logo
‘Mooving Day': Farmers Ask Drivers Not To Honk And To ‘Please Drive Slowly' As They Relocate Cows

‘Mooving Day': Farmers Ask Drivers Not To Honk And To ‘Please Drive Slowly' As They Relocate Cows

Scoop30-05-2025
Article – RNZ
For the annual event to relocate cows they also have a plea for motorists: drive slowly., Reporter
'Don't toot your horns, and please drive slowly'. That's the message for motorists as dairy farmers walk or transport their cows to different farms over the next couple of weeks.
Moving Day, or Mooving Day as it's sometimes termed, is an annual event in the dairy farming calendar on 1 June.
The term 'Gypsy Day' was formerly used – but it has been acknowledged it may be regarded as derogatory.
From now until mid June about 5000 dairy farming families, and herds of cows, relocate to new farms – as it's the start of winter and many cows are not being milked.
Dairy NZ spokesperson Tony Finch said Moving Day happens throughout most of the country – with more density in the Waikato, Taranaki, Canterbury and Bay of Plenty regions.
Finch said thousands of people were literally moving households and farms to new sharemilking jobs and starting the new season at the same time.
'It is a really busy time for a lot of people because of the volume of them moving houses, moving possessions, kids, animals, family into a new community.
'It does make a big part of the annual dairy calendar and it can be stressful. There is a lot of planning involved.'
Finch said many cows were transported to their new farm in a stock truck, but for those not moving far they will walk on rural roads.
He is urging drivers to be patient if they are delayed behind a herd of cattle, or a stock truck on a rural road.
'I suppose the big thing we want to remind people is to be mindful, respectful and patient – that there's going to be a lot of traffic, potentially, and stock moving.'
People needed to be considerate as it was a stressful time for the animals and farmers, he said.
'Impatient drivers tooting their horns is no help – for cattle walking on the roads, and cattle in stock trucks being transported to other areas. Please do not toot. Just wait.'
Biosecurity protection
Finch said there were many rules about safely moving stock on roads, and farmers needed to have a plan surrounding their cows welfare.
To prevent the spread of potentially fatal diseases, such as Mycoplasma bovis farmers have to respect biosecurity regulations.
'It is a critical part of any movement that we ensure cows NAIT (ID tags each cow wears) are up to date. We have had some big scares in the past about biosecurity and that was M Bovis so we want all stock to be tracked correctly. And that we secure boundary fencing so cattle don't get into neighbouring farms. All equipment must be clean that's left in the farms, and what is taken to the new farm.'
It's not just diseases that have the potential to be spread – it's invasive weeds as well.
Bay of Plenty Regional Council biosecurity officer Nicky Oliver-Smith was reminding farmers and contractors that strong biosecurity practices were essential to prevent the spread of pest weeds.
'We know farmers put a huge amount of planning into the shift, and good biosecurity and effluent management are key parts of getting it right.
'Unclean machinery can easily spread pests. Just one seed or weed fragment on contaminated equipment can lead to a new infestation.'
Oliver-Smith said Alligator weed and Noogoora buras were two of the most concerning agricultural pest weeds in the region. These fast-growing weeds can reduce crop value and pose a risk to livestock if eaten.
Effluent from moving stock trucks, and cows walking along roads can also cause problems on the roads. To prevent large spillages, farmers are advised to only feed their cows dry food, and not green grass, for several hours prior to transporting them to a new farm.
One cow can produce about 52 litres of effluent a day.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?
Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?

RNZ News

time6 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?

