The Unexpected Relative Kate Middleton and Prince William Turn to for "Advice" When Placing Bets at Royal Ascot
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Royal Ascot is taking place from June 17 until June 21 in 2025, and several members of the Royal Family will be in attendance at the prestigious society event. According to a former royal butler, Kate Middleton and Prince William—along with other members of the Royal Family—are most likely to turn to one unexpected royal relative for advice when it comes to betting on the horses at Royal Ascot.
While Princess Kate sadly won't be attending this year, the Prince and Princess of Wales are regular attendees at the horse racing event, which welcomes approximately "300,000 over five days, all dressed up in their finest clothes and hats," per the Royal Family's website. "The royals are allowed to bet on horses," former royal butler Grant Harrold said on behalf of Spin Genie.
"In fact, the late Queen [Elizabeth] was famously known for betting on horses, and there's a clip of her winning a whole entire £20 [$27], which she was really excited about," Harrold shared. "They don't bet silly; they just bet what anyone else would put on...They like putting something on; it would be wrong not to."
As for which member of the Royal Family is an expert at picking winners, Harrold noted, "Queen Camilla is very much into horses. The King is, but I would say Camilla is more so, along with Princess Anne. If you're going to be taking advice on which horses, I would look at Camilla for a good tip."
Harrold—who served as King Charles's personal butler at Highgrove for more than 6 years—also reflected on Queen Elizabeth II's Royal Ascot legacy, which is likely to loom large for her children. "Horse racing is a great tradition within the family—royals and horses go back centuries," Harrold explained. "I'm sure [King Charles] won't be able to go to Ascot and not think of the late Queen, his mother. That was a huge highlight of her year."
The former royal butler further explained, "While King Charles isn't as much of a bettor or racegoer as his mother, he has always had an association with horses, especially when he did fox hunting. Often he's seen out riding horses, and he's had a great love of them. He even had horses at Highgrove until a few years ago. The association has always been there." Harrold continued, "He will definitely keep the tradition of horses going within the family."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry and Meghan at heart of King's funeral plans
There has been increasing talk of olive branches and reconciliation between the King and Prince Harry. Much of it has been conveyed, on the Duke of Sussex's side at least, through television interviews; his emotion, anger and frustration on full display. From Buckingham Palace, there has been little said on the record. Beyond the occasional frustrated shrug, royal aides have kept their counsel, determined not to fan the flames of this deeply personal rift in public. But behind the scenes, the King is very much hopeful that he will be reunited with Prince Harry and that he might still build a relationship with his two California-based grandchildren. Opportunities would seem to present themselves at the next iteration of the Duke's Invictus Games, due to take place in Birmingham in 2027, and the King's 80th birthday celebrations the following year. Given that set-piece royal events are planned years in advance, it is possible to cast the net further into the unknown. Indeed, The Telegraph can reveal that the King has factored not only the Duke but the Duchess of Sussex and their two children, Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, three, into the heart of his funeral plans. Credit: BBC Whenever the time comes, the monarch is adamant that his youngest son take his rightful place at the centre of his family, perhaps mindful of that final chance to create family harmony. There is no suggestion that the King's reign will not continue for many more years. Planning for such set-piece ceremonial events begins sometimes decades in advance, evolving over time through briefings with senior representatives from the Royal household, the police, the military and the Church. The Telegraph understands that the Sussexes remain enveloped in the King's funeral plans at the highest level, with the Duke expected to walk side by side with his brother, by then the King, at the forefront of the sombre processions through the streets of central London. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be invited to take part in the family vigil during the lying in state at Westminster Hall and play a prominent role alongside the most senior royals during the funeral service. Arrangements have also been made for Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, the King's youngest grandchildren, to attend the funeral service at Westminster Abbey, as well as the committal at St George's Chapel, Windsor, should they wish. While the vast majority of the state funeral, codenamed as for all monarchs Operation London Bridge, will look and feel much like Elizabeth II's, the King has made some changes to the plans, which are reflective of his own personal beliefs. His lifelong dedication to the environment is expected to be recognised with the incorporation of sustainable elements wherever possible. Meanwhile, the period of royal mourning will be reduced, bringing it into line with the period of national mourning. This will begin on the King's death and last until the day of his funeral, 10 or 11 days later. When Elizabeth II died in September 2022, the period of royal mourning continued for a further week after the funeral. As always, detailed plans cover every eventuality in terms of the potential location of the King's death, with procedures in place to transport the monarch's coffin from each royal residence to Buckingham Palace. However, while the royal train was factored into plans for the late Queen's death in Scotland, that mode of transport is now thought to have been removed from any royal death plans. In the event, plans to use the train in 2022 were scrapped over fears for public safety and disruption, with the Queen's body instead flown to RAF Northolt in London, accompanied by the Princess Royal. Buckingham Palace aides insisted that the King's funeral plans had not been finalised and cautioned against speculation. The King, who is still undergoing weekly cancer treatment, maintains a full work schedule with planning underway for engagements and events well into the future. The inclusion of the Sussexes in the plans, however, will prove a talking point. Their involvement, not just throughout the public-facing ceremonial elements, but behind the scenes in briefings and rehearsals, will avoid further rupturing relations with the couple. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are thought to have returned home on the day after Elizabeth II's funeral feeling more ostracised than ever, their new status in the general hierarchy having been made abundantly clear. Barely on speaking terms with several of their closest relatives, the lack of communication between Buckingham Palace and their own office was blamed for various dramas, from a mistaken invitation to a state reception to confusion over military uniforms, not to mention differing versions of exactly when Prince Harry learnt of his grandmother's death. At the King's Coronation eight months later, the Duke cut a lonely, peripheral figure. He made a dash straight from Westminster Abbey to the airport, opting not to join the rest of his family for lunch at Buckingham Palace, and was not in any of the official portraits that captured the moment for the history books. The Duke was said to have been determined to make it back to the family home in Montecito in order to kiss his son, Prince Archie, goodnight on his fourth birthday. By putting aside any differences and signing off plans that place the Sussexes at the heart of his funeral, the King will ensure that his final public act brings his family together. While the Duke has vowed never to bring his family back to the UK unless he can guarantee full police protection, they would automatically be enveloped into the official security operation for such a state occasion. Elizabeth II's death marked the first time in history that the grandchildren of a monarch had taken part in ceremonial events that followed. All eight, from Peter Phillips, the eldest at 44, to James, Viscount Severn, the youngest at 14, stood vigil around her coffin as she lay in state at Westminster Hall. At the King's request, Prince Harry wore military uniform for the first time since 2020. The cousins stood in silence with their heads bowed as members of the public continued to file past. The family vigil following the King's funeral is likely to look rather different, not least owing to the relatively young ages of his grandchildren. While Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, currently aged 11, 10 and seven, will almost certainly be involved in some of the most public-facing elements of the mourning period, they would be shielded from certain duties. Prince Louis, then four, did not join his elder siblings at Elizabeth II's funeral. Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, while factored into current plans as the grandchildren of the monarch, may similarly be considered too young or simply not equipped to be thrust into the global spotlight in such circumstances. Similarly, younger members of the King's family such as Zara and Mike Tindall's children, Mia, 10, Lucas, six, and Lucas, three, Princess Beatrice's daughters, Sienna, three and Athena, six months, and stepson Wolfie, eight, and Princess Eugenie's sons, August, four, and Ernest, two, are likely to have been factored in but may not be involved. During planning for royal funerals, each member of the family is given a different, bridge-themed codename. As heir to the throne, the King's plans were codenamed Operation Menai Bridge, while his elder son's were Operation Clare Bridge. Prince William's plans are now codenamed Menai Bridge.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry and Meghan at heart of King's funeral plans
There has been increasing talk of olive branches and reconciliation between the King and Prince Harry. Much of it has been conveyed, on the Duke of Sussex's side at least, through television interviews; his emotion, anger and frustration on full display. From Buckingham Palace, there has been little said on the record. Beyond the occasional frustrated shrug, royal aides have kept their counsel, determined not to fan the flames of this deeply personal rift in public. But behind the scenes, the King is very much hopeful that he will be reunited with Prince Harry and that he might still build a relationship with his two California-based grandchildren. Opportunities would seem to present themselves at the next iteration of the Duke's Invictus Games, due to take place in Birmingham in 2027, and the King's 80th birthday celebrations the following year. Given that set-piece royal events are planned years in advance, it is possible to cast the net further into the unknown. Indeed, The Telegraph can reveal that the King has factored not only the Duke but the Duchess of Sussex and their two children, Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, three, into the heart of his funeral plans. Credit: BBC Whenever the time comes, the monarch is adamant that his youngest son take his rightful place at the centre of his family, perhaps mindful of that final chance to create family harmony. There is no suggestion that the King's reign will not continue for many more years. Planning for such set-piece ceremonial events begins sometimes decades in advance, evolving over time through briefings with senior representatives from the Royal household, the police, the military and the Church. The Telegraph understands that the Sussexes remain enveloped in the King's funeral plans at the highest level, with the Duke expected to walk side by side with his brother, by then the King, at the forefront of the sombre processions through the streets of central London. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be invited to take part in the family vigil during the lying in state at Westminster Hall and play a prominent role alongside the most senior royals during the funeral service. Arrangements have also been made for Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, the King's youngest grandchildren, to attend the funeral service at Westminster Abbey, as well as the committal at St George's Chapel, Windsor, should they wish. While the vast majority of the state funeral, codenamed as for all monarchs Operation London Bridge, will look and feel much like Elizabeth II's, the King has made some changes to the plans, which are reflective of his own personal beliefs. His lifelong dedication to the environment is expected to be recognised with the incorporation of sustainable elements wherever possible. Meanwhile, the period of royal mourning will be reduced, bringing it into line with the period of national mourning. This will begin on the King's death and last until the day of his funeral, 10 or 11 days later. When Elizabeth II died in September 2022, the period of royal mourning continued for a further week after the funeral. As always, detailed plans cover every eventuality in terms of the potential location of the King's death, with procedures in place to transport the monarch's coffin from each royal residence to Buckingham Palace. However, while the royal train was factored into plans for the late Queen's death in Scotland, that mode of transport is now thought to have been removed from any royal death plans. In the event, plans to use the train in 2022 were scrapped over fears for public safety and disruption, with the Queen's body instead flown to RAF Northolt in London, accompanied by the Princess Royal. Buckingham Palace aides insisted that the King's funeral plans had not been finalised and cautioned against speculation. The King, who is still undergoing weekly cancer treatment, maintains a full work schedule with planning underway for engagements and events well into the future. The inclusion of the Sussexes in the plans, however, will prove a talking point. Their involvement, not just throughout the public-facing ceremonial elements, but behind the scenes in briefings and rehearsals, will avoid further rupturing relations with the couple. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are thought to have returned home on the day after Elizabeth II's funeral feeling more ostracised than ever, their new status in the general hierarchy having been made abundantly clear. Barely on speaking terms with several of their closest relatives, the lack of communication between Buckingham Palace and their own office was blamed for various dramas, from a mistaken invitation to a state reception to confusion over military uniforms, not to mention differing versions of exactly when Prince Harry learnt of his grandmother's death. At the King's Coronation eight months later, the Duke cut a lonely, peripheral figure. He made a dash straight from Westminster Abbey to the airport, opting not to join the rest of his family for lunch at Buckingham Palace, and was not in any of the official portraits that captured the moment for the history books. The Duke was said to have been determined to make it back to the family home in Montecito in order to kiss his son, Prince Archie, goodnight on his fourth birthday. By putting aside any differences and signing off plans that place the Sussexes at the heart of his funeral, the King will ensure that his final public act brings his family together. While the Duke has vowed never to bring his family back to the UK unless he can guarantee full police protection, they would automatically be enveloped into the official security operation for such a state occasion. Elizabeth II's death marked the first time in history that the grandchildren of a monarch had taken part in ceremonial events that followed. All eight, from Peter Phillips, the eldest at 44, to James, Viscount Severn, the youngest at 14, stood vigil around her coffin as she lay in state at Westminster Hall. At the King's request, Prince Harry wore military uniform for the first time since 2020. The cousins stood in silence with their heads bowed as members of the public continued to file past. The family vigil following the King's funeral is likely to look rather different, not least owing to the relatively young ages of his grandchildren. While Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, currently aged 11, 10 and seven, will almost certainly be involved in some of the most public-facing elements of the mourning period, they would be shielded from certain duties. Prince Louis, then four, did not join his elder siblings at Elizabeth II's funeral. Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, while factored into current plans as the grandchildren of the monarch, may similarly be considered too young or simply not equipped to be thrust into the global spotlight in such circumstances. Similarly, younger members of the King's family such as Zara and Mike Tindall's children, Mia, 10, Lucas, six, and Lucas, three, Princess Beatrice's daughters, Sienna, three and Athena, six months, and stepson Wolfie, eight, and Princess Eugenie's sons, August, four, and Ernest, two, are likely to have been factored in but may not be involved. During planning for royal funerals, each member of the family is given a different, bridge-themed codename. As heir to the throne, the King's plans were codenamed Operation Menai Bridge, while his elder son's were Operation Clare Bridge. Prince William's plans are now codenamed Menai Bridge.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
I Heard Jurassic World Dominion Was Bad, But I Would Watch It Over Any Other Jurassic Sequel
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. SPOILER WARNING: The following article gives away, just about, the entire plot of Jurassic World Dominion. If you have not yet seen the 2022 Jurassic Park movie, act like Owen Grady holding up his hand to magically neutralize a dinosaur, and proceed with caution as you read on. With Jurassic World Rebirth hitting theaters soon, I figured it was about time that I do something I had been reluctant to do: catch up with the full franchise and watch Jurassic World Dominion. Considering the beastly reviews from critics and audiences, I was braving the worst, but, to my surprise, I thought it was far from it. To be clear, I would not call Colin Trevorrow's sequel a good movie. I think it suffers from a pitifully lazy script, sleepy acting, and throwing out the previous film's setup for a dinosaur-ridden dystopia in favor of, echoing Eric Eisenberg's Jurassic World Dominion review, two bland, disparate plotlines that have little to do with, ya know, dinosaurs. However, I do not at all regret watching it and would choose to watch it again over most sequels to Steven Spielberg's 1993 classic, which I realize may come as a shock to many Jurassic fans. Well, allow me to explain… In previous articles of mine, such as my reaction to the recent sci-fi thriller Companion, I have made it clear that I am a staunch technophobe who fears how dangerously technology's advancement could, or already has, affected our society. However, there is one fear of mine that I have been a bit less vocal about in my writing until now: bugs, especially ones of unusual size. So, you might be able to imagine how I felt when the genetically engineered locusts appeared on the screen. Now, I will agree with the widely shared opinion that a Jurassic Park movie focusing its plot on a non-reptilian prehistoric creature is a mistake, but said creatures did manage to get my adrenaline going faster than any of the dinosaurs that appear in Jurassic World Dominion. That being said… Whenever a dinosaur would appear on screen in Dominion, I found it nothing short of impressive. The special effects, boasting the classic blend of practical animatronics with some of the best CGI Hollywood has to offer, were so convincing, I am surprised there was not more praise about that aspect, at least. Aside from their visual effects, I felt that the action sequences involving dinosaurs are genuinely some of the best that the franchise has ever seen. I recall, in particular, being thoroughly riveted by a scene taking place in Malta, when Owen Grady (Chris Pratt) is chased on a motorcycle through the city by Atrociraptors. I had to stop and think to myself, Wow, I am actually having fun with this movie, and it did not stop there. Some have said the extended edition of Jurassic World Dominion is better than the theatrical version, but you can get both on a Blu-ray and 4K UHD set from Amazon for nearly half off the regular price!View Deal The one reason I had to be somewhat optimistic about finally watching Dominion was the one aspect that I had heard positive rumblings about: DeWanda Wise as Kayla Watts. I could not agree more with my colleague Sarah El-Mahmoud that the daredevil pilot is the best character from the Jurassic World trilogy for her bravery and quick wit, and for just being a badass. If there are any downsides to Kayla, I would say that she makes most of the other newer characters (including Mamoudou Athie's Ramsay Cole and even Pratt's Grady) look weaker than I already believed they were, and that she should have been introduced to the franchise earlier. With all due respect to Scarlett Johansson and Mahershala Ali, a part of me wishes that she were the focus of the upcoming 2025 movie, Jurassic World Rebirth, instead. Despite my harsh words about the newer Jurassic characters, I have to admit that I really enjoyed seeing them finally interact with Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill), Dr. Ellie Sattler (Laura Dern), and Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum). In fact, I don't think I was ever amused by the OG heroes' return until that moment, as the parameters of their reunion and the moments the trio shared never felt particularly natural. And don't get me started about the random callbacks to the first film, like Lewis Dodgson (Campbell Scott) somehow possessing the fake Barbasol canister and displaying it in his office. What?! Anyway, I can't say that 'natural' is a word I would use to describe Grant, Sattler, and Malcolm's meeting with Grady, Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard), and others in the final act either. The events that lead them to each other are far too convenient (like many other aspects of the plot), and much of their dialogue feels egregiously forced. Yet, there was something about seeing them all gathered together and relying on one another to survive against the prehistoric wildlife that left me wishing the movie had dedicated more time to bringing them together. Of course, any Jurassic Park fan knows that the real draw of this franchise is not the meat, but the meat-eaters, and the one who rules them all is the Tyrannosaurus Rex. Any return by that big behemoth in these movies, no matter how convoluted the reasoning may be, is warmly welcomed by me, and its appearance in Dominion was no exception, especially since it was not alone. I actually really dug how the T-Rex was treated as a hero, Godzilla style, in the film's final act, when it teams up with a Therizinosaurus to bring down the Giganotosaurus. Watching the T-Rex throw the Giganotosaurus onto the Therizinosaurus' claws, fatally impaling it, made for a more satisfying final battle than the Indominus Rex showdown in 2015's Jurassic World, if you ask me. I don't see a future in which I ever boot up my Peacock subscription to watch Jurassic World Dominion again, unless I get curious and decide to check out the extended edition, which I hear is an improvement. Yet, I can't say I feel that I wasted my morning watching it the other day, which is something I can't say about most of the follow-ups to the original '90s movie classic, and that calls for a modest roar of applause in my book.
