for biting off part of a police officer's finger during a protest, was released from prison on October 25, 2024. But he remained under the CSD's supervision order, which is effective until August 26, 2026. He applied in January this year to the CSD's Supervision Case Review Committee to leave for the UK after receiving a conditional offer to study law at the University of Birmingham. But the committee rejected To's application in April and later rejected his appeal. According to To's court filing, the CSD's committee said To did not 'demonstrate sincere remorse and reflection' and had not undergone 'full rehabilitation and deradicalisation.' The committee also said that since To holds a British National (Overseas) (BNO) passport, he could apply for British citizenship during his studies there and abscond from the supervision of Hong Kong authorities. The committee said the British government had interviewed a person who was wanted for endangering national security and breaching a supervision order, an apparent reference to pro-independence activist Tony Chung, who fled to the UK in December 2023 while he was under post-release supervision. Chung, formerly the convenor of the now-disbanded pro-independence group, was sentenced to three years and seven months in jail in 2021 after pleading guilty to inciting subversion and money laundering. He is among 19 overseas activists wanted by Hong Kong police for alleged national security offences. The committee said it believed that the British authorities would not extradite To back to Hong Kong in the case of him breaching his supervision order. It said To could remain in Hong Kong to study instead of going abroad. In his court filing, To's lawyers said the committee's decision had excessively restricted To's freedom of movement protected under the law. They argued that studying law abroad would improve To's understanding of the rule of law, and therefore would contribute towards the protection of national security and his rehabilitation. To was not admitted into law programmes in the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong, whereas the City University of Hong Kong had yet to inform him of his application results, his lawyers said. That means To may not be able to study law if he has to stay in Hong Kong, they added. The lawyers also argued that To's BNO status and the case of a breach of supervision order by another person were irrelevant considerations for the CSD in To's case. They asked the court to handle the application before August 22 so that To could confirm his enrolment at the university before September 4.
AllAfrica
4 days ago
- AllAfrica
Russia challenging US, China for strategic clout in Africa
Russia has never had an African colony. It stayed out of the scramble for Africa, only engaging with African states in the 19th Century. In 1869, for instance, the Russians gave Ethiopia military support to threaten the position of the British in their quest to control the Suez Canal. Russia did this because Britain was one of its main European rivals. It wasn't until the Cold War started in 1947 that Russia began to develop diplomatic relations with several African countries. This was a way to counter the influence of its rivals such as the US. The Cold War dictated the former USSR's relations with many African countries for decades. This was followed by a period of relative inactivity. More recently, however, relations have become increasingly important for Russia as well asfor some African countries. The result is that some African countries no longer need to choose between the American and the Chinese way of development. Ostensibly, China has the most pragmatic engagement with Africa. Its policy is not to interfere with the internal workings of nation states or play geopolitics by pitting countries against each other. But it has become increasingly difficult for the country to resist using its military power to protect its economic interests. For its part, the US's ultimate aim is to tip the regional balance of power in its favor while also gaining access to Africa's resources. My research explores Russia's current relationship with the continent. The research examines Russian President Vladimir Putin's strategy to redress the global balance of power by countering America's influence in Africa and trying to match China's large economic footprint on the continent. I conclude that Russia's primary goal is political influence. This is achieved by gaining control of natural resources and providing military support and intelligence. Yet, despite making massive inroads, the Russian Federation is still less influential than the US and China on the continent. From the African point of view, Russia offers a strategic alternative to America's global hegemony, China's economic diplomacy and the lingering influence of Africa's former colonial masters. During the Cold War the Russians provided diplomatic, economic, military, and educational support for numerous African liberation movements. These included Algeria, Angola, Cape Verde, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Guinea, Madagascar, Sao Tome & Principe and Tanzania. As a result many young Africans were educated in Moscow. Russia began to trade and interact with these states routinely. It sent in military intelligence officers to establish a strong presence and ensure that Africa was not purely influenced by the West. The Russians developed relations with Africa so intensely that for the 10 years between 1950 and 1960 it surpassed the influence of colonizing powers. That influence would remain more or less intact until the Boris Yeltsin era. Between 1990 and 1999 Russia's impact on the continent was spectacularly lowered. Nine embassies and three consulates were closed. The number of personnel subordinated to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs was drastically reduced. Russian cultural institutions were closed, and economic relations were unilaterally terminated. Previously generous