RNZ's money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Send your questions to I recently separated and managed to buy the house and own it myself with a mortgage ... I have been seeing someone that I don't plan to live with. So my question is if you have a relationship with someone for a length of time that you don't live with or share bills with do I need to protect myself with a prenuptial agreement? When does the relationship need to have documentation of what I own and never want to share? People normally think of relationship property issues arising when a couple lives together but you can sometimes be captured even if you're living apart. Victoria University law professor Nicola Peart said this question came down to whether a relationship would qualify as 'de facto' . She pointed to the Property Relationships Act, which sets out a definition of a de facto relationship. But she said none of the criteria were essential to decide that someone was in such a relationships. The act says that the things taken into account include the nature of the relationship, the extent of common residence, whether you have a sexual relationship, the amount of financial interdependence between the parties, the ownership and use of property, the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life, the performance of household duties and the public aspects of the relationship, as well as the care of children. So it's possible you could tick off those factors while still maintaining separate homes. "Not living in the same house or not sharing finances does not exclude the possibility that a de facto relationship exists. If in doubt, contract out to preserve separate property ," Peart said. My partner of 11yrs received his inheritance last September. Just wondering if I'm entitled to any of it ... we split up just five weeks ago due to an argument. It sort of depends what he did with it when he received it. If it went into a joint bank account you both contribute to and pay bills from, or into a mortgage on your family home, for example, then it's likely to have become relationship property and you would be entitled to a share of it. But if he has kept it separate, you might not be. This would be a good thing to talk to a lawyer about as you work through your separation agreements. If property investors are making a loss, can't they still get something back on taxes? Through a rebate scheme? I thought I heard something about that. It used to be the case that property investors who made a loss on their rental investments could offset that against their other sources of income, such as the salary and wages they received from their job. That would reduce the tax they paid and sometimes meant they got a tax refund at the end of the year. That ended when "residential loss ring fencing" rules were introduced in 2019. "Broadly, these rules quarantine any losses from residential property so they can only be offset against profits from residential property, either carried forward to a future year or offset against other properties in a portfolio. There are some minor exceptions to these rules, for example for property which is or will be taxed on sale, and a property that is also a person's main home," said Robyn Walker, a tax partner at Deloitte. What you might have heard about recently is the reintroduction of interest deductibility. From 2021, investors' ability to include interest payments in their calculation of property profits was phased out. That's returned now, which will usually reduce their tax bills. Walker said another thing you might be thinking of is the Investment Boost policy. "This allows a 20 percent deduction for the cost of new assets which are used for business purposes on or after 22 May 2025. There are some restrictions on this as it does not apply to residential property or improvements to residential property. This restriction covers the building itself, it's possible that Investment Boost can apply to other assets which are included in a residential property but are not part of the property itself - separately identifiable chattels like a fridge. Again, any deductions available under the Investment Boost are also subject to the ring fencing rules." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Alternative Alert System ‘Mothballed' Despite Benefits
Alternative Alert System ‘Mothballed' Despite Benefits

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

Alternative Alert System ‘Mothballed' Despite Benefits

Article – RNZ The founder of an alternative alert framework says officials never gave it a look-in when they were setting up the under-fire Emergency Mobile Alert system. The founder of an alternative emergency alert framework says officials never gave it a look-in when they were setting up the under-fire Emergency Mobile Alert system. And he reckons his was better, proving its worth during the aftermath of the Christchurch quakes. The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) is investigating glitches in the current system following the magnitude 8.8 earthquake off Russia on Wednesday. Some Kiwis say they received up to 50 alerts, while some did not receive any at all. Matthew Nolan founded an alternative system, Readynet, which was used during the Christchurch Earthquakes and to mobilise volunteers cleaning up the Rena oil spill. 'I think that the NEMA system – which costs them the best part of $20 million – has miscued for them, and it's certainly not the first time,' he told Morning Report on Friday. 'There is a record of it waking people up at night for messages that were text messages only, and as well as circumstances where people did not get the alert that they should have got.' NEMA spokesperson John Price told Checkpoint on Thursday there were many reasons for the differences. 'It could be different providers and different cell towers. There's a lot of possibilities, but this is something we're working through. We'll look into it, absolutely.' Nolan criticised the NEMA system as being 'one-way' only, and unable to tell if people had actually received the message as no information was sent back. 'Whereas other systems and a better system, and yes, our system was interactive, and we could see where the messages had been received. 'So for example, you send a message out into an area where there's a big river and cell towers have been wiped out. Our system would tell you that all the people in that river have not received the message – all the people in that river valley have not received the message. You can deduct from that, that in fact, the cell phone towers are out.' He claimed the Emergency Mobile Alert system 'can't target messages'. 'It's a modern equivalent of a World War 2 fire siren. It alerts people that something's happening and it gives them a brief message, but it can't target messages. 'So for example… people in Upper Hutt got no message. In Lower Hutt, lots of people got the message. So, you know, why is there a difference between one area and another?' According to the NEMA website, the current system can 'broadcast to all capable phones from targeted cell towers to areas affected by serious hazards'. 'You may not receive an alert if you are out of mobile coverage, mobile phone towers are damaged, or there is a power outage.' Price said the variation in coverage 'could be different providers and different cell towers, there's a lot of possibilities'. Nolan suggested the system was not working as well as it could because it was now owned by 'a banking conglomerate out of New York'. New Zealand's system was provided by Dutch company one2many, which is now a division of Everbridge Public Warning, an American software company that specialises in alert systems. 'Now, those sorts of companies are chasing the big markets, the multi-million markets, and I think New Zealand is a very small end of that market,' Nolan said. 'There is no office of that organisation in Wellington to work alongside emergency services in New Zealand… 'I think that a New Zealand-owned, developed, supported, helpdesked system is the best, and that's what we had built, and our system is now mothballed.' He said he asked officials to look at using Readynet for the national system, but 'they never ever fully examined what we had, even though it was used during Christchurch to communicate after the Christchurch earthquake, to communicate with all the residents and contractors left inside the cordons. 'And that was, information such as, well, 'The cordon will be open on the corner of such and such street at four o'clock this afternoon to allow people in and out for shopping there.' That's the sort of stuff you can't put on Facebook.' As of Friday morning, a tsunami advisory remained in place. Pacific nations emerged relatively unscathed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store