Startups Can't Afford to Ignore Cybersecurity: Interview
Fresh off an award win at GISEC North Star 2025, TECHx Media spoke with Vivek Chandran, CEO of RISKNOX Private Limited, for an interview featured in the recent June–July 2025 edition of CodeRED. In this conversation, he explains why cybersecurity has become a survival issue for startups. Size and speed no longer guarantee success. As cyberattacks grow more sophisticated, even early-stage startups are in the crosshairs. Once dismissed as too small to target, they now face the same threats as global enterprises.
To understand what's at stake and what emerging businesses should do, Vivek brings a grounded, tactical view of the evolving threat landscape and how startup leaders can survive and thrive in 2025 and beyond.
What are the top cybersecurity threats that startups should be most concerned about in 2025 and the coming years?
The cybersecurity threat landscape isn't what it was even five years ago, it's evolving constantly. That's the first thing startups need to understand: it's not a static problem. The tools and tactics used by cybercriminals change every few months, if not weeks.
If I had to pick the top three threats right now, AI-enabled cyberattacks would top the list. We're seeing a rise in sophisticated attacks powered by artificial intelligence, from deepfake phishing to automated vulnerability scanning and exploitation. These are faster, more adaptive, and harder to detect than traditional threats.
Second, and this may surprise some, is human negligence. It's not a 'threat' in the classic sense, but it's often the root cause of security breaches. You can spend millions on tech, but one employee clicking the wrong link can still bring the system down. Humans remain the weakest link.
And third, phishing is still a huge problem. It's old-school, but highly effective. Startups are particularly vulnerable because they often lack the infrastructure to detect and respond to social engineering attacks quickly. Phishing doesn't need to be advanced to be dangerous, it just needs to be convincing.
How has the cybersecurity landscape changed over the past five years? What trends should startups keep an eye on?
The past five years have been transformational. The biggest disruptor has been AI and, again, it's a double-edged sword. AI is helping us build smarter, more efficient cybersecurity tools that automate detection and response. But on the flip side, attackers are using the same AI to supercharge their campaigns.
Another major shift is that every new technology introduces new vulnerabilities. AI, blockchain, IoT they all come with their own security challenges. And often, organizations adopt these technologies faster than they can secure them.
Finally, governmental and regulatory forces are playing a bigger role. From GDPR to CCPA and now the Cyber Resilience Act, we're seeing a global trend toward mandatory cybersecurity compliance. This is actually a good thing it forces businesses to maintain at least a minimum viable security posture.
Should cybersecurity be a legal responsibility for startups, or is that too ambitious at an early stage?
In an ideal world, yes, cybersecurity would be a legal responsibility for every business, regardless of size. But in the real world, especially for startups, it's complicated.
Startups often don't have the budget or the team to build a full-fledged cybersecurity framework. As a founder myself, I know how tough it is, cybersecurity can feel like a luxury when you're trying to stay afloat. But that doesn't mean startups are off the hook.
What I believe and advocate is a shared responsibility model. Cybersecurity shouldn't be one person's job. Everyone, from founders to interns, should be aware of the basic principles of digital safety. Startups may not be able to do everything, but they can start with the basics: secure passwords, multi-factor authentication, data access control, and regular backups. These don't cost much but can go a long way.
How do global data regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and the Cyber Resilience Act shape the way startups operate?
They're reshaping the mindset and that's crucial. A few years ago, cybersecurity was often viewed as a luxury. Many smaller companies thought, 'Why would anyone target us?' That thinking no longer holds.
These regulations are forcing accountability. They're saying: If you're collecting user data, you're responsible for securing it. No exceptions. And that accountability builds trust not just with regulators, but with customers.
What these regulations have done is establish a baseline culture of cybersecurity. Even if a company isn't directly under the purview of something like GDPR, they often adopt the practices anyway to future-proof their operations. This is especially important as startups scale globally.
Do you believe governments should impose stricter cybersecurity regulations on startups, or offer more support instead?
Support first, regulations later. Imposing strict rules too early can backfire. Startups, already stretched thin, might try to find workarounds just to stay in business.
What governments should do instead is invest in capacity-building offer grants, training programs, and subsidized tools. Help small businesses adopt best practices without breaking their budgets. Once there's a baseline maturity in the ecosystem, then phase in stricter compliance rules.
