Gold's comeback: Why the world is turning to the yellow metal in 2025
1) US-China tariff negotiations
2) Confidence in the US dollar
3) Fed autonomy & US interest rates
What do North America, Europe, and Asia have in common right now? Well, apart from unnerving stock market volatility, it's their preference for gold. According to data from the World Gold Council, flows into Gold Exchange Traded Funds from these regions touched $21 billion in Q1 2025 — the largest quarterly inflow since the first quarter of 2022.Despite the many economic and geopolitical differences between the regions, investors seem to agree on one thing — the relevance of gold in investment portfolios . And they have good reason to.To recap, President Trump' s aggressive trade policies have stoked inflationary and recessionary fears in the United States, as well as world over, as disrupted supply chains and trade relations are expected to put upward pressure on commodity prices and hurt trade and commerce. Stock markets have sharply corrected in response.Usually, such equity market upheavals trigger a flow of investor money into the US dollar, US government bonds and gold which are considered relatively stable avenues to park funds. But this time, considering the policy uncertainty and grim economic outlook in the US, investors have been shunning US based assets and opting for gold and other leading international currencies and bonds. The result has been the remarkable ~25% rally in gold prices since the start of this calendar year - which has not only been rewarding from a returns perspective but has also cushioned multi-asset portfolios from sharp drawdowns.Now with Akshaya Tritiya 's gold-buying tradition around the corner, the question is what next for gold? Has gold run up too much and is a correction on the cards? Or is the outlook still promising? Well, three key global factors are set to impact international gold prices and in turn domestic gold prices in the near to medium term:With the two largest economies embroiled in a tit for tat trade war, a mutually beneficial trade deal will not be easy to arrive at. If unexpectedly productive negotiations ease tensions, gold prices may face pressure in the short run. But if there is a prolonged period of friction or if talks collapse and tensions escalate, risk sentiment will be hurt, stock markets may tumble and gold will continue to benefit.The United States has been the leader of the liberal, globalized world. But that seems to be changing with the country, under Mr Trump's presidency, opting out of geopolitical partnerships, international cooperation agencies as well as free trade agreements. This has put a question mark on the US's and thus US dollar's hegemony.This decline in confidence has been underway since the Russia-Ukraine war broke out and led the US to freeze Russia's US-based assets. This made other countries nervous about holding reserves in the form of US assets and resulted in a strategic change to diversify reserves away from the US dollar and into gold.Global central banks have bought over 1,000 tonnes of gold for three consecutive years since 2022, and the buying momentum is strong in 2025 too, creating a structural tailwind for gold prices. If policy making in the US continues to increase trust deficit, dollar assets held by foreigners may leave US shores where gold can be one of the beneficiaries.The US central bank - the Federal Reserve - which determines US interest rates is in a tricky spot. With higher tariffs on imported goods, inflation in the US is expected to go up. At the same time, expectation of higher prices is likely to slow down consumption of goods and services and the policy uncertainty is expected to weigh on business sentiment – both slowing down the economy.If the Fed were to cut interest rates now, inflation could get fired up on the back of lower borrowing costs. But lower borrowing costs are needed to support consumption and business investment and avoid a US recession. With President Trump pressuring the Fed to cut rates, Fed independence is in question, and lower US interest rates and thus potentially higher US inflation are on the horizon – both being bullish for non-yielding gold.So, while gold has taken a breather for now, fundamentals are looking supportive of gold and investors would do well to buy the dip this Akshaya Tritiya. A 10-15% portfolio allocation to Gold Exchange Traded Funds or via the Gold Savings Fund is ideal to navigate this complex geopolitical and macroeconomic environment, marked with equity market volatility. Because as POTUS recently said, 'he who owns the gold makes the rules.'(Author of the article is Chirag Mehta , CIO at Quantum AMC): Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian-origin woman advocates working ‘14+ hours a day… It's baseline'; internet reacts
