logo
Why police are investigating Bob Vylan and Kneecap's Glastonbury sets – and what comes next

Why police are investigating Bob Vylan and Kneecap's Glastonbury sets – and what comes next

By Monday (Tuesday AEST), police had formally opened a criminal investigation into comments made by members of Bob Vylan and Kneecap during their Glastonbury sets.
What are the police investigating?
Avon and Somerset Police said on Monday (Tuesday AEST), after reviewing footage from Glastonbury, that both Bob Vylan and Kneecap's performances had been recorded as a 'public order incident at this time'. The investigation, they noted, would 'consider all appropriate legislation, including relating to hate crimes'.
'There is absolutely no place in society for hate,' an Avon and Somerset Police spokesperson said. The department also 'politely' requested the global and local public 'refrain from continuing to report this matter to us because an investigation is already taking place'.
According to Deadline, Bob Vylan has been dropped by talent agency UTA, with the duo seemingly scrubbed from UTA's website. The pair were scheduled to tour the United States from October, though Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau said the State Department had revoked Bob Vylan's United States visas due to their 'hateful tirade' at the festival.
Loading
'Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country,' Landau wrote on X (formerly Twitter) overnight.
Separately, Kneecap's Mo Chara is facing charges under the British Terrorism Act for supporting a proscribed organisation after he allegedly waved a Hezbollah flag at a concert in November. He has denied allegations he is a supporter of Hezbollah or Hamas, saying he picked up the flag, without knowing what it represented, after it was thrown on stage.
Mo Chara is on unconditional bail, with a court hearing scheduled for August.
What does this mean for the BBC?
In the lead-up to the festival, the BBC had been focused on mitigating the potential fallout from livestreaming Kneecap's performance due to Mo Chara's charges, and the trio's penchant for using their performances as platforms for activism.
On Saturday morning the broadcaster announced that it would not stream Kneecap's set live, while noting it would 'look to make an on-demand version of Kneecap's performance available on our digital platforms, alongside more than 90 other sets'. For many viewers, this meant the only way they could watch Kneecap's set live was through TikTok user @helensmashinglife 's stream on the video-sharing platform.
But those looking to watch Bob Vylan's set an hour-and-a-half earlier had no issue accessing a BBC livestream, a decision the broadcaster now regrets.
'Millions of people tuned in to enjoy Glastonbury this weekend across the BBC's output but one performance within our livestreams included comments that were deeply offensive,' a statement from the public service broadcaster, issued on Monday (Tuesday AEST), said.
'The BBC respects freedom of expression but stands firmly against incitement to violence. The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves. The team were dealing with a live situation but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen.'
Loading
British broadcasting watchdog Ofcom has said the BBC 'clearly has questions to answer' after the Bob Vylan livestream, noting: 'We have been speaking to the BBC over the weekend and we are obtaining further information as a matter of urgency, including what procedures were in place to ensure compliance with its own editorial guidelines.'
It's understood that on the direction of BBC director general Tim Davie, footage of Bob Vylan's performance would not feature in further Glastonbury coverage. There are now calls for Davie, who was at the festival on Saturday afternoon, to resign, with Israel's deputy foreign minister Sharren Haskel telling London's The Telegraph: 'If no one will be fired over such an outrageous thing then I think that Tim Davie should take responsibility and resign.'
Kneecap's performance is available on the BBC's streaming service, iPlayer, with a strong language advisory, though Bob Vylan's set does not appear to be available on the platform any more.
What are people saying about Bob Vylan's set?
On Sunday (Monday AEST), Starmer criticised Bob Vylan's performance and the BBC's handling of the matter, saying: 'There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech. I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence.'
On the same day, Glastonbury Festival and its organiser Emily Eavis issued a joint statement on Instagram saying the event stands 'against all forms of war and terrorism' and, with 4000 performances in the line-up, there would 'inevitably be artists and speakers appearing on our stages whose views we do not share'.
'However, we are appalled by the statements made from the West Holts stage by Bob Vylan yesterday. Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the Festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence,' the statement concluded.
Loading
In an Instagram post shared with the caption 'I said what I said', Bobby Vylan stood by his actions, and said his phone had been 'buzzing non-stop' with messages 'of both support and hatred'.
'Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place,' he wrote.
'As we grow older and our fire starts to possibly dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us.'
Bob Vylan drummer Bobbie Vylan, Bobby Vylan, and members of Kneecap have continued to share content to Instagram calling for freedom of speech and a free Palestine.
On Sunday (Monday AEST), United States President Donald Trump again push ed for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, with Palestinians in northern Gaza reporting one of the worst nights of Israeli bombardment in weeks. Jewish settlers also reportedly rampaged around a military base in the Israeli-occupied West Bank that same day. The death toll in Gaza continues to rise.
Who is Bob Vylan?
Bob Vylan is an English punk rap duo comprised of performers Bobby Vylan and Bobbie Vylan – stage names the pair say are designed to protect their identities.
The London-based duo have released four albums since 2019, with their music often focusing on issues including police brutality and racism.
In 2021, the duo successfully campaigned for the removal of South African rap group Die Antwoord from the lineup of the ALT + LDN music festival citing concerns over the group's alleged 'history of abuse towards young people, towards vulnerable people, towards gay people, and people of colour.'
Bob Vylan's 2024 album Humble as the Sun received widespread critical acclaim and featured the song Dream Big, which was later remixed with vocals from Amy Taylor, the leader singer of Melbourne band Amyl and the Sniffers.
Who is Kneecap?
Northern Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap rose to worldwide prominence following the release of the 2024 fictionalised biopic – also titled Kneecap – which starred the band members as themselves. The film premiered at the Sundance Film Festival and was submitted as the Irish entry for the Academy Awards, but was not nominated.
Loading
The trio have released two albums with songs focussing on issues of Irish republicanism and culture, with strong anti-establishment currents. The performers rap in both English and Irish and have developed a cult following, recently becoming a mainstay of festivals.
Kneecap toured Australia in March, including a free performance in Melbourne, which saw a crowd of more than 10,000 pack Federation Square.
Glastonbury's political past
What's now known as Glastonbury Festival started as Pilton Pop Folk & Blues Festival, first held in 1970 on dairy farmer Michael Eavis' family farm in southern England's Pilton, Somerset.
Eavis, who was inspired by seeing a Led Zeppelin performance at 1969's Bath Festival of Blues, then teamed up with Andrew Kerr for 1971's Glastonbury Fayre, and the rest, as they say, is history.
Alongside events including Coachella and Rock in Rio, Glastonbury is considered one of the most important music festivals on the global cultural calendar. This year almost 4000 acts performed across 120 stages during the five-day festival.
The festival has remained relatively controversy-free over the years, however, in 1994 a shooter opened fire on a crowd at Glastonbury, injuring five individuals. There were no fatalities, but that year also saw an unrelated death from drug overdose, the first in the festival's history.
In 2015, a petition was circulated attempting to stop American rapper Kanye West from headlining the festival, but the attempt was unsuccessful.
In 2005, the Scottish band Primal Scream came under controversy after lead singer Bobby Gillespie seemingly performed a Nazi salute on stage during the closing number of his set. He also altered a Make Poverty History poster to say 'Make Israel History'. Gillespie said changing the poster was done to advocate for Palestinian rights, and told NME in 2006 that his history of advocacy would show 'what my politics are. I'm no f---in' Nazi.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk launches new political party
Musk launches new political party

