logo
Opinion: Weekend shootings should not define us

Opinion: Weekend shootings should not define us

Yahoo22-06-2025

Last weekend was a tragic and frustrating one along the Wasatch Front and in Minnesota. We mourn for the loss of life in two separate shootings in Utah and in the apparent assassinations in Minnesota.
We also urge everyone to resolve that the awful crimes perpetrated against innocent people in public places must not become commonplace along the Wasatch Front.
Unfortunately, Utah Sen. Mike Lee chose to respond to the shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers by posting tweets on X that seemed to blame the Democratic Party and ultra leftist ideologies for the tragedies.
Along with a photo of the alleged shooter, Vance Luther Boelter, who reportedly had a list of 70 or so potential targets, including more Democrats, Lee posted, 'This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way.'
He also posted two photos of Boelter with the caption, 'Nightmare on Waltz Street,' misspelling the name of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.
Lee has since removed those posts after talking to Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar.
The tweets were unacceptable for anyone, let alone from a member of the Senate. It revealed a lack of compassion for both victims and their loved ones and cast a poor light on Utah, the state Sen. Lee represents. Removing the tweets was a start. An apology and recognition of the mistake should follow.
Utah's horrible weekend began with a peaceful protest in downtown Salt Lake City on Saturday, which was similar to many other protests in cities nationwide. This was marred when shots were fired. Arthur Folasa 'Afa' Ah Loo, a man police said was not the intended target, was killed. A man whom police and some witnesses alleged was acting as if he intended to shoot people also sustained a gunshot wound. He was taken to a hospital and later booked into jail for investigation of murder.
Protesters scattered in fear. Police cordoned off streets.
Many questions remain to be answered. But one thing is sure: This was a tragedy that struck at the heart of cherished freedoms.
The right to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for redress of grievances is a bedrock and foundational American liberty enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution. A few other cities reported violence, including someone driving an SUV into a crowd in Virginia. But that is no excuse for what happened in Utah.
And then, a day later, at West Valley City's annual WestFest, more shots rang out. As a result, a 41-year-old woman, an 8-month-old infant and an 18-year-old man died. The woman and child were not connected to the fight that allegedly precipitated the gunfire, police said. Also, two teenagers were shot in their arms. It was unclear whether they were involved in the fight.
The main suspect was alleged to be a boy only 16 years old.
WestFest typically attracts many families, all of whom ought to feel safe and secure while enjoying the entertainment and other amenities and activities being offered. This crime, whether gang-related or sparked by something else, was an affront to a community tradition that celebrates all that is good in the city. People should not fear going to a festival with loved ones.
On the WestFest website, West Valley City Mayor Karen Lang and the City Council issued a joint statement that said they are 'heartbroken.'
'West Valley City is a community rooted in resilience, compassion and unity,' the statement said in part. 'In the face of heartbreak, we must lean on one another, care for one another, and recommit ourselves to building a safer, stronger community.'
That was well said. This is a time to mourn and to comfort. Tragedies tend to lead good people to unite and resolve. The loss of precious lives will leave gaping wounds in the lives of many others. It will reverberate for years as dreams go unfulfilled, tender moments go unshared and treasured memories are missed.
In Minnesota, the nation watched as federal authorities hunted down Boelter, the 57-year-old suspect who allegedly killed a Minnesota state representative and her husband, and who shot a state senator and his wife, both of whom survived. Reports said Boelter had a list of about 70 other targets he may have intended to kill, ranging from Democratic lawmakers to community leaders and people at Planned Parenthood centers.
These crimes struck at the heart of representative government and at the respect Americans should have for those who choose to stand for election, no matter what their political philosophies. It is a time for reflection, not partisanship.
Democrats aren't the only politicians who are vulnerable. Utah House Speaker Mike Schultz said state lawmakers here have also seen 'a noticeable increase in verbal threats' in recent years. The Deseret News reported that the Utah Statewide Information and Analysis Center recorded 73 threats toward elected officials in the state through July of last year, which was far more than the 49 recorded in all of 2023. This is a disturbing trend.
Taken together, these incidents paint a foreboding picture at the start of summer. Good, law-abiding, tolerant and freedom-loving people must never concede to a future marred by repeated random violence and the intimidation of elected officials.
That resolve begins with compassion for victims and requires flooding the nation with volunteerism, acts of random service and the bright light of goodness that overwhelms darkness. It must involve institutions of all kinds, from churches to schools and charitable organizations and, yes, politics. The nation's social currency must be kindness and charity toward all, especially on social media and in political discourse.
As Americans and Utahns, we must never accept what happened last weekend as normal. And we must find a greater measure of compassion for those suffering loss.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mike Lee Shoves Another Bad Land Sale Provision into the Senate's Final Budget Bill
Mike Lee Shoves Another Bad Land Sale Provision into the Senate's Final Budget Bill

