Husband's extramarital affair not cruelty, abetment of suicide: Delhi HC
Justice Sanjeev Narula said an extramarital relationship was not a ground to implicate the husband for dowry death in the absence of a nexus between the alleged relationship and dowry demand.
The court, as a result, granted bail to a man, who was arrested in a case under Sections 498A /304-B aside from Section 306 of IPC, following the unnatural death of his wife in her matrimonial home on March 18, 2024, within nearly five years of marriage.
"The prosecution relies on materials to suggest that the applicant was involved in an extramarital relationship with a woman. Certain videos and chat records have been cited in support. However, even assuming such a relationship existed, the law is settled that an extramarital affair, per se, does not amount to not, cruelty under Section 498A IPC or abetment under Section 306 IPC, unless it is shown that the relationship was pursued in a manner calculated to harass or torment the deceased," the court held.
The verdict went on, "An extramarital relationship cannot be a ground to implicate the accused under Section 304B IPC. The Court held that harassment or cruelty should be linked to dowry demands or sustained mental cruelty that occurred 'soon before the death'."
The man had been in custody since March 2024, and the court noted his continued incarceration would serve no purpose. The court further observed a chargesheet was filed after conclusion of investigation and the trial was not likely to conclude in near future.
There was no risk of tampering with evidence or fleeing from justice and it was well-established that the object of granting bail was neither punitive nor preventative, it added.
The court directed his release on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of the like amount.
The woman's family alleged the husband had an affair with his colleague and when confronted, he physically abused her.
The man was further accused of regularly subjecting his wife to domestic violence and pressurising her to secure EMI payments from her family for a car he had purchased.
The court observed no such complaint was made by the woman or her family when she alive and therefore prima facie diluting the immediacy and plausibility of the dowry-related harassment claim.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
'Not Community, But Crime Specific Movie': CBFC To Delhi HC On 'Udaipur Files' Controversy
Last Updated: The CBFC told the Delhi High Court that it has done a "great job" by directing the "removal/modification" of 55 portions of the movie, 'Udaipur Files' The Central Board of Film Certification on Thursday told the Delhi High Court that the movie, Udaipur Files, is not 'community specific, but crime specific" while arguing against a plea seeking a ban on it. During the hearing on the matter, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) told the court that it has done a 'great job" by directing the 'removal/modification" of 55 portions of the movie. 'Dialogues of the film have been modified suitably; Nootan Sharma has been removed. The board has done a great job. It directed for removal/modification of 55 portions of the movie. The board is conscious of the fact that you directly or indirectly don't target a particular community," said advocate Chetan Sharma appearing for the CBFC. 'It's not a community specific but crime specific movie, which has been made to promote harmony and caution people that harmony is being disrupted by certain foreign elements." The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought a clarification from the parties on the observations made by the Supreme Court in related proceedings pertaining to release of movie 'Udaipur Files" which is based on tailor Kanhaiya Lal murder case. A top court bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi on Wednesday refused to urgently list a plea challenging screening of the movie and orally observed: 'Let the film be released". The top court observation was made after a counsel, appearing for one of the accused in the murder case, said the release of the film will prejudice the trial. 'In newspapers we saw the matter was in SC, which was refused, saying 'let the screening go on'," the HC bench said. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioners seeking a ban on the movie, submitted that only listing of the matter was requested before the apex court, not a stay. 'Mentioning was rejected, not the request for stay. The SC did not even see the case file," Sibal said, requesting time to get a clarification from the top court on Wednesday's observation on release of the film. The apex court's observations on the issue was reported in media. The high court would hear the plea again at 2.30 PM. Udaipur-based tailor Kanhaiya Lal was murdered in June 2022 allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous. The assailants had later released a video claiming the murder was in reaction to the tailor allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP leader Nupur Sharma after her controversial comments on Prophet Mohammed. The case was probed by the National Investigation Agency and the accused were booked under stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), besides provisions under the Indian Penal Code. The trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur. (With PTI inputs) view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Why it's tough for India to save Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya from the gallows in Yemen