AU Financial Review

time3 hours ago

  • AU Financial Review

Musk launches new political party

Elon Musk says a new political party he has been threatening to start up 'is formed,' a day after President Donald Trump signed a tax-cut and spending bill that the Tesla Inc. billionaire chief executive officer has denounced. Musk made the announcement on his X social network after posting the results of a poll on the platform that he said showed 65 per cent of respondents in favour of creating an America Party. 'You want a new political party and you shall have it!' he said Saturday (Sunday AEST). 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' Musk, the world's richest man, didn't provide details. He floated the idea as Congress prepared to pass Trump's budget package, which will end of a popular $7500 consumer tax credit for electric vehicle purchases this year. That followed Musk's exit from the administration in an incendiary spat with Trump that ended his role heading the Department of Government Efficiency's drive to cut federal spending. Weeks after the public blowup with Trump, Musk began to ramp up criticism of the tax and spending bill through a series of posts on X after the Senate version sped up the end of EV tax credits. He took aim at Congress members who supported the bill, threatening to launch a new political party and vowing to boost his political spending to unseat lawmakers who voted for the bill during the next round of US elections. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' Musk said on X at the time. He also criticised the package for giving 'handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future' and for raising the federal debt ceiling by $5 trillion.

Yes, condemn the anti-IDF rappers. But then you don't get to ignore it when others do the same thing
Yes, condemn the anti-IDF rappers. But then you don't get to ignore it when others do the same thing

News.com.au

timea day ago

  • News.com.au

Yes, condemn the anti-IDF rappers. But then you don't get to ignore it when others do the same thing

