Kerala backs off from enacting black magic law, cites policy decision in High Court
In an affidavit filed before a division of Kerala High Court, headed by Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar, the state said a draft bill titled "The Kerala Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill, 2022" had been prepared based on recommendations from the Law Reforms Commission.
However, after deliberations, the council of ministers decided on July 5, 2023, not to go ahead with the legislation, it said.
The government submitted that while the court may have noted the social concerns raised in the PIL, it cannot compel the legislature to pass a law.
"A writ of mandamus will not lie against the legislature directing it to legislate on a particular subject," the affidavit said.
Meanwhile, the high court asked the state government to clarify the steps it intends to take to control sorcery and black magic, especially in light of the government's stand that no legislation is currently under consideration.
The court noted that although the K T Thomas Commission report had recommended legislation to curb black magic and related inhuman practices, the government had not taken any follow-up action on the report.
The court has now asked the state to clearly explain how it plans to prevent the practice of black magic and sorcery, even in the absence of a law.
It also directed the government to file a detailed affidavit within three weeks.
The state's home department had filed the affidavit on June 21, 2025, stating that the Council of Ministers had initially discussed the matter but later decided not to proceed with legislation.
The court had earlier asked the state to clarify its position after a public interest litigation filed by the Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham sought a law similar to those enacted in Maharashtra and Karnataka to prohibit harmful rituals conducted in the name of supernatural powers.
The PIL, first filed in 2022, was dismissed in June 2023 due to the absence of representation from the petitioner. It was later restored, prompting the High Court to seek the government's latest stance.
The Yuktivadi Sangham, in its plea, has stated that the Law Reforms Commission, headed by Justice K T Thomas, had submitted a comprehensive report to the State of Kerala in the year 2019, with legislative recommendations based on new social conditions.
"The Kerala Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill-2019, is one of the recommended statutes. But so far, no attempt has been made on the part of the state on the matter," the organisation has claimed.
The plea was filed in 2022 in the wake of a ritual human sacrifice of two women in the Pathanamthitta district of Kerala by three people, including a couple.
The petition has claimed that the states of Kerala and Maharashtra have passed laws against sorcery and black magic.
It has also sought a declaration that "films on big screens and OTT platforms, and several serials and other telefilms, aired on television channels and YouTube, having content of superstitious beliefs, including sorcery and occult practices, exempting those having good intentions and having good artistic values, are illegal".
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh HC issues contempt notice to police officials for not complying with compassionate appointment order
RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh High Court issued contempt notices to DIG Parul Mathur and Janjgir-Champa SP Vijay Pandey for failing to comply with its order to provide a compassionate appointment to the son of the late ASI Boond Ram Bharti within 90 days. Bharti was compulsorily retired in 2017, but after his death, his service was reinstated following a High Court directive. The delay in implementing the court's order prompted a contempt petition, highlighting the broader issue of over 1,100 such petitions filed this year due to non-compliance by authorities. The case involves the late Boond Ram Bharti, who was compulsorily retired from service as an Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) by the DIG (Administration), Raipur, on 18 August 2017. Following his death, the Home Secretary cancelled the compulsory retirement order, making his dependents eligible for compassionate appointment, as per a High Court order. However, despite the High Court's directive to provide a compassionate appointment within 90 days, Vikki Bharti, son of Boond Ram Bharti, has not yet received the appointment in the police department. Counsels Abhishek Pandey and Priya Agrawal filed a contempt petition in the High Court. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep ResMed Buy Now Undo They informed the court that senior police officers are failing to comply with court orders within the stipulated timeframe. This non-compliance resulted in 1,149 contempt petitions being filed between January and July this year, consuming valuable court time. The counsels cited provisions for six months imprisonment and a ₹2,000 fine in contempt cases. The counsels sought action against the DIG and SP under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Taking serious note of the matter, the High Court issued notices to the senior police officers, seeking their replies. Clarifying the restoration of Boond Ram Bharti's service after his death, counsel Pandey said that many govt employees over the age of 50 were compulsorily retired under a govt scheme following an assessment of their performance and alleged poor service records. Boond Ram, along with several other affected employees, challenged the compulsory retirement orders in the High Court. In response, a committee was constituted to review the cases in accordance with the court's directive. The committee subsequently recommended the reinstatement of several employees, including Boond Ram Bharti. However, in the interim, Boond Ram passed away, and his service was reinstated 21 days after his death, the counsel informed the court.
