Delhi BJP chief accuses state-run liver hospital of misappropriating staff PF
In a letter dated May 15, Sachdeva alleged that the contributions made by the institute appear to be noncompliant with statutory norms. He claimed that the institute contributes only 8% of employees' salaries towards PF, instead of the mandatory 12%, and that an equivalent amount is being deducted from employees' pay.
The complaint alleged that the salary amounts reported to the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) are understated and these irregularities have been going on for a few years now. The violations are apparently happening with the knowledge of senior officials, while employees, most of whom are contractual employees, refrain from complaining due to a fear of termination.
'This manipulation not only violates the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, but also undermines the financial security of the employees. Moreover, it is alleged that these actions are taking place with the full knowledge and complicity of senior officials at the Institute,' the letter read.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Call for ‘review' of Constitution an assault on its foundational ethos
At a time when the Indian Constitution hailed globally as a model of democracy has completed 75 years of its progressive journey, fresh calls to 'review' it are nothing short of a veiled assault on its foundational ethos. The Sangh Parivar's demand for a reassessment of secularism and socialism within the Constitution is, in essence, an attempt to dismantle the safeguards extended to the marginalised, oppressed, and minority communities in India. The inclusion of the terms 'Secular' and 'Socialist' in the Preamble of the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment in 1976 was a visionary move by the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Recognising India's complex social fabric marked by diversity in culture, religion, caste, and tradition she courageously acted to enshrine principles that uphold equality and justice for all citizens, regardless of background or belief. These terms were not ornamental additions but essential pillars of a truly inclusive republic. Secularism, as framed in the Indian Constitution, ensures that the State maintains equidistance from all religions, guaranteeing every citizen the right to practise, propagate, and profess their faith without fear or favour. Simultaneously, socialism was envisioned to promote social and economic equity ensuring equitable distribution of land and resources, challenging entrenched landlordism, and creating a level playing field for the socio-economically disadvantaged. However, forces steeped in caste supremacy and majoritarian ideology those who idolise Manusmriti have long harboured resentment toward these constitutional guarantees. RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale calling for a review of secular and socialist values in the Constitution is a blatant revelation of the Sangh Parivar's true intentions. Their agenda is not reform but re-engineering of the Republic itself, to align with a hegemonic, exclusivist vision. It is not the first time that BJP-RSS leaders have made controversial remarks on the Constitution. Last December, Union Home Minister Amit Shah made dismissive comments about Dr BR Ambedkar, the chief architect of the Indian Constitution, from in the Parliament. Rather than taking disciplinary action, Prime Minister Narendra Modi defended Shah, reinforcing the BJP's authoritarian disposition. These developments triggered a nationwide outcry, with the Rahul Gandhi-led INDIA alliance launching protests under the banner 'Jai Bhim, Jai Samvidhan,' aimed at awakening the collective conscience of the nation's marginalised. The Congress party's grassroots campaign to safeguard the Constitution resonated across the country, contributing significantly to BJP's underwhelming performance in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. Despite contesting under the grand slogan 'Ab ki Baar, 400 Paar', the BJP was confined to just 240 seats. The electorate's verdict was a clear rejection of the party's veiled attempts to subvert constitutional values. The Sangh Parivar's strategy appears systematic and persistent. In a shocking move on September 19, 2023, when MPs the new Parliament building printed copies of the Constitution that were distributed to them deliberately omitted the words 'Secular' and 'Socialist' from the Preamble. This omission provoked sharp condemnation from Sonia Gandhi and other opposition figures. The move was widely seen as a symbolic assault on the very soul of the Republic. Compounding the anxiety are developments in BJP-ruled states, where religious polarisation is increasingly rampant. The marginalised, especially Muslims, are being pushed into fear and uncertainty. The dilution of the Places of Worship Act (1991), amendments to the Waqf Board laws, and bulldozer politics in Uttar Pradesh all highlight a governance model rooted in communal vendetta. In Manipur, the ethnic violence since May 2023 and Modi's deafening silence and absence from the conflict zone illustrate the apathy towards regions in crisis, particularly when minorities are affected. The Congress, meanwhile, has demanded the immediate implementation of caste census, a move aimed at reinforcing socialism by ensuring just representation in political, educational, and economic spheres. Though the Modi government reluctantly agreed to it, any delay or politicisation of the process would only reinforce concerns of systemic exclusion. The Supreme Court had last