Before we deal with more complicated matters let's acknowledge, without caveat, the numbskullery of a British rap duo called 'Bob Vylan'. First of all, on a note that carries no substance but bugs me nonetheless: Bob Vylan? Really? Is that ... is that allowed? We're just stealing the names of other musicians, now, and changing one letter? By that logic I could go around calling myself Chakira, and indulging in a little bum wiggle here and there, and committing tax fraud, and label it art. (That's a touch too harsh on Shakira. She did give us the second-catchiest World Cup anthem of my lifetime, and the raciest Super Bowl half time show since Janet Jackson, both of which warrant no small dividend of respect. Pay your taxes though, babe.) As for the real Vylans of the piece here. While performing at the Glastonbury music festival in Britain, the pair led chants of 'death, death to the IDF', referring to Israel's military, which were broadcast live by the BBC, and thus beamed around the world. As a general rule, surely we can agree that any sentence starting with 'death, death to' is heading in a very poor direction. 'Restraint, restraint from the IDF' may lack punch, but it also lacks any conceivable justification for, or incitement to, violence. Which is to say much of the indignation this week has been warranted. British police opened an investigation into the group, which is roughly in line with their treatment of other extreme rhetoric. Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned them. Their agent ditched them. Shows across Europe were cancelled. The US government revoked their visas, stressing that 'foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors'. (No word on whether hatred glorified by American citizens - say, members of Congress, or senior administration officials - deserves similar condemnation, but that's a whole other kettle of scalding hot water, and we shan't touch it today.) I'm not here to argue any of the backlash described above was wrong. It all ties into a broader question about how liberal societies should calibrate their restrictions on free speech, and across 34 years of life I have never yet encountered a perfect answer. You're fumbling around for the least objectionable border between irreconcilable rights. Not easy. You can sense the looming 'but'. I am here to wonder why these loathsome words, from a pair of formerly quasi-famous rappers - (I'm not quite deficient enough in self-awareness to call them nobodies) - are being treated as more outrageous, and worthier of action, than the daily, continuing tide of actual violence, and actual death, in Gaza. You don't go to any music festival in search of sophisticated views on foreign policy. There's a rawer form of humanity on display. So why is it that we seem, collectively, to care so much more, to be so more readily angry, about a chant at Glastonbury than the opinions, and decisions, of those privileged individuals who actually hold the power to shape what will happen in Gaza and Israel? The future tense there is deliberate. We all know what happened, past tense, on October 7 of 2023. We know of the innocent lives stolen, and the indelible trauma those horrors have inflicted on thousands of Israelis. We know civilians were dragged into the tunnels as hostages, where some remain all these months later. We know about the litany of other atrocities committed by Hamas, not just on that day, but for many years before it. We know it's a terrorist group whose existence hinges on an objective of genocide. We know it cynically uses Palestinian civilians as human shields, hiding in hospitals and neighbourhoods. And we recognise the cruel irony that follows, when Hamas condemns the deaths it goaded Israel into causing. So to banish any lack of clarity: a person who supports Hamas in Australia, or Britain, or America, or any other liberal nation, is insulting their own intelligence. We also know that, in this age of social media, the terrors of war are more easily witnessed and documented than ever before. Which makes the images from Gaza uniquely affecting. All these things we know. And not one of them gives Israel a carte blanche to do absolutely anything it likes in response. Not one renders all collateral damage acceptable. Not one frees Israel from the obligations of international law, or of basic morality. Not one strips all the women, children and innocent men in Gaza of their dignity and right to life. The responsibility of those with power is to consider what comes next; to build the best possible future they can. Not to seek vengeance for what came before. And this war ... what has it become, exactly? It started as a crime against Israeli civilians. Then it became a retaliatory mission, one of self-defence, whose