logo
Musk Just Made Trump Really Paranoid about JD Vance: Author

Musk Just Made Trump Really Paranoid about JD Vance: Author

Yahoo10-06-2025
President Donald Trump is spiraling into paranoia after Elon Musk turned Vice President JD Vance into an existential threat to his power, author Michael Wolff said on the Daily Beast Podcast.
During their explosive spat last week, Musk called for Trump's impeachment and urged that Vance take his place.
Wolff, the best-selling Trump biographer, suggested that Musk's demand struck fear into the president and made him even more suspicious of Vance.
The Fire and Fury author noted that Trump has always been ambivalent about Vance, an 'unlikely Republican' whose 'hardcore support is in the tech bro community.' Trump chose Vance as his running mate, Wolff said, in part because Musk made his backing, worth of hundreds of millions of dollars, conditional conditional on that pick.
The president's high-profile fallout with Musk—a 'central pillar' of the tech world's incursion into right-wing politics—leaves him vulnerable and will push him to scrutinize his vice president ever more closely, Wolff said.
'He will set up what we will see as a set of tests that Vance is going to have to endure and pass,' Wolff told host Joanna Coles. '(Vance has) got to profess his absolute loyalty to Trump, or he will just be marginalized within the administration.'
Vance has tried to get ahead of such tests by doing exactly that.
'I'm the vice president to President Trump. My loyalties are always going to be with the president,' he said as Trump-Musk feud was still unfolding, adding, 'I think it's a huge mistake for (Musk) to go after the president like that.'
It remains to be seen if that will satisfy Trump, who, Wolff noted, 'demands flattery on a constant basis.'
Even if Vance is not plotting a tech-bro takeover of the White House, Musk dropped another existential threat on Trump by claiming he 'is in the Epstein files' in an X post he has since deleted.
'The Epstein stuff floats around Trump as a consistent threat, as a consistent silver bullet really,' Wolff said. Trump had a longstanding relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, the late New York financier and convicted sex offender, from the late 1980s to the early 2000s.
The president has distanced himself from Epstein in the decades since, saying he ended the relationship in the early 2000s and had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes.
Although Musk withdrew his X post, Wolff argued that the billionaire 'could always bring back the threat.'
In a statement to the Daily Beast, White House Communications Director Steven Chung slammed Wolff as 'a blithering idiot who has been widely discredited due to his blatant lies and fabrications.'
'He is an imbecile of the highest order and his Trump Derangement Syndrome-addled brain has caused him to lead a miserable existence devoid of reality,' he continued. 'Nothing he says is the truth and he resorts to outlandish falsehoods in order to stay relevant since Father Time has passed him by 20 years ago.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signals deference to farmers on undocumented workers
Trump signals deference to farmers on undocumented workers

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump signals deference to farmers on undocumented workers

President Trump late Thursday signaled deference to farmers in the U.S. who employ undocumented migrants, aiming to shield some of them from his administration's deportation efforts. 'Farmers, look, they know better. They work with them for years. You had cases where, not year, but just even over the years where people have worked for a farm, on a farm for 14, 15 years and they get thrown out pretty viciously and we can't do it. We gotta work with the farmers, and people that have hotels and leisure properties too,' Trump told the crowd at the 'Salute to America' event in Des Moines, Iowa. The president indicated during his speech, which formally kicked off the year-long celebration of the 250th anniversary of the nation's founding, that his administration is working on legislation that would permit some migrants without authorization to stay in the country and keep working on farms. 'We're gonna work with them and we're gonna work very strong and smart, and we're gonna put you in charge. We're gonna make you responsible and I think that that's going to make a lot of people happy,' Trump said, acknowledging that 'serious radical right people, who I also happen to like a lot, they may not be quite as happy but they'll understand.' Trump then turned toward Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, who was in attendance, and asked if 'they'll understand that.' 'You're the one that brought this whole situation up. Brooke Rollins brought it up and she said, 'So we have a little problem. The farmers are losing a lot of people,' and we figured it out and we have some great stuff being written,' the president said in Iowa, the state that has over 86,000 farms. 'Let the farmers be responsible.' The White House has gone back and forth on the issue of migrant labor on farms and in the hotel industry. The administration has directed immigration agents to mostly halt raids at hotels, plants and farms in early June, though it reversed course days later. Later in June, Trump said during an interview on Fox News that a temporary pass would be issued to migrants in the hospitality industry and on farms to allow their employers to have more control. 'I cherish our farmers. And when we go into a farm and we take away people that have been working there for 15 and 20 years, who were good, who possibly came in incorrectly. And what we're going to do is we're going to do something for farmers where we can let the farmer sort of be in charge,' Trump said on Fox News's 'Sunday Morning Futures' with Maria Bartiromo. 'The farmer knows he's not going to hire a murderer.' During his speech in Iowa, the president warned that if the farmers do not do a 'good job, we'll throw them out of the country.' 'We'll let the illegals stay and we'll throw the farmer the hell out, okay? Get ready, farmer,' he said.

Are Texans Most Likely To Lose the Most Due to Tariffs?
Are Texans Most Likely To Lose the Most Due to Tariffs?

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are Texans Most Likely To Lose the Most Due to Tariffs?

