logo
This was supposed to be the best foldable of 2025, so why doesn't it exist?

This was supposed to be the best foldable of 2025, so why doesn't it exist?

Phone Arenaa day ago
I've been a fan of this phone brand ever since its inception, which coincided with the start of my employment here at PhoneArena. Ever since then, through the ups and downs, great releases, and disappointing launches, I've always enjoyed using devices made by this specific brand. It probably hasn't grown to be the household name its founders intended, but it is definitely one of the more recognizable Android makers around that still provide steady competition to Samsung, Google, and Apple. And it simply refuses to make the phone that would easily sweep the competition in the US. The brand is OnePlus, and the dream phone in question is none other than the OnePlus Open 2, which doesn't exist, but I'd have been on cloud nine if it did. At the time of its launch, the first OnePlus Open was one of the better foldable phones available in the US, a very decent and appealing alternative to the Galaxy Z Fold and the Pixel Fold. Looking back at it in hindsight from mid-2025, it is a bit rough around the edges and had a lot of potential for steady improvements but was still among the best phones you could get in late 2023, either foldables or not.
The blessing and the curse of the OnePlus Open is that it wasn't a terribly original phone, so to speak. The phone used the design blueprint of parent company Oppo's Find N3 foldable and combined superb hardware with OnePlus' pretty decent OxygenOS, which is still among the cleaner custom Android skins around.
The OnePlus Open had a decent camera, a small display crease, and lots of other redeeming qualities, with the only "downside" being its fairly high price (which was still more affordable than the Galaxy or the first Pixel Fold ).
Overall, a successful translation of an excellent Oppo phone to a superb OnePlus flagship, which at the time felt like a formula that would be easily perfected in the future. I mean, the only thing OnePlus had to do was get Oppo's next foldable, rebadge it, throw in its own interface, and call it a day.
However, the hopes of getting a successor to the OnePlus Open , likely styled after the exceptional Oppo Find N5, were sadly crushed with the announcement that OnePlus won't be releasing a foldable phone in 2025.
Ah, what woe! With the risk of sounding melodramatic, I still remember the day when I read that news, and ever since, I've had the blues when I think of OnePlus, as the OnePlus Open 2 was probably my most anticipated device of the year, the one that could have easily stolen the spotlight in 2025.
It would have been an outstanding phone: below 9 mm in thickness when folded, with super-bright OLED displays, the Snapdragon 8 Elite, a large 6,000 mAh silicon-carbon battery, and a great camera, as well as all the other exceptional bits and pieces that make the Oppo Find N5 such an impressive device of its own.
The OnePlus Open 2 would have been the perfect foldable phone (Image by PhoneArena)
Well, sure, in all but name the Oppo Find N5 is essentially what the OnePlus Open 2 should have been.
However, while it went global, the phone isn't available in some key markets like the USA, and it might not support all the bands of your carrier, so even if you go out of your way to import the device, there's always the risk that it won't work properly, as a OnePlus phone would. This makes it a curiosity that only phone reviewers, YouTubers, and die-hard foldable or Oppo fans would want to use, less so the average person who's browsing the phone section at Walmart, T-Mobile, or Best Buy.
There are also some small but important differences in the interface. Despite the most significant difference between OxygenOS and ColorOS being the name itself, the interface that OnePlus uses has an extra sprinkle of attention to detail. Color OS, while mostly similar, just feels off. Another phone that could have helped OnePlus stay in the conversation more is a hypothetical OnePlus 13 Ultra, and that's yet another device that doesn't exist.
The OnePlus 13 is mostly a slightly downgraded version of the Oppo Find X8 Pro, lacking the nice periscope camera and the quick camera button, for example. Well, the China-only Oppo Find X8 Ultra, which I really wanted to use as a daily driver, would have served as a very impressive foundation for a hypothetical OnePlus 13 Ultra, a phone that could have easily intermingled with all the top flagships in the US and potentially come out on top.
Sadly, like the OnePlus Open 2 , it seems OnePlus is slowly getting pushed out of the premium segment. Not from an outside factor or a rival, but from within, from Oppo's market strategies themselves.
Due to the geopolitical situation, it seems that Oppo is wary of spending too many resources on the US market, and while the global versions of all its phones and OnePlus itself are still mostly good to go in the US, this year's toning down of the flagship and high-end effort is likely a sign of the things to come. Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Samsung set to win infringement case which will impact iPhone 17e prices
Samsung set to win infringement case which will impact iPhone 17e prices

Phone Arena

timean hour ago

  • Phone Arena

Samsung set to win infringement case which will impact iPhone 17e prices

Samsung filed an infringement case against Chinese display manufacturer BOE ages ago, and is now set to win after a recent ruling by the ITC ( International Trade Commission ). When the case concludes, the results will be a major blow to BOE, and will most likely negatively impact the pricing of the iPhone ITC has ruled ( translated source ) that BOE infringed on Samsung Display's trade secrets. Furthermore, new restrictions are currently set to be placed on BOE, which will prevent any products containing its display panels from being imported into the U.S. This will be problematic for Samsung's largest rival in the smartphone space: Apple. Apple has used BOE for its more affordable displays for years, particularly on budget offerings like the iPhone 16e. The iPhone 17e was likely going to use BOE panels as well, but may no longer be allowed to do so. This will almost assuredly result in prices going up. Additionally, BOE had just scored a major win with Apple, having been entrusted with iPhone 17 display production for the Chinese market. Until very recently, BOE had been failing to meet Apple's standards, and was set to lose out on iPhone 17 orders entirely. While the ITC's ruling shouldn't affect devices being made for Chinese consumers, it will make it much more difficult for BOE to conduct further business with Apple. The iPhone 16e uses displays manufactured by BOE. | Video credit — Apple Apple has been trying to shift entirely to using displays provided by BOE for years. The manufacturer was recently projected to have the majority share of MacBook displays as well. Simply put, BOE provided displays at more affordable rates than Samsung Display and LG Display. As such, Apple saw it as a means to reduce manufacturing there was always something going wrong with BOE's attempts. Either its displays wouldn't meet the standards for global implementation on the top-end iPhone models, or it would try to pull a fast one on Apple. This new development may be the final nail in the coffin for BOE for a very long time. It all depends on whether the company is able to catch up to its competitors quickly, hopefully by its own merit this time. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