The Wire
8 hours ago
- The Wire
'When I Got Home, We Just Cried': A Muslim Man's Journey From the Phansi Yard to Acquittal
Communalism Sukanya Shantha 42-year-old Ehtesham Qutubuddin, who was a death row convict for nearly a decade before being acquitted by the Bombay high court earlier this month, reflects on time in prison. Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty A tiny 80-square-feet room, fitted inside a compact V-shaped enclosure known as the phansi yard (gallows yard) of Nagpur Central Prison, served as 'home' for 42-year-old Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui for nearly a decade. In 2015, soon after a special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court sentenced 12 individuals – five men, including Siddiqui, to death, and the remaining seven to life imprisonment – in the 2006 Mumbai serial train blasts case, he was transferred to Nagpur jail. All 12 men were acquitted by the Bombay high court on July 21 and subsequently released from prison. Siddiqui describes his decade-long solitary confinement as a place that made him feel 'safe.' 'In the existing political atmosphere, especially as Muslim men convicted on terror charges, this isolation was the only way we could have stayed safe in jail,' he feels. An incarceration spanning two decades Reflecting on his two decades of incarceration – nine years as an undertrial prisoner in Mumbai and then as a death row convict in Nagpur – Siddiqui says that while the trial took nearly a decade, the transition from undertrial to death row prisoner was 'quite sudden.' 'One minute, we were jostling for space in the overcrowded prison barracks in Mumbai (until the lower court's verdict), and suddenly, we were thrown into solitary confinement. It was a very small room but it was still ours. It had an attached bathroom, a ceiling fan and a tubelight,' he says, describing the prison room. Solitary confinement in India is unconstitutional. Even for death row convicts, it is permissible only after their mercy petition is rejected by the President of India. In the serial train blasts case, the death penalty had not yet been confirmed by the High Court but they were still subjected to solitary confinement. 'But none of this really matters. It's a common practice. The moment a person is given a death sentence, the prison authorities transfer them into the phansi yard,' Siddiqui says, as he recalls the names of many death row convicts housed in the 30 tiny solitary cells near his. Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty 'Many lacked proper legal representation and were simply abandoned here after the trial court imposed a death sentence. They would arrive here horrified, thinking this was where they would be hanged the very moment they reached there.' It became almost a duty of other death row convicts like Siddiqui to explain legal procedures, offer advice, and calm newcomers in the phansi yard. Siddiqui says he saw many come and go over those ten years. 'Almost all were eventually acquitted in their appeals before higher courts,' he points out. Siddiqui's observation is in sync with different studies on the Indian judicial system and capital punishment. The Death Penalty reports that the NLU- Delhi's Project 39A (now renamed as The Square Circle Clinic after it shifted its base to NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad), a criminal justice research and legal aid programme released every year has long established the pattern of death penalties getting either commuted to life or lesser punishment or in many cases, simply ending up in acquittals. Siddiqui recalls his interactions with five men from the Shinde family, who were sentenced to death by a trial court in a rape and murder case, only to be later acquitted by the Supreme Court. The Shindes, from a Nomadic Tribal community, endured 16 years of incarceration, 13 as death row convicts. 'They would keep asking me what I thought of their case, and I would keep reassuring them they'd be out soon. That simple fact made them so happy.' The Shindes were acquitted in 2019 following a strongly worded Supreme Court judgment. Among them, Ankush Maruti Shinde, was only 17, a minor, at the time of his arrest. Experienced sustained physical torture Siddiqui says the hope that their innocence would eventually be proven kept them going. 