logo
Why being a parent could give your career a boost

Why being a parent could give your career a boost

For decades, research has warned of a " motherhood penalty" in the workplace: women who have children are sometimes viewed as less committed and less competent, diminishing their chances of promotions or raises.
However, a new major study found the script may be outdated — and that parenthood may actually help some employees.
A paper published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology found no evidence of a motherhood penalty in a series of large-scale experiments. It was authored by Christopher D. Petsko, an assistant professor of organizational behavior at UNC Chapel Hill; Rebecca Ponce de Leon, an assistant professor at Columbia Business School; and Ashleigh Shelby Rosette, professor of leadership at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business.
Instead, the researchers found what they called a "parenthood boost" — a tendency for people to evaluate parents more favorably than their childfree peers, regardless of gender.
"I was very surprised, yes," Petsko told Business Insider about the findings. "The motherhood penalty has been such a foundational finding in the behavioral sciences that seeing it not replicate was striking."
"That said, society has changed a lot over the last couple of decades, and it's not unusual for phenomena that were first documented 20 years ago to look different today."
No penalty, but a boost for some
In a series of four large-scale experiments with 4,742 participants, Petsko's team revisited the classic motherhood penalty studies with a new lens: racial identity.
They manipulated race, gender, and parental status in fictional employee profiles and asked participants to rate these employees' competence, warmth, and suitability for promotion.
Not only did the researchers find no evidence of a penalty for mothers, they concluded that the opposite was true.
Parents were consistently rated more positively than non-parents, regardless of gender.
However, there was a catch. While both Black and white parents received a boost, the increase was significantly larger for white employees.
When the researchers combined data from all four experiments, they found that white parents were perceived as more competent and warmer and were less likely to be discriminated against than their childless peers.
Black parents, by contrast, didn't enjoy the same bump. In some cases, they saw no change in evaluation at all when parenthood was introduced.
"Truth be told, we're not sure," Petsko said when asked why white parents seemed to benefit more.
"Something that seems plausible — at least to me — is that the societal prescription to 'raise a family' might be something that people hold more strongly for members of dominant racial groups than for members of non-dominant racial groups," he said.
"And if that's the case, then it would make sense for people in the US to more strongly reward parenthood when they see it in white employees than when they see it in Black employees."
However, Petsko said his comments were purely "speculation" and that there was no data to help determine the causes of this racial bias.
Not over yet
Petsko said he did not want companies to conclude that the findings meant that motherhood penalties were now "a thing of the past."
"Although motherhood penalties didn't emerge in our experiments — which assessed single-shot impressions of men versus women in the workplace — they do still seem to emerge in other kinds of studies," he said, citing longitudinal studies of men's versus women's wages after they become parents.
Instead, Petsko said parenthood itself may trigger biased evaluations.
"There truly may be a systematic tendency to think of someone as more competent at their jobs, and even as more deserving of promotion, simply because we've learned that they have children," he said.
"And if that bias is real — and not just real, but directed more strongly toward white employees than toward Black employees — then companies ought to know about it. Companies can't create equitable work environments if they aren't aware of the biases that underpin their decision-making."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nichelle Nichols Space Camp for Teen Girls to Open in 2026, Honoring Late 'Star Trek' Icon's Legacy (Exclusive)
Nichelle Nichols Space Camp for Teen Girls to Open in 2026, Honoring Late 'Star Trek' Icon's Legacy (Exclusive)

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Nichelle Nichols Space Camp for Teen Girls to Open in 2026, Honoring Late 'Star Trek' Icon's Legacy (Exclusive)

