Ellen DeGeneres U.K. Farm in Photos
'The A-Team' Producer's Former SoCal Estate Lists for $20 Million
This $65 Million Florida Mansion Has Both Indoor and Outdoor Pools
Mark Zuckerberg Quietly Added Another 1,000 Acres to His $300 Million Compound in Hawaii
Best of Robb Report
The 10 Priciest Neighborhoods in America (And How They Got to Be That Way)
In Pictures: Most Expensive Properties
Click here to read the full article.
The stone-clad exterior.
The great room's lounge.
The dining area.
The kitchen.
The kitchen is fitted with premium appliances.
A casual dining spot alongside the kitchen.
A sunroom.
The primary bedroom
The primary bath.
There are two ample dressing rooms.
The gym.
The minimalistic indoor swimming pool.
Many rooms spill out to a central courtyard.
An alfresco dining terrace.
The naturalistic gardens.
Atop the carriage house is a massive entertainment space with a bar.
A seating area inside the barn.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Does Tesla Become More Valuable for Investors When Elon Musk Gets Richer?
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, among many other things, is famous for being the wealthiest human being on Earth. Currently, Musk's estimated net worth runs between a staggering $400 billion and $425 billion –that's almost twice the wealth of the next-richest person in the world, Mark Zuckerberg. A great deal of Musk's wealth stems from Tesla, the automotive company he invested in in 2004 and later became CEO of. Musk owned 20% of Tesla stock in late 2020, when the car company's valuation skyrocketed, thus creating 75% of Musk's now incredible wealth, per The Guardian. As such, Musk's wealth is irrevocably intertwined with Tesla's value. Find Out: Read Next: That doesn't mean that Tesla becomes more valuable for its investors when Elon Musk gets richer, though; rather, the inverse is true. According to The Verge, Musk has a compensation plan with Tesla that forgoes an annual salary; instead, Musk's compensation is generated by Tesla's profits and stock values — the billionaire only receives payment if Tesla hits specific stock market heights. This means that the more Tesla's stock rises, the richer Elon Musk becomes. Tesla does not become more valuable for investors when Musk gets richer, instead, Musk gets richer when Tesla becomes more valuable for investors. In that way, Musk is somewhat like the average Tesla stockholder himself — he profits when the company does well (he is, however, unlike most investors in that he makes millions upon millions in this scenario). Even though Musk's wealth can't increase the value of Tesla for stockholders, the world's richest man does have the power to influence the company's value. Musk, in addition to being the richest person on Earth, is also one of the most famous, with his every move under seemingly endless scrutiny. He has the ability to change and impact Tesla's valuation, profits and momentum via his public behavior. For instance, his controversial involvement with the second Trump administration (including DOGE) drew harsh criticism, which led to steep declines in Tesla stock and value. Additionally, his subsequent exit from the Trump administration led to an uptick in Tesla stock, which increased Musk's considerable wealth. Bottom line: When Musk gets richer, that is usually a good thing for Tesla investors, as it's a sign they'll be getting richer, too. It's just that his wealth isn't the source of their success, it's merely a large result of it. More From GOBankingRates 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 This article originally appeared on Does Tesla Become More Valuable for Investors When Elon Musk Gets Richer? Sign in to access your portfolio
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How To Tell If A Lower Salary Is The Right Career Move
A lower salary doesn't always mean a step back. With the right strategy, it can be a smart career ... More move toward growth, learning, or a healthier work-life balance. getty You've received a job offer. The role sounds promising, the team feels like a great fit, and the experience could open doors, but then you see the number. The salary is lower than expected, maybe even lower than you can comfortably live on. So now you're stuck asking yourself a question that feels both personal and practical: Is this job still worth it? As a career coach, I've worked with many professionals who have faced this very decision. And here's the truth: the right move isn't always black and white. It comes down to clarity, intention, and understanding the full picture. Here's how to evaluate a low-paying offer with confidence, not confusion. Before you dive into spreadsheets or call your accountant, take a moment to reflect. What does worth it mean to you right now? Is it about building experience in a new field? Is it about finally getting out of a toxic work environment? Or is it about financial stability, full stop? 'Worth it' is different for everyone, and it can shift depending on where you are in your career or life. For some, a lower-paying job with growth potential may feel like a smart investment. For others, it may be too risky or unsustainable. Start with your values, goals, and priorities, not someone else's metrics. If a role aligns with where you want to go long term, it may be worth serious consideration, even if the short-term payoff isn't ideal. Some jobs don't pay much up front, but offer serious returns later on. Will this role teach you in-demand skills? Give you access to a strong network or mentorship? Put you on a path toward higher earning potential in 6-12 months? For example, maybe it's a startup where you'll wear multiple hats and gain cross-functional experience quickly. Maybe it's a nonprofit that offers leadership opportunities early on. Or maybe the role gives you access to training, certifications, or clients that could level up your resume for future opportunities. Ask yourself: 'Will this job make me more valuable in a year than I am today?' If the answer is yes, it might be worth accepting a temporary dip in salary for a major leap in career trajectory. Salary is important, but it's only one part of the package. Take time to assess the total offer . Does the job come with strong health benefits? Generous