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mike Lee Shoves Another Bad Land Sale Provision into the Senate's Final Budget Bill

UPDATE: Facing overwhelming opposition from all Democrats and a growing number in his own party, Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee tonight withdrew his proposal to sell millions of acres of public land to help balance the federal budget. Universally reviled legislation that will sell up to 1.25 million acres of BLM land around the West starting this fall has been placed in the Senate's final budget bill which will face floor votes as early as today. Utah Sen. Mike Lee (R), chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee that oversees the Interior Department's budget, released new language Friday night that doubles down on his longstanding desire to reduce the federal estate, using veiled language that justifies land sales to alleviate housing shortages in fast-growing Western cities. The bill's latest draft tightens problematic language of earlier versions that risked being flagged by the Senate parliamentarian as non-conforming for a reconciliation bill, say sources who reviewed Lee's draft late last night. But it contains the most unacceptable provisions to public-land advocates, and could open some of the West's most remote and cherished public lands for sale. Because it now includes unallocated mineral leases, it could also balloon the amount of land eligible for sale. Specifically, the final draft expands the definition of eligible BLM land, which Lee says is designed to promote affordable housing and urban infrastructure, by prioritizing federal land sales within five miles of the border of 'population centers.' Instead of using the commonly accepted definition of a population center as a municipality of 2,500 or more people, the new draft defines a population center as 'a census-designated place or incorporated municipality with a population of not less than 1,000 persons.' This provision greatly expands the eligibility of BLM land that could be sold surrounding unincorporated rural communities. Last night's draft also now allows leasing of some previously protected lands, omitting national preserves, national seashores, lakeshores, national historic sites, and national memorials and battlefields from the categories of land that could not be considered for sale. It includes unallocated subsurface mineral leasing as a qualifying covenant for land sales, along with earlier drafts that omit active surface uses and BLM land with active livestock-grazing leases from sale consideration. This allowance of unsubscribed mineral rights could greatly increase the number of eligible acres for sale to something over 3 million, say sources. That's because the BLM administers subsurface mineral rights on some 700 million onshore and offshore acres. If millions of those acres now qualify for sale because of Lee's new language 'we could be talking about the sale of way more than 1.25 million acres,' says a land-use expert who was still researching the question as of this morning. 'We could be talking 3 million and more, depending on the answer to the question of whether the BLM owns those rights or simply administers them.' Lee's latest draft also changes the definition of who can bid on this 'surplused' public land. Nominations for tracts can come from what Lee defines as 'qualified bidders.' That term is not defined in the bill. The bill extends the mandatory sale deadline from five to 10 years and increases the amount of federal money that will be used to execute these sales from $5 million to $15 million. But what's especially galling to critics of the bill, who note the many loopholes that allow disposal of federal land for purposes other than affordable housing, is that the new draft adds criteria for disposal of our most valuable lands to include a mechanism for consolidating large ranches and for including 'isolated tracts that are difficult to manage.' That last provision could list for sale some of the most valuable hunting and fishing acreage in the West. Sources noted, with rising alarm, that Lee's latest draft appears to be calibrated to make it through Senate parliamentary scrutiny. 'This appears to be an effort to try and survive parliamentarian review,' says David Willms, associate vice president for public lands for the National Wildlife Federation. 'Adding a priority of selling the highest value lands, and including subsurface rights along with the surface rights seems to be an effort to sell the provision as one with primarily budget impacts, which is necessary to survive the Byrd Rule' that requires items in reconciliation bills to have budgetary, rather than policy, implications. 'Obviously, to anyone that cares about public lands, however, that's simply a smokescreen to sell an area more than twice the size of Rocky Mountain National Park to an as-yet-undefined 'qualified bidder,'' says Willms. 'But it's also an indication of the sloppy and haphazard nature of this latest bill.' Lee's new draft is so contrary to and tone-deaf to the hundreds of thousands of calls, letters, and emails to congressional offices over the past week that some critics of the bill suggest that it's designed to fail in full Senate voting that starts today. In an Instagram reel, New Mexico Sen. Martin Heinrich (D) noted that the groundswell of calls to congressional offices is the 'broadest and deepest coalition that I have ever seen for public lands in my life. Keep it up. We are winning.' View this post on Instagram A post shared by Senator Martin Heinrich (@senatormartinheinrich) Fellow Republican Senators, including Montana's Steve Daines and Tim Sheehy and Idaho's Mike Crapo and Jim Risch, have publicly stated their opposition to the bill. The news site NOTUS yesterday reported that Daines has the votes to kill Lee's draft in the budget reconciliation process. That's the expedited process that requires only a simple majority in both the House and Senate for passage. Republicans hold a 3-vote majority in both chambers. At least five Republicans in the House of Representatives have said they won't vote for any version of the budget bill that contains the land-sale provision. They include Montana's Ryan Zinke, Mike Simpson from Idaho, Dan Newhouse from Washington, Oregon's Cliff Bentz, and David Valadao from California — all Westerners with large public-land holdings in their congressional districts. 'At the end of the day, I would bet on this [bill language] getting kicked out, but it's gonna be a slog,' says a public-land advocate who asked not to be named as they were still reviewing the bill draft. 'I'm still wondering if, in the long run, Lee is doing more to help public lands, by inspiring so much advocacy, than to hurt them.' Land Tawney, whose group American Hunters and Anglers has been a vocal opponent of the land-sale legislation, says the latest draft confirms Lee's inability to read the national mood. Read Next: Silencer Deregulation Plan Fails in the Senate 'Regardless of how Mike Lee polishes his public lands sell off proposal, it's still a piece of shit,' says Tawney. 'Not a square inch of our public lands should be used to pay off tax breaks for billionaires.'

