WearOS smartwatches will soon warn you about earthquakes: Here's how Google's alert system works
The first sign of this new feature came from the Google System Release Notes page, which quietly mentioned that users will 'get alerts on Wear when an earthquake is expected to cause shaking.' 'Wear' here almost certainly refers to WearOS, Google's smartwatch operating system that powers devices from brands like Samsung, Fossil, and more. So, if you're someone who wears a Galaxy Watch or any other WearOS device, you'll soon be able to get earthquake alerts right on your wrist.
It looks like this update is rolling out with Google Play Service version 25.21. While Google hasn't officially announced the release yet, but Android Authority spotted early hints of it in an APK teardown. That means the groundwork is already being laid, and it's only a matter of time before the feature goes live for everyone.
Here's how it'll work: if Google's system detects shaking, your compatible smartwatch will buzz with an alert, just like your phone does now. You'll get the same information - magnitude, distance to the epicentre, and a heads-up that shaking is expected. It's a small addition, but it could make a huge difference, especially if your phone isn't nearby. Think about those times you're out for a run, in the kitchen, or just have your phone charging in another room - your watch will still keep you in the loop.
Why does this matter? Because earthquakes are unpredictable and can cause devastating damage, especially in densely populated places like India. Having an early warning - even if it's just a few seconds - can give people enough time to get to safety. Sure, no alert system is perfect, but expanding this feature to smartwatches means more people can be reached, more quickly. That's a win for everyone.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pioneer VREC-H520DC dashcam review: A worthy investment or just an expensive toy?
The Pioneer VREC-H520DC dashcam gets a clear HD display to preview recordings. Check Offers A recent survey of 3,000 car owners across Delhi NCR, Mumbai, and Bangalore found that nearly 48 per cent consider front and rear dashcams the most important feature new cars should come equipped with, ranked even above six airbags or Bharat NCAP ratings. The shift is tied to growing concerns about road rage, accidents, and insurance disputes, situations where video evidence can make a real difference. To address this growing interest, Pioneer introduced a range of dashcams in India in 2024, with prices starting at ₹ 5,399 and topping out at ₹ 23,499. One of the higher-end models in this lineup is the Pioneer VREC-H520DC, a dual-channel setup officially priced at ₹ 18,499. It offers features like a 2K QHD, 5 MP front camera with Sony's Starvis 2 sensor, a 1080p rear camera, GPS tracking, Wi-Fi connectivity and parking surveillance. On paper, it sounds well-equipped, but how does it perform in real-world conditions? Here's what we found. Pioneer VREC-H520DC: Design and build Inside the box, the H520DC includes the front and rear cameras, a micro-USB cable to connect them, a USB-C power cable, a 12V adapter, and two electrostatic mounting sheets. While installation is fairly straightforward, it's a bit disappointing that cable management clips aren't included, considering the price. The main unit resembles a compact digital camera and feels solidly built, while the rear unit is smaller and easier to hide, but doesn't match the front in terms of material quality. A 3-inch screen on the back of the front camera is bright and usable in all lighting. The front lens offers a 143-degree field of view and uses the Sony IMX675 Starvis 2 sensor. There are six buttons in total: four below the screen for navigation, and two on the side for power and switching channels. The Pioneer VREC-H520DC supports microSD cards of upto 512 gb. The front camera mount is adjustable in both rotation and tilt, but the rear mount only allows tilt adjustment once fixed in place. Fortunately, the electrostatic sheets can be repositioned easily for minor alignment corrections. Pioneer VREC-H520DC: App and user experience The camera pairs with Pioneer's 'ZenVue' app, available on Android and iOS. Once connected via Wi-Fi, users can view footage, switch channels, and transfer files. While pairing was seamless with Android during testing, we did face connection issues with an iOS device. The app itself is minimal and easy to navigate, but we did encounter a bug early on. After a firmware update, the on-screen text on the camera disappeared, and the menus were still functional but completely blank. A factory reset fixed the issue, but it's worth noting for users who may not be familiar with the settings layout. We were only able to fix the glitch because we had luckily remembered where the reset option was in the menu. After setup, the interface is generally straightforward, both on the app and the camera. Features like loop recording, parking mode (which requires a separate hardwire kit), and emergency event recording are available. ADAS alerts are also included. There's an option to turn off the sound alerts or entirely disable the feature if it becomes a distraction. Pioneer VREC-H520DC: Performance and video quality Like many dashcams, the unit warms up slightly in use due to its bright display and Wi-Fi chip, but not to an alarming level. Daytime video quality is quite sharp, and license plates are clearly visible from about two car lengths. Night performance is decent, too, with the Sony sensor doing a good job in low-light traffic. However, smaller plates on two-wheelers or autorickshaws can still be hard to read, especially in motion. The 1080p rear camera is sufficient for basic rear coverage during the day, though it doesn't hold up well in low light to be able to recognise plates while on the move. Still, thanks to the wide-angle lenses, coverage is broad enough to capture most relevant activity around the vehicle. The rear unit is small and easy to conceal. Motion sensing for automatic emergency recordings works reliably, and the sensitivity can be adjusted to suit different driving conditions. GPS data, including location and speed, is consistently recorded in the video files, which can be useful for insurance claims or reviewing incidents. Additionally, there is also a hotkey to start and stop recording the audio in case of emergencies. One of the four navigation buttons is mapped to the mute/unmute switch, which can prove useful when someone comes up to your window to have a chat. Whether it is a road rage scenario or a cop situation, you can always be rolling the tapes. Furthermore, the screen turns off the display, which makes it non-obnoxious is such situations. As for ADAS alerts, they didn't have much practical impact on typical city traffic. The only frequent alert was a vague 'front vehicle motion detected' message accompanied by a chime. Since looking at the camera while driving isn't feasible, these alerts don't add much to the experience and may be better left disabled. The image quality of the Pioneer VREC-H520DC is decent to serve the purpose which it is built for. Pioneer VREC-H520DC: Verdict The Pioneer VREC-H520DC delivers on its core purpose, which is capturing clear, reliable footage during both day and night. Its dual-channel setup, intuitive interface, and dependable build give it an edge over generic budget models. However, it's not without flaws, software bugs, limited ADAS utility and a few missing installation aids slightly undercut the experience. While the official ₹ 18,499 price tag is not very affordable, it can be considered for the price at which it is available on e-commerce platforms around the ₹ 13,000 mark. It is a capable option for users mainly interested in good-quality dashcam footage and basic parking surveillance. However, if your main goal is to add meaningful ADAS functions to an older vehicle, this model might fall short of expectations. Overall, the H520DC is a solid offering, being good at its primary function of recording accidental events and proof-keeping. First Published Date: 05 Jul 2025, 08:44 AM IST
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Technobabble: We need a whole new vocabulary to keep up with the evolution of AI
The artificial intelligence (AI) news flow does not stop, and it's becoming increasingly obscure and pompous. China's MiniMax just spiked efficiency and context length, but we are not gasping. Elon Musk says Grok will 'redefine human knowledge," but is that a new algorithm or just hot air? Andrej Karpathy's 'Software 3.0" sounds clever but lacks real-world bite. Mira Murati bet $2 billion on 'custom models," a term so vague it could mean anything. And only by testing Kimi AI's 'Researcher" did we get why it's slick and different. Technology now sprints past our words. As machines get smarter, our language lags. Buzzwords, recycled slogans and podcast quips fill the air but clarify nothing. This isn't just messy, it's dangerous. Investors chase vague terms, policymakers regulate without definitions and the public confuses breakthroughs with sci-fi. Also Read: An AI gadget mightier than the sword? We're in a tech revolution with a vocabulary stuck in the dial-up days. We face a generational shift in technology without a stable vocabulary to navigate it. This language gap is not a side issue. It is a core challenge that requires a new discipline: a fierce scepticism of hype and a deep commitment to the details. The instinct to simplify is a trap. Once, a few minutes was enough to explain breakthrough apps like Google or Uber. Now, innovations in robotics or custom silicon resist such compression. Understanding OpenAI's strategy or Nvidia's product stack requires time, not sound-bites. We must treat superficial simplicity as a warning sign. Hot areas like AI 'agents' or 'reasoning layers' lack shared standards or benchmarks. Everyone wants to sell a 'reasoning model,' but no one agrees on what that means or how to measure it. Most corporate announcements are too polished to interrogate and their press releases are not proof of defensible innovation. Extraordinary claims need demos, user numbers and real-world metrics. When the answers are fuzzy, the claim is unproven. In today's landscape, scepticism is not cynicism. It is discipline. This means we must get comfortable with complexity. Rather than glossing over acronyms, we must dig in. Modern tech is layered with convenient abstractions that make understanding easier, but often too easy. A robo-taxi marketed as 'full self-driving' or a model labelled 'serverless' demands that we look beneath the surface. Also Read: Productivity puzzle: Solow's paradox has come to haunt AI adoption We don't need to reinvent every wheel, but a good slogan should never be an excuse for missing what is critical. The only way to understand some tools is to use them. A new AI research assistant, for instance, only feels distinct after you use it, not when you read a review of what it can or cannot accomplish. In this environment, looking to the past or gazing towards the distant future is a fool's errand. History proves everything and nothing. You can cherry-pick the dot-com bust or the advent of electricity to support any view. It's better to study what just happened than to force-fit it into a chart of inevitability. The experience of the past two years has shattered most comfortable assumptions about AI, compute and software design. The infographics about AI diffusion or compute intensity that go viral on the internet often come from people who study history more than they study the present. It's easier to quote a business guru than to parse a new AI framework, but we must do the hard thing: analyse present developments with an open mind even when the vocabulary doesn't yet exist. Also Read: Colleagues or overlords? The debate over AI bots has been raging but needn't The new 'Nostradami' of artificial intelligence: This brings us to the new cottage industry of AI soothsaying. Over the past two years, a fresh crop of 'laws' has strutted across conference stages and op-eds, each presented as the long-awaited Rosetta Stone of AI. We're told to obey Scaling Law (just add