logo
McLeod Lecture Series to feature former governors Edwards, Baker

McLeod Lecture Series to feature former governors Edwards, Baker

American Press29-04-2025
Former Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards served two terms, from 2016 to 2024. (Special to the American Press)
By Sonny Marks
A Democrat governor from a red state meets a Republican governor from a blue state. They will meet Tuesday night in Lake Charles, in an event open to the public and free of charge.
Former governors John Bel Edwards (D) and his Massachusetts counterpart Charlie Baker (R) will speak at 7 p.m. at the Tritico Theatre on the McNeese State University campus, in this year's McLeod Lecture, part of McNeese's Banners cultural series. A reception for the public will begin at 5:45 p.m. outside the theater in the Grand Gallery of the Shearman Fine Arts Center. Doors to the theater will open at 6:30 p.m.
Edwards and Baker will speak about working with majority legislative bodies of the opposing parties. The moderator of their discussion will be Stephanie Grace, editorial director and columnist for The Advocate.
The McLeod Lecture Series honors the late Bill McLeod of Lake Charles, who was a district judge and state legislator. McLeod died in 2003, and the first Lecture Series event was held in 2004. The annual series focuses on timely, historical aspects of Louisiana politics, and on efforts to promote good government and public service.
The two governors both served two terms, Edwards from 2016 to 2024, and Baker from 2015 to 2023. Discussion points in the lecture may include their early lives and what positioned them to lead their states, challenges they faced and how they dealt with them, keys to their success and accomplishments, what might they do differently if given the opportunity, thoughts on how to cross the aisle to bring people with opposing views together, and advice for young people about democracy, voting, getting involved, running for office, and public service.
Baker is now president of the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association), and Edwards is practicing law with the Fishman Haygood firm of Louisiana, focusing on renewable energy matters.
As governors, both sought middle ground. Baker's positions put him at odds with the leader of Massachusetts' Republican Party. On the other side, state Democrats pushed back against the governor's effort to expand the list of offenses for which a criminal suspect could be held pre-trial without bail for 120 days if the court determined the person to be dangerous.
Baker put money into public transportation and expanded broadband internet access to areas of the state that lacked infrastructure. His administration propelled the planting of more than 35,000 trees and spurred the investing of more than $1 billion to deal with climate change. Baker signed legislation requiring utilities to use sources of clean energy.
Edwards grew up the son of a sheriff, graduated from the U.S. Military Academy, and served as an Army Ranger. He was against abortion and his views on guns were moderate. The day he was first inaugurated as this state's governor, the majority-Republican House of Representatives refused Edwards' choice as house speaker and voted in their own. For the previous hundred years, Louisiana governors traditionally picked the speaker of the house.
He expanded Medicaid, joined efforts to combat climate change, and invested in education. In his last term in office, the Legislature overturned Edwards' veto of congressional maps that would have maintained only one majority-Black district. It was the first veto override of a Louisiana governor in 31 years. Later that year, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a legal challenge to the map, thus providing, at least temporarily, for a second majority-Black district in a state in which one-third of the state's voters are Black.
The late Bill McLeod served 23 years in the Louisiana Legislature and was dean of the Southwest Louisiana delegation. He was one of the Young Turks, reform-minded legislators in the late 1960s and '70s who supported and sponsored numerous changes in state government. One of McLeod's hallmarks was to set up a card table and folding chairs outside of grocery stores throughout his district to allow constituents to provide him their input prior to each legislative session.
In addition to the Lecture Series created to honor McLeod, the Southwest Louisiana Legislative Archives were formed at McNeese from the same initiative. Related professorships and student stipends were also created at the university. This year's McLeod Professors are Victoria Jeansonne (Political Science) and Lindsay Ayling (History). The McLeod Students are Louis Gilley (Political Science) and Tanner Milner(Political Science).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICE efforts to poach local officers are angering some local law enforcement leaders
ICE efforts to poach local officers are angering some local law enforcement leaders

NBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • NBC News

ICE efforts to poach local officers are angering some local law enforcement leaders

