Global markets slip and oil prices rise as investors weigh US strikes on Iran
Early moves were contained, with the dollar getting only a minor safe-haven bid and no sign of panic selling across markets. Oil prices were up around 2.8 per cent, but off their initial peaks.
Optimists were hoping Iran might back down now its nuclear ambitions had been curtailed, or even that regime change might bring a less hostile government to power there.
'Markets may be responding not to the escalation itself, but to the perception that it could reduce longer-term uncertainty,' said Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo.
READ MORE
'That said, any sign of Iranian retaliation or threat to the Strait of Hormuz could quickly shift sentiment and force markets to reprice geopolitical risk more aggressively.'
The Strait of Hormuz is only about 33 km wide at its narrowest point and sees around a quarter of global oil trade and 20 per cent of liquefied natural gas supplies.
Analysts at JPMorgan also cautioned that past episodes of regime change in the region typically resulted in oil prices spiking by as much as 76 per cent and averaging a 30 per cent rise over time.
'Selective disruptions that scare off oil tankers make more sense than closing the Strait of Hormuz given Iran's oil exports would be shut down too,' said Vivek Dhar, a commodities analyst at Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
'In a scenario where Iran selectively disrupts shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, we see Brent oil reaching at least $100/bbl.'
Goldman Sachs warned prices could temporarily touch $110 a barrel should the critical waterway be closed for a month.
For now, Brent was up a relatively restrained 1.8 per cent at $78.42 a barrel, while US crude rose 1.9 per cent to $75.26.
Elsewhere in commodity markets, gold edged down 0.1 per cent to $3,363 an ounce.
World share markets were proving resilient so far, with S&P 500 futures off a modest 0.3 per cent and Nasdaq futures down 0.4 per cent.
MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan fell 1.0 per cent, while Chinese blue chips dipped 0.2 per cent. Japan's Nikkei eased 0.6 per cent, though surveys showed manufacturing activity there returned to growth in June after nearly a year of contraction.
Eurostoxx 50 futures lost 0.4 per cent, while FTSE futures fell 0.3 per cent and Dax futures slipped 0.5 per cent. Europe and Japan are heavily reliant on imported oil and LNG, whereas the United States is a net exporter.
The dollar edged up 0.3 per cent on the Japanese yen to 146.50 yen, while the euro dipped 0.2 per cent to $1.1500. The dollar index firmed marginally to 98.958.
There was also no sign of a rush to the traditional safety of Treasuries, with 10-year yields rising 2 basis points to 4.395 per cent.
Futures for Federal Reserve interest rates were a tick lower, likely reflecting concerns a sustained rise in oil prices would add to inflationary pressures at a time when tariffs were just being felt in US prices.
Markets are still pricing only a slim chance the Fed will cut at its next meeting on July 30th, even after Fed governor Christopher Waller broke ranks and argued for a July easing.
Most other Fed members, including chair Jerome Powell, have been more cautious on policy leading markets to wager a cut is far more likely in September.
At least 15 Fed officials are speaking this week, and Powell faces two days of questions from lawmakers, which is certain to cover the potential impact of president Donald Trump's tariffs and the attack on Iran.
The Middle East will be high on the agenda at a NATO leaders meeting at the Hague this week, where most members have agreed to commit to a sharp rise in defence spending.