A new space camp for teen girls is set to open in January, named for the late Star Trek actress Nichelle Nichols The camp, a product of the actress's namesake foundation, aims to bring science and technology education to a new generation Other stars from the Star Trek universe are on board with the project, singing its praises in an exclusive chat with PEOPLEStar Trek's Nichelle Nichols broke barriers in her time on Earth, and three years after her death, she's continuing to open doors for women and girls. In January, the Nichelle Nichols Foundation will launch the Nichelle Nichols Space Camp, a weekend-long experience for female teens 14 to 18 at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Ala. According to the website, "Students will work as a team and confront mission scenarios that require dynamic problem solving and critical thinking — 21st century learning skills required in the workplace." For Nichols' former Star Trek costar, William Koenig, it's the perfect fit. "It's a positive project to be involved in," the 88-year-old tells PEOPLE exclusively. "Creating a career which is so exciting and so full of promise is great." Star Trek: Prodigy's Bonnie Gordon, 39, will serve as a mentor at the camp, a job she calls a "no-brainer" to take. "Not only am I a huge fan of space exploration and science, I'm just a big fan of mentoring young girls and children in science," she tells PEOPLE. "I feel like there's so much here on Earth that we have yet to explore and so much that NASA and space programs have accomplished in space, advancing technologies. There's just so much we can learn where everything's connected." Plus, she adds, "Pushing these young women to be whatever they want to be, pushing the boundaries of not just space, but science and their own personal discoveries, is just a dream come true for me." Gordon crossed paths with Nichols in their shared time in the Star Trek universe at fan conventions and events. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "I'm very lucky to have met her," she shares. "You could see the joy she felt when meeting fans, especially the women she'd inspired." Koenig feels the same. "She was extremely warm-hearted," he says. "We had a lot of laughs together. She was the first person who came over to me from the series and introduced herself; I remember that and I thought it was very sweet. We got along quite well over the years." Nichols — who died in July of 2022 at 89 years old — enjoyed decades in the spotlight thanks to her screen work, her music career and her activism to help more women succeed in the field of astronomy. Her breakout role came when Gene Roddenberry cast the actress as Lt. Nyota Uhura on the original Star Trek series. When the show first aired in 1966, Nichols was one of the first Black women to play a major role on primetime television. Following the end of the science-fiction series, Nichols worked to recruit diverse astronauts to NASA, including women and people of color. Among those who were recruited as a result of the program was Sally Ride, the first female American astronaut. Not long after her death, her ashes were sent into space via a Celestial Memorial Spaceflight. "I don't think people realize how groundbreaking she was, not just in entertainment, but in science, because so many little girls who watched Star Trek growing up saw that they could have a future in science," Gordon says. "There's so much that she's left behind. She was a big believer in the philosophy of infinite diversity and infinite combinations, which is basically the Vulcan philosophy." While she's excited for the actual content of camp — simulations, moon walks and more — Gordon is thrilled "to be part of something that moves life forward," she says. "There's so much happening right now where people are trying to cut and constrain when it comes to science, where people who are different or have different values or views are being constrained," she says. "I feel like now is the time to break those boxes open and work together. We can find common ground on so many different levels if we communicate with others and not let hate or anger blind us." The Nichelle Nichols Foundation does just that, she adds. And she hopes to see the camp grow and thrive for years to come. "I know the goal is to make this program bigger and better," she adds. "This is just the beginning. And if it continues to grow, that just means it's going to give even more opportunities to young women in the future." Registration for the Nichelle Nichols Space Camp is now open. Read the original article on People

Why being a parent could give your career a boost
Why being a parent could give your career a boost