November rejected the petitions filed by BJP leaders, including Subramanian Swamy, seeking the removal of 'Secular' and 'Socialist' from the Preamble. Yet, the ideological onslaught continues unabated, revealing the Sangh Parivar's deep-rooted antipathy to constitutional morality. The need to defend secularism and socialism has never been more urgent. The threat posed by the Sangh Parivar and the BJP is not just to these two values, but to the entire constitutional framework. What we are witnessing is not mere ideological difference, but an orchestrated campaign to dismantle the Republic's pluralist character. Rahul Gandhi, through his relentless 'Bharat Jodo Yatra,' has managed to galvanise public opinion against these regressive forces. The Congress, under his leadership, has transformed defence of the Constitution into a national movement. The 'Jai Samvidhan' rallies across the country have been instrumental in educating people about the BJP's constitutional subversion. It is time for all democratic forces, political parties, civil society groups, intellectuals, and ordinary citizens to unite beyond political lines and resist this existential threat. The Constitution is not a document of the past. It is the very foundation of our shared future. If we fail to defend it now, we risk surrendering our democracy to forces that neither understand nor respect its values. (The writer is Chairman, Rajiv Gandhi Panchayati Raj Sanghatan, Telangana)
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Today in Politics: Uddhav, Raj Thackeray to hold joint ‘victory' rally after Maharashtra govt reverses policy on Hindi
For the first time in 20 years, estranged cousins Uddhav and Raj Thackeray will share the stage on Saturday at a joint 'victory' rally organised by the Shiv Sena (UBT) and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) to celebrate the BJP-led Mahayuti government's rollback of two contentious government resolutions (GRs) on the three-language policy in Maharashtra. Calling it 'Marathi Vijay Diwas', the parties had initially planned separate protest marches against the state government's three-language policy in schools, which the Opposition termed as an 'imposition of Hindi'. Facing mounting pressure, ahead of the Maharashtra Assembly's Monsoon Session, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis revoked the GRs, which introduced Hindi as a third language in primary schools. The first GR had made Hindi the mandatory third language for students from Class 1 to 5, while the second one made it optional. The CM also announced the formation of a committee to reexamine the three-language policy. On Friday, as the government sought to recover from the withdrawal of its GRs, Fadnavis said no one in the state should be targeted for not knowing Marathi, days after MNS workers assaulted a shopkeeper for not speaking in Marathi. Fadnavis's remarks came a day after his administration issued a resolution announcing that October 3 would be celebrated annually as 'Classical Marathi Language Day'. With the elections to the high-profile Mumbai civic body and other municipal corporations due in the coming months, a potential rapprochement between the Thackeray brothers on the sensitive issue of the Marathi identity is being keenly watched in state political circles. Raj Thackeray, nephew of late Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray, had resigned from the then undivided Shiv Sena in 2006, apparently due to differences with Uddhav. Of late, however, the Thackerays have come closer together, signalling a possible alliance in the forthcoming civic polls. But Raj Thackeray, particularly after a meeting with Fadnavis, had sparked further speculation of an alliance with the BJP. While a Thackeray reunion could help consolidate the Marathi votes and tap into the emotional connect of older voters who long for the Bal Thackeray era, the BJP views the MNS as a strategic disruptor that draws support from the same Marathi-speaking electorate that forms the Sena (UBT)'s core voter base. Though the Sena (UBT) and MNS are coming together for the joint rally on Saturday, where they will likely present a united front on the issue of Marathi identity, it remains to be seen if the parties form an alliance for the local body elections and beyond. Amit Shah in Gujarat Meanwhile, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who also holds the cooperation portfolio, is set to visit Gujarat's Anand, where he will lay the foundation stone of the country's first national level cooperative university, the Tribhuvan Sahkari University, on Saturday. Gujarat CM Bhupendrabhai Patel and Assembly Speaker Shankar Chaudhary will also be in attendance, along with other Union and state ministers. – With PTI inputs
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Maharashtra politics has let down Marathi-speaking people
It all began in February 1956 when the States Reorganisation Commission led by Justice Fazal Ali, with K M Panikkar and H N Kunzru as members, recommended a bilingual Bombay State, including Maharashtra and Gujarat, with Bombay its capital, thereby denying Maharashtra's exclusive claim over the city. Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Home Minister Vallabhbhai Patel were against the restructuring of states on a linguistic basis, but the death of Potti Sreeramulu, the Telugu activist who went on a fast to press for the demand to create Andhra Pradesh, compelled them to alter their stand. But they were unwilling to concede Maharashtra's right over the city of Mumbai. The apparently adamant stand of Nehru and Patel triggered independent India's first all-party coalition against the mighty Congress party, which was accused, rightly so, of being anti-federal. It necessitated the formation of the Samyukta Maharashtra Samiti, which came into being in February 1956, the first all-party anti-Congress front of independent India that had the likes of communist Sripad Amrut Dange, aka Bhai Dange, socialist S M Joshi and activists such as Keshav Sitaram 'Prabodhankar' Thackeray and other well-known Maharashtrians. With the 70th anniversary of the formation of the Samiti, which successfully led the agitation demanding an independent state for Marathi-speaking people with Mumbai as its capital, a few months away, Maharashtra is witnessing another all-party mobilisation against the allegedly anti-federal Centre. The difference between now and then, however, is that the once-strong omnipresent Congress at the Centre has been replaced by the BJP. There are two striking similarities between the situations then and now. Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar, or Guruji, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief then, had extended open support to Nehru and Patel in their initial stand that was against states' reorganisation on the basis of language. The RSS and Nehru-Patel, strange as it may sound, were on the same page — both believed that linguistic divisions could lead to fragmentation and instability and become a threat to the integration of the newly independent nation. This explains the BJP's insistence on Hindi. Spoken predominantly in the north Indian states, Hindi remains central to the saffron camp's grand design of 'nation building', which envisages Oneness — one nation, one religion and one language (and one political party, one leader, BJP critics might add). It also explains Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis's recent political experiment to bring in Hindi as the third language in school education from the primary level. The move backfired but, on the way, it galvanised the Opposition, which wasted no time in forming an all-party front, à la 1956, to oppose the BJP. Maharashtra is crucial as the only state south of the Vindhyas for the RSS's long-envisaged plan of Hindi-isation of India. Had Fadnavis, a true swayamsevak, succeeded in making Hindi mandatory from school level, Maharashtra would have been the first big state outside the cow belt to embrace the north Indian language. United in thwarting his efforts were the Thackeray brothers, Uddhav and Raj, who buried their hatchet, if only for the time being, to challenge the ever-so-strong Centre, taking a cue perhaps from their grandfather Prabodhankar, who had played a significant role in spoiling the Nehru-Patel design 70 years ago. So, like in 1956, there is a Thackeray involved in the current politics of language as well. The 70-year gap between then and now illustrates how Maharashtra politics has let down the Marathi-speaking people. Following the formation of the state of Maharashtra, with Nehru later conceding the state's demand for Mumbai as its capital, the Samiti that spearheaded the agitation against Nehru-Patel was dissolved, and then the Shiv Sena rose. Led by maverick Bal Thackeray, the son of Prabodhankar, it espoused the cause of the Marathi manoos, but it didn't go much further than ensuring lowly jobs for locals in state-run PSUs. Unlike the DMK in Tamil Nadu, the Trinamool Congress in West Bengal or even the Assam Gana Parishad in the Northeast, the Shiv Sena was far from being a pan-Maharashtra party. It was, till a few years ago, confined to Mumbai and the Konkan. It lost its mojo after aggressive Hindutva became the mainstay of politics. The Thackerays, having strayed from the Marathi cause, jumped onto the Hindutva bandwagon. It didn't take much effort for the BJP to first overshadow the Sena and then split it into two. Meanwhile, Raj Thackeray, the Shiv Sena founder's successor in charisma, tried his hand at exploiting Marathi sentiments. Like Thackeray Sr, he, too, lost steam on the way and settled for playing second fiddle to the BJP. Led now by Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, it was much easier for the BJP to neutralise the younger Thackeray and make his political outfit, the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, redundant. In its zeal to run the state on its own, the BJP's aggressive leadership tried to politically weaken the two Thackerays. The Fadnavis government's ill-timed decision — now rolled back — to introduce (read: Impose) Hindi at school level came in this fraught context. It was nothing short of bowling a full-toss in the death overs for a team battling to stay afloat. The BJP government's move not only rejuvenated the two Thackerays and their two Senas, in the bargain it also sullied the saffron party's anti-federal image further. The BJP now is being compared with the old Delhi-centric, all-powerful Congress. It is certainly not a comparison the BJP would be happy about. Now, like in the Sixties, the issue of Hindi has crossed political boundaries and has taken a Maharashtra vs Might of Delhi turn. In the Sixties, the fall-out of the Samyukta Maharashtra movement was the Congress's defeat in subsequent elections. Will history repeat itself with the BJP, which has replaced Congress now? Only time will answer this question. But meanwhile, like the play Six Characters in Search of an Author by Italian dramatist Luigi Pirandello, Maharashtrians' search for a genuine and honest regional political party that can go beyond hooliganism and thuggery in the name of Marathi manoos continues. The writer is editor, Loksatta
