Record number of migrants crossing Channel for first half of year
The total is 48% higher than the figure for the first six months of 2024, which was 13,489, and 75% higher than the equivalent figure for 2023, which was 11,433.
Data collection on the Channel crossings began in 2018.
A Number 10 spokesman said on Tuesday the numbers are 'clearly unacceptable', adding: 'Let's be clear, the rising numbers in recent years are because these gangs have been allowed to embed industrial-scale smuggling enterprises across Europe.'
Some 879 migrants made the journey in 13 boats on Monday, the third highest number of arrivals on a single day so far this year.
The highest number of arrivals on a single day so far in 2025 is 1,195 on May 31.
The record for the highest number of arrivals on one day is 1,305, which took place on September 3 2022.
On Tuesday, the Conservatives claimed the number of migrants crossing the Channel has passed 20,000.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'One year into Labour's Government and the boats haven't stopped – they've multiplied.
'Labour tore up our deterrent and replaced it with fantasy.
'This is the worst year on record, and it's become a free-for-all.
'We need a removals deterrent so every single illegal immigrant who arrives is removed to a location outside Europe.
'The crossings will then rapidly stop.'
But the Number 10 spokesman said the problem requires 'international solutions and international partnerships', which is 'what you're seeing'.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer revealed in May that he has talked to countries about 'return hubs' for failed asylum seekers as the Government is looking at the possibility of processing them in third countries before they are deported.
French officials have also agreed to changes that would allow police patrolling the coast to take action in the sea when migrants climb into boats from the water, which is yet to come into effect.
The Government's Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill is also continuing through Parliament, which will hand counter-terror style powers to police and introduce new criminal offences to crack down on people-smuggling gangs.
Refugee Council chief executive Enver Solomon said the Government is right to tackle gangs but 'these measures alone are so far not achieving the intended outcome, with deadly crossings rising'.
He added: 'These rising numbers mean the Government must immediately move from enforcement-only to a multi-pronged approach, which includes international co-operation, and ensure refugees can access safe and legal pathways, in the same way Ukrainians have been able to travel to the UK without having to take a dangerous journey.'
The figures also come as the UK's borders watchdog David Bolt said in June he did not feel 'very optimistic about the ability to smash the gangs', adding that with organised crime 'the best thing you can do is deflect it to something else you're less concerned about rather than expect to eradicate it'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
16 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Tax rises 'increasingly likely' after DWP savings 'dwindle to nothing'
Tax rises 'increasingly likely' after DWP savings 'dwindle to nothing' The benefits cut U-turn has left Rachel Reeves with a £4.8billion hole to fill Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves Labour faces renewed speculation over its tax plans after concessions to the party's welfare rebels left a £4.8 billion hole in Rachel Reeves's spending plans. The concessions, including the last-minute shelving of plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), were enough to head off the Government's first Commons defeat on Tuesday evening. But they also removed a key plank of Sir Keir Starmer's welfare reform agenda, delaying changes to Pip until after a review of the benefit not due to conclude until autumn 2026. With no clarity on when the changes will be enacted or what they might entail, the Chancellor now faces a fiscal headache as a forecast £4.8 billion in welfare savings have been whittled away to nothing. Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and Resolution Foundation think tanks warned that Tuesday's concessions meant Ms Reeves could now expect no 'net savings' by 2029/30 – a key year for meeting her fiscal targets. IFS deputy director Helen Miller said the move had effectively halved the Chancellor's 'margin of error' against her main fiscal rule, once again raising the possibility of tax rises in the autumn. On top of that, a stuttering economy and global instability could mean she has even less room for manoeuvre than expected. Ms Miller said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.' The Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice agreed that there would be no savings in 2029/30, but suggested changes to universal credit – almost the only part of the Government's proposals still standing – could save money in the longer term. On Wednesday morning, the Conservatives accused Labour of making billions in unfunded spending commitments, including both the U-turns on welfare and the partial reinstatement of winter fuel payments. Article continues below In a letter to Ms Reeves, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride demanded to know where the money was coming from, asking: 'Will you raise tax or increase borrowing?' Ministers have repeatedly insisted that Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT. But Ms Reeves also remains committed to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues – not borrowing – in 2029/30. Meanwhile, Sir Keir himself will face a grilling from MPs on Wednesday as he attempts to repair relations with his backbenchers. Article continues below The weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions comes just a day after 49 of his own MPs voted against his welfare reforms – the biggest rebellion of his premiership so far – while several backbenchers described the Government's handling of the issue as 'chaotic' and 'a shambles'.
South Wales Argus
20 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Keir's first year: Starmer under pressure after a rocky start for Labour
Labour swept back into Downing Street with more than 400 MPs on July 4 last year – clinching a majority just short of Tony Blair's landslide in 1997. A year later, polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice is calling it 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister'. Sir Keir was accused of setting a gloomy tone at the outset, telling the public that 'things will get worse before they get better' and warning of 'tough choices' and a 'black hole' left in the finances by his predecessors. Soon after, a plan was unveiled to cut back winter fuel payments for pensioners, only for an enduring backlash to see the Government U-turn and widen eligibility months later. This and the recent climbdown over plans for welfare cuts to stave off a backbench rebellion have raised the prospect of further tax rises in the autumn budget as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. It has also raised the prospect of rebellious MPs being emboldened to continue pushing back on future policy, putting Sir Keir's plans at risk. When it comes to whether voters like him, Sir John has argued that the Government has a 'lack of direction' and that the Prime Minister was 'never especially popular' and that 'the public still don't know what he stands for.' 'The only vision he's really presented is: 'We'll fix the problems the Conservatives left us.' But it's not clear how he wants to change the country,' he told Times Radio. Sir Keir has acknowledged the 'challenge' of 'getting our story across'. 'If I was to list to you all the things we've done, it's a big long list of things. [But] how do we tell the story of what we've done? How do we make sure it's actually felt by working people?' he said in an interview with The Times. He also said he took 'ownership' of all decisions made by his Government, and that he did not get to grips with the growing rebellion over welfare reforms earlier as he was focused on international affairs. Although that rebellion was eventually reduced from 126 MPs to just 49, it required extensive concessions and marked the biggest revolt of his premiership so far, just days before he celebrated his first year in office. He has played a balancing act on the world stage, strengthening ties with the EU while courting US President Donald Trump, who he wooed with an invitation for a second state visit to the UK when they met in the White House. The football-loving Prime Minister lists a 'hat-trick' of deals – an EU 'reset', a deal with India, and an agreement for relief from Mr Trump's tariffs which has been partially implemented – among his key achievements. Sir Keir said he took 'ownership' of all decisions made by his Government (Kin Cheung/PA) He also touts his commitment to get defence spending up to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 – and the new Nato defence and security spending pledge of 5% of GDP by 2035. At home, he is battling the rise of Reform UK. A YouGov megapoll released last week said a general election now could see Reform UK taking more seats than Labour, while the latest Ipsos poll puts Nigel Farage's party at 34% with Labour behind at 25%. Sir Keir framed Reform UK as Labour's main opposition at a press conference in May, saying the Conservative Party has 'run out of road'. It came after Reform UK hoovered up council seats across England in local elections, as well as gaining a seat previously held by Labour in the Runcorn and Helsby by-election. An immigration speech in which the Prime Minister said the UK could become an 'island of strangers' drew criticism and comparisons with Enoch Powell's infamous 'rivers of blood' address that was blamed for inflaming racial tensions in the 1960s. Sir Keir has since expressed regret at the phrasing. But he reportedly plans to target 'authoritarian-leaning' voters with a focus on tackling migration and crime. In recent polling by LabourList of members, 64% said they wanted the party to shift to the left, with only around 2% favouring a move to the right. Sir Keir has pledged to lead a 'decade of national renewal' (Jordan Pettitt/PA) The next test at the polls will be Welsh and Scottish elections in May, at which Reform UK hopes to end Labour's 26-year domination in the Senedd next year. Sir Keir again took aim at the party in a speech to the Welsh Labour conference last weekend, saying Mr Farage has 'no plan at all' for the nation. Political historian Sir Anthony Seldon has praised Sir Keir's ability to react to crises in foreign policy and during the riots last summer, but urged him to counter Reform UK by communicating 'growth' and 'optimism'. 'Show people that you're Prime Minister, show people you've got a story, show people things are getting better across the whole country with growth and then, you know, that will deal with Reform,' he told Sky News. Sir Keir has pledged to lead a 'decade of national renewal' and said that the first year of that has been 'cleaning up that mess' his Government inherited. In a signal he is seeking to put a positive spin on the future, he told business leaders last week: 'We've wiped the state clean, we've stabilised the economy, and now we can go on to the next phase of government, building on that foundation.'