An Indian-origin woman and founder of a US-based startup has stirred a heated discussion online after claiming that working 80 hours a week is not excessive but simply the 'baseline'. Neha Suresh, the founder of April – a US-based AI voice assistant app – posted a timelapse video on X (formerly Twitter), showing her working from early morning until late at night. In her now-viral post, Suresh wrote: 'If you're not spending 14+ hours a day working on your dream, you're ngmi.' She added, 'You can't build a world-changing product on 9–5 energy. 80-hour weeks aren't extreme. It's baseline.' Her comments, which have racked up over 65,000 views, sparked a range of responses from users — from admiration to criticism. One person asked, 'What do you do to decompress after an 80-hour week? Physically. What actually works?' Another replied with sarcasm, 'Why just 14 hours? Make it 24.' Some shared personal experiences. 'I burned out chasing 80-hour weeks. Found I actually build better products when I'm rested and thinking clearly,' a user wrote. Another commented, 'Wow, another person who's never had to pay bills or have a social life telling me how to live my best life.' The post has since fuelled a wider conversation about work-life balance and the pressure of hustle culture in startups and tech. Joining the ongoing conversation about work-life balance, India-origin tech leader Dharmesh Shah had offered a frank take on the reality of building a successful startup. Shah, who is the founder and Chief Technology Officer of HubSpot, shared his thoughts in a post on X (formerly Twitter) in March, where he spoke openly about the challenges of managing both work and personal life in the startup world. He acknowledged that maintaining balance is difficult, especially when aiming for high levels of success. "Wanting work-life balance is OK. Wanting to build a breakthrough startup is OK. But you shouldn't expect both," he wrote. 'In 30+ years and knowing hundreds of founders, I've never met a single founder that built a breakthrough startup while maintaining work-life balance. Any competitive human endeavor requires sacrifice to stand-out. Whether it's athletics, arts or entrepreneurship. Raw talent is not enough. You have to toil,' Shah wrote. 'Unhappiness comes from expecting more out of the system than you put in. Either path is totally OK, as long as you understand that you picked a path. Two roads diverged in a wood, and if you take the one most traveled by, don't think that won't make a difference,' Shah said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India to keep buying Russian oil despite Trump's penalty threat: Report
India will continue to buy crude oil from Russia, despite US President Donald Trump's warning of a penalty, according to a report in Reuters, quoting two Indian government sources, who did not wish to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." The New York Times, in its report, quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. One of the officials, in the news report, said the government had "not given any direction to oil companies" to cut back imports from Russia. The Indian authorities had, on Friday, said their energy decisions are based on national interest and market factors. Trump recently claimed India may stop purchasing oil from Russia, calling it a 'good step' if true. However, India's foreign ministry stated on Friday that no such decision has been made. Speaking to the media on Friday, Trump said, 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard — I don't know if that's right or not — but that would be a good step.' His comment followed the US government's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods imported from India, effective from August 1, along with an unspecified penalty. Tougher stance: 100% tariff warning In mid-July, Trump issued a stronger threat, warning of up to 100 per cent tariffs on any country that continues to buy oil from Russia unless there is a complete peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. Earlier this week, he also criticised India's economic partnership with Russia. Posting on Truth Social, Trump said, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' He repeated long-standing complaints about India's high tariffs, saying, 'Their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world. The US has done very little business with India for this reason.' On Wednesday, the US officially announced a 25 per cent tariff on all Indian exports to the United States starting August 7. India defends its position Responding to the US statements, India's Ministry of External Affairs said the country decides on oil purchases based on availability, global prices, and domestic needs. 'We look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation,' said foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal during a press briefing on Friday. Russia remains India's top oil supplier Russia continues to be India's leading crude oil supplier, accounting for about 35 per cent of total oil imports. From January to June 2025, India imported around 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil — slightly higher than the same period last year, Reuters reported. Other key suppliers include Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. India is the world's third-largest importer and consumer of oil. US Senator Marco Rubio calls India's Russia ties a concern US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also expressed concern over India's oil purchases from Russia, saying it is 'most certainly a point of irritation' in the US-India relationship. Speaking to Fox Radio on Thursday, Rubio noted that even among allies, it is normal to disagree on some foreign policy matters. 'India is a strategic partner. Like anything in foreign policy, you're not going to align 100 per cent of the time,' he said. (With agency inputs)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Trump's tariff threat: For India, no deal is better than a bad one
Trade deals aren't T20s—they're Test matches, needing years of diplomacy, while President Trump wants them wrapped up in days read more America is India's largest trading partner. Still, the world is larger than the US, and India is a sovereign global power. File Image/Reuters The President of the United States, Donald Trump, issues policy decisions and administrative orders from golf courses, aboard Air Force One, on his social media platform Truth Social, and occasionally from the White House in the form of Executive Orders. For President Trump, 'tariff' is the most beautiful word in the dictionary. Once again, on July 31, 2025, Trump disrupted the global trade order, sending markets into turmoil with a sweeping revision of ad valorem duties on imports from nearly 200 countries. His latest Executive Order was issued just a day before his extended deadline to the world expired on August 1, 2025. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India, along with Brazil, Canada, and Switzerland, has been hit particularly hard. I'll examine the implications for India shortly. Extreme Break, and the Cost to US Consumers First, what do these new tariff orders signify? Indisputably, they add more confusion to an already uncertain global trade environment. More critically, they represent a sharp departure from over a century of US trade policy. According to the Budget Lab at Yale University, the new tariffs will lead to an overall effective tariff rate of 18.3 per cent— the highest since 1934. They estimate this will cost the average American household around $2,400 in 2025 alone. Markets in a Tizzy The new trade policy, effective August 7, impacts nearly every country and marks a decisive break from decades of free trade. The result? Markets tumbled on both sides of the Atlantic. After an early-day sell-off in Asian markets, Europe's Stoxx 600 fell nearly 2 per cent, the UK's FTSE 100 declined by 0.8 per cent, and Wall Street closed lower, with the Dow Jones and S&P 500 down over 1 per cent, and the Nasdaq dropping more than 2 per cent. The market drop was worsened by weaker-than-expected US job data. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why So Much Uncertainty? First, the second Executive Order (dated July 31) came just months after the original April 2 order — a one-two punch for global markets. Second, there is no assurance that we've seen the worst of Trump's tariff campaign. Decoding the New Tariff Regime The revised tariffs impact nearly every country and signify a hard pivot toward protectionism. Here's how the new structure breaks down: 10 per cent Tariff: Imposed on countries with whom the US has a trade surplus (ie, countries that import more from the US than they export to it). 15 per cent Tariff: Set as a minimum for about 40 countries where the US runs a trade deficit. For some, this is lower than the April 2 'reciprocal' tariffs; for others, it's higher. Above 15 per cent: Over two dozen countries now face tariffs higher than 15 per cent, either due to agreed frameworks or unilateral decisions by Trump — mostly those with large trade deficits with the US. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trans-shipment Penalty: An additional 40 per cent tariff may be imposed on goods Washington deems as 'trans-shipped' through another country — a move primarily targeting Chinese goods. Winners and Losers The new tariff framework has created a jarring set of winners and losers. Losers: Brazil: Hit hardest with a 50 per cent tariff, including a vague 'free speech' penalty. India: Faces a 25 per cent tariff, plus an unspecified penalty for purchasing Russian energy and military hardware — potentially as high as 200 per cent. Syria: 41 per cent tariff — second highest after Brazil. Myanmar and Laos: 40 per cent each. Switzerland: Slapped with a 39 per cent tariff, the highest for any European nation outside the EU. Iraq and Serbia: 35 per cent each. Canada: Tariff raised to 35 per cent, but goods compliant with the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) are exempt. South Africa, Algeria, Libya: 30 per cent each — the highest in Africa. Moldova, Mexico, Brunei, Tunisia, Kazakhstan: All face a 25 per cent tariff — same as India, though India has the added Russia penalty. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Winners: Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Vietnam: Each now faces a 20 per cent tariff, down sharply from April's rates (46 per cent for Vietnam, 44 per cent Sri Lanka, 37 per cent Bangladesh, 31per cent Taiwan). Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand: Tariffs lowered to 19 per cent, from as high as 49 per cent (Cambodia) and 32 per cent (Indonesia) in April. This comparison puts India at a clear disadvantage among its Asian peers. Trump had initially imposed tariffs up to 27 per cent on Indian goods in April, later paused. Since then, multiple rounds of trade talks have taken place. There's More Beyond general import tariffs, targeted levies now affect specific industries: Steel & Aluminium: 50 per cent (effective June 4) Copper: 50 per cent (effective August 1) Automobiles & Car Parts: 25 per cent (from April 3 and May 3) Though not yet implemented, Trump has threatened 200 per cent tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, citing national security. Ninety Deals in Ninety Days? On April 2 — what Trump dubbed Liberation Day — he introduced his first round of 'reciprocal' tariffs. Days later, he paused them, giving trading partners 90 days to negotiate deals with the US. Trump ambitiously aimed for 90 deals in 90 days. According to Kevin Hassett, Director of the National Economic Council, over 50 countries began talks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Arm-Twisting, Not Diplomacy Despite his optimism, Trump has little to show beyond coercive deals: UK: A deal allowing 100,000 cars to be exported to the US at 10 per cent tariff (down from 25 per cent). EU: 15 per cent flat tariff — less than the threatened 30 per cent. Japan: 15 per cent tariff, plus $550 billion investment in US infrastructure and agricultural market access. Philippines: Reduced from 20 per cent to 19 per cent. China: Tariff reduced from 145 per cent to 30 per cent; China reciprocated with a cut from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. South Korea: Tariff set at 15 per cent (down from 25 per cent); Korea pledged $350 billion investment and $100 billion in US energy purchases. These are not carefully negotiated, mutually beneficial agreements — they are outcomes of arm-twisting. Trade Deals Aren't White-Ball Cricket Trump's 90-deal ambition was destined to falter. Trade deals aren't T20 matches — they're Test cricket. They require years of diplomacy and legislative buy-in. The global average to finalise a trade deal is 2.5 years. Trump wants them done in days. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's Trade Talks – Derailed Again India has held five rounds of talks with the Trump administration — predating the April 2 tariffs. Trump repeatedly claimed a 'great deal' with India was coming. Then, out of nowhere, he delivered a bouncer. Despite ongoing talks, he branded India a 'tariff king' and an 'abuser of trade ties', imposing a 25 per cent tariff — significantly higher than most Asian peers — plus an unspecified Russia-related penalty. The most alarming scenario? Trump enforces his earlier threat of a 100 per cent secondary tariff on Russian energy buyers. This would make Indian goods prohibitively expensive in the US. The Logic? There Often Isn't One Trump's justification? High Indian tariffs, non-monetary barriers, and India's defense trade with Russia. Here's what he posted on Truth Social on July 30: 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high… Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia… INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25% PLUS A PENALTY… STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST. THANK YOU… MAGA!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The next day, Trump doubled down: 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care…' Consequences of No Deal In just three days, Trump reversed course — from promising a 'great deal' to dismissing India's economy altogether. The 25 per cent tariff took effect on August 1. A last-minute mini deal India and the US had been negotiating since February has now collapsed. A comprehensive trade deal looks even more unlikely. Time for Bharat First If the new tariffs and the Russia penalty persist, India's GDP could take a 0.2-0.4 per cent hit, especially affecting export sectors like marine products, textiles, leather, automobiles, and pharmaceuticals. But it's time to hold the line. As the government rightly states, India must take all necessary steps to protect its national interest — as seen in recent trade pacts like the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK. America is India's largest trading partner. Still, the world is larger than the US, and India is a sovereign global power. India must refuse any trade agreement that is inequitable or detrimental to its farmers, entrepreneurs, and Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). No deal is better than a bad deal. The author is a multi-disciplinary thought leader with Action Bias and an India based impact consultant. He is a keen watcher of changing national and international scenarios. He works as President Advisory Services of Consulting Company BARSYL. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
