Ivy League student accused of causing 'emotional harm' to non-faculty staff for sending DOGE-like email
A student at Brown University is being accused by the university of causing "emotional harm" because he asked the school's non-faculty employees what they do all day.
"It costs $93,064 to attend Brown University," student Alex Shieh wrote in an op-ed in Pirate Wires published Tuesday. "The annual budget deficit is $46 million. I wanted to know where the hell all the money was going."
With the help of AI, Shieh created a database of the 3,805 non-faculty employees of Brown University. He also emailed them asking them, "What do you do all day?"
Doge Slashes Over $100M In Dei Funding At Education Department: 'Win For Every Student'
To organize his information and rank the roles of the non-faculty employees, he created a website, Bloat@Brown, which Shieh said was similar to DOGE and Mark Zuckerberg's college project of scrapping student ID photos to rank who was hotter.
Shieh wrote about how he used publicly available information on LinkedIn, the student newspaper, and job boards to compile all the information he could about each employee and fed that information into a GPT-4o mini, an AI app, to rank the non-faculty employees.
Read On The Fox News App
Shieh, a sophomore at Brown University, said he did this work from a common room in his dorm's basement that floods whenever it rains, thus making plastic tarps for the shared work and leisure space a necessity for a school that charges students $93,064 a year.
He formatted his site to identify three particular jobs: "DEI jobs, redundant jobs, and bulls--t jobs."
According to Shieh, DEI was important to look into because of President Donald Trump's executive orders and his administration threatening to withhold federal funds to universities with DEI policies.
Department Of Education Doled Out Over $200M To Universities To Inject Dei Into Counseling Courses: Report
In fiscal year 2024, Brown University, which has an Office of Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion, reportedly received "more than $254 million" in federal funding.
"After doing some digging, I discovered that much of the money is being thrown into a pit of bureaucracy," Shieh wrote. "The small army of 3,805 non-faculty administrators is more than double the faculty headcount, and makes for roughly one administrator for every two undergrads."
In addition to the information Shieh found, he also sent a mass email to the 3,805 non-faculty employees asking about their duties.
"This was purposefully done in the dead of night, just in case Brown's IT team felt inclined to block emails from my domain," Shieh said, adding that he said he was a journalist for The Brown Spectator, an inactive libertarian journal that is attempting to restart.
Shieh said that only 20 of the 3,805 people emailed responded, with some replies allegedly saying, "f--k you," and another directing Shieh to "stick an entire cactus up [his] a--."
The following day, after sending the email, the university reportedly told staff not to respond to Shieh's email. In addition, Shieh claimed his social security number was leaked, and his email was spammed with "every porn newsletter on the internet."
"Less than 48 hours later, as has previously been reported, an associate dean my model warned could be redundant (her role overlapped with other deans on the discipline team and she was the only one without a JD) informed me I was under review for 'emotional/psychological harm,' 'misrepresentation,' 'invasion of privacy,' and 'violation of operational rules,'" Shieh wrote.
Shieh, who is being represented by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), said the associate dean also told him give back all the confidential information he had, which he says was "scraped from the public internet."
"If college administrators are this scared of a sophomore with a laptop, they should be terrified of what's coming next," Shieh wrote.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, Brian Clark, vice president for news and strategic campus communications at Brown University said, "In the early morning hours of Tuesday, March 18, emails were sent to approximately 3,800 Brown staff members noting the launch of a website that appeared to improperly use data accessed through a University technology platform to target individual employees by name and position description.
Clark added that "The website included derogatory descriptions of job functions of named individuals at every job level. While the emails were framed as a journalistic inquiry, the supposed news organization identified in the email has had no active status at Brown for more than a decade, and no news article resulted. We advised employees, many of whom expressed concerns, not to respond, and evaluated the situation from a policy standpoint. That review has informed the steps we've taken since. Due to federal law protecting student privacy, the University cannot provide additional details, even to refute the inaccuracies and mischaracterizations that have been made public. We are treating this matter with the utmost seriousness."Original article source: Ivy League student accused of causing 'emotional harm' to non-faculty staff for sending DOGE-like email

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
21 hours ago
- Forbes
DEI Is Still a Business Advantage—Here's Why It Matters
Concept of treatment and adjustment of DNA molecule. Despite public backlash and perception, DEI work persists because most teams are global, and firms don't want to lose out on the international market. Understanding diversity, equity, and inclusion issues is essential for team excellence. In my interview with Melissa Ng Goldner, the Head of Strategy at Coqual, she leads the organization's enterprise-wide approach to embedding equity, inclusion, and belonging into systems that drive business outcomes, she cited that 84% of their members are still doing DEI. Ng Goldner sees organizations shifting their language, realigning DEI to business outcomes, and measuring the impact rather than withdrawing altogether. She recommends leaders think about how to weave DEI into the DNA of your organization, embedding it into the culture, versus making it a standalone entity that is much easier to dismantle. Language Shifts, Meaning Does Not Common language shifts Ng Goldner sees are calling renaming DEI activities essential leadership skills, talent strategy, retention, and innovation. DEI was always about skill development to attract and retain the best talent to stay relevant and innovative. This reframe is not diluting the work; it speaks to the impact of the work. 