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The 19 seconds that killed Keir's premiership
Every Prime Minister has a defining moment, a decision, crisis, triumph or more likely blunder that etches itself in the public mind and shapes their legacy. For Major, it was Black Wednesday. For May, the dead-in-the-water Chequers deal. For Sunak, the D-Day disappearance. Keir Starmer's came on July 30, 2024, less than a month after he entered Number 10. As he placed his floral tribute among hundreds of others at a police cordon in Southport, hovering wordlessly for less than 20 seconds, he was heckled by members of the public, who shouted, 'How many more children? Our kids are dead and you're leaving already?' That excruciating scene crystallised in many minds the sense that Starmer was the wrong leader at the wrong time. He was the antithesis of Tony Blair after the death of Princess Diana; Starmer would not – could not – rise to the occasion. Try as he might, the words wouldn't come. And they've never come since as successive problems unfolded, as they do for Prime Ministers in the twenty-first century. Donorgate, Rosie Duffield, the riots and Lucy Connolly, Sue Gray, the Budget, Louise Haigh, Tulip Siddiq, Israel, the Winter Fuel Allowance U-turn, the trans women U-turn, the 'island of strangers' U-turn, the assisted dying absence… somehow the words never flow. Ill at ease, repetitious, robotic – and increasingly tetchy. Starmer's Southport moment may not yet have seared into public minds in the same way, as say, Gordon Brown's Bigotgate meltdown, but they are as telling of his premiership's weaknesses. As we approach the anniversary of the general election, we can trace Starmer's demise to that fateful moment in Lancashire. In the aftermath of July 4, his approval rating was +10. By mid-August, it was +3; by mid-September it had dropped to -26 and it hasn't recovered. The country is now more divided, not less, than it was last summer. The Government's own report on the unrest suggested another disturbance is likely. Already, violence has erupted on the streets of Ballymena in Northern Ireland, following the alleged sexual assault of a teenage girl by two 14-year old boys of Romanian descent. Where are the efforts to repair the fraying fabric of our society? Where are the attempts to counteract claims of skewed justice, which thanks to Bob Vylan's pathetic stunt at Glastonbury are now reaching fever pitch? To restore trust in our institutions, which is at an all time low? To assuage public concern that democracy is being subverted, the needs of our citizens sidelined by the judicial blob? This week it was reported that the same immigration judge who ruled that an Albanian with 50 convictions can stay in the UK because his crimes were 'not extreme' enough to warrant deportation was one of the barristers who fought the Tories' Rwanda scheme in 2023. We don't believe Starmer will confront this; we consider this superannuated lawyer and his Best Buddy The Lord Hermer to be part of the problem. How will Labour ease fears that more and more of our towns have a real element of menace to them at night, surely not helped by the decision of the last government to place unvetted men in local hotels? That many women feel less safe walking our streets? Their only solutions are displacement activity: bans on zombie knives, more social media censorship, ramping up the anti-'populist' rhetoric. If this is the picture for Starmer at the national level, one of plunging confidence and mounting betrayal, politically it's even worse. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payments Bill may have scraped through its Second Reading but the PM's authority is shot. He cannot recover from all the indecision, the sense he is buffeted by events, a hostage – or sausage – to internal pressure rather than a politician who will drive policy through with conviction. His MPs – and indeed his chief of staff – seem to consider him a chump. So the pack is turning on him – with arguably the worst culprit ersatz Mancunian Andy Burnham, who has long been positioning himself for a (third) bid for the crown. MPs are queuing up to put the boot in. They're fractious, disillusioned, and too many in number. They're also largely nonentities, career politicians, union officials, charity and public sector workers with little to no grasp of how private enterprise works, just treating it as an endless source of wonga, to be slandered, bullied and coerced as the mood takes them. Yet they consider themselves latter-day Nye Bevans, sniffing fastidiously that they didn't go into politics to cut benefits. They care little for the fact that the total cost for PIP alone is expected to reach £35 billion by the end of this decade, up from £16 billion by 2024-25. Someone else can pay, probably you and me. The total benefits bill, if you include the state pension, universal credit and other benefits, could hit £324 billion by 2030. How is sustaining this tower of cards noble? Keir Starmer's instincts to cut benefits back was right, but he couldn't stick to it. His tragedy, which will endure for the next four years unless the Westminster assassins put him out of his misery, is that even when he is right, he gets it wrong. Agents of the state On the subject of displacement activity, do spare a thought for Britain's supermarkets, unfailingly reliable, endlessly pilloried. The average big store stocks 20,000 items including 40 different types of fresh vegetable, offering choice, convenience and low prices to their consumers. Yet in March 2023, their chiefs were hauled into Defra to explain why some shelves were bare. And now, Wes Streeting is attempting to turn them into agents of the state. Supermarkets could be required to report sales data, with those who somehow fail to control what their customers buy facing fines. It's not just supermarkets, either, but restaurants. Picture the armies of staff closely monitoring our consumption, noting down whether we finish our side of fries. The Health Secretary claims he's not 'meddling', but rather 'working with' these businesses. In much the same way an interrogator 'works with' a prisoner beneath their jackboot. Labour insist growth is their priority; now they want to squander productive resources on restaurant compliance officials. Against stiff competition, Streeting could yet turn out to be Labour's most disappointing cabinet minister.