'We too survived prison life on that one hope. After all, how long could justice evade us?' he asks. Siddiqui experienced both extremes of prison life: sustained physical torture in Mumbai's Arthur Road Jail (complaints about which led to the transfer of the then-jail superintendent, Swati Sathe) and a relatively calmer existence with better food and living conditions in Nagpur. 'I'm not romanticising prison life, but Nagpur's prison was certainly a lot better. Which also means prisons can be made liveable if one wished,' he says. But his co-defendant Kamal Ansari's death during the second wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in 2021 shook him. 'Everyone around us was falling sick. Kamal fell sick and was moved to the hospital ward. He never returned.' Siddiqui says most of the men implicated in the case were unknown to him at the time of arrest. 'But as circumstances brought us together, we eventually became each others' support system,' he adds. The police and jail officials, he claims, tried hard to turn them against each other. 'And the frustration does eventually get to you. So, each time we reached a point of anger or frustration against each other, we would simply stop talking. That helped us cool off, and rework on our relationship,' he shares. Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui with his father at their family house in Jaunpur. Photo: By arrangement In Nagpur, Siddiqui had no trouble accessing writing materials. So he wrote extensively. His book, Horror Saga, which details his prison life and the botched up trial, was published last year. He has a manuscript ready for his next book. He has also translated several others while incarcerated. How did he access books and research materials in jail? 'I deviced a unique method,' he says, with a sense of pride. Siddiqui filed nearly 6,000 Right to Information (RTI) applications over two decades, primarily to gather evidence against the investigating agency, which helped debunk the police's case, and also to access books published by the government press. Earned over 20 degrees while in prison A college dropout at the time of his arrest, Siddiqui has since earned over 20 degrees, including several Master's, Bachelor's, and Diplomas. In 2001, while in his third year of a Chemical Engineering program, he was arrested for a few days for alleged involvement with the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), an organisation banned that year, leading to the overnight criminalisation of many men from the Muslim community. Since then, Siddiqui says he tried several times to complete his education and earn a formal degree, but it didn't happen. 'So, in jail, I made full use of the time to gain as many degrees as I could,' he shares. As strange as it may sound, among the first undergraduate degrees that Siddiqui enrolled himself was Tourism. 'I wanted to keep my brain stimulated somehow and not let the incarceration consume me. So, I went on this rage of enrolling myself for every opportunity that was made available,' he recalls. He knew how to read Urdu, Arabic but didn't possess a formal degree. 'So, I got one while in jail.' Siddiqui, who worked as a Desktop Publishing (DTP) operator as a local publishing house in Mumbai, now holds an MBA degree, master's degrees in English Literature, Sociology, Marketing, and Financial Management, and diplomas in Nutrition and Mass Communication, among others. He is in the final semester of a three-year law degree. Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty If not studying, Siddiqui would take care of the small garden outside the barrack. 'Those plants were the only pretty thing to look at,' Siddiqui laughs. The prison rules don't allow assignment of any work to a death row convict. Which means, even though Siddiqui worked, he was not paid for his labour. According to the Maharashtra state's revised prison rules, a convicted prisoner is paid up to Rs. 65 per day, although a paltry sum and much lower than the minimum wages standards, yet some money that most incarcerated people look forward to to lead a dignified life in jail or to take back home at the end of their jail term. Having spent nearly two decades in different prisons of Maharashtra, Siddiqui says the level of surveillance is 'simply unnerving' now. 'You will find hundreds of cameras loom overhead. Even a slight movement for exercise inside your barrack is instantly tracked, and jail officials confront you with a barrage of questions,' he says." Surveillance doesn't stop here. Abdul Wahid Shaikh, one of 13 arrested in this case and acquