Ex-Wimbledon finalist 'body searched' and nearly denied entry' to tournament
Nick Kyrgios says he was body searched by security at Wimbledon because he did not have ID to prove who he was. Kyrgios is not playing at Wimbledon for the third straight year due to injury, but is working at the Grand Slam as a pundit.
The Australian is one of the most famous faces in tennis, having earned a reputation as being the sport's bad boy. While he has fallen foul of the rules, the 30-year-old has also enjoyed some great times at the All England Club, having reached the final in 2022, where he lost to Novak Djokovic.
Kyrgios was dropped by the BBC as a commentator this year, but is working for talkSPORT during the two-week tournament. Despite being a former finalist, it seems he is treated no differently to everyone else who enters the grounds.
Speaking on talkSPORT's Wimbledon: Unfiltered, Kyrgios said: "Look, I'm not normally one to say: 'Do you know who I am?' when I'm trying to get into events.
READ MORE:
"But today, my agent was like okay, let's try and pick up your credentials just to save someone a ground pass and I was sitting there and she asked: 'Do you have a photo ID?'
"I had just got a new phone, because it was broken, I didn't have any photos... and she laughed before she asked me, so she clearly knew who I was but was just following protocol.
"I said, 'do you reckon you could get me in and give me my credentials just one time' and she was like: 'No.' I went: 'Seriously? Please', but they said they can't do that. Then I got body searched. They told me to put all of my stuff down and I got body searched."
Mirror Sport contacted the All England Club to request comment. As Kyrgios himself acknowledged, the member of security staff was merely following protocol.
Asked if it had happened before, Kyrgios added: "Yes and no. There's been clips of Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal not being let into some changing rooms because they didn't have credentials and stuff. But I don't know, me getting body searched in front of the crowd was something I'd never thought would happen to me at Wimbledon, but it did."
He added: "It was probably just a Kyrgios treat... if you're going to wear the black hat and be a villain, then you've got to deal with some of that stuff. I did [keep it cool], I didn't say 'Do you know who I am?'.
"I was asked do you have any ID, but I replied: 'Does Google work?'. I guess that was kind of like a little dig."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wimbledon organisers apologise after line-calling system turned off in error
Wimbledon organisers have apologised after the electronic line-calling system was turned off in error at a crucial moment in Sonay Kartal's match on Centre Court. The British No 3's opponent, the 34-year-old Russian veteran Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, accused the All England Club of home bias and said a game had been stolen from her when the AI-enhanced technology missed a call. Pavlyuchenkova, on game point, became convinced that a Kartal shot had landed long but there was no 'out' call by the system which controversially replaced line judges this year. The umpire, Nico Helwerth, who did not know the system had been turned off, said the technology was 'unable to track the last point', which had to be replayed. 'I don't know if it's in or it's out. How do I know? You cannot prove it, because she's local they can say whatever. You took the game away from me,' Pavlyuchenkova said after Kartal won the point and went on to break for a 5-4 lead. 'They have stolen the game from me, they stole it.' A Wimbledon spokesperson said the club had apologised to the players after finding that the technology was 'deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game'. Pavlyuchenkova went on to overpower Kartal, who later said she was 'devastated' that her fairytale run had ended with a 7-6 (3), 6-4 defeat on her Centre Court debut. Cameron Norrie became the last Briton standing after battling through to the Wimbledon quarter-finals in a five-set epic which also was not short of drama. The 29-year-old defeated his Chilean opponent Nicolás Jarry in four and a half hours and became the only British player to reach the second week of the tournament despite a promising start from several hopefuls. Norrie, the British No 3, fell to the floor after his 6-3, 7-6 (4), 6-7 (7), 6-7 (5), 6-3 win in front of a roaring No 1 Court crowd. Spectators appeared to boo Jarry when the South American confronted Norrie as the pair were shaking hands at the net. Jarry, the 29-year-old world No 143, had earlier complained to the umpire after appearing frustrated with how long Norrie was taking to serve. 'It is not a nervous tic, it is something he can control,' Jarry said. He later denied there had been a spat, saying all he had told Norrie at the net was the Briton had deserved to win. In an on-court interview after the match, Norrie said of the five-set epic: 'I just had to keep fighting.' The former top 10 player, who was knocked out of the Wimbledon semi-finals in 2022 by Novak Djokovic, went on: 'I think at the beginning of this year I was struggling a little bit with confidence and had some doubts – and just wanted to enjoy my tennis a little bit more. 'I'm doing that and I enjoyed it today, so it was a bonus today, but I was more happy I was enjoying it and I was playing point for point, that's what mattered.' When asked about the courtside drama, he added that Jarry had told him he was 'a little bit vocal'. Kartal, ranked 298 in the world this time last year and 51 now, earlier said she was proud of her performance this week. 'Probably for the rest of the day I'll be a bit sad,' the 5ft 4in Brighton native told reporters. 