Time is of the essence for Malayali nurse Nimisha Priya, who is on death row in Yemen for the murder of a local man. Kerala politicians are pressing the Indian government to intervene through diplomatic channels as she is set to be executed next week. What can the Centre do? read more Nimisha Priya, from Kerala's Palakkad district, was arrested in 2017 and later convicted for the murder of her business partner, Talal Abdo Mahdi. Image Courtesy: X Time is running out for Nimisha Priya, a nurse from Kerala, who is on death row in Yemen for the murder of a local man. The woman, in her late 30s, will reportedly be executed on July 16 unless she gets a reprieve. The Supreme Court on Thursday (July 10) agreed to hear the plea by an organisation, fighting to save the Malayali nurse from the gallows, seeking directions to the Central government to secure her release through diplomatic efforts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But can the Centre protect Nimisha Priya from the death sentence in Yemen? We take a look. Why is Nimisha Priya on death row in Yemen? A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Nimisha Priya moved to Yemen in 2008, when she was just 19 years old, to support her parents, who were daily-wage labourers. She initially worked at a few clinics before deciding to open her own. But as per Yemeni law, the Malayali nurse needed a local as a partner. More from Explainers Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya to be executed on July 16 for murdering Yemeni national This is where Talal Abdo Mahdi came into the picture and how Nimisha's ordeal began. She started her clinic in 2015 with the assistance of the Yemeni national. According to her family, Mahdi harassed Nimisha and physically abused her. He 'stole a photograph of Nimisha's wedding when he visited their home in Kochi and he later manipulated it to claim he was married to Nimisha', a plea moved by her mother, Prema Kumari, in the Delhi High Court, alleged. It claimed 'he physically tortured her and took away all the revenue collection from the clinic', adding that their 'relationship deteriorated when Nimisha questioned him about embezzlement of funds'. Mahdi 'threatened her with a gun" on several occasions. When Nimisha approached the police in Sanaa, 'instead of taking any action against him, they locked her up for six days', the petition stated. In July 2017, Nimisha contacted the warden of a jail near her clinic, who suggested she sedate Mahdi and then get her passport. She allegedly tried to sedate Mahdi, with the assistance of her fellow nurse Hannan, but her business partner died due to an overdose. The nurses panicked and chopped Mahdi's body, later dumping it in a water tank. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The duo was arrested after Mahdi's body was discovered. Nimisha is currently lodged in Sanaa central jail in the capital of Yemen. In 2018, the Indian nurse was convicted of murder. She was sentenced to death by a trial court in Sanaa in 2020 and Yemen's Supreme Judicial Council dismissed her appeal in November 2023. It, however, gave her the option of paying ' blood money' to the victim's family, which would help her escape the death penalty. In a last-ditch attempt, Nimisha's mother has been in Yemen since last April to save the nurse from the noose. Earlier this January, Mahdi al-Mashat, president of the rebel Houthis' Supreme Political Council, approved her execution. Calls rise for Indian govt to save Nimisha Priya Amid reports that Nimisha Priya will be executed in Yemen on July 16, calls have increased from various quarters for the intervention of the Indian government. The reports surfaced after a statement from Samuel Jerome Bhaskaran, a Yemen-based social worker, who has been nominated by Nimisha's mother to negotiate with Mahdi's family to reach a settlement for blood money. Speaking to India Today TV, the human rights activist said, 'The only option available to us is to seek the assistance of the influential people to convince the family to accept the offer.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He urged the Indian government to reach out to sheikhs and other influential people, who he believed could convince the victim's family to accept the blood money, or diyah. Bhaskaran also praised the Indian government for its efforts to save Nimisha Priya from the death penalty. He mentioned the letter sent by the former Minister of State for External Affairs, General VK Singh, which led to the nurse's trial. '(Otherwise) she would have been executed a long, long time back.' Meanwhile, two Kerala MPs and leaders of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), or CPI(M), have called on the Centre for urgent diplomatic intervention to save Nimisha's life. In his letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, MP K Radhakrishnan urged the Union government to either secure the nurse's release or seek commutation of her capital punishment. 'Nimisha Priya's mother and family are going through unbearable anguish and continue to pin their hopes on the intervention of the Indian government,' he wrote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas shot off a letter to External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, urging the government to facilitate talks with the victim's family, tribal leaders, and other local stakeholders. He underlined that the Save Nimisha Priya Action Council, a citizens' group advocating for her release, is ready to bear the financial cost of the blood money. However, Brittas said the group required the government's help to identify the stakeholders, determine the amount, and ensure the funds are properly transferred. 'As evidence of their commitment, an initial tranche of USD 40,000 was handed over to the Government. Yet, regrettably, there has been no follow-up on the final amount required or any update on negotiation progress, resulting in critical time being lost,' Brittas wrote. The Indian government's efforts to save Nimisha are challenging as it does not have formal diplomatic relations with the Houthis, the rebel group controlling large swathes of Yemen. The Centre previously told the Parliament that it was providing all assistance to the nurse's family. Sources told Hindustan Times that India has been actively working to prevent Nimisha from the gallows in Yemen. 'We have been closely following the matter since she was given the death sentence. We have been in regular touch with Yemeni authorities and her family members and rendered all possible assistance,' an Indian official said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, the Supreme Court will hear the petition by Save Nimisha Priya Action Council on July 14, seeking directions to the Central government to save her through diplomatic negotiations. 'It is pertinent to mention that strong and timely diplomatic interventions of Indian authorities can only save the life of Ms Nimisha Priya and therefore, facilitations for effective negotiations are highly warranted,' the Council's petition said. The apex court has asked the government to apprise it of the actions it took or could take to protect the Malayali nurse. What about blood money? The Action Council has ramped up efforts to commence negotiations with the victim's family and local Yemeni authorities. The group told The News Minute (TNM) that they offered to pay $1 million (about Rs 8.5 crore). However, the talks hit a roadblock as Mahdi's family has not communicated the amount they expect as blood money. The members of the council said they will again attempt to contact the victim's family to negotiate and finalise the diyah amount. With inputs from agencies
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
Delhi court discharges TMC MP Derek O'Brien, 9 others in 2024 ECI protest case
New Delhi [India], July 10 (ANI): Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday discharged ten Trinamool Congress (TMC) leaders, including MP Derek O'Brien, in a case related to a protest outside the Election Commission of India on April 8, 2024. The other leaders discharged by the court include Mohd. Nadimul Haque, Dola Sen, Saket Gokhle, Sagarika Ghosh, Vivek Gupta, Arpita Ghosh, Dr Santanu Sen, Abir Ranjan Bishwas and Sudip Raha. The case pertained to alleged disobedience of an order issued by a public servant, which enjoins the unlawful assembly despite an order to disperse. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Neha Mittal discharged all 10 accused. 'All are discharged,' the court said while pronouncing the order. A detailed order is awaited. Advocate Kunal Mimani, along with Shraddha Chirania, represented eight accused persons, including Derek O'Brien. On April 21, the court had issued summons to the accused after taking cognisance of the charge sheet and a complaint filed by the Delhi police. 'I have perused the charge-sheet as well as the complaint under Section 195 CrPC. I take cognisance of the offences punishable under Section 188/145/34 IPC,' ACJM Mittal ordered on April 21. TMC leaders had allegedly gathered and protested at the Election Commission of India in April 2024 ahead of the General Election. The facts of the prosecution case are that on 08.04.2024, at around 4:00 p.m., the accused persons gathered outside the main gate of the Election Commission of India and started protesting while holding placards and banners in their hands without permission, despite the imposition of Section 144 of the CrPC. It was further alleged that the accused persons continued to protest despite a warning regarding the imposition of Section 144 CrPC, upon which the present FIR was registered. Advocate Shraddha Chirania argued the discharge application for Derek O Brien, Mohammed Nadimul Haque, Dola Sen, Saket Ghokhale, Sagarika Ghosh, Arpita Ghosh, Abhir Ranjan Biswas and Sudip Raha. It was submitted that on 08.04.2024, ten TMC party members were peacefully sitting outside the ECI office and expressing their political dissent. Without following the due standard and procedure mentioned in the guidelines issued by Delhi Police, the party members were taken to the police station and charged with an offence under Section 188 of the IPC. (ANI)