Immigration and Customs Enforcement is newly flush with billions from the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' spending legislation and under pressure to rapidly hire 10,000 new agents. But one tactic it recently tried to do that hiring — aggressively recruiting new agents from some of its most trusted local law enforcement partners — may have alienated some of the leaders it needs to help execute what the Trump administration wants to be the largest mass deportation in US history. 'We're their force multipliers, and this is the thanks we get for helping them do their job?' Polk County, Florida Sheriff Grady Judd said in an interview with NBC News. Judd said he's not happy about a recruitment email sent by ICE's deputy director to hundreds of his deputies and he blamed Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who oversees ICE. 'Kristi Noem needs to get on her big girl pants and do what's right. She needs to make sure that there's an apology,' said Judd, who also made clear that he wants to 'support President [Donald] Trump's mission.' NBC News spoke to local law enforcement leaders in four states whose agencies participate in 287(g) and whose deputies were being targeted for ICE recruitment. The recruitment email those agencies' officers received, sent earlier this week, appears to have targeted law enforcement officers whose agencies participate in ICE's 287(g) program, under which local officers are deputized to help in immigration enforcement. The email from Sheahan, which NBC News has obtained, reads in part, 'As someone who is currently supporting ICE through the 287(g) program, you understand the unique responsibility we carry in protecting our communities and upholding federal law. Your experience in state or local law enforcement brings invaluable insight and skills to this mission —qualities we need now more than ever.' The email also touts potential $50,000 signing bonuses as an incentive for joining ICE and links to a government recruitment website featuring an image of Uncle Sam, the headline 'AMERICA NEEDS YOU,' and the possibility of up to $60,000 in student loan repayment beyond those signing bonuses. 'ICE actively trying to use our partnership to recruit our personnel is wrong and we have expressed our concern to ICE leadership,' the Pinellas County, Florida Sheriff's Office said in a statement to NBC News. The sheriff in Pinellas County is a Republican, as is Polk County's Judd. 'It was bad judgement that will cause an erosion of a relationship that has been improving of late. And it's going to take some getting over and it's gonna take leadership at DHS to really take stock cause hey, they need state and locals,' Jonathan Thompson, the executive director and CEO of the National Sheriffs' Association, said in an interview with NBC News. Thompson said that the association has heard from more than a dozen law enforcement agencies about the recruitment emails. He also said that the group has not heard from DHS since the emails were flagged to the association, and that he intends to send a 'very stern note' to ICE. 'This is inappropriate behavior of a partner organization,' Thompson said. 'We're all on the same boat. And you just don't treat friends or partners like this.' One Florida chief of police who did not want to be named out of concern his department could face retaliation said departments that have partnered with the federal government now fear they could lose their best officers. 'Now you know why everybody's so pissed,' the chief said. 'This is like the transfer portal in college sports,' the chief said, adding, 'We see people leave us because they believe they can make more money at other locations… Law enforcement has always been a calling. Now it's a job.' The DHS press office did not respond to questions about local law enforcement concerns but provided NBC News with a statement that it attributed to a senior DHS official: 'ICE is recruiting law enforcement, veterans, and other patriots who want to serve their country … This includes local law enforcement, veterans, and our 287(g) partners who have already been trained and have valuable law enforcement experience. Additionally, more than $500 million from President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill will go to increasing our 287(g) partnerships with state and local law enforcement.' The sheriff's office in Forsyth County, Georgia told NBC News that the Atlanta ICE office 'sent an apology' for the recruitment email. Not all sheriffs are upset with the recruitment effort. In fact some say they support it. Thaddeus Cleveland, the sheriff of Terrell County, Texas, said, 'I think if someone wants to better their life, better their career, you know, look towards the long years, the long game, retirement, there's nothing better than the US government to go out and have a successful career.' Cleveland, who has just four deputies on his staff, admits he can't compete with the $50,000 bonuses that the agency is offering. 'We may not be able to turn around and hire somebody the next day. It may take a few weeks. It may take a few months. But again, I support, you know, someone wanting to pursue something they're interested in. I may end up having to work a little more, which is okay.' Goliad County Texas Sheriff Roy Boyd also said he's not upset about the recruitment, and noted that his office also has to deal with the state recruiting new troopers from his department. 'We can't compete with the salaries of the state and the feds,' he said.