This layered or phased approach is more sustainable and more effective in the long run.
There's talk of a cybersecurity talent shortage. Is it really that hard to find skilled professionals?
There's no shortage of interest but there is a gap between certifications and real-world skills. Many candidates have credentials but lack hands-on experience.
Startups, in particular, need practical problem-solvers, not just textbook experts. What we need more of are experiential learning platforms, internships, cyber ranges, environments where people can learn by doing.
For founders, my advice is to hire based on potential and adaptability. You might not be able to compete with tech giants on salary, but you can offer learning, autonomy, and purpose, which many securities professionals' values just as much.
If you could give one piece of cybersecurity advice to every new founder, what would it be?
Don't let lack of budget stop you from doing something.
There are tons of free and low-cost resources out there from SANS to OWASP to NIST guidelines. You can absolutely build a minimal, but meaningful, cybersecurity foundation even if you're bootstrapping.
Treat cybersecurity like any other critical function, your dev team, your HR, your marketing. It's not optional anymore. Even a basic security hygiene culture can drastically reduce your risk.
Do you think cybersecurity will eventually be seen as a fundamental utility, as essential as electricity or water?
Without a doubt. We already rely on digital infrastructure for everything, finance, healthcare, transportation, energy. If any of these go down due to a cyberattack, the consequences are devastating.
Cybersecurity is no longer just about protecting data. It's about protecting lives and national security. We're also seeing how cyber warfare is becoming a central strategy in geopolitical conflicts.
So yes, cybersecurity will and should, become a default layer of modern society. It's the new electricity. Invisible, but absolutely essential.
Vivek Chandran's message to founders is clear: cybersecurity is a necessity, not a luxury. Startups may face budgetary and staffing constraints, but that's no excuse for ignoring the risks. From AI-driven threats to phishing scams and regulatory pressures, the cyber battlefield is real, and unforgiving.
Fortunately, knowledge is power. And as Vivek points out, the tools to get started are already out there, many of them free. For founders in 2025, the goal isn't perfection, it's proactive protection
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Web Release
7 hours ago
- Web Release
GCG Enterprise Solutions Partners with Egnyte to Deliver Secure File Collaboration and Governance Across the Region
GCG Enterprise Solutions, a leader in digital transformation and secure content services is excited to announce its strategic partnership with Egnyte – the U.S.-based leader in secure content collaboration, intelligence, and governance. This collaboration brings to the region a unified platform that redefines how organizations manage, share, and protect their critical files in an era of hybrid work, stringent compliance, and increasing demand for secure collaboration. Egnyte's proven platform natively integrates with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, AutoDesk, Salesforce, and more, enabling seamless project collaboration, vendor coordination, remote field access, and secure data rooms. This partnership also supports GCG's strategy to modernize file services, replace legacy file shares, and advance the UAE's cloud-first initiatives. Speaking on the new partnership with GCG Enterprise Solutions, Mohammad Alfaour, Director for the Middle East at Egnyte stated that 'We are excited to bring our offering to the region together with GCG Enterprise Solutions. As organizations across industries including architecture, engineering, construction (AEC), financial services, and life sciences face growing operational and regulatory complexities, the need for intelligent platforms that go beyond traditional file storage has never been greater. Egnyte's platform combines the simplicity of cloud file sharing with enterprise-grade control, making it the platform of choice for forward-thinking digital enterprises'. Elaborating on how the new partnership has expanded GCG Enterprise Solutions' capabilities in secure collaboration, Waleed Al Awadi, Head of Digital Transformation stated that 'This partnership significantly expands our capabilities in secure content services, compliance, and hybrid collaboration. By integrating Egnyte into our portfolio, we are now better positioned to serve sectors where data integrity, mobility, and auditability are mission-critical'. The GCG–Egnyte partnership delivers immediate, tangible benefits to clients across the region: Centralized, Secure Access: Organizations can now provide secure, centralized access to project and operational files across remote sites, departments, and external partners. Organizations can now provide secure, centralized access to project and operational files across remote sites, departments, and external partners. AI-Powered Compliance: Egnyte's AI-driven file classification, access controls, and compliance monitoring help clients meet regulations such as NESA, GDPR, and HIPAA. Egnyte's AI-driven file classification, access controls, and compliance monitoring help clients meet regulations such as NESA, GDPR, and HIPAA. Enhanced Productivity: Teams benefit from fast, reliable access to large files—including CAD and BIM models as well as large video footage and detailed renderings—even over low-bandwidth connections. Teams benefit from fast, reliable access to large files—including CAD and BIM models as well as large video footage and detailed renderings—even over low-bandwidth connections. Scalable Digital Foundation: The platform offers a robust foundation for digital project execution, secure collaboration, and content lifecycle governance enabling our clients to become AI-ready and structuring their data so they can utilize it across their portfolio. With this partnership, organizations can move away from fragmented file systems and embrace smart, compliant, and connected content operations—empowering them to thrive in today's digital landscape.
TECHx
a day ago
- TECHx
What Cybersecurity Vendors Must Do to Earn CISOs Trust
Home » Interview Of The Week » What Cybersecurity Vendors Must Do to Earn CISOs Trust What do CISOs really want from cybersecurity vendors? Denis Yakimov of Equiti Group offers a perspective in this exclusive interview published in CodeRED June–July Edition. From the importance of aligning cybersecurity initiatives with business strategy to the flaws in vulnerability management and the value of co-developing tools, Yakimov outlines what's working, what's broken, and how vendors can better support enterprise security goals in an evolving digital ecosystem. What are the top cybersecurity priorities for your organization this year? This year, our top priority is to support the business in achieving sustainable growth and stability as it works toward its strategic objectives. I often see CISOs setting goals in isolation focusing on internal KPIs or reacting to emerging threats without aligning with the broader business context. But it's critical to remember that security exists to enable the business, and everything we do should be guided by that principle. How do you align cybersecurity initiatives with overall business goals? Everything starts with the business setting its goals for the year, which are typically based on shareholder expectations. At Equiti, business goals are clearly defined and openly communicated, so every employee understands the direction in which the organization is heading. From a security standpoint, we use these goals as a foundation and, at the beginning of the year, during strategy planning, we brainstorm which cybersecurity actions will most effectively support the achievement of these goals. For instance, in 2024 we achieved ISO 27001 certification, which helped Equiti take a significant step toward building stronger trust with key clients and partners and becoming one of the leading brokers in the UAE. Similar security initiatives are aligned with goals related to operational resilience, among others. What are the key factors you consider when evaluating cybersecurity vendors? We take a comprehensive approach when selecting vendors, using comparison tables and well-defined evaluation criteria. These always include compatibility with our existing environment and compliance with local regulatory requirements. For example, in the UAE, financial institutions must store regulated customer data within the country, which immediately disqualifies many SaaS vendors without local data centers. Given that Equiti is a rapidly growing organization, scalability and ease of deployment are critical factors for us. Once all evaluation criteria are met, we proceed with a PoC, a data privacy assessment, and a third-party risk assessment. While the process may seem complex at first, we aim to complete evaluations at a startup pace – typically within 2–3 weeks. How do you prefer vendors to approach you, with education, product demos, proof of value? I believe that anything that helps evaluate a solution within the context of our own environment is highly valuable. I have a hard time understanding vendors who reject proof of concept and instead get caught up in internal approval cycles at this stage. For me, that's usually a yellow flag. If a vendor is willing to schedule as many meetings as necessary to ensure that the solution works effectively within our infrastructure, that is always an additional reason for me to prioritize them. It signals a high likelihood that they will continue to provide support after the purchase and that they have nothing to hide. What are the biggest gaps in current cybersecurity solutions that vendors should address? In my view, areas such as vulnerability management, despite their long history, are still underdeveloped. Even well-established and experienced vendors like Qualys and Rapid7 continue to generate a significant amount of noise in their vulnerability dashboards, and current prioritization methods do little to change that. I regularly speak with many CISOs across the industry, and I keep hearing about hundreds or even thousands of high and critical vulnerabilities reported by their VM solutions. Yet, in reality, 99% of security incidents are either unrelated to vulnerability exploitation or are linked to vulnerabilities that were not flagged or covered by these VM tools at all. Are there specific challenges in integration, scalability, or support that you've faced? We've encountered situations where we acquire a tool that fits our needs very well, but face challenges finding the right expertise to implement it properly, considering all the specific requirements. And it's not even about internal resources – it's about the expertise available on the market. While evaluating a solution itself is relatively straightforward, assessing the contractor's expertise, especially ensuring they are both trustworthy and fairly priced, can be quite difficult. I've previously worked at various MSPs, and I clearly remember how service providers often focused on selling the service first, while trying to acquire the necessary expertise during the implementation phase. What role do vendors play in helping