aid programs were scrapped. This all changed when Putin came to power in 1999. Under his leadership Russia has started to regain its economic and political clout in Africa. Putin has jumpstarted Russia's diplomatic, economic, and military ties with its former African allies. From my research, I can conclude that Russia's primary intent is to build political alliances by supporting nation states economically and militarily while remaining non-judgmental about their internal governance structures. Its long-term goal is to become a political, economic and military mediator that can stand behind Africa's global interests and count on the continent's support in return. Here are some of the areas where Russia are mainly active: Economic interests: Russia is now seeking to exploit conventional gas and oil fields in Africa and elsewhere. Part of its long-term energy strategy is to use Russian companies to create new streams of energy supply. For example, Russian companies have made significant investments in Algeria's oil and gas industries. They have also invested in Libya, Nigeria, Ghana, Ivory Coast and Egypt. Russia is also expanding its African interests in minerals. Uranium, key to the nuclear power industry, is at the top of its list. In addition, Russian companies are producing aluminum in Nigeria and have constructed hydropower stations in Angola, Namibia, and Botswana. Russia is also on track to build nuclear plants in Egypt, Nigeria and Algeria. These investments are a means to becoming an integral part of Africa's energy sector. Russia has also improved its commercial relations with its African partners. In 2009, it established the Coordinating Committee for Economic Cooperation with sub-Saharan Africa to assist in promoting Russian business interests. Defense interests: Russia has traditionally been one of Africa's main arms suppliers. During the Cold War, many armed liberation organizations and African countries – among the latter Angola, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Zambia and Guinea –bought military equipment from Russia. More recently Russia has made significant arms deals with Angola and Algeria. Also, Egypt, Tanzania, Somalia, Mali, Sudan and Libya have bought arms from Russia. The Russians also provide military training and support. Aid: Under Putin, Russia has made sizeable aid donations to a variety of African countries, averaging about $400 million per year. Around 60% of Russian aid is delivered through international organizations; global humanitarian organizations, including the World Food Program and the UN refugee agency. The remaining 40% gets to Africa in a framework of bilateral cooperation. Moscow also makes donations to support education, healthcare, agriculture, the environment, and energy. A risk for Moscow is that the more progress it makes with African governments, the more likely it is that its interests will collide with those of either China or the US, or both. János Besenyő is an associate Professor at Óbuda University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
HKFP
5 days ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong court to hear former Stand News editor's appeal application against sedition conviction in Sept 2026
Hong Kong's Court of Appeal will hear the appeal application of a former senior editor at defunct media outlet Stand News against his sedition conviction in September next year. The three-day hearing will begin on September 22, 2026, according to the Judiciary's court diary. Patrick Lam, the former acting chief editor at Stand News, lodged the appeal to overturn his conviction in October last year, one month after he was sentenced alongside former chief editor Chung Pui-kuen at the District Court. The pair were found guilty of 'conspiracy to publish and reproduce seditious publications' in August. The parent company of Stand News was also found guilty of the colonial-era sedition charge. Chung was sentenced to 21 months in jail, while Lam was handed a 14-month jail term. But Lam was released immediately after District Court Judge Kwok Wai-kin determined that Lam would not have to serve extra time in jail after taking into account the 10 months Lam spent in pre-trial detention and his poor health. The judgment marked the first sedition conviction of journalists in Hong Kong since the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997. 'Tool to smear and vilify' Stand News was forced to shutter in December 2021 after national security police raided its newsroom and froze its assets. The two editors and the outlet's parent company were later charged under the colonial-era sedition offence, punishable by up to two years in jail. Judge Kwok ruled that the two editors were not conducting genuine journalism during the period of the offence, but instead 'participating in the so-called resistance.' Kwok found that the news outlet had published 11 articles ruled to be seditious, 'at a time when over half of the Hong Kong society distrusted [Beijing] and [the local] government, the police, and the judiciary.' The 11 articles, mostly opinion pieces critical of the authorities, caused 'potential detrimental consequences to national security,' the judge said. Stand News 'became a tool to smear and vilify the [Beijing] Authorities and the [Hong Kong] Government' during the 2019 protests and unrest, Kwok wrote. The homegrown national security law, known locally as Article 23, which came into effect in March 2024, raised the penalty for sedition to seven years in prison and 10 years if the offender is found to have colluded with a foreign element. Separate from the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects' access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city's opposition-free legislature. The law has been criticised by rights NGOs, Western states and the UN as vague, broad and 'regressive.' Authorities, however, cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to 'close loopholes' after the 2019 protests and unrest.