The Trump administration's campaign of taxing foreign governments in an effort to 'Make America Great Again' may have unforeseen domestic ramifications. This is particularly true in the state of Texas, as its economy is intimately tied to its southern neighbor Mexico. In fact, some analysts foresee nothing short of a calamity for the Texas economy if the tariffs go forth as planned. But that's also a big 'if.' Read Next: Check Out: Here's a look at the potential effect on the Texas economy due to the Trump administration's tariffs as currently planned. One of the problems with economic indicators is that some are lagging, meaning they only give a picture of what has already happened. On that level, Texas looks A-OK, as job growth was good in the first quarter of 2025. But according to the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank, which has more up-to-date information on economic trends and sentiment, business activity is weakening. And this is before the full effect of the tariffs are even being felt. Be Aware: Every month, the Dallas Fed conducts a manufacturing outlook survey to gauge the real-time, on-the-ground response of businesses to various economic stimuli. In the first quarter of 2025, manufacturing activity actually picked up a bit in Texas, but some of that was likely due to orders being pulled forward ahead of the implementation of tariffs. The fact that manufacturing activity is now rapidly declining, with the index actually turning negative in April, helps validate that theory. Perhaps not surprisingly, businesses are uncertain about the future due primarily to the tariff policy. According to the Dallas Fed, the uncertainty level among Texas businesses has reached multiyear highs, and this in and of itself can hurt economic prospects. Businesses that are unsure what to expect may opt to hunker down and reduce capital expenditures or even hiring until the path ahead becomes more clear. This self-imposed slowdown can exacerbate the economic damage created by the actual tariffs themselves. Texas is the leading trade state in the country, so tariffs on foreign countries are likely to affect it disproportionately. Mexico is the state's No. 1 trading partner, according to the Office of the Governor of Texas, to the tune of $272.3 billion worth of goods exchanged in 2023 alone. And it's not just one-way trade either. Mexico is both the leading source of imports and the top export market for Texas. The bottom line here is that when Mexico is subject to tariffs, it also has a large effect on the state of Texas. According to Trade Partnership Worldwide, Texas businesses could see a $47 billion economic loss. And a Perryman Group analysis found that a sustained 25% tariff on Mexican goods could cost the state over 287,000 jobs. Although no one can tell with 100% accuracy what the final tariff policy will be — and how it will affect Texans — there are some steps you can take to prepare. Just as businesses are hunkering down in the wake of the tariff uncertainty, it makes sense as an individual to boost your cash reserves as well. Since any type of economic contraction could lead to job loss, it's best to sock away at least three to six months' worth of income in a savings account. From a longer-term perspective, it can make sense to upskill yourself so that your value as an employee can outlast any economic turndowns. This will help ensure job security even beyond the potentially temporary tariff issues. If you have the luxury of flexibility, consider exploring other industries that might be less affected by tariff concerns than, for example, construction and auto manufacturing. Service-oriented industries are a good option, as are businesses that don't source materials or trade with tariff-impacted countries like Mexico. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck This article originally appeared on Are Texans Most Likely To Lose the Most Due to Tariffs? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Slate Auto ditches 'under $20,000' price tag for its pickup EV after Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passes
Slate Auto ditches 'under $20,000' price tag for its pickup EV after Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passes

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Slate Auto ditches 'under $20,000' price tag for its pickup EV after Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passes

Slate Auto has quietly removed the "under $20,000" expected price tag for its electric pickup truck. Trump's huge tax bill is set to scrap federal EV incentives, which Slate had hoped to qualify for. Slate's website now says it expects its modular pickup to be priced in the "mid-twenties." Slate's plan to sell its no-frills electric pickup for under $20,000 appears to have hit a speed bump. The Jeff Bezos-backed EV startup previously said its modular Slate truck was expected to start at under $20,000 after federal incentives, but has now changed its website to say the electric truck will be priced in the "mid-twenties." Slate's website featured the "under $20,000" expected price as recently as Wednesday, according to Internet Archive screenshots viewed by Business Insider. TechCrunch first reported the change. It comes as the US House of Representatives passed a final version of President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which is expected to kill the $7,500 tax credit for new US-built electric cars from September. When it unveiled the utilitarian truck in April, Slate said it would cost $25,000. However, the company had been banking on federal incentives, such as the $7,500 discount, to push the price of its first EV under the $20,000 mark. The company did not respond to a request for comment from BI, sent outside normal working hours. A lack of affordable options has hampered EV adoption in the US, and Slate Auto's CEO previously told BI the company aimed to help fill that gap. The startup made a big splash with its first vehicle, with the back-to-basics pickup truck amassing 100,000 refundable reservations in its first three weeks on sale. Although the base version of the truck, which is set to be built in Indiana with deliveries beginning in 2026, will lack frills such as screens, radios, or power windows, Slate says it will be heavily customizable. Buyers will be able to buy over 100 accessories, ranging from personalized wraps to an "SUV kit" that transforms the Slate truck into a five-person people carrier. The average price of an EV in the US is already almost $10,000 more expensive than its combustion-engine equivalent, and experts have warned that the scrapping of the $7,500 tax credit will make electric cars even more unaffordable. A report by Harvard University's Salata Institute in March found that removing the tax credit would result in a 15% hit to expected EV sales by 2030, and 20 million metric tons extra of CO2 emissions over the same time period. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store