Samsung Galaxy S26 sizes leak, lineup outlines similar strategy to Apple's iPhone 17
Samsung Galaxy S26 sizes leak, lineup outlines similar strategy to Apple's iPhone 17

Phone Arena

time2 hours ago

  • Phone Arena

Samsung Galaxy S26 sizes leak, lineup outlines similar strategy to Apple's iPhone 17

The Samsung Galaxy S26 models will be more of the same as their predecessors when it comes to display sizes. However, Samsung is reportedly ( translated source ) abandoning the Plus model and replacing it with the new Edge, a strategy similar to Apple's approach for the iPhone 17. According to the report, the sizes of the base Galaxy S26 , the S26 Edge, and the S26 Ultra will be pretty similar to their Galaxy S25 counterparts. To be precise, the phones will have the following sizes: Base Galaxy S26 : 6.27 inches : 6.27 inches Galaxy S26 Edge: 6.66 inches Edge: 6.66 inches Galaxy S26 Ultra: 6.89 inches It appears that Samsung will once again not be making its flagships larger, a decision that many users will be more than okay with. As of now, it seems that phone manufacturers have somewhat moved on from boasting about cameras and sizes, and are instead focusing on thickness and AI. The Galaxy Z Fold 7, which is currently up for pre-ordering, was heavily marketed as a super slim foldable compared to the Galaxy Z Fold 6. Furthermore, Samsung once again talked about how it would provide the best AI experience on its phones. Though the Fold did see a camera upgrade, it wasn't anything groundbreaking: it just adopted the camera found on the Galaxy S25 Ultra. Samsung has released a foldable that gives the industry a run for its money. | Video credit — Samsung The cancellation of the Plus model — and its replacement with the Edge — is a very similar strategy to what Apple is employing for the iPhone 17 . Apple will be introducing a new model this year, the iPhone 17 Air. The Air will be just like the Galaxy S25 Edge: focusing on aesthetics at the cost of some practicality. It will be also be replacing the iPhone Plus model due to poor sales. However, Samsung and Apple are diverging in other aspects. Apple is reportedly making its Pro models thicker so that it can pack more battery into their chassis. Meanwhile, Samsung will be making its phones slimmer still, and will not be opting for improvements to battery capacity just yet. $1120 off (53%) Pre-order the Galaxy Z Fold 7 at Samsung and grab a free storage upgrade on the 512GB model. On top of that, you can save an extra up to $1,000 with eligible device trade-ins. Pre-order at Samsung Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

Google Fi's latest upgrade doesn't involve signal bars, but it might save your phone
Google Fi's latest upgrade doesn't involve signal bars, but it might save your phone

Phone Arena

time2 hours ago

  • Phone Arena

Google Fi's latest upgrade doesn't involve signal bars, but it might save your phone

Google Fi is Google's own mobile service that runs on T-Mobile's network and it comes with some pretty cool perks. For one, Google Fi doesn't throttle your data during busy times, so your speeds stay steady. Plus, it switches between multiple networks to keep you connected whether you are traveling around the US or abroad. Now, Google is leveling up device protection, too. Following what we saw earlier this year with Pixel Preferred Care, Fi's own protection plan just switched providers – from Assurant to Asurion. Yep, if your device is shipped on or after July 14, 2025, Asurion is your device protection provider. That is the same Asurion that already works with Verizon, AT&T and Samsung, so Google is clearly going with an experienced partner. The plan itself is getting a small but very welcome improvement, too. You now get up to two claims for loss, theft or physical damage in a rolling 12-month period (except in New York). Previously, that was just one. And of course, the plan still covers up to two cases of accidental damage – like screen cracks or spills – plus unlimited coverage for mechanical breakdowns. That applies to phones and smartwatches bought through the Google Fi for pricing, it varies depending on your device. For example, the latest Pixel Watch 3 or the brand new Galaxy Watch 8 will run you $4 per month, while phones are pricier – think $12/month for the Pixel 9 Pro and $14/month for the Galaxy S25 Ultra. There's also a deductible. For example, cracking the screen on your Galaxy Ultra and getting it repaired in-store would cost you about $29. Samsung's Ultra model is typically among the priciest to insure. | Image credit – PhoneArena Other carriers offer similar protection plans, too. T-Mobile , for instance, works with Assurant – Google's former partner – and has its own plan called Protection 360. It covers loss and theft up to five claims a year (which is a lot), unlimited accidental damage, and even includes $0 screen repairs. But it'll cost you more: anywhere from $7 to $25 per month, depending on your device. If you've got something like the Galaxy S25 Ultra , you are looking at the top tier – around $18 to $25 a yeah, Google Fi's updated protection plan actually stacks up pretty well. You are getting solid coverage, a trusted provider in Asurion and pricing that feels fair. Sure, you get fewer loss or theft claims compared to T-Mobile , but two per year is still reasonable – unless you are constantly misplacing your phone, in which case… maybe a strap's not a bad idea. Jokes aside, if you are someone who tends to drop, crack or lose your phone often, having extra coverage – no matter the provider – is just smart. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store