'But I think tomorrow I'll probably wake up, and I can look back on this week and be super proud of it and step back and think, you know, fourth round of a slam, it's the first experience, and for it being here, having beaten the players that I did to do that.' Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion She said she had 'goosebumps' entering and exiting Centre Court to thunder and lightning. Her match was as dramatic as the weather after the embarrassing malfunction with the AI-enhanced Hawk-Eye technology. After an investigation which included speaking to the players, Helwerth, Hawk-Eye operators and a review official, a spokesperson for the All England Club said: 'It is now clear that the live electronic line calling (ELC) system, which was working optimally, was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system. 'In that time there were three calls not picked up by live ELC on the affected part of the court. Two of these were called by the chair umpire, who was not made aware that the system had been deactivated. 'Following the third, the chair umpire stopped the match and consulted with the review official. It was determined that the point should be replayed. 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball tracking technology. The live ELC system relies on the Hawk-Eye operators, the review official and the technology to work in harmony. This did not happen. 'In this instance there was a human error and as a consequence we have fully reviewed our processes and made the appropriate changes.' Emma Raducanu and Jack Draper, the British No 1s, have both complained about the new technology and questioned some of its calls. Speaking after her win, Pavlyuchenkova said she believed the umpire should have called the ball out rather than making them replay the point. 'He was probably scared to take such a big decision. I think they should … that's why we have a chair umpire,' she told reporters. 'Otherwise, I think soon let's just play without them, right, and then we're going to have everything automatic. I think we losing a little bit of the charm of actually having human beings … it just becomes a little bit weird and, like, robot sort of orientated.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Anisimova's career comes full circle after burnout fears
LONDON, July 6 (Reuters) - When Amanda Anisimova reached the Wimbledon quarter-finals as a 20-year-old in the summer of 2022, she was being hailed as the "next big thing" in American tennis along with Coco Gauff. But instead of providing a launch pad for her career, that achievement led to a downward spiral. From mid-August that year to the following May, Anisimova failed to win back-to-back matches in any of the 10 tournaments she entered, winning a paltry four matches in total during that miserable nine-month run. With her time on the tour taking a toll on her mental health, in May 2023 she pulled the plug on her tennis year to try and get away from it all, after realising that she was simply burned out from the never-ending cycle of defeats. When she made her comeback to the Grand Slam stage at the Australian Open last year, her ranking had plummeted to 442 but, now rejuvenated and ready to go again, that statistic did not faze her. She made it to the last 16 before running into eventual champion Aryna Sabalenka, and rather than getting down in the dumps, Anisimova took it as proof that her career was back on an upward trajectory as it was the first time since Wimbledon 2022 that she had won three successive matches. Even when she failed to qualify for Wimbledon last year, while ranked 189th, she knew that mentally she was in a better place than she had been 12 months earlier. Fast forward 12 months and things are looking bright and sunny again for Anisimova - albeit at a soggy Wimbledon. Seeded 13th, she is back in the quarter-finals at Wimbledon following a nerve-shredding 6-2 5-7 6-4 victory over Czech 30th seed Linda Noskova - a result that will allow her to break into the world's top 10 for the first time. "I was just super excited to compete here ... and just being seeded was already really special," said the 23-year-old, who opened her Wimbledon account by handing Yulia Putintseva the dreaded 6-0 6-0 double bagel in the first round. "I felt really good about myself because I think it was just a huge reminder of all the work and progress I've made so far this year. "I knew that every match was going to be a battle, which it has been. I've just been really enjoying the journey here." With French Open champion Gauff having suffered a shock first round exit at Wimbledon, Anisimova and 10th seed Emma Navarro, who plays her last 16 match against Mirra Andreeva on Monday, are the only Americans left with a chance of lifting the Venus Rosewater Dish come Saturday. Anisimova will fancy her chances of reaching the semi-finals at the grasscourt major for the first time considering she holds a 3-0 win-loss record against her next opponent, Russia's Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova. "Ever since I took my break, I just found this new perspective and this newfound sense of fighting for everything and accepting the challenges that come and embracing them," said Anisimova, born in New Jersey to Russian immigrants. "A lot of things have changed ... I feel like my professionalism and work ethic has taken a whole 360. Everything is centred around my tennis and how I can prepare the best that I can. "It's super special and a surreal feeling to be in the top 10. If I thought to myself last year ... that I'll be breaking the top 10 by now, it would be pretty surprising to me, considering where I was last summer."