stated aim was to root out Hamas. What is it now? Whole cities have been reduced to rubble. Some monumental number of the 2.2 million people who lived in Gaza are dead. And the survivors of this carnage live in tents, and walk kilometres to line up for food, ever fearful of gunshots from the soldiers above. Where does it stop? What is the objective? How does this end any other way than with the radicalisation of an entire new generation of Palestinians, and more decades of violence, and more despicable anti-Semitism rising across the world in a backlash to Israel's actions, and any prospect of a lasting peace being killed off for another lifetime? If you are genuinely angry, and genuinely horrified, by those words from Bob Vylan, then I ask this of you: as you read these quotes below, imagine the roles are reversed. Assess how you would react if a Palestinian said these things about the Israeli people. First is Nissim Vaturi, Deputy Speaker in Israel's Knesset and a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's party. He described the Palestinians as 'subhumans'. And he called for all men in Gaza to be killed. 'Who is innocent in Gaza? 'Civilians' went out and slaughtered people in cold blood,' Mr Vaturi told the radio station Kol BaRama. Air quotes there implied by him, not me. 'They are outcasts, and no one in the world wants them.' He argued that Israel should 'separate the children and women and kill the adults in Gaza', and said the IDF was being 'too considerate'. 'The international community understands the residents of Gaza are not welcome anywhere.' Too considerate! One truly does shudder at the thought of an inconsiderate IDF. Here is Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. 'The humanitarian aid currently entering Gaza is an absolute disgrace,' Mr Gallant said just last week. 'What is needed in Gaza is not a temporary halt of the 'humanitarian' aid, but a complete cessation of it. 'Stopping the aid will quickly advance us toward victory.' That would be the aid which is currently the only thing feeding children who might otherwise starve to death. Give Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich some marks, at least, for brevity: 'Gaza will be entirely destroyed.' Heritage Minister Amichay Eliyahu said there were 'no uninvolved civilians' in Gaza. None. Among a population of more than two million. All of them are complicit, apparently. Moshe Feiglin, leader of the Zehut party in the Knesset, is mercifully not a government minister. He is, however, a man of questionable opinions. 'Every child, every baby in Gaza is an enemy,' said Mr Feiglin. 'The enemy is not Hamas, nor is it the military wing of Hamas. 'We need to occupy Gaza and settle it, and not a single Gazan child will be left there. There is no other victory.' Look, I could keep going here. There is no shortage of material. And given the time, I could draw up a list of stunningly bloodthirsty language from Arab leaders as well. It's not all Israelis, nor is it all Arabs, nor is it all Palestinians, and that is part of the damn point here. Everywhere you look in this conflict, there's a refusal to recognise the humanity in other people. From the anti-Semites, you get a failure to distinguish between the actions of Israel's government and those of the Jewish people. And in the other direction, a failure to tell the difference between Hamas militants and the civilians, many of them small children for goodness' sake, whose bodies lie crushed amid the ruins. Perpetuating those attitudes will give us nothing more than pain and death, forever. Someone in a position of leadership needs to grow beyond them. Or you will be back here in 20 years reading the same rant, and I'll be back here in 40 years writing it again. After October 7, I made a point of watching the footage responsible news organisations would never publish. To call it harrowing would be a mockery of the word. Now the images that you, as a reader, will never see, are of Palestinian kids with their limbs blown off. Among other horrors. If you can muster fury for one, but not the other, then for the love of whatever god you believe in, do consider waking up. Consider the fact that everyone involved here is a human being, with the same inherent dignity. Consider the fact that, were you born in Tel Aviv, or Jerusalem, or Gaza, or the West Bank, you might be a victim, not a witness. The entire conflict is a catastrophe. It's repugnant. Every day it degrades us. So yes. Condemn the rappers. Cancel their shows. Prosecute them, if laws have been broken. But the next time a government official speaks of children as enemies, not from the stage at a music festival but from a place of real, substantive power, I expect your indignation to burn no less brightly.

Mushroom murder trial jury fail to reach verdict, sending deliberations into a sixth day
Mushroom murder trial jury fail to reach verdict, sending deliberations into a sixth day

7NEWS

time2 days ago

  • 7NEWS

Mushroom murder trial jury fail to reach verdict, sending deliberations into a sixth day

Heavy fog rolled over the Victorian town of Morwell on Friday morning as the jury in the Erin Patterson mushroom murder case entered their fifth day of deliberations. The fog got heavier the closer you got to town, providing an ironically eerie backdrop to a place that has hosted one of Australia's most famous murder trials. It's been nine weeks since Patterson's trial began, with multiple key witnesses including Patterson's estranged husband, doctors, nurses, mushroom experts, the fatal lunch's sole survivor and even the accused herself taking the stand. The case has drawn international media like the BBC to the Gippsland town of 14,000, with documentary makers from Netflix seen filming outside the Latrobe Valley Magistrates Court. Just before 10am on Friday all the major Australian news outlets gathered outside the court, with some erecting small marquees to house all their camera equipment, microphones, autocue and laptops. Journalists sat on camping chairs, going over notes of the case in the event the jury reached a verdict. It's mostly a waiting game, with members of the media making small talk with each other, as well as with the local police that they've come to befriend. The police station is only just next door, so officers walk through the outside court precinct regularly. Locals also pop by, bringing their friendly dogs for pats — a welcome reprieve for weary journalists. By mid-morning the fog had all but gone and was replaced with bright blue skies and a pleasantly warm sun, making sitting around and waiting for something to happen a bit easier. When deliberations broke at 1pm for lunch, the media quickly dispersed, grabbing a bite to eat from one of the many local cafés near the court. As Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC returned an hour later, she was jovial and friendly as she made a passing comment to waiting journalists about them sitting out of the sun. While journalists and members of the media have dedicated a good chunk of their lives to covering the case, by far the biggest impact has been on the locals, whose once relatively unknown town has been transformed into a media circus. Some locals, like Carolyn Rich, have enjoyed the excitement the trial has brought to the town, even going so far as to nab a seat in the public gallery to watch the proceedings for herself. The local florist waited for about 45 minutes to get into the court during the first few weeks of the trial in May. 'It was interesting, it is different to when you're watching it on TV to when you're actually face to face … and the family (is) right there, so it's got a different feel about it,' she told '(I've) always (been) interested in true crime, even before we had all the streaming services. 'I was only in there for a couple of hours though.' She said she hadn't noticed the increased media presence have much of an impact on business, but locals had noticed it had become harder to get car parks in town. 'We probably haven't seen many of the reporters, only when they've wanted to come in and speak to us,' Rich said. Other locals however are more than ready for the trial to finish and for everyone to move on. 'I don't even read it in the local paper anymore, because it's just gone on for too long and I'm just not interested in it at all,' Lorraine Dickson, who works at the local Vinnies, said. 'I followed it for a short time but then after that, it's just gone on too long.' She also remarked that it had become harder for locals to get car parks in the town. While a quick verdict is hoped for by members of the media and some locals, 7NEWS Melbourne chief crime reporter Cassie Zervos, who has been covering the trial on and off over the past nine weeks, said it was important to remember the jury were making a life-changing decision. 'It's someone's life that has to be determined by these strangers and it's a huge decision,' she said. 'So yes, I'd love to get home …. but I think as a reporter it feels silly complaining.' Patterson is accused of murdering three relatives and attempting to kill a fourth at a family lunch by serving up beef wellington with poisonous death cap mushrooms She has pleaded not guilty to murdering her former in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, 66, after the trio died days after attending a July 2023 lunch at her Leongatha home. The 50-year-old has also pleaded not guilty to attempting to murder Heather's Baptist pastor husband, Ian, 68, who spent months in hospital, but survived. The jury will continue deliberating on Saturday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store