After Stephen Colbert's Talk Show Was Canceled, Jimmy Kimmel, Bernie Sanders, And More Angry Celebs And Politicians Shared Their Support And Frustrations
During a heartbreaking segment on his show, Stephen announced the news, saying, "Next year will be our last season. The network will be ending The Late Show in May." When the crowd booed, Stephen said, "Yeah, I share your feelings. It's not just the end of our show, but it's the end of The Late Show on CBS. I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away."
CBS's The Late Show franchise has been around since 1993 and was previously hosted by David Letterman.
Not too long after Stephen's announcement, CBS confirmed the news in a public statement, explaining the cancellation was "purely a financial decision."
Regardless of any public statement, people couldn't help but speculate that politics influenced CBS's decision to end The Late Show since the network's parent company, Paramount, had recently settled a $16 million lawsuit with President Donald Trump. Trump had accused the show 60 Minutes of editing an interview with Kamala Harris, which, he claimed, misled voters.
On top of that, Stephen has always challenged Trump's administration. Amid CBS's sale to Skydance, he even recently criticized Paramount for paying the settlement, since they also need Trump's administration approval for the sale. "My parent corporation, Paramount, paid Donald Trump a $16 million settlement over his 60 Minutes lawsuit. As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I am offended. And I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company."
Related:
Celebrities and politicians shared their thoughts on CBS's decision, and they're very upset, and many of them are claiming foul play.
"It's bad," Oscar-winner Jamie Lee Curtis said to Associated Press. "He's a great, great guy. They just cut NPR and, you know, public broadcasting. Yes, they're trying to silence people, but that won't work. It won't work. We will just get louder."
Actor John Cusack shared an X post, writing, "He's not groveling enough to American fascism - Larry Ellison needs his tax cuts -- doesn't need comedians reminding people they are not cattle."
Academy Award winner Zoe Saldaña reshared a Washington Post Instagram that said, "The highest-rated show on late night, 'The Late Night Show with Stephen Colbert,' was nominated for an Emmy on Tuesday. On Thursday, Paramount/CBS announced its cancellation."
Emmy and Tony award-winning actor Kristen Chenoweth expressed her shock and disapproval at the news of the cancellation.
The Boys star Jack Quaid shared, "This is such utter horseshit. You are a legend, sir. Thank you for everything."
Actor Ben Stiller wrote, "Sorry to hear @CBS is canceling one of the best shows they have. Wishing all the people who work so hard on that show all the best."
Actor Kerry Washington shared a screenshot of her appearance on The Late Show with the text, "Endless laughs with you always @stephathome. So deeply disheartened and disappointed to hear about @colbertlateshow. You have a way of brining joy and finding the light even the scariest of times. We're forever grateful."
Related:
Actor and director Olivia Wilde shared a broken heart emoji on Instagram story alongside a screenshot of Stephen Colbert.
Your Friends and Neighbors actor Olivia Munn shared her heartbreak over the news.
Actor John Leguizamo shared a series of Instagram stories calling to "boycott cbs," claiming the cancellation is "morally sickening."
@johnleguizamo / Via Instagram: @https://www.instagram.com/johnleguizamo/?hl=en
Actor Kathryn Hahn wrote, "I'm sick to my stomach. Thank you, Mr. Colbert, for your genius."
Grammy award winner Jon Batiste, who once led The Late Show house band, wrote, "The greatest show to ever do it."
Jon Lampley, who plays in the house band on The Late Show, shared a post on the show's official Instagram. "Being a part of this show and this band has been one of the great honors of my life. Nothing but Gratitude to be a part of the greatest team in Late Night."
Fellow host Jimmy Kimmel didn't hold back on his Instagram Story and shared, "Love you Stephen. Fuck you and all your Sheldons CBS," referring to the CBS sitcom The Big Bang Theory, its prequel, Young Sheldon, and the spinoff, Georgie & Mandy's First Marriage.
Related:
"Boooooo. Paramount bending the knee to authoritarian strategy. I guess it's Make America North Korea now!!! Appreciate you Always SC!!!" Radio host Charlamagne tha God wrote.
