&w=3840&q=100)
New Zealand halts millions of dollars in aid to Cook Islands over deals with China
This photo taken on June 15, 2025 shows a sign outside the Apii Nikao primary school, funded by the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Cook Islands on the main island of Rarotonga. AFP
New Zealand's government halted aid to close partner the Cook Islands on Thursday because of a row over agreements the Pacific island nation struck with China.
New Zealand 'paused' the payments and would not resume them until the Cook Islands took 'concrete steps' to restore trust, a spokesman for Foreign Minister Winston Peters said in a statement.
The self-governing Cook Islands, a country of 17,000 people, has a 'free association' relationship with its former colonial ruler New Zealand, which provides budgetary assistance as well as help on foreign affairs and defence.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Cook Islands caught New Zealand off guard in February when it signed a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership agreement with China covering deep-sea mining, regional cooperation and economic issues.
Peters' spokesman pointed to the 'lack of consultation' surrounding the 'agreements signed by the Cook Islands and China' as a reason for the aid pause.
'Trust and meaningful engagement are fundamental to free association,' he said.
New Zealand provided US$116 million (NZ$194 million) to the Cook Islands over the past three years, according to government figures.
It has paused a planned US$11 million development assistance payment for the next financial year.
'New Zealand will also not consider significant new funding until the Cook Islands Government takes concrete steps to repair the relationship and restore trust,' Peters' spokesman said.
'New Zealand hopes that steps will be taken swiftly to address New Zealand's concerns so that this support can be resumed as soon as possible.'
The pause in funding comes as New Zealand's Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is scheduled to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Friday.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday morning, Peters said the funding pause was not timed to coincide with Luxon's trip to China.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Peters said he discussed New Zealand's concerns about the Cook Islands agreement during a meeting with China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi earlier this year.
Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
'About control'
Brown survived a no-confidence vote in February over the deal with China, blaming 'misinformation' from New Zealand for destabilising his country.
'It becomes very clear this is not about consultation. This is about control,' he said at the time.
Former Australian diplomat Mihai Sora said Cook Islands was being 'a bit cute'.
'And it's not surprising that New Zealand has reacted in such a way,' the Lowy Institute analyst told AFP.
'New Zealand obviously wants to repair its relationship with Cook Islands. It wants to block China from gaining increased strategic access to the Cook Islands, but also essentially to its immediate neighbourhood.
'But if Cook Islands pushes closer to China in a way that threatens New Zealand's national security, it's really not possible to have such intimate ties.'
New Zealand also announced this year it would review aid to climate-threatened Pacific nation Kiribati, one of China's closest friends in the region.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The review came after Kiribati's president brushed off a planned meeting with Peters at the last minute.
'This was especially disappointing because the visit was to be the first in over five years by a New Zealand minister to Kiribati,' Peters' office said at the time.
'For this reason, we are reviewing our development programme in Kiribati.'
New Zealand had given around US$57 million in aid to Kiribati since 2021, according to official figures, including money for 'economic development and climate resilience'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Days after Trump claimed credit, Coca-Cola announces new cane sugar Coke. But classic recipe stays
Days after US President Donald Trump claimed he had convinced Coca-Cola to swap out high-fructose corn syrup for cane sugar, the company has confirmed it will release a new version of Coke made with US cane sugar—though its flagship product will remain unchanged. As per CNN, in its quarterly earnings report Tuesday, Coca-Cola said that as 'part of its ongoing innovation agenda,' it would launch a new cane sugar version of its cola in the fall, intended to 'complement the company's strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences.' Some regional versions of Coke, such as the Mexican variant, already use cane sugar. Last week, Trump posted on Truth Social that Coca-Cola had 'agreed' to use cane sugar in its colas. However, the company's announcement clarifies that the traditional Coke recipe sold in the US will continue to include high-fructose corn syrup. The move aligns with a broader push from Trump's Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has publicly railed against high-fructose corn syrup. As per a report by CNN, in a September appearance on Dr. Jordan Peterson's podcast, Kennedy called it a 'formula for making you obese and diabetic,' as part of his ongoing campaign to eliminate artificial and ultra-processed ingredients from American foods. High-fructose corn syrup has long been used in US-made Coca-Cola because of its low cost and abundance, especially compared to cane sugar. Health experts warn, however, that neither ingredient makes soda healthy. While cane sugar may seem more 'natural,' nutritionists continue to flag sugar-sweetened beverages as major contributors to obesity, diabetes, and other chronic health conditions.
New Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
UN says Israeli military killed over 1,000 seeking Gaza aid since late May
GENEVA: The UN on Tuesday said Israeli forces have killed over 1,000 Palestinians trying to get food aid in Gaza since the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operations. An officially private effort, the GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel halted supplies into the Gaza Strip for more than two months, sparking famine warnings. GHF operations have been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli forces firing on people waiting to collect rations in the Palestinian territory. "Over 1,000 Palestinians have now been killed by the Israeli military while trying to get food in Gaza since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operating," UN human rights office spokesman Thameen Al-Kheetan told AFP. "As of July 21, we have recorded 1,054 people killed in Gaza while trying to get food; 766 of them were killed in the vicinity of GHF sites and 288 near UN and other humanitarian organisations' aid convoys." Kheetan added, "Our data is based on information from multiple reliable sources on the ground, including medical teams, humanitarian and human rights organisations." The war in Gaza has created dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people who live in the coastal territory. Gaza's population faces severe shortages of food and other essentials. GHF says it has distributed more than 1.4 million boxes of foodstuffs to date. "We're adjusting our operations in real time to keep people safe and informed, and we stand ready to partner with other organisations to scale up and deliver more meals to the people of Gaza," GHF interim director John Acree said Monday. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the GHF over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives and violates basic humanitarian principles.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
22 minutes ago
- First Post
How state plunder and CPEC have made Balochistan Pakistan's Achilles' heel
Pakistan's focus on external threats over internal reconciliation highlights its failure to assert sovereignty through governance, leaving Balochistan a battleground for both local aspirations and global ambitions read more In the past week, the BLA has launched a deadly assault on Pakistani security forces, killing 29 people in Quetta and Kalat. The attack targeted a bus reportedly carrying over 48 passengers, including Pakistani soldiers. Image: AFP The Balochistan Liberation Army's (BLA) relentless campaign against Pakistani forces has thrust Pakistan's largest yet most marginalised province into the spotlight of a deepening crisis. In the first half of 2025 alone, the BLA claimed responsibility for 286 attacks, resulting in over 697 Pakistani military personnel killed and significant territorial gains, including the seizure of 45 strategic locations. In the past week, the BLA has launched a deadly assault on Pakistani security forces, killing 29 people in Quetta and Kalat. The attack targeted a bus reportedly carrying over 48 passengers, including Pakistani soldiers. This incident marks one of the deadliest strikes in recent months, pushing the military's casualty count to its highest in the past six months. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These audacious operations, marked by sophisticated tactics and coordinated assaults on military infrastructure, signal a reinvigorated insurgency that challenges Pakistan's sovereignty over its resource-rich western frontier. The BLA's actions, including high-profile attacks like the Jaffar Express hijacking in March 2025, underscore a growing defiance rooted in decades of grievances—political exclusion, economic exploitation, and systemic human rights abuses. Balochistan, despite its vast reserves of gas, gold, and copper, remains Pakistan's poorest region, with 70 per cent of its population living in multidimensional poverty. The province's strategic significance, amplified by the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), has only intensified tensions, as Baloch nationalists view such projects as tools of external exploitation rather than local development. Pakistan's heavy-handed military response, characterised by enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings, has further alienated the Baloch, swelling the ranks of insurgent groups with educated youth and even women. This escalating conflict exposes not only Pakistan's failure to integrate Balochistan but also its inability to reconcile with a population demanding autonomy or independence. The BLA's growing sophistication and public support signal a broader rejection of Islamabad's authority, raising questions about the state's capacity to maintain control over a region integral to its geopolitical ambitions. As the violence intensifies, the roots of this conflict—historical neglect, resource disputes, militarisation, and external influences—demand closer examination to understand why Pakistan's grip on Balochistan is slipping. Historical Neglect and Broken Promises The roots of the Pakistan-BLA conflict trace back to the forced annexation of Balochistan in 1948, when the princely state of Kalat was coerced into joining Pakistan despite its brief declaration of independence. This historical grievance set the stage for recurring rebellions, with five major uprisings since 1947, each driven by the Baloch people's sense of betrayal. The Pakistani state's early policies, such as the One-Unit scheme of 1955, which merged Balochistan into West Pakistan, stripped the region of its distinct identity and political