Among the economic data due are figures on US core inflation and weekly jobless claims, along with early readings on June factory activity from across the globe. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Car makers sound alarm as China turns off tap on mineral supplies
China has spent several years trying to corner much of the global market for minerals and materials used in high-tech and manufacturing industries. It has been a point of concern for many of the world's car makers for some time that China is all but a monopoly when it comes to the supply and refinement of the likes of lithium, crucial for electric car batteries. Now, that dominance is being asserted as China has, up to a point, turned off the tap when it comes to the supply of rare-earth metals, many of which are crucial to the making of combustion-engined and hybrid cars as well as electric vehicles (EVs) . So tight has supply now become that Japanese car maker Suzuki has said it will pause production of its popular Swift small car until supply restrictions ease. CLEPA, the organisation that represents Europe's car component and parts suppliers, has said the restrictions in rare-earth metals, such as dysprosium, represent a significant threat. In a statement, CLEPA's secretary general Benjamin Krieger said: 'With a deeply intertwined global supply chain, China's export restrictions are already shutting down production in the European supplier sector.' Could this lead to another crunch in car production, similar to that seen in 2021 and 2022 when Covid restrictions and a global shortage of microchips sent the car industry into a spiral? It may well do. The VDA, the German umbrella organisation that represents that country's car industry, has warned that China's restrictions could cause car factories to 'grind to a halt'. READ MORE Speaking to CNBC, VDA president Hildegard Muller said: 'The Chinese export restrictions on rare earths are a serious challenge for the security of supply, and not just in the automotive supply chains. Although some licences have now been granted, this is currently not enough to ensure smooth production. A further problem arises from the slow clearance of exports for which a valid export licence has been granted. If the situation does not change quickly, production delays and even production stoppages can no longer be ruled out.' The situation became serious enough in May that it broke down the corporate rivalry between General Motors, Toyota , Hyundai and Volkswagen sufficiently that those companies came together to form a lobbying group called the Alliance For Automotive Innovation, which wrote an open letter to the US government. It said: 'Without reliable access to these elements and magnets, automotive suppliers will be unable to produce critical automotive components, including automatic transmissions, throttle bodies, alternators, various motors, sensors, seat belts, speakers, lights, motors, power steering and cameras.' Previously, the world's car makers were criticised for not acting swiftly enough to shore up the supply of microchips when the supply of that technology became severely restricted. Tech companies such as Apple and Samsung saw the problem coming over the horizon much sooner and acted to bulk up on inventory This left many car makers out in the cold and forced to cut or even stop production, or to build cars with fewer high-tech features. There seemed to have been a thaw in recent months, as both China and the EU sought to work together to circumvent the so-called Trump tariffs It's not just high-tech features which are affected by this shortage, however. While batteries and touchscreens certainly use their share of rare-earth metals, you'll also find them – including the likes of platinum, palladium, and rhodium – in catalytic converters, oil pumps, stereo speakers and windscreen wiper mechanisms. There's another significant difference this time around. Whereas the semiconductor microchip shortage affected the whole world, this time China appears to be specifically targeting not only car makers, but other industries which rely on the supplies of these materials, possibly in an effort to increase the export success of its own companies. It marks yet another step change in the relationship between the EU and China's car makers. That relationship had become exceptionally frosty in the wake of the EU imposing stiff tariffs on China's electric cars, amid claims and counter-claims of state subsidies and low-cost 'dumping'. There seemed to have been a thaw in recent months, as both China and the EU sought to work together to circumvent the so-called Trump tariffs , but this rare-earth restriction could indicate a new phase of China's expansionist industrial policy. The likes of BYD and MG (the latter long since owned by China's Shanghai Automotive Industrial Corporation) are looking to duck around European tariffs both by building factories in the EU and Turkey (BYD's Hungarian factory begins producing its first cars later this year) as well as ramping up the numbers of plug-in hybrid cars – which are not affected by tariffs – that they sell. BYD, in particular, has announced major ambitions for European sales, including plans to become the biggest-selling brand in the UK and elsewhere. It's backed up those ambitions by taking advantage of stumbling Tesla sales, picking up customers disgruntled by Elon Musk's controversial public and political actions. BYD's vice-president, Stella Li, has previously said she wants the company to effectively become a European car maker, with more than one factory in Europe, 'putting jobs and investment into the community'. China's move to restrict exports is also a form of response to the inconsistent trading policies of the current Trump administration That may be of cold comfort to those currently employed by rival car makers who now can't access the supplies and materials they need, especially if it turns out that rather than the restrictions being merely the result of sclerotic bureaucracy, China is weaponising the supply chain specifically to damage rival economies and companies. Both Nissan and BMW have said they can foresee production restrictions if the tightness of supply continues, although both Volkswagen and Mercedes have said they have plans in place to source materials from other countries. With China having a 60 per cent chokehold on the world's supply of rare-earth metals, that may prove easier said than done. Mercedes has pointed out that it is working on new designs, especially electric motors developed by its UK-based subsidiary YASA, that use far fewer rare-earth metals, and in some cases which don't use any at all. China's move to restrict exports is also a form of response to the inconsistent trading policies of the current Trump administration in the US, and is effectively a form of leverage against higher tariffs. Reuters reports that the 'big three' US car makers – General Motors, Ford and Stellantis Group (a European-based conglomerate, but it owns Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram commercial vehicles) – had all been granted export licences for some rare Earth metals. It remains to be seen if these new export agreements will allow Ford to restart production of its Explorer SUV (the large US-market car, not the compact all-electric European model of the same name, which is made in Cologne), which had been paused.