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Wimbledon says a call on a shot that landed out was missed because the electronic system was off
A ball that clearly landed long in a match at Centre Court wasn't called out Sunday because the electronic system that replaced line judges at Wimbledon this year accidentally was shut off for three points. And, because the replay review procedure that used to be in place also has been scrapped, the chair umpire called for a do-over on the point at 4-all in the first set — much to the dismay of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, the player who would have won the game if the proper call had been made originally. Pavlyuchenkova wound up getting broken there to trail Sonay Kartal of Britain, but she eventually did manage to come back to win the match 7-6 (3), 6-4 and reach the quarterfinals at the All England Club for the first time since 2016. 'You took the game away from me,' 2021 French Open runner-up Pavlyuchenkova told chair umpire Nico Helwerth at the changeover after the game ended. Pavlyuchenkova, who is Russian, also said in the moment that the decision-making there went in Kartal's favor because she is a local player. Next for Pavlyuchenkova is a match against No. 13 Amanda Anisimova of the United States, a 6-2, 5-7, 6-4 winner against No. 30 Linda Noskova on Sunday night. Anisimova also was a Wimbledon quarterfinalist in 2022; her best Slam showing was making the 2019 French Open semifinals at age 17. At her news conference, Pavlyuchenkova said Helwerth told her following the match that he did think Kartal's shot landed out. 'I think he felt bad, a little bit,' Pavlyuchenkova said. 'He probably felt like he should have taken the initiative and called it out.' Pavlyuchenkova also said Helwerth 'probably was scared to take such a big decision.' Pavlyuchenkova was serving and had a game point when Kartal hit a backhand that landed beyond the opposite baseline, TV replays showed. But there was no sound of one of the recorded voices being used for the first time at Wimbledon to reflect when the technology being used in place of human officials determines that a ball landed out. At least Pavlyuchenkova could joke about the whole episode later. Asked how she'd feel about it had she lost the match, Pavlyuchenkova responded with a laugh: 'I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back.' She also cracked that chair umpires are 'very good at giving fines and code violations' and never miss those, but perhaps it would be beneficial if they did a better job of noticing mistaken calls. Kartal said she couldn't see where her shot went. 'That situation is a rarity. I don't think it's really ever happened — if it has. It's tough. What can you do? The umpire's trying his best in that situation, and he handled it fine,' Kartal said. 'I think the system just malfunctioned a little bit, and the fairest way was what he did: replay the point.' Helwerth delayed play while he made a phone call from his stand. Eventually, play resumed, Pavlyuchenkova missed a forehand on the replay, then lost the game a few points later. The tournament looked into it afterward and blamed 'human error,' saying that the line-calling setup 'was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system,' according to an All England Club spokesperson, who added: 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology.' The spokesperson also said Pavlyuchenkova and Kartal received apologies from the club. The French Open is now the only Grand Slam tournament that still uses line judges instead of electronic calls. From 2007 through last year, players were allowed to challenge in-or-out calls at Wimbledon; a video review was employed to decide whether a line judge's — or chair umpire's — ruling was correct. That challenge system was removed for the current tournament, but there immediately were demands on social media from some tennis fans or observers to bring that back to aid chair umpires. Pavlyuchenkova agreed, saying: 'We should probably look into something else to have better decisions.' Taylor Fritz, who reached the quarterfinals with a win at a different court Sunday, didn't see what happened. But when it was explained by a reporter, his biggest question was why the chair umpire didn't just make the call himself if it was so clear what actually happened on Kartal's shot. 'The chair umpire has to make the call,' 2024 U.S. Open finalist Fritz said. 'Why is he there if he's not going to call the ball?' ___