Breaking: Mike Lee's Public Land Sale Plan Is Dead
Breaking: Mike Lee's Public Land Sale Plan Is Dead

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Breaking: Mike Lee's Public Land Sale Plan Is Dead

Facing overwhelming opposition from all Democrats and a growing number in his own party, Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee tonight withdrew his proposal to sell millions of acres of public land to help balance the federal budget. In a statement issued by his office, Lee said that because of the 'strict constraints of the budget reconciliation process, I was unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families — not to China, not to BlackRock, and not to any foreign interests. For that reason I've made the decision to withdraw the federal land sales provision from the bill.' Lee's language, a central part of the omnibus federal budget bill, would have put more than a million acres of BLM land on the auction block starting later this year. Senate leaders, hurriedly working to get the budget to a floor vote this weekend, gave Lee the opportunity to pull his provision, pages 202 to 211 of the thousand-page Big Beautiful Bill, knowing that it would have faced certain defeat by the Republican-majority Senate. That language would have forced the sale of BLM land in 11 Western states to offset tax cuts and royalty rebates to gas and oil drillers. The language in those pages, sponsored and revised over the last two weeks by Lee, would have created the largest disposal of public land since the Homestead Act. Tens of thousands of hunters, anglers, hikers, and public-land recreationists have pummeled the offices of their congressional delegations with increasingly strident demands to kill Lee's bill. That continued pressure from a broad and vocal coalition of rural hunters, suburban hikers, livestock producers, Main Street business owners, anglers, dirtbag climbers, and whitewater rafters made the difference, says Montanan Randy Newberg, host of Fresh Tracks and a vocal public-land advocate. 'Mike Lee did something that we've not been able to do, to have all Americans become focused on one issue, no partisanship, no Rs, no Ds, and in the process I hope they have sent a message that public lands are that third rail of American politics,' says Newberg, one of several social-media personalities who rallied his audience around defending public lands. 'I think you could also say the same of the Senate, they put partisanship aside to kill this bad idea.' Newberg singled out the work of New Mexico Democrat Martin Heinrich for his ability to keep all Democrats aligned on killing Lee's bill, and working across the aisle to convince fellow Western Republicans that it was bad for their constituents. While calls for the removal of the land-sale language from the mega bill was nearly unanimous, Lee kept digging in, making revisions that increased the amount of land that could be sold and adding vague language that seemed to stray from what he said was his intention: to allow Western municipalities to buy surrounding federal land in order to grow and build affordable housing for their residents. But in the most recent iteration, released by Lee's office last night in order to satisfy the Senate's budgetary rules, the highest priority for would-be disposed BLM lands was their appraised value. That highly valued land would likely have been bought by amenity purchasers, not cash-strapped Western cities. By adding lands with unallocated subsurface mineral rights to the total, the latest draft of the bill alarmed conservationists —— as much as 3 million acres of BLM land might have been available for sale to private industries, speculators, and even foreign governments. The Senate's budget reconciliation process allows the omnibus budget package to pass by a simple majority. Republicans have only a 3-seat majority in both the Senate and House, but four Western Republicans had indicated they wouldn't support the budget bill if it contained Lee's land sales provision. Sources report that the roster of Republicans quietly in opposition to the measure was large and growing, causing the Senate leadership to strike Lee's language in order to move the rest of the Big Beautiful Bill, which among other things could make tax cuts permanent for the wealthiest Americans and also includes cuts to Medicaid, public-lands management agencies, and federal reimbursements to rural hospitals. The Senate's death blow to Lee's bill removes pressure on the House of Representatives to kill the language. The House had been considered the 'backwall' in efforts to make sure the land-sale provision didn't advance to President Trump, who had indicated strong support for the proposal.

Statement from Abbey Laurel-Smith: "I Will Create Green Jobs for New Yorkers"
Statement from Abbey Laurel-Smith: "I Will Create Green Jobs for New Yorkers"

Associated Press

timean hour ago

  • Associated Press

Statement from Abbey Laurel-Smith: "I Will Create Green Jobs for New Yorkers"

New York, NY June 30, 2025 --( )-- Following is a statement from Abbey Laurel-Smith: Fellow New Yorkers, if elected Mayor and made guardian of the city's charter, I will set to work with an ordinance - since it takes so much time for the City Hall to pass a bill into law. As an administrative tool, the goal of my first ordinance will be to make it illegal for individual vehicle owners to wash their own cars anywhere on the streets and everywhere by themselves, in any one of the five boroughs. Oil, chemicals, soaps and other ingredients that are normally used to wash vehicles contain chemiclas that are dangerous to the city's tactile but degradable road surfaces, drainage system, as well as the city's breathable air and living environment in general. As much as the end result of this action is to create a set of new green jobs for out of luck city residents. It should also be noted that this move is also driven by the need to protect the city's underground water table, by simply keeping everyday common contaminants in check. I am Abbey Laurel-Smith, an Independent candidate running for Mayor of the City of New York, 2025. I hope this one - out of many of my ideas, will help persuade you to go out and vote for me as your preferred candidate come this general election in November. As your candidate, I follow the law, not politics. I believe in public safety, that's why I favor the general well being of all New Yorkers. And as much as I promise to work to improve the living experience for retirees, students, city workers and low income families, I will also devise a means to bring back those high earning out-migrators who left the city for neighboring states during the pandemic. The creation of these green jobs that I plan to enact citywide, could help solve the problem of vagrancy, petty theft and homelessness in New York city. It could be used to expand city's revenue base, create a new network of small businesses, build new wealth and boost quality of life services provided to low income communities. This plan for green jobs - if backed by public or community banks, will help shift focus from private for profits to public well being. As revenues from these green and small businesses will provide rural capital for the city's multi-faceted communities as well as the city's environmental land trust. All in all, it would help improve air quality, and our streets will be defouled. With this in place, we therefore won't need to have congestion charges placed on anyone visiting Manhattan or going to work in Manhattan. I am committed to a safe, secure and sustainable city - where living costs, rates and rent are lowered, and city's productive identity revived and energized by technology. I put New Yorkers first, and you can always trust in me to lead the city in a new direction. A vote for me is a vote for a better life! Follow my campaign, donate if you can, and help spread the word about SmithieForMayor NYC 2025. Contact: Abbey S Laurel-Smith [email protected] @smithieformayor @SmithiesNewYork Contact Information: ReBuildNewYork Abbey Laurel-Smith +1 646-764-3162 Contact via Email Read the full story here: Statement from Abbey Laurel-Smith: 'I Will Create Green Jobs for New Yorkers' Press Release Distributed by

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store