RTÉ News
21 hours ago
- RTÉ News
UK competition watchdog clears £3.7 billion Aviva-Direct Line deal
The UK competition watchdog has today cleared Aviva's £3.7 billion takeover of smaller rival Direct Line, paving the way for the creation of Britain's largest home and motor insurer. The Competition and Markets Authority, which launched an initial investigation into the deal in May, said it would not refer the deal to an in-depth probe. Aviva and Direct Line inked an agreement in December to create one of London's largest listed insurers, rivalling Legal & General and the Asia-focused Prudential in terms of market value. The combined company, representing Aviva CEO Amanda Blanc's most ambitious corporate transaction to date, would have a more than 20% share in both home and motor insurance in the UK, analysts said at the time the deal was announced.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Iranian firm sought Irish diplomats' help for business deals with Vodafone, Eir and Three
A telecoms company with suspected ties to a key arm of the Iranian regime asked Irish diplomats for help setting up business deals in the Republic with Eir , Vodafone and Three , internal correspondence shows. The Iranian company linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) requested the help of the State's Embassy in Tehran at the start of this year to line up mobile roaming agreements with several Irish networks. In a January 6th letter, seen by The Irish Times, the Mobile Company of Iran (MCI) said it wanted to expand its roaming coverage to Ireland, 'considering the friendly relations' between the two countries. The Mobile Company of Iran is one of the largest telecoms firms in the country and is owned by a company believed to be under the control of the IRGC. READ MORE The revolutionary guard is a military force, but also controls sections of many important economic industries in Iran. It oversees covert operations and plays a central role in aiding Middle East proxy militias, such as Hamas and Hizbullah. 'We would like to express our gratitude for the consistent efforts of the Embassy of Ireland in strengthening bilateral relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Ireland,' the letter from MCI to the Irish Embassy said. The Iranian company claimed it had international roaming deals in place with nearly 200 operators across 110 countries, where local providers extend mobile phone coverage to customers travelling from foreign countries. 'We kindly request the esteemed Embassy of Ireland to facilitate and support the establishment of international roaming agreements with active operators in Ireland (Three, Vodafone, and Eir),' the letter said. The Republic's ambassador to Iran, Laoise Moore, did not respond to the letter, a copy of which was released to The Irish Times following a Freedom of Information Act request. Vodafone previously had a roaming deal with MCI, but cut ties in the last year. The UK telecoms giant feared the agreement might breach rules prohibiting companies from doing business with the Iranian regime. Three Ireland did not respond to queries about whether it was involved in any discussions to sign a roaming deal with the Iranian company. An Eir spokeswoman said its roaming agreements were 'established in full compliance with existing international legal frameworks'. The company 'reviews publicly available sanctions lists prior to finalising any agreements', she said. Eir did not respond to specific questions about MCI. An internal assessment by the European Commission, the EU's executive arm, previously said there was reason to believe MCI was 'indirectly owned or controlled' by an entity that had been sanctioned by the bloc. The main shareholder of MCI is connected to an entity put on an EU sanctions blacklist in 2010, due to links to the IRGC. A Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman said the IRGC was subject to economic sanctions, but the Mobile Company of Iran itself was not. Irish staff working in the Tehran Embassy were evacuated when fighting between Israel and Iran intensified, in the 12-day war that ended at the start of last week. The Embassy in Iran had only reopened last year, after having been closed in 2012 as part of a cost-cutting effort following the financial crash. The letter from MCI to Ms Moore was addressed to 'His excellency, ambassador of Ireland in the Islamic Republic of Iran'.