PTO? Remote flexibility that cuts commuting costs? Tuition reimbursement or wellness stipends? These perks can directly improve your quality of life and your budget. In some cases, strong non-monetary benefits can offset a lower base salary. A job that allows you to work from home, save on transportation, and maintain a better work-life balance might be more valuable than a higher-paying role that burns you out in six months. Make sure you're comparing total compensation, not just the paycheck. Know Your Financial Flexibility Let's talk reality: can you afford to take this job right now? Look at your monthly expenses, savings, and financial goals. Would this salary cover your basics like housing, food, transportation, and health care? Would you be living paycheck to paycheck? If so, how long could you reasonably sustain that while staying mentally and emotionally well? If taking the job means constant financial stress, borrowing money, or sacrificing basic needs, then it's likely not a sustainable choice. But if you have some financial cushion or support, and the role offers strong future benefits, it might be a calculated risk you're willing and able to take. There's no shame in needing stability now. Your well-being and security matter. At the end of the day, you can still find growth-minded roles that don't ask you to compromise them. Be Honest About the Trade-Offs Every job comes with trade-offs. A low salary might mean faster career growth or better work-life balance. But it can also mean delayed financial goals, side hustles to stay afloat, or needing to renegotiate sooner than expected. Be honest with yourself: What are you willing to trade, and what are you not? Ask questions like: 'Will I feel resentful six months in if I accept this offer?' or 'Am I taking this job out of fear, or because I believe in the opportunity?' Talk to people in similar roles. Run the numbers. And then trust your answer. Whatever it is. Remember, you're allowed to say no to a job that doesn't support your goals. And you're also allowed to say yes to one that feels right in other ways, even if the salary isn't ideal. Deciding whether to accept a low-paying job isn't about settling; it's about strategy. It's about weighing your personal goals, your current circumstances, and your long-term vision. There's no one-size-fits-all answer, but there is a right answer for you . If you do take the role, set a timeline to reassess your progress, advocate for raises, and look for new opportunities when the time is right. If you pass, trust that more aligned offers will come your way. Keep in mind that you're not just building a career here. You're building a life that reflects your values and ambitions. Don't be afraid to choose what serves both. Rooting for you!
Entrepreneur
6 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
Meta Appoints Ex-OpenAI Scientist Shengjia Zhao to Lead New Superintelligence Lab
Zhao, previously a research scientist at OpenAI, played a pivotal role in creating GPT-4 and various lighter models such as version 4.1 and o3. He is among at least eight researchers who have recently transitioned from OpenAI to Meta. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Meta Platforms has appointed Shengjia Zhao, a leading figure in the development of OpenAI's ChatGPT, as chief scientist of its newly launched Superintelligence Lab. This high-profile move marks a significant step in Meta's accelerating drive to position itself at the forefront of advanced artificial intelligence. CEO Mark Zuckerberg shared the announcement on Friday through Threads. He said Zhao will guide the lab's scientific direction and collaborate closely with both Zuckerberg and Meta's Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang. Wang joined the company earlier this year after Meta took a substantial stake in his former company, Scale AI. Zhao, previously a research scientist at OpenAI, played a pivotal role in creating GPT-4 and various lighter models such as version 4.1 and o3. He is among at least eight researchers who have recently transitioned from OpenAI to Meta. The influx of talent signals Meta's intent to rapidly close the distance with competitors in the race toward building artificial general intelligence. The creation of the Superintelligence Lab is part of Meta's broader efforts to establish a premier AI research division. The lab is distinct from FAIR, Meta's long-standing AI unit led by deep learning pioneer Yann LeCun. While FAIR has focused on foundational research, the new lab aims to develop what Zuckerberg has described as full general intelligence. Zuckerberg also confirmed that Meta plans to open-source the work produced by the Superintelligence Lab. This strategy has drawn mixed reactions within the AI community, with some praising the transparency and others warning of risks linked to such openness. Meanwhile, Meta's recruitment campaign has unsettled OpenAI. Internal messages leaked this month revealed OpenAI Chief Research Officer Mark Chen comparing Meta's tactics to "someone breaking into our home and stealing something." In response, OpenAI is reportedly reassessing its compensation practices and offering staff additional time off to curb further departures. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has publicly criticised what he views as profit-driven hiring practices. He alleged that Meta has lured researchers with offers reaching USD 100 million in signing bonuses, a claim dismissed as exaggerated by Meta's Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth. However, reports of even higher offers, including an unverified USD 1.25 billion compensation package over four years, illustrate the escalating competition for elite AI talent. While Altman argues that OpenAI's mission-focused approach offers a stronger long-term foundation, others in the industry see Meta's strategy as justified. Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis called the hiring surge a rational response given Meta's desire to catch up. With over USD 14 billion invested in AI infrastructure and partnerships, Meta is making its intentions clear. The addition of Zhao and other key hires underscores the company's determination to lead—not just follow—the next wave of AI development.