you maintain compliance? When it comes to vendors and compliance, I truly appreciate the direction the market is taking toward GRC Engineering. I believe this area has the potential to become highly developed and popular in the future – similar to how DevSecOps gained momentum in its time. Take Vanta, for example. Although it is essentially a tool for automating GRC processes, its interface is so simple and intuitive that it has successfully captured a market even among startups—a segment where selling anything from the security domain is typically challenging due to immaturity and limited budgets. On our side, we are also taking proactive steps toward compliance automation. However, we must consider a wide range of factors, including our presence in multiple countries and various privacy obligations. How is your cybersecurity budget evolving year-over-year? There is a lot of talk on social media about cybersecurity underbudgeting, but in reality, many organizations tend to overinvest. A common pattern is CISOs onboarding numerous dashboards that generate excessive noise and offer limited optimization. At Equiti, even though we're open to increasing the cybersecurity budget, our team has been focused on cost optimization for two consecutive years, mainly through smarter licensing decisions. This often means replacing vendors – always with a proper risk assessment – but given the vast range of available solutions on the market, finding quality alternatives at a lower cost is rarely a challenge today. What's your advice to vendors looking to position their solutions for budget approval? My advice is not to focus on addressing yet another threat, but rather to demonstrate how your tool brings real business value. Modern CISOs are increasingly expected to speak the language of the business and sit at the board table. As a result, the tools in a CISO's toolkit should support business enablement, not just threat mitigation or the addition of another dashboard. If you look at the most successful cybersecurity companies such as Wiz, Okta, or Zscaler they've become integral to their customers' operations and have a direct impact on business efficiency. Have you collaborated with vendors on co-developing or customizing solutions? Absolutely. Vendors willing to adapt their roadmap for our needs are always strong candidates. For example, we're working closely with a SAST vendor that is developing integration features for one of our specific CI/CD environments. Since this environment is relatively niche and not widely supported out of the box, the vendor's willingness to invest effort in saving us extensive engineering time on custom integration has been a major factor in our decision. I must admit, this kind of flexibility is more common among small to mid-sized vendors. What common mistakes do vendors make when engaging with CISOs? Pushing too hard and being overly persistent. In my view, if someone genuinely needs your product, they will be responsive and willing to do whatever it takes to close the deal quickly. If you spend your time chasing people who show limited interest, you might move the deal forward temporarily, but in the end, it will likely fall through and you will have simply wasted time. What's one innovation or improvement you hope to see from vendors in the next 12 months? Although I remain skeptical about the grand future predicted for AI,where it is expected to replace humans, I personally would like to see more practices focused not on solving isolated micro-tasks or problems by introducing yet another tool to the portfolio, but rather on enabling the correlation of all available security data into a unified pool of interconnected knowledge. Such an approach could help predict where threats are most likely to emerge or which changes would yield the most significant impact. I believe that an AI system capable of aggregating insights across the entire organization and its cybersecurity tools could deliver this kind of value. In today's world, many security leaders still make strategic decisions based on educated guesses and abstract, subjective risk assessments essentially, reading tea leaves rather than relying on data-driven foresight.
TECHx
a day ago
- TECHx
Google AI Unveils Deep Think for Enhanced Reasoning
Google has officially announced the launch of Deep Think, the newest and most advanced reasoning model in its Gemini 2.5 series. This AI model offers a refined experience designed to improve logical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. The rollout is now available exclusively to Google AI Ultra subscribers through the Gemini app. This marks a significant milestone in Google's efforts to develop more capable and intuitive AI systems. According to Google, Deep Think outperformed leading competitor models such as OpenAI o3 and Grok 4 in multiple benchmark tests. The model was first revealed during the recent Google I/O conference after a limited testing phase. Deep Think enhances AI reasoning and creativity Available now for Google AI Ultra subscribers Outperforms competitors in benchmark tests The post Google AI Unveils Deep Think for Enhanced Reasoning first appeared on TECHx Media.