agency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These actions sowed seeds of distrust that have persisted for decades. Baloch nationalists argue that Islamabad's promises of autonomy and development have consistently been broken, leaving the province politically marginalised. Despite constituting 44 per cent of Pakistan's landmass, Balochistan holds only 5 per cent of its population and lacks proportional representation in federal institutions, with Punjabi elites dominating the bureaucracy. The dismissal of Balochistan's provincial government in 1973, followed by a brutal four-year insurgency, further deepened this alienation. Successive governments have failed to address these grievances, opting instead for cosmetic reforms or outright repression. The Baloch see their region's strategic importance—bordering Iran and Afghanistan, with a coastline along the Arabian Sea—as a curse, exploited by the central government for geopolitical gain without reciprocal investment in local welfare. This historical neglect has created a fertile ground for the BLA's narrative of resistance, framing their fight as a legitimate struggle against a state that has consistently failed to honour Balochistan's sovereignty or aspirations for self-determination. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Economic Exploitation and the CPEC Balochistan's vast natural resources—gas, coal, gold, and copper—should have made it a cornerstone of Pakistan's economic growth, yet the province remains mired in poverty. The central government's exploitation of these resources, often without equitable benefit to the local population, has been a key driver of the BLA's insurgency. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a $62 billion infrastructure project linking China's western region to Gwadar's deep-sea port, has become a lightning rod for Baloch grievances. While CPEC is touted as a game-changer for Pakistan, Baloch nationalists view it as a symbol of external exploitation, with Chinese investments prioritising federal and foreign interests over local needs. Militarised Repression Deepens Alienation Pakistan's response to Baloch dissent has relied heavily on militarisation, exacerbating the conflict and undermining its sovereignty over Balochistan. The Pakistani military's 'kill-and-dump' policy, involving enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings, has targeted thousands of Baloch activists, students, and intellectuals since the early 2000s. Estimates suggest over 20,000 Baloch have gone missing, with bodies often found bearing torture marks, fuelling public outrage. Operations like the 2025 counterinsurgency campaign, involving drone strikes and mass arrests in Quetta and Mastung, have failed to quell the BLA's momentum, instead radicalising more civilians. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The military's heavy presence—over 50,000 troops stationed in Balochistan—creates a siege-like atmosphere, with checkpoints and raids disrupting daily life. This approach has alienated even moderate Baloch, who view it as collective punishment. The BLA's recruitment of educated youth, including women, reflects this growing resentment, with groups like the BLA's Majeed Brigade conducting suicide attacks against military targets in 2025. Pakistan's refusal to pursue political solutions, coupled with its reliance on force, has strengthened the BLA's narrative of state oppression, eroding trust in federal authority. By prioritising security over dialogue, Pakistan has failed to address the root causes of unrest, allowing the BLA to gain legitimacy as defenders of Baloch rights. This militarised approach not only escalates the conflict but also exposes Pakistan's inability to govern Balochistan effectively, weakening its claim to sovereignty. External Influences and Geopolitical Stakes Balochistan's strategic location and resources have drawn external actors, complicating the Pakistan-BLA conflict and exposing vulnerabilities in Pakistan's sovereignty. Bordering Iran and Afghanistan, with access to the Arabian Sea, Balochistan is a geopolitical hotspot. The CPEC has elevated its importance, with China investing heavily in Gwadar and energy projects. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, Iran's concerns about Baloch militancy spilling across its border have led to joint military operations with Pakistan, further complicating the regional dynamic. The BLA's reported ties to sanctuaries in Afghanistan, where porous borders allow training and arms flows, have emboldened its 2025 offensive, with 45 strategic locations seized. These external factors expose Pakistan's failure to secure Balochistan's borders, undermining its territorial control. The involvement of global powers in CPEC amplifies local grievances, as Baloch nationalists frame their struggle as resistance to foreign-backed exploitation. Pakistan's reliance on Chinese investment to stabilise its economy ties its hands, limiting its ability to address Baloch demands for fear of jeopardising CPEC. This geopolitical entanglement, coupled with Pakistan's inability to counter external influences or secure regional cooperation, has allowed the BLA to exploit fault lines, intensifying the conflict. The state's focus on external threats over internal reconciliation highlights its failure to assert sovereignty through governance, leaving Balochistan a battleground for both local aspirations and global ambitions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author, a columnist and research scholar, teaches journalism at St. Xavier's College (autonomous), Kolkata. His handle on X is @sayantan_gh. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