'DEI is not the problem, it just has a branding problem,' Ng Goldner said. These subtle pivots in language bring more allies into the conversation. They speak to the issues that matter to them and incentivize behavior to support them instead of polarizing them. Align to Business Outcomes With more precise language around business outcomes, DEI can further be woven into the DNA of the firm. Common business outcomes that organizations experience with DEI are higher revenues, improved decision-making, and profitability. Yet, the clear connection to DEI is not always clear. By eliminating bias in your hiring processes, the organization was able to broaden the talent pool for open opportunities and hire more robust talent. What is that worth to the organization? Or, perhaps your team conducted an inclusive leadership program for high-potential employees and was able to promote several into senior leadership roles, saving onboarding time and equipping them with the skills to be successful. How could you quantify the impact on the organization? Measure the Impact Ng Goldner recommends that organizations gather data on proactive measures of inclusion instead of reactive metrics. Organizations can measure psychological safety data as a precursor to inclusion. What is the comfort level with feedback or candid conversations, for example? This can be more helpful than measuring lagging high-level data like retention, hiring, and promotions. 'Look for the smoke signals that warrant investigation. For example, who leaves after the performance reviews? These are indicators that a process, person, or team might need support,' Ng Goldner asserted. Rather than bold proclamations, little speed bumps or pivots can often be more impactful. Ng Goldner asks leaders to challenge bias in decision-making frameworks. Pause decisions to reflect on: who benefits, who is burdened, and who might be missing. Make it a requirement to ask these reflection questions before making big decisions like new policies, products or services, or processes. Look for where the data shows the biggest gaps. What voices are heard in decision making, who fills the high visibility roles, and who are you developing and designing for? 'DEI is not a stand-alone event. It needs to be baked into every decision-making process. When DEI is baked into the DNA of your firm, it is like gum in your hair; you cannot remove it,' Ng Goldner cited. DEI work continues despite public backlash, as most teams are global and firms aim to maintain access to international markets. Organizations are shifting language, realigning DEI to business outcomes, and measuring impact to weave it into their core operations rather than treating it as a separate initiative.


USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Don't expect the Boston Celtics to trade Brown or White
On Monday, June 23, the Boston Celtics traded Jrue Holiday to the Portland Trail Blazers. Brad Stevens then followed that up with the June 24 trade of Kristaps Porzingis, with the veteran big man being sent to the Atlanta Hawks as part of a 3-team deal. However, those trades haven't stopped the rumor mill from churning out ideas of a potential Jaylen Brown or Derrick White trade. Both Brown and White are expected to shoulder significant roles next season, as the Celtics attempt to navigate life without Jayson Tatum, who is recovering from a torn Achilles. During a recent news conference, Celtics Vice President of Basketball Operations, Mike Zarren, quickly shut down the idea that Boston has been considering trade offers for either star. Zarren noted that "there haven't been anything close to serious discussions" regarding a potential trade for either player. 'Those two guys are really, really great NBA players,' Zarren said. 'There hasn't been anything close to serious about trading them. And so I'm not sure where all this reporting came from. But those guys are key parts of our team, and we're lucky to have them here.' The only logical reason to consider trading Brown or White is to create further flexibility below the luxury tax line. However, the Celtics would be unlikely to get fair or comparable value in any potential trade. Therefore, the most logical outcome will be for White and Brown to remain part of the roster heading into next season. You can watch Zarren's full news conference by clicking on the embedded video above. Watch the "Taylor Talks Celtics" podcast on: YouTube: Website:
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Legendary Investor Josh Brown Is Betting Big on This 1 Robotaxi Stock (Hint, It's Not Tesla)
Ritholtz Wealth Management chief executive Josh Brown expects Uber (UBER) shares to remain a top beneficiary of the booming autonomous vehicle market. In fact, the ride-hailing giant is currently his largest personal holding because of that conviction, he revealed in a recent interview with CNBC. Tesla's Robotaxis Reportedly Sped and Veered Into the Wrong Lanes. Does This Crush the Bull Case for TSLA Stock? Dear Micron Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for June 25 Up 93% in 2025, Palantir Stock Is Too Hot to Handle Here Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Uber stock has been in a sharp uptrend in recent months – and is currently up some 50% versus its April low. Brown's bullish remarks on Uber shares arrive shortly after the mobility firm extended its robotaxi services to Atlanta, which the market veteran dubbed 'super important' in his CNBC interview. According to him, self-driving vehicles from all OEMs (Tesla (TSLA), Waymo, or any other) is a massive positive for UBER as the technology removes the human driver – 'the most expensive part of the experience for both the consumer and the company.' The Ritholtz chief executive believes the NYSE-listed firm will continue to sign new partnerships with autonomous businesses, which he's convinced will deliver a meaningful boost to its profitability over time. On Wednesday, Josh Brown also confirmed that he wouldn't sell UBER stock even if it surpasses $100 in the weeks ahead. Josh Brown expects self-driving partnerships to bolster UBER's already strong financials. In May, the ride-hailing giant reported $0.83 of EPS for its fiscal Q1 – well above Street estimates. Investors should also note that the NYSE-listed firm already has about a dozen partnerships with autonomous players. Just this month, it teamed up with Wayve on 'level 4' self-driving vehicles in London. That made Justin Post – a senior Bank of America analyst – reiterate his 'Buy' rating on Uber shares with a price target of $97, which indicates potential for another 8% rally from current levels. UBER does not currently pay a dividend, though. Wall Street analysts seem to share Brown's optimism on UBER stock, given the consensus rating on the ride-hailing giant currently sits at 'Strong Buy.' Analysts' price targets on Uber Technologies go as high as $115 at the time of writing, indicating potential upside of more than 25% from here. On the date of publication, Wajeeh Khan did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on