more data), respect Chinchilla Law (actually, add exactly 20 times more tokens) and reflect on the reanimated Solow Paradox (productivity still yawns, therefore chatbots are overrated). When forecasts miss the mark, pundits invoke Goodhart's Law (metrics have stopped mattering) or Amara's Law (overhype now, under-hype later). The Bitter Lesson tells us to buy GPUs (graphic processing units), not PhDs. Cunningham's Law says wrong answers attract better ones. Our favourite was when the Victorian-era Jevons' Paradox was invoked to argue that a recent breakthrough wouldn't collapse GPU demand. We're not immune to this temptation and have our own Super-Moore Law; it has yet to go viral. Also Read: AI as infrastructure: India must develop the right tech These laws and catchphrases obscure more than they reveal. The 'AI' of today bears little resemblance to what the phrase meant in the 1950s or even late 2022. The term 'transformer," the architecture that kicked off the modern AI boom, is a prime example. Its original 2017 equation exists now only in outline. The working internals of today's models—with flash attention, rotary embeddings and mixture-of-experts gating—have reshaped the original methods so thoroughly that the resulting equations resemble the original less than general relativity resembles Newton's laws. This linguistic mismatch will only worsen as robotics grafts cognition onto actuators and genomics borrows AI architecture for DNA editing. Our vocabulary, built for a slower era, struggles to keep up. Also Read: Rahul Matthan: AI models aren't copycats but learners just like us Beneath the noise, a paradox remains: staying genuinely current is both exceedingly difficult and easier than ever. It's difficult because terminology changes weekly and breakthroughs appear on preprint servers, not in peer-reviewed journals. However, it's easier because we now have AI tools that can process vast amounts of information, summarize dense research and identify core insights with remarkable precision. Used well, these technologies can become the most effective way to understand technology itself. And that's how sensible investment in innovation begins: with a genuine grasp of what's being invested in. The author is a Singapore-based innovation investor for GenInnov Pte Ltd
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Women, be careful: 7 types of photos to avoid that can easily be ‘undressed' by AI dress changing apps
Be careful about what kind of photos you're putting out there. A full-length shot in a sharp business suit on LinkedIn can be turned into a bikini pic in seconds — no skill, no money, just one AI app that pops up on the first page of Google Search. The scary part is that these apps are now getting better in terms of accuracy. All it takes is a screenshot of one solo, full-body image. The threat is real. But there are ways to prevent your public photos from being misused by AI dress changing apps. (Photo generated by Google Gemini) Across India, women are discovering their social media photos are being misused by AI-powered 'dress changing' tools that digitally strip clothes and create fake nudes. No consent. No clue. Just a clear image and a screenshot. These apps are floating around on Telegram channels, and the dark web. Many free AI dress changing apps that 'gets-the-job-done' can be accessed through a simple Google Search for free. And they're not going after celebrities. They're targeting everyday women: students, professionals, influencers, even homemakers. Why blame just shady apps? Google has announced its own AI dressing changing app called 'Doppl'. This app is currently available in the US and does not support try-ons for shoes, swimwear, lingerie, or accessories, yet. All it takes is a screenshot of one solo, full-body image. That's enough for the algorithm to generate a fake lingerie or nude version that can look realistic, without the woman ever knowing. The threat is real. But there are ways to prevent your public photos from being misused. There are 7 common photo types these AI tools rely on — avoid them, and you make their job a hell of a lot harder for perverts. 7 types of photos you should avoid posting If you want to stay active on social media but reduce your risk, avoid uploading these photo styles: 1. Full-length, solo shots AI tools work best on clear, front-facing, full-body pictures — especially when you're alone in the frame. Stick to waist-up or group shots when possible. 2. Single-layer or body-hugging clothes Tight outfits or visible body outlines make it easier for AI to guess what's underneath. Layered clothing like jackets, dupattas, or scarves are harder to fake. 3. Photos with plain backgrounds Blank walls or clean backdrops are ideal for AI detection. Instead, use natural settings like streets, parks, or indoor scenes with visible objects. 4. Unedited high-resolution images Crystal-clear, high-res images give AI more data to process. Slightly reduce resolution or apply filters before posting. 5. Photos without watermarks A small watermark, even a light diagonal one with your name or username, can confuse AI and lower the chances of misuse. 6. Straight-on poses with arms by the side Straight posture with arms by your side makes it easy for AI to outline your figure. Natural poses — crossing your arms, holding a bag, or turning sideways — make manipulation harder. 7. Similar photos posted frequently Posting the same type of pose or angle often gives AI more data to learn from. Vary your photo style and frequency. Why AI dress-changing apps are dangerous These tools use machine learning to scan a photo, detect the body outline under clothes, and generate a manipulated version of the image — sometimes changing traditional Indian outfits into revealing bikinis, lingerie, or outright fake nudes. Unlike Photoshop, these apps don't need skill. All they need is the right kind of photo — which is where your caution comes in. What can Indian users do to keep a check India has one of the largest internet user bases, but awareness about image misuse is still low. Here's how you can stay ahead:
