Spitfire forced to make emergency landing in Kent field after 'loss of power'
Investigations are underway into what caused a Spitfire to make an emergency landing in a Kent field.
The plane went down near Hythe on the evening of Saturday 3 May after it lost power.
Both the pilot and passenger were uninjured.
The aircraft is owned by Fly A Spitfire which provides flight experiences out of RAF Biggin Hill.
The incident is being investigated by the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB).
In a statement, the AAIB, said: "The AAIB were notified that a Spitfire, registration G-BMSB, with the pilot and one passenger on board, experienced a loss of power and the pilot made a controlled forced landing into a field near Hythe, Kent.
"The AAIB were informed that no injuries were sustained by the pilot or passenger.
"Whilst the AAIB did not deploy a team to the accident site they will undertake an investigation with the Operator to understand the cause of the loss of power."
The incident was attended by Kent Fire and Rescue Service (KFRS).
In a statement, KFRS said: "Kent Fire and Rescue Service was called to Lower Wall Road, West Hythe to an aircraft that had made an emergency landing.
"Two fire engines attended, and crews helped to make the scene safe.
"One person was passed into the care of SECAmb paramedics."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Fuel to engines cut off before Air India crash, preliminary report says
Fuel to the engines of the Air India plane involved in a deadly crash was cut off moments after take-off, a preliminary investigation report has recovered cockpit voice recordings, the report said one of the pilots can be heard asking "why did you cut off?" - to which the other pilot replied he "did not do so".The London-bound Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed less than a minute after taking off on 12 June from Ahmedabad airport in western India, killing 260 people, most of them passengers. One British national miraculously survived the crash. The investigation led by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is expected to produce a more detailed report in 12 months. Follow live coverageWhat we know so far about Air India crash investigationRead the preliminary report According to data from the flight recorder, both of the plane's fuel control switches moved from the run to the cut-off position in the space of a second, shortly after switches are usually only cut off to turn off the engines after landing, or during emergency situations such as an engine fire - rather than during cut-off caused both engines to lose thrust, the AAIB report is then confusion heard in the cockpit, with one pilot asking the other why he had switched off the fuel, which the other denied. The Gatwick-bound plane was being piloted by Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and co-pilot Clive Kundar. The report does not specify which voice is fuel switches then moved back into their normal in-flight position, automatically starting the process of relighting the engines. One engine, the report said, was able to regain thrust - but could not reverse the plane's deceleration. One of the pilots submitted a Mayday call just before the plane plummeted and crashed into a building used as doctors' accommodation, causing an pilots had an "adequate rest period prior" to the flight, the report had previously speculated that birds could have caused the crash, but the report said that "no significant bird activity" was observed in the vicinity of the plane's flight Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin in 2018 highlighting that some Boeing 737 fuel control switches were installed with the locking feature disengaged, the report issue was not deemed an unsafe condition requiring an Airworthiness Directive - a legally enforceable same switch design is used in Air India's VT-ANB aircraft which crashed. As the bulletin was advisory, Air India did not perform inspections. Experts who spoke to the BBC offered differing opinions on whether this could have played a factor. An Air India spokesperson said the airline acknowledged receipt of the preliminary report."We continue to fully co-operate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses. Given the active nature of the investigation, we are unable to comment on specific details and refer all such enquiries to the AAIB," the Air India spokesperson a statement, Boeing said it would defer to AAIB to provide information about the crashed plane, in adherence with protocol under the UN International Civil Aviation Organization (Icao). It also said it continued to support the investigation and its customer, Air US National Transportation Safety Board said that there were no recommended actions in the report aimed at operators of Boeing-787 jets or the GE accident marked the first time a 787-8 Dreamliner suffered a fatal crash since entering service in India says one engine on crashed plane was newHow the Air India crash investigation is unfoldingThe crash is a major setback for Air India, which is in the middle of a business turnaround following its privatisation. It was bought out by the Tata Group from the Indian government in airline has announced a cut in international operations on its wide-body aircraft as it grapples with several disruptions in the aftermath of the story has been corrected to clarify that the Federal Aviation Administration issued the bulletin about Boeing 737 fuel control switches in 2018
Metro
4 days ago
- Metro
Air India captain 'cut fuel to engines before crash'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video New information leaked from the Air India disaster investigation suggests the captain switched off the engine fuel flow. Officials have been probing the black boxes of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner recovered from the crash site in Ahmedabad. An early assessment by US officials suggested the June 12 crash, which killed 260 people, was not caused by any problems with the passenger jet. This raised suspicions that the plane's fuel flow was switched off. Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, was leading the flight destined to London Gatwick, with first officer Clive Kunder, 28, in control just before the smash, a source has said. It comes after the first initial report left out which pilot said what. The audio allegedly reveals how the first officer was controlling the plane when he asked captain Sabharwal why he moved the fuel switches into a position that stops the fuel, a source told the Wall Street Journal on condition of anonymity. The preliminary report showed that the two crucial fuel switches were in 'cutoff' mode instead of 'run,' causing the plane to lose power before plunging onto a hostel housing doctors and medical students. The early report by India's Air Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) did not say whether the switch was accidental or deliberate. But a pilots' association accused the initial report of trying to blame the captain and the first pilot without definitive proof. The AAIB has since urged the public and the media to 'refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process,' adding that 'it is too early to reach any definite conclusions.' The pilots had only seconds to try to repair the fault and switch the fuel back on, but the plane began losing thrust at 650 feet and fell. Just hours before one of India's worst aviation disasters, the captain had reportedly told the security guard in his apartment complex to look after his elderly father who lived with him. The captain, who had over 15,600 hours of experience in the cockpit, said: 'Please, take care of papa. I will be back soon.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video His colleagues have rallied around him to pay tribute. Sabharwal was 'one of the nicest people you could ever hope to fly with,' former colleague Neil Pais told The Telegraph. Captain Kapil Kohal described him as a 'hero' and a 'gentle soul.' His nickname was 'Sad Sack' because of his melancholic eyes, and he was deeply charismatic and always happy to help,' captain Kohal added. The doomed plane was carrying 169 Indian nationals, 53 British, one Canadian and seven Portuguese people. One passenger on board, Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40 was the only survivor from the plane. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Air India crash investigators give update after recovering black box data
Reuters
6 days ago
- Reuters
India investigators say too early to draw conclusions on Air India crash cause
NEW DELHI, July 17 (Reuters) - India's aircraft accident investigation body said on Thursday it was too early to reach any "definite conclusions" on what led to the deadly Air India Boeing plane crash last month that killed 260 people. "We urge both the public and the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process," Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) chief GVG Yugandhar said, adding that the investigation is still not complete. Earlier on Thursday, the Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with U.S. officials' early assessment of evidence, reported that a cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the flight indicated that the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines. Reuters could not independently verify the Wall Street Journal's report. The AAIB's preliminary report on the crash on Saturday said one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel and "the other pilot responded that he did not do so." It did not identify who made those remarks. The two pilots in the flight deck were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3,403 hours, respectively. Kunder, who was flying the plane, asked Sabharwal why he moved the fuel switches to the "cutoff" position seconds after lifting off the runway, according to the Journal report. The newspaper did not say if there was any evidence that Sabharwal did move the switches, beyond the verbal exchange it cited. But it quoted U.S. pilots who have read the Indian authorities' report as saying that Kunder, the pilot actively flying, likely would have had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner's controls at that stage of the flight.
