
Six crew rescued, 15 missing after Houthis sink latest Greek ship in Red Sea
The United States Mission in Yemen accused the Houthis of kidnapping many surviving crew members from Eternity C and called for their immediate and unconditional safe release."The Yemeni Navy responded to rescue a number of the ship's crew, provide them with medical care, and transport them to a safe location," the group's military spokesperson said in a televised address.The Houthis released a video they said depicted their attack on Eternity C. It included sound of a Yemen naval forces' call for the crew to evacuate for rescue and showed explosions on the ship before it sank. Reuters could not independently verify the audio or the location of the ship, which it verified was the Eternity C.The Houthis also have claimed responsibility for a similar assault on Sunday targeting another ship, the Magic Seas. All crew from the Magic Seas were rescued before it sank.The strikes on the two ships revive a campaign by the Iran-aligned fighters who had attacked more than 100 ships from November 2023 to December 2024 in what they said was solidarity with the Palestinians. In May, the U.S. announced a surprise deal with the Houthis where it agreed to stop a bombing campaign against them in return for an end to shipping attacks, though the Houthis said the deal did not include sparing Israel.Leading shipping industry associations, including the International Chamber of Shipping and BIMCO, denounced the deadly operation and called for robust maritime security in the region via a joint statement on Wednesday."These vessels have been attacked with callous disregard for the lives of innocent civilian seafarers," they said."This tragedy illuminates the need for nations to maintain robust support in protecting shipping and vital sea lanes."RESCUE SEARCHThe Eternity C and the Magic Seas both flew Liberia flags and were operated by Greek firms. Some of the sister vessels in each of their wider fleets had made calls to Israeli ports in the past year, shipping data analysis showed.advertisement"We will continue to search for the remaining crew until the last light," said an official at Greece-based maritime risk management firm Diaplous.The EU's Aspides naval mission, which protects Red Sea shipping, confirmed in a statement that six people had been pulled from the sea.The Red Sea, which passes Yemen's coast, has long been a critical waterway for the world's oil and commodities but traffic has dropped sharply since the Houthi attacks began.The number of daily sailings through the narrow Bab al-Mandab strait, at the southern tip of the Red Sea and a gateway to the Gulf of Aden, numbered 30 vessels on July 8, from 34 ships on July 6 and 43 on July 1, according to data from maritime data group Lloyd's List Intelligence.Oil prices rose on Wednesday, maintaining their highest levels since June 23, also due to the recent attacks on ships in the Red Sea.MULTIPLE ATTACKSEternity C was first attacked on Monday afternoon with sea drones and rocket-propelled grenades fired from speed boats by suspected Houthi militants, maritime security sources said. Lifeboats were destroyed during the raid. By Tuesday morning the vessel was adrift and listing.advertisementTwo security sources told Reuters that the vessel was hit again with sea drones on Tuesday, forcing the crew and armed guards to abandon it. The Houthis stayed with the vessel until the early hours of Wednesday, one of the sources said.Skiffs were in the area as rescue efforts were underway.The crew comprised 21 Filipinos and one Russian. Three armed guards were also on board, including one Greek and one Indian, who was one of those rescued.The vessel's operator, Cosmoship Management, has not responded to requests for confirmation of casualties or injuries. If confirmed, the four reported deaths would be the first fatalities from attacks on shipping in the Red Sea since June 2024.Greece has been in talks with Saudi Arabia, a key player in the region, over the latest incident, according to sources.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
White House unveils artificial intelligence policy plan
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The White House on Wednesday released an artificial intelligence (AI) policy plan highlighting priorities for the US to achieve "global dominance" in the plan developed by US President Donald Trump's administration, calls for open-source and open-weight AI models to be made freely available by developers for anyone in the world to download and three core themes are accelerating AI innovation , build American AI infrastructure and lead in international AI diplomacy and Krishnan, White House advisor on AI policy, took to X to share the announcement. "There is a lot of exciting actions in here but one I'm very partial to is the focus on open source and open weights and making sure the U.S. leads in this critical area," his post AI plan calls for the Commerce Department to research Chinese AI models for alignment with Chinese Communist Party talking points and previously reported by Reuters, it adds the federal government should not allow AI-related federal funding to be directed toward states with "burdensome" regulations.(With inputs from Reuters)


Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump has his biggest target in crosshairs. What can happen