Business Insider

time2 days ago

  • Business Insider

Why being a parent could give your career a boost

For decades, research has warned of a " motherhood penalty" in the workplace: women who have children are sometimes viewed as less committed and less competent, diminishing their chances of promotions or raises. However, a new major study found the script may be outdated — and that parenthood may actually help some employees. A paper published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology found no evidence of a motherhood penalty in a series of large-scale experiments. It was authored by Christopher D. Petsko, an assistant professor of organizational behavior at UNC Chapel Hill; Rebecca Ponce de Leon, an assistant professor at Columbia Business School; and Ashleigh Shelby Rosette, professor of leadership at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business. Instead, the researchers found what they called a "parenthood boost" — a tendency for people to evaluate parents more favorably than their childfree peers, regardless of gender. "I was very surprised, yes," Petsko told Business Insider about the findings. "The motherhood penalty has been such a foundational finding in the behavioral sciences that seeing it not replicate was striking." "That said, society has changed a lot over the last couple of decades, and it's not unusual for phenomena that were first documented 20 years ago to look different today." No penalty, but a boost for some In a series of four large-scale experiments with 4,742 participants, Petsko's team revisited the classic motherhood penalty studies with a new lens: racial identity. They manipulated race, gender, and parental status in fictional employee profiles and asked participants to rate these employees' competence, warmth, and suitability for promotion. Not only did the researchers find no evidence of a penalty for mothers, they concluded that the opposite was true. Parents were consistently rated more positively than non-parents, regardless of gender. However, there was a catch. While both Black and white parents received a boost, the increase was significantly larger for white employees. When the researchers combined data from all four experiments, they found that white parents were perceived as more competent and warmer and were less likely to be discriminated against than their childless peers. Black parents, by contrast, didn't enjoy the same bump. In some cases, they saw no change in evaluation at all when parenthood was introduced. "Truth be told, we're not sure," Petsko said when asked why white parents seemed to benefit more. "Something that seems plausible — at least to me — is that the societal prescription to 'raise a family' might be something that people hold more strongly for members of dominant racial groups than for members of non-dominant racial groups," he said. "And if that's the case, then it would make sense for people in the US to more strongly reward parenthood when they see it in white employees than when they see it in Black employees." However, Petsko said his comments were purely "speculation" and that there was no data to help determine the causes of this racial bias. Not over yet Petsko said he did not want companies to conclude that the findings meant that motherhood penalties were now "a thing of the past." "Although motherhood penalties didn't emerge in our experiments — which assessed single-shot impressions of men versus women in the workplace — they do still seem to emerge in other kinds of studies," he said, citing longitudinal studies of men's versus women's wages after they become parents. Instead, Petsko said parenthood itself may trigger biased evaluations. "There truly may be a systematic tendency to think of someone as more competent at their jobs, and even as more deserving of promotion, simply because we've learned that they have children," he said. "And if that bias is real — and not just real, but directed more strongly toward white employees than toward Black employees — then companies ought to know about it. Companies can't create equitable work environments if they aren't aware of the biases that underpin their decision-making."

New study investigates autism spectrum disorder prevalence
New study investigates autism spectrum disorder prevalence

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

New study investigates autism spectrum disorder prevalence

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that includes a variety of differences or challenges with social communication and interaction, restricted interests, repetitive behaviour, and sensory processing differences. A new report from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 16 sites across the US has found that rates of ASD in children aged between four and eight years were higher in 2022 than in previous years. This study adds data to support the trend of an increasing prevalence of ASD across the US, but the study found the situation was more complex than simply rising prevalence rates. This study found that in 2022, the observed prevalence of ASD was 32.2 per 1,000 children, meaning that approximately 1 in 31 children had ASD, a notably higher estimate than that of 2020 (26.1 per 1,000 children). The prevalence varied widely across sites in this study, with the highest prevalence observed in the California study site. Race and sex were also investigated, and a higher prevalence of ASD was seen in Asian/Pacific Islander (A/PI), Black, and Hispanic children than in White children. Additionally, the prevalence was higher, as observed in previous studies, in boys than in girls across all study sites. The study also investigated why the prevalence of ASD in young children appears to have increased between 2020 and 2022. Since the last study period, the screening rate for ASD in young children has increased, in large part due to campaigns toeducate medical professionals who work with previously underserved communities. Increased screening, especially in low-income, A/PI, Black, and Hispanic communities, has resulted in improved case detection and higher prevalence rates. In the US, GlobalData epidemiologists have noted an increase in diagnosed prevalent cases, with a forecasted increase from approximately 3,207,000 cases in 2025 to 3,267,000 cases in 2031. This increase is observed across all ethnic groups. Total prevalent cases of ASD, which include cases that are both diagnosed and currently not diagnosed, are expected to increase from approximately five million in 2025 to 5.1 million by 2031. This study is released against a backdrop of concern for increasing ASD rates across the US. It is important to note that while the study only comments on changes between 2020 and 2022 in ASD prevalence, there is a longer trend of increasingprevalence of ASD lasting nearly two decades. This is in part due to changes in the definition of ASD, which was formerly called 'autism,' to include a broader variety of disorders under the umbrella term ASD. Changes in definition, combined with increased screening and awareness, contribute chiefly to the increase in prevalence of ASD in this age group. This supposition is further supported by studies investigating the subgroup of children who have high support needs, including 24-hour-a-day support and care, limited verbal communication, and intellectual disability co-occurring with autism. The rates of this subtype of ASD have increased only very slightly, if at all, over the last ten years. So, while ASD diagnosis and prevalence are on the rise, it is important to keep in mind that the primary use of this information must be meeting the needs of these children and ensuring that all children are given the support they need to reach their full potential. "New study investigates autism spectrum disorder prevalence" was originally created and published by Clinical Trials Arena, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store