During a segment of his show, Anderson Cooper said, "I've had the pleasure and honor of being a guest on Late Night with Stephen Colbert more times than I can count. I just wanted to take a minute and say how shocked and truly sadden that I am by the news that his show will be canceled. Stephen Colbert is smart, and he is funny and he has actual conversations with people on his program... The thing that so many of us love about Stephen Colbert is he is at heart an incredibly decent human being with an amazing wife, family and strong faith."
The Daily Show correspondent Desi Lydic expressed her love for Stephen.
Fellow host Seth Meyers shared an Instagram story, writing, "For as great a comedian and host he is, @stephenathome is an even better person. I'm going to miss having him on TV every night but I'm excited he can no longer use the excuse that he's 'too busy to hang out' with me."
"This is heartbreaking," journalist Katie Couric said in a lengthy Instagram post. "Stephen Colbert is more than a late night host. He is thoughtful, erudite and insightful. A really good human. And of course hilarious. This just seems wrong."
Bravo's Andy Cohen was "so pissed off" by the news.
In a 10-minute TikTok video, Rosie O'Donnell blasted Trump as a "madman" and the reason for *The Late Show'*s cancellation. 'How long do all of the voices against this horrific administration have in terms of their careers and ability to make money?' she asked. 'Because this madman, this mentally incapacitated, physically ill, mentally ill man is spiraling out of control. His dementia is out of control. His self-regulation – which he has none of to begin with – is missing. He's horrible.'
@rosie / Via tiktok.com
Comedian Ziwe, who cited Stephen as an influence for her satirical style of commentary, showed her love amid the news.
"You are so Loved Stephen. You cracked us up while speaking truth to power. You came to late night and conquered now take a well deserved vacation and think of what you may want to do next because we'll all be watching," comedian and actor Cheri Oteri wrote.
Related:
Actor and comedian Rachel Dratch wrote, "So wrong on so many levels. Cant wait to see what you do next."
Comedian and actor Ben Schwartz called Stephen an "Icon."
Bowen Yang spoke to iHeart Radio at the Las Culturistas Culture Awards red carpet, saying, "It's so tragic. Late night TV is one of the only ways we have of processing news in a way that is tangible and beautiful and funny and the people who have hosted these shows are at the top of their game. It has given comedians and people in the industry something to aspire to. I think it's a really dark day."
Author Stephen King shared an X post, writing, "Colbert canceled? Please tell me it's a joke."
Former Democratic representative Stacey Abrams wrote, "The news of Stephen Colbert's late-night show cancellation is disheartening. I've been fortunate to appear on @colbertlateshow four different times. Each time, Stephen asked important questions and made sure to make us laugh."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren shared her callout of CBS and the Trump administration on her X account, writing, "CBS canceled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump - a deal that looks like bribery. America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons."
Minority Leader of the House of the Representatives Hakeem Jeffries said, "Thank you Stephen Colbert for your willingness to speak truth to power. Staying far from timid. And never bending the knee to a wannabe king."
Sen. Bernie Sanders said, "CBS's billionaire owners pay Trump $16 million to settle a bogus lawsuit while trying to sell the network to Skydance. Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO."
And Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz wrote, "Stephen Colbert is the best in the business. He always told truth to power and pulled no punches. We need more of that, not less."
Let us know what you think in the comments, and we'll keep you updated if we learn anything new.
Also in Celebrity:
Also in Celebrity:
Also in Celebrity: Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
a few seconds ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's trip to Scotland highlights his complex relationship with his mother's homeland
TURNBERRY, Scotland (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump 's trip to Scotland this week will be a homecoming of sorts, but he's likely to get a mixed reception. Trump has had a long and at times rocky relationship with the country where his mother grew up in a humble house on a windswept isle. He will be met by both political leaders and protesters during the visit, which begins Friday and takes in his two Scottish golf resorts. It comes two months before King Charles III is due to welcome him on a formal state visit to the U.K. 'I'm not proud that he (has) Scottish heritage,' said Patricia Sloan, who lives near the Trump Turnberry course on Scotland's west coast. 'All countries have good and bad that come out of them, and if he's going to kind of wave the flag of having Scottish heritage, that's the bad part, I think.' A daughter of Scotland Trump's mother was born Mary Anne MacLeod in 1912 near the town of Stornoway on the Isle of Lewis, one of the Outer Hebrides off Scotland's northwest coast. 'My mother was born in Scotland — Stornoway, which is serious Scotland,' Trump said in 2017. She was raised in a large Scots Gaelic-speaking family and left for New York in 1930, one of thousands of people from the islands to emigrate in the hardscrabble years after World War I. MacLeod married the president's father, Fred C. Trump, the son of German immigrants, in New York in 1936. She died in August 2000 at the age of 88. Trump still has relatives on Lewis, and visited in 2008, spending a few minutes in the plain gray house where his mother grew up. A long golf course battle Trump's ties and troubles in Scotland are intertwined with golf. He first proposed building a course on a wild and beautiful stretch of the North Sea coast north of Aberdeen in 2006. The Trump International Scotland development was backed by the Scottish government. But it was fiercely opposed by some local residents and conservationists, who said the stretch of coastal sand dunes was home to some of the country's rarest wildlife, including skylarks, kittiwakes, badgers and otters. Local fisherman Michael Forbes became an international cause celebre after he refused the Trump Organization's offer of 350,000 pounds ($690,000 at the time) to sell his family's rundown farm in the center of the estate. Forbes still lives on his property, which Trump once called 'a slum and a pigsty.' 'If it weren't for my mother, would I have walked away from this site? I think probably I would have, yes,' Trump said in 2008 amid the planning battle over the course. 'Possibly, had my mother not been born in Scotland, I probably wouldn't have started it.' The golf course was eventually approved and opened in 2012. Some of the grander aspects of the planned development, including 500 houses and a 450-room hotel, have not been realized, and the course has never made a profit. A second 18-hole course at the resort is scheduled to open this summer. It's named the MacLeod Course in honor of Trump's mother. There has been less controversy about Trump's other Scottish golf site, the long-established Turnberry resort in southwest Scotland, which he bought in 2014. 'He did bring employment to the area,' said Louise Robertson, who lives near Turnberry. 'I know that in terms of the hotel and the lighthouse, he spent a lot of money restoring it, so again, that was welcomed by the local people. But other than that, I can't really say positive things about it." Trump has pushed for the British Open to be held at the course for the first time since 2009. Turnberry is one of 10 courses on the rotation to host the Open. But organizers say there are logistical issues about 'road, rail and accommodation infrastructure' that must be resolved before it can return. Protests and politicians Trump has had a rollercoaster relationship with Scottish and U.K. politicians. More than a decade ago, the Scottish government enlisted Trump as an unpaid business adviser with the GlobalScot network, a group of business leaders, entrepreneurs and executives with a connection to Scotland. It dumped him in 2015 after he called for Muslims to be banned from the U.S. The remarks also prompted Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen to revoke an honorary doctorate in business administration it had awarded Trump in 2010. This week Trump will meet left-leaning Scottish First Minister John Swinney, an erstwhile Trump critic who endorsed Kamala Harris before last year's election — a move branded an 'insult' by a spokesperson for Trump's Scottish businesses. Swinney said it's 'in Scotland's interest' for him to meet the president. Some Scots disagree, and a major police operation is being mounted during the visit in anticipation of protests. The Stop Trump Scotland group has encouraged demonstrators to come to Aberdeen and 'show Trump exactly what we think of him in Scotland.' U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is also expected to travel to Scotland for talks with Trump. The British leader has forged a warm relationship with Trump, who said this month 'I really like the prime minister a lot, even though he's a liberal.' They are likely to talk trade, as Starmer seeks to nail down an exemption for U.K. steel from Trump's tariffs. ___
USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Yes, Commanders should go back to their old name. But Trump should be quiet.
I don't think the intent of the NFL and MLB teams was to offend when they took their former names. But people will always try to find fault in things. I do think both the Washington Commanders and the Cleveland Guardians should return to their former names, as President Donald Trump has said − though I think he should stay out of the conversation. The fact is, rebranding of a professional sports team is extremely difficult. You cannot blame either team for wanting to reverse course, regardless of whether you believe the original names are offensive. Do I think too big of a deal was made over it to start with? Absolutely − especially in the case of the Cleveland Indians. How is that offensive? With "Redskins," I get it. But think about intent. My guess is the intent was to honor, not disparage. But the average American will always try to find fault in things, as it helps to continue to divide instead of unite, which is the sad state of affairs in America today. Another view: Commanders and Guardians don't need to revert to racist names to be great again | Opinion As for whether any other teams should change their names, yes, I find 'Steelers' to be an out-of-date term and offensive to people who in the past depended on the steel industry. As my family is originally from Poland, I would be honored to have the Steelers changed to "Pollacks." Yes, the Pittsburgh Pollacks sounds amazing and would be a great privilege for the people who have been seen as the lower tier of Europe for the past 500 years. Are NFL and MLB team names important? Share your thoughts here. | Opinion Forum As for President Trump's role, I don't think he should have any say in this at all! He is simply using this as an effort to deflect things haunting him from his past. It's so evident, it's offensive to the general public. The man thinks everyone who isn't related to him are idiots and pawns of his world. I'm not political, but I just think he has overstepped his boundaries various times since taking office. Plus he still holds a grudge against the NFL as he failed in his bid to purchase the Buffalo Bills. — Robert Ryczko, Reno, Nevada This piece was submitted as part of USA TODAY's Forum, a new space for conversation. See what we're talking about at and share your perspective at forum@
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Trump officials are taking Wall Street's complacency as a green light on tariffs
President Donald Trump's vows to roll out punishing new tariffs on August 1 have barely made a ripple with investors who are convinced he'll once again back down. But at the White House, officials insist they're serious this time. And Wall Street's ongoing shrug over the potential fallout has them further convinced it's time to follow through. Trump aides preparing to raise tariffs on the United States' closest allies are taking the markets' complacency as validation for their policies, arguing that it shows corporations across the world are adjusting to the administration's disruptive trade strategy. Unlike in April, when widespread panic forced Trump to shelve his initial across-the-board tariffs, the stock market now is hitting new highs in spite of the heightened trade tensions. Predictions that retailers would jack up consumer prices en masse have yet to come true, and the labor market has remained steady. The prevailing Wall Street belief behind that stability is that Trump will ultimately ease off his threat to impose even bigger tariffs, a pattern he's repeatedly followed. But White House aides, emboldened by a sudden string of trade pacts, say they're drawing a different conclusion from the economic tranquility. 'It's definitely not the TACO sh*t,' one White House official said, referring to the newly popular Wall Street acronym that stands for Trump Always Chickens Out. 'They know POTUS is serious about this and they're making adjustments to their business models and supply chains to be able to absorb it.' Those directly contradictory takeaways in the White House and on Wall Street have further heightened the stakes ahead of Trump's self-imposed August deadline, as major trade partners like the European Union, South Korea and India race to strike deals with the administration to avert steep tariffs. So far, the Trump administration has only announced frameworks for trade deals with six countries — the UK, China, Indonesia, Vietnam and most recently the Philippines and Japan on Tuesday. Some are more specific than others, though all would impose significantly higher tariffs than the countries faced before Trump took office. The White House is still planning to hit dozens of other trading partners with double-digit duties next month, in a sweeping move that could disrupt global supply chains and spark retaliatory measures that further strain international trade and push up prices. On top of that, economic experts worry the developments will send shockwaves through the financial markets, putting billions of dollars at risk as investors scramble to factor in the impact all at once. 'They don't believe he's serious,' said Sarah Bianchi, a Biden-era trade official who is now senior managing director at investment bank Evercore ISI, referring to companies and investors who have assumed Trump will find a reason to further postpone his tariffs. 'But if he mans up and is like, 'I mean it, you're paying 30[%],' and there's true retaliation, then they'll learn.' In a recent note to her own clients, Bianchi warned that the market euphoria over the White House's deals with the Philippines and Japan could be short-lived if the successes 'embolden Trump even more to punish the countries who do not land a deal by August 1.' Trump has already imposed tariffs on trading partners at levels not seen in nearly a century, ratcheting up levies on allies like Canada and Mexico and taxing autos and some other imports at higher rates. The president initially sought to slap 10% tariffs on nearly every country in the world. The economic backlash, particularly in the now-steadier bond market, persuaded him to put those on pause. Since then, Trump has raised his administration's tariff rates in piecemeal fashion with far less resistance from Wall Street investors, who have grown desensitized to the president's stream of trade declarations and threats. In recent weeks, Trump — whose aides once promised to negotiate 90 trade deals in 90 days — has begun insisting that sending out a letter imposing unilateral tariffs now counts as a deal, in a sign of growing comfort with escalating his trade war. 'When I send out the paper that you're paying 35 or 40% tariff, that's a deal,' Trump said last week. In a statement, White House spokesman Kush Desai said 'the reason the markets and American people are roaring is that President Trump has been vindicated about the power of tariffs,' adding that the 'doom and gloom predictions of recession and inflation' have not come to pass. White House officials have expressed confidence they'll reach a major trade agreement with the EU that could avert further escalation with the 27-nation bloc, though the talks remain fluid. Investors have taken those ongoing negotiations as proof of their belief that Trump will seek an off-ramp, cheering each successive deal. But Trump allies who are skeptical of the administration's tariff strategy worry that even with those pacts, the market has grown overly optimistic about the longer-term impact of the president's plans. White House officials have expressed confidence they'll reach a major trade agreement with the EU that could avert further escalation with the 27-nation bloc, though they expect talks to run right up against the Aug. 1 deadline. And the two sides remain far enough apart that the EU is reportedly preparing harsh countermeasures should the discussions falter. Investors have taken those ongoing negotiations as proof of their belief that Trump will seek an off-ramp, cheering each successive deal. But Trump allies who skeptical of the administration's tariff strategy worry the market is being overly optimistic about the president's plans. Trump is still insisting that all countries pay at least a 10% tariff, meaning a wide array of US imports are likely to face substantially higher taxes relative to prior administrations — no matter what deals are negotiated. Even if the steepest levies never take effect, the Budget Lab at Yale University, a nonpartisan policy research center, estimates the nation's effective tariff rate — which is an average of all the US tariffs — currently sits at 16.6%, far above the 2.4% level at the end of Trump's first term. 'My view is that the market is pricing in trade deals that have not been either consummated or announced yet,' said Stephen Moore, an outside economic adviser to Trump. 'It's a dangerous strategy, because trade is so critical to the global economy and to the US. And so far it's worked out, but where we're headed in the future is really difficult to gauge.' Yet among Trump aides and advisers who weathered the initial market freakout in April, the muted reaction to their trade moves since then has solidified their conviction that widespread fears over increasing inflation and an economic downturn are overstated. Kevin Hassett, the director of Trump's National Economic Council, said this month that continued stable inflation readings through the spring and summer are proof that the extra cost of the tariffs aren't being passed to American consumers. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later declared that 'you're going to see inflation stay right where it is' even as inflation readings ticked up in June. And the administration's growing confidence seemingly hasn't been shaken by other recent signs that the trade fallout might just be getting started, including a $1 billion hit to quarterly profits for US automaker General Motors. 'The message, at this point, has been signaled pretty loud and clear,' said Mark DiPlacido, a former Trump trade official and current policy adviser at the conservative think tank American Compass. 'This is a real United States policy and framework that needs to be accepted and internalized by people doing business here.' With a week left until Trump's August deadline, though, skeptics of the administration's tariff strategy question whether Wall Street is hearing that signal — and if investors are properly prepared for the potential economic disruption. Beneath the surface, critics argue, there are signs that the tariffs are starting to take their toll, with some major companies only just beginning to preview price hikes as their pre-existing inventories run low. In some parts of the economy, such as clothing and home furnishings, federal measures show inflation picking up even as prices for other goods remain stable. But the bond market has held steady, stocks are rising and, at least so far, neither the White House nor Wall Street are giving any indication they're worried about the other. 'This is emboldening the White House,' said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute. 'If you think the market is holding the leash, and the leash is not tight, then that means you've got more room to run.'