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The political temperature in Washington has surged again, this time over a storm of accusations from President Donald Trump , targeting former President Barack Obama . During a press appearance alongside Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Trump accused Obama of orchestrating a 'coup' in 2016 by politicising intelligence regarding Russian election interference . The spark for this latest escalation: a set of newly declassified documents released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard last week, which Trump claims are proof of treason. He is now demanding that the Department of Justice (DOJ) open a criminal unprecedented moment raises a pressing question: can a former US president actually face prosecution for actions taken while in office? And what are the legal and political implications of such a move?At the heart of the controversy are intelligence documents recently declassified by Tulsi Gabbard, who now heads the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Gabbard's disclosures allege that Obama-era officials -- specifically James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey, Susan Rice, and Andrew McCabe --deliberately distorted or suppressed intelligence to frame a narrative of Russian election interference that would damage argued that this manipulation of intelligence was not only unethical but possibly criminal, referring to it as a 'treasonous conspiracy". According to her statements, certain intelligence reports that cleared the Trump campaign of collusion were deliberately downplayed or ignored, while narratives emphasising Russian interference were selectively elevated. Importantly, the materials do not show that votes were altered or that Obama directly interfered in vote counts. Rather, they appear to suggest a pattern of politically motivated intelligence shaping which is serious, but far from the clear-cut criminal behaviour that would normally prompt a DOJ on the released documents, Trump quickly amplified the narrative. He accused Obama of treason and insisted that the DOJ open an investigation. Trump even went so far as to post an AI-generated video showing the FBI arresting Obama in the Oval Office, a move that was widely condemned as inflammatory and reckless. While Obama's office rarely responds to Trump's ongoing attacks, the former president issued a statement calling the accusations 'bizarre,' 'ridiculous,' and 'a weak attempt at distraction". The statement emphasised the unprecedented nature of the accusation and suggested it was designed to distract from Trump's own mounting legal and political Trump's message resonated with his base. Conservative media and MAGA-aligned lawmakers echoed his call for accountability, with several suggesting that the disclosures represent the biggest scandal in American the political firestorm, the likelihood that Obama will face criminal prosecution remains extremely slim. The evidence currently available may not establish that Obama committed a prosecutable offence. The documents suggest internal disagreements and potentially politicised decision-making, but not necessarily criminal behaviour. Under US law, proving treason or criminal conspiracy requires evidence of intent, coordination and direct action to break the there is the matter of precedent and prosecutorial norms. No former US president has ever been prosecuted for actions taken while in office unless there was incontrovertible proof of criminal conduct. Even in high-profile cases like Watergate, those involved were either pardoned or avoided criminal charges through plea deals and immunity arrangements. While it is possible that the DOJ may quietly review the Gabbard disclosures, the standard for launching a formal criminal case against a former president is extraordinarily high. Without compelling evidence, it's unlikely that Attorney General Merrick Garland would take the risk of igniting a constitutional has promised more disclosures in the coming weeks. If new documents emerge that contain stronger evidence of deliberate falsification or political manipulation, especially if Obama is directly implicated, then the DOJ could face renewed pressure to the allegations have already become a powerful tool for Trump and his allies, who are using the narrative to galvanise support and frame the 2016 Russia investigation as a calculated attack. For Democrats, however, the accusations are viewed largely as a diversion tactic, aimed at deflecting attention from Trump's own troubles. Within the intelligence community, Gabbard's unilateral declassification has raised alarm, with critics arguing that it undermines institutional credibility and could damage relationships with allied intelligence services. These concerns have been echoed by figures such as Senator Mark Warner, who warned that such politicisation erodes the foundational trust that intelligence-sharing depends the legal pathway seems narrow, the political implications are far-reaching. Trump and his allies have seized on the moment to reframe the Russia investigation as a political weapon wielded by Obama to undermine the peaceful transfer of power. In their view, the disclosures prove that the 2016 Russia investigation was a 'hoax' built on fabricated intelligence and partisan motives. This can help Trump regain support of many of those among MAGA who have been disppointed by the Trump adminsitration's handling of Epstein role in all of this cannot be overstated. Once a Democratic congresswoman known for her anti-establishment stance, she has become a central figure in reshaping how intelligence is handled in the executive branch. Critics say she is politicising national security, while supporters argue she is exposing long-standing corruption.


Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘10% is the new zero tariff': Trump seals trade deals with many countries - what do they mean for India?