Tariffs announced, tariffs delayed — tariffs denied? From the Politics Desk
Tariffs announced, tariffs delayed — tariffs denied? From the Politics Desk

NBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Tariffs announced, tariffs delayed — tariffs denied? From the Politics Desk

Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, our team looks at Trump's tariff agenda on the eve of his deadline for reimposing some of the duties he announced and then delayed in April, as well as a legal case looming over all of the tariffs. Meanwhile, Jonathan Allen outlines the thought process that awaits Kamala Harris ahead of the 2028 election. — Scott Bland Trump's tariffs face another inflection point, and a court test President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs, the ones he originally announced in April, are set to go into effect (again) on Friday. But on Thursday, his whole tariff agenda faced a stern test in federal court, NBC News' Steve Kopack reports. The Court of International Trade initially blocked the tariffs in late May, though they were allowed to stay in place pending appeal. The court said the law Trump cited in many of his executive orders did not 'delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President.' It also said the tariffs did not meet the test of interceding against an 'unusual and extraordinary' risk to the country, after Trump implemented them by claiming a national emergency. All of Trump's tariffs on major trading partners, such as Canada, Mexico, China, the European Union, Japan, India, Brazil and a handful of other countries, have been deployed using the law. On Thursday, an appeals court took a skeptical view of the Trump administration's argument that imposing the tariffs is well within the president's authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, per NBC News' Ryan Balberman. Some of the judges noted that Trump's use of the law effectively cuts Congress out of tariff policy, though the law doesn't mention tariffs. Meanwhile, Trump extended the deadline for negotiations with Mexico before imposing new tariffs there. He's hit India, Brazil and South Korea with new tariffs as the deadline looms. Altogether, as NBC News' Rob Wile and Steve Kopack write, since the April tariff rate announcement Trump dubbed 'Liberation Day,' the president backed down — and since then has steadily been reintroducing elevated tariffs at levels not seen since the 1930s. What's next? We'll find out more on Friday. And more still when that appeals court makes its decision. What Kamala Harris will weigh ahead of 2028 Analysis by Jonathan Allen There are more than 2 million reasons for Kamala Harris not to run for president again: That's the margin she lost by in 2024. Moreover, no Democrat has lost a general election and come back to win the presidency since Grover Cleveland in 1892. The last Democrat to win the party's nomination, lose the general election and come back to win the nomination four years later was Adlai Stevenson in 1956. But what may ultimately be more compelling to Harris are the arguments for mounting a third bid for the Oval Office in 2028. In passing on a run for governor of California this week, she said that 'for now,' her focus is not on elective office. That left open the door to a future campaign, and there's only one job above the one the former vice president held most recently. If Harris does hope to make a comeback, she will have to reckon with the most glaring deficiency of the 107-day campaign she ran in the shadow of President Joe Biden: She didn't articulate a clear vision for the country that met the needs of voters who were dissatisfied with his leadership. While she has time to hear voters, develop an agenda and brush up her presentation skills, she would have to devote herself to executing on those goals to win a primary and the presidency. Still, Harris would walk into a primary race with a set of advantages over most of her rivals. For starters, and for better or worse, everyone in her party knows who she is. Most candidates have to spend exorbitant amounts of time and money to build name recognition outside their states. That's not a problem for Harris, who received more than 75 million votes in 2024. Candidates also have to spend money on television ads and field operations, which can be prohibitively expensive. Harris would start the race with the strongest record of raising money — much of it attributable, of course, to the fact that she was the party's nominee — and the biggest list of donors. Again, she would start the race farther down the track than prospective opponents. In her 2024 and 2020 campaigns, the latter of which actually ended in 2019 when she ran out of money and support, Harris showed she had a lot to learn about creating and communicating a message. In 2028, she would not be dealing with the scrutiny of the national media and the exhausting crunch of day-to-day campaigning for the first time. Again, these are edges she would have over first-timers. One question she will have to answer for herself — and it's one that helped dissuade Hillary Clinton from running in 2020 — is whether she would still run if she were convinced she could win the nomination but was unlikely to defeat a Republican in November. There's plenty of time for Harris to determine her own appetite for another campaign, the electorate's interest in her and the pure political calculation of her chances of ending up in the White House. It may be that Americans have seen the last of Harris on a ballot. But while a Democrat last avenged a defeat in the distant past, one very present politician did it less than a year ago: Donald J. Trump. Elon Musk gives millions to Republican super PACs ahead of the midterms By Ben Kamisar and Bridget Bowman Billionaire Elon Musk may be gone from President Donald Trump's White House, but he may not be done with Republican politics. Musk made a pair of $5 million donations on June 27 to the main super PACs backing House and Senate Republicans. That made Musk the largest individual donor to both groups in the first six months of 2025, according to new campaign finance reports filed Thursday. The new contributions are further proof of how Musk can make a big splash in politics by putting his signature on just one check. And they raise the question of how much more there might be before the midterms, despite Musk's messy post-White House breakup with Trump and his statements in July about starting a third party, made after the donations. Musk's June 27 donations supporting the Senate Leadership Fund and the Congressional Leadership Fund, the two GOP super PACs, came about a month after leaving his official post as an adviser to Trump and days before he began publicly discussing the idea of starting a new political party. Meanwhile, other new campaign finance reports show Musk pumped $45.3 million into his own super PAC in the first six months of this year. The tech billionaire gave nearly $17.9 million directly to the group and sent another $27.4 million in in-kind contributions, with Musk covering funds for million-dollar prizes to voters who signed petitions.

A look at colleges with federal money targeted by the Trump administration

time37 minutes ago

A look at colleges with federal money targeted by the Trump administration

Several elite U.S. colleges have made deals with President Donald Trump's administration, offering concessions to his political agenda and financial payments to restore federal money that had been withheld. Ivy League schools Columbia, Brown and the University of Pennsylvania reached agreements to resolve federal investigations. The Republican administration is pressing for more, citing the deal it negotiated with Columbia as a 'road map' for other colleges. There is a freeze on billions of dollars of research money for other colleges including Harvard, which has been negotiating with the White House even as it fights in court over the lost grants. Like no other president, Trump has used the government's control over federal research funding to push for changes in higher education, decrying elite colleges as places of extreme liberal ideology and antisemitism. Here's a look at universities pressured by the administration's funding cuts. Columbia said July 23 it had agreed to a $200 million fine to restore federal funding. The school was threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support, including more than $400 million in grants canceled earlier this year. The administration pulled the money because of what it described as Columbia's failure to address antisemitism on campus during the Israel-Hamas war. Columbia agreed to administration demands such as overhauling its student disciplinary process and applying a federally backed definition of antisemitism to teaching and a disciplinary committee investigating students critical of Israel. Federal officials said the fine will go to the Treasury Department and cannot be spent until Congress appropriates it. Columbia also agreed to pay $21 million into a compensation fund for employees who may have faced antisemitism. The deal includes a clause that Columbia says preserves its independence, putting in writing that the government does not have the authority to dictate 'hiring, admission decisions, or the content of academic speech.' An agreement Wednesday calls for Brown to pay $50 million to Rhode Island workforce development organizations. That would restore dozens of lost federal research grants and end investigations into allegations of antisemitism and racial bias in Brown admissions. Among other concessions, Brown agreed to adopt the government's definition of 'male' and 'female' and remove any consideration of race from the admissions process. Like the settlement with Columbia, Brown's does not include a finding of wrongdoing. It includes a provision saying the government does not have authority to dictate Brown's curriculum or 'the content of academic speech.' Under a July agreement resolving a federal civil rights case, Penn modified a trio of school records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas and said it would apologize to female athletes 'disadvantaged' by Thomas' participation on the women's swimming team. The Education Department investigated Penn as part of the administration's broader attempt to remove transgender athletes from girls and women's sports. As part of the case, the administration had suspended $175 million in funding to Penn. The administration has frozen more than $2.6 billion in research grants to Harvard, accusing the nation's oldest and wealthiest university of allowing antisemitism to flourish. Harvard has pushed back with several lawsuits. In negotiations for a possible settlement, the administration is seeking for Harvard to pay an amount far higher than Columbia. The White House announced in April that it froze more than $1 billion of Cornell's federal funding as it investigated allegations of civil rights violations. The Ivy League school was among a group of more than 60 universities that received a letter from the Education Department on March 10 urging them to take steps to protect Jewish students or else face 'potential enforcement actions.' Like Cornell, Northwestern saw a halt in some of its federal funding in April. The amount was about $790 million, according to the administration. The administration this week froze $108 million in federal money for Duke. The hold on funding from the National Institutes of Health came days after the departments of Health and Human Services and Education sent a joint letter alleging racial preferences in Duke's hiring and admissions. Dozens of research grants were suspended at Princeton without a clear rationale, according to an April 1 campus message from the university's president, Christopher Eisgruber. The grants came from federal agencies such as the Department of Energy, NASA and the Pentagon. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store