One thing is becoming clear - 10% base tariffs are the 'new zero' with which countries will have to contend in terms of negotiations. (AI image) India-US trade deal: As US President Donald Trump announces trade deals in quick succession ahead of his August 1 deadline for reciprocal tariffs, one thing is becoming clear - 10% base tariffs are the 'new zero' with which countries will have to contend in terms of negotiations. A series of trade deals - with Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan - all appear to be in the broad range of 15-20%, much lesser than the tariffs threatened by Trump on April 2, but still above the baseline 10% tariff that is currently in place. So where does that leave India? India-US Trade Deal: What To Expect? An India-US trade deal is still elusive despite several rounds of talks between officials of the two countries. And even though Trump has said multiple times in the recent past that a deal with India is 'near', the last (and fifth) round of negotiations has proved to be inconclusive. Also Read | 'Always, zero tariffs to…': Donald Trump says US willing to lower tariff rates for major countries - this condition needs to be fulfilled It appears that a trade deal is unlikely to be announced before August 1 since deadlock on agriculture and dairy sectors continues. Reuters reported two government sources as saying that a mini trade deal before Trump's deadline looks unlikely. Meanwhile, according to a PTI report US officials are expected to visit India in the second half of August as part of the ongoing efforts for the first phase of the deal by fall. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Beyond Text Generation: An AI Tool That Helps You Write Better Grammarly Install Now Undo India maintains a strong position against American pressure in the proposed trade deal, specifically concerning lower tariffs on US farm imports like maize and soybean. The United States is asking India to open its agriculture and dairy sectors. The Indian government's key priorities include safeguarding farmers and addressing health considerations related to genetically modified commodities. The dairy industry holds particular significance in India, influenced by cultural and dietary traditions. Indian consumers raise objections to American cattle feeding methods that include animal by-products, as these practices conflict with Indian dietary principles. It is yet uncertain whether the 26% reciprocal tariff announced by Trump for India will come into effect from August 1, or will this deadline be extended. Whenever a trade deal is announced, with or without agriculture and dairy a part of it, Trump's recent actions indicate that India is unlikely to secure a tariff rate below 10%. It is broadly expected to be in the ranges similar to the tariffs announced in America's recent trade deals. Asian Countries Score Deals With Trump Administration Trump seems to finally have brought some clarity to the trade landscape of the world's largest manufacturing region through his recent tariff deals. On Tuesday, Trump finalised an agreement with Japan, with a 15% tariff rate on imports, notably also for the automotive sector, which represents the largest portion of the trade imbalance between both nations. Also Read | 'Aggressive US pressure can force…': GTRI warns India against one-sided trade deal; says don't fall into same trap' as Indonesia A deal with the Philippines saw a 19% tariff, matching Indonesia's rate and sitting just below Vietnam's 20% baseline. This suggests that most Southeast Asian nations are likely to receive comparable tariff rates, according to a Bloomberg report. "We live in a new normal where 10% is the new zero and so 15% and 20% doesn't seem so bad if everyone else got it," Trinh Nguyen, senior economist for emerging Asia at Natixis told Bloomberg. She noted that US firms will still find it economically viable to import goods at these tariff levels rather than look at establishing US as their new manufacturing hub. The China Play US seems to be on its path to further streamline a trade deal with world's second largest economy, and the mid-August deadline for China tariffs is expected to be extended. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he will meet Chinese officials in Stockholm in the coming week for their third discussion round, focusing on extending the tariff deadline and broadening the dialogue. This development indicates improving relations between the two largest global economies, following the US's recent relaxation of semiconductor restrictions and China's resumption of rare earth material exports. "We're getting along with China very well," Trump told reporters on Tuesday. "We have a very good relationship." The situation shows signs of becoming more stable after half a year of tariff-related uncertainty, which had previously elevated tariffs to 145% for China and approximately 50% for various smaller Asian export nations. Also Read | Trump tariff war: Deal or no deal - why it won't matter much for India What's The Road Ahead On Global Trade? Despite these recent agreements offering partial respite, significant uncertainties persist. The Trump administration continues to evaluate various sector-specific tariffs on products such as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, which are vital for Asian economies including Taiwan and India - neither of which has finalised tariff arrangements with the US. South Korea faces heightened vulnerability to sector-specific tariffs, despite the Japanese agreement offering a potential blueprint for newly elected President Lee Jae Myung, according to the Bloomberg report. Trump's swift negotiations with countries which US has a significant trade deficit with are accompanied by his proposal to implement a uniform rate of 10% to 15% on approximately 150 smaller nations. The increasing clarity on tariff structures will allow organisations with intricate Asian supply networks and US market dependence to strategise operational adjustments to minimise revenue impacts. Similar to the 2018 trade tensions, recent tariff declarations are expected to encourage firms to relocate production away from China. At present, China faces the region's highest average tariff rates, whilst ongoing White House scrutiny of its technological and trade aspirations may prompt businesses to seek more stable alternatives. Shipments from Asia to the US are expected to come down after the implementation of new tariff rates. Although Southeast Asian economies and Japan face lower tariffs than initially threatened by Trump, these rates remain significantly higher compared to pre-Trump administration levels. Also Read | 'Illegal, unilateral sanctions…': China hits out at Donald Trump's tariff threat for Russia's allies; says 'coercion will not…' Barclays Plc analysts, including Brian Tan, noted in their report that "continue the trend of tariff rates gravitating towards the 15-20% range that President Trump recently indicated to be his preferred level for the blanket rate instead of 10% currently." Their analysis suggests a negative impact on Asia's GDP growth projections, the Bloomberg report said. US consumers, who have remained largely unaffected by tariff increases thus far, might experience price impacts in the coming months. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. economists predict an increase in the US baseline 'reciprocal' tariff rate from 10% to 15%, potentially leading to increased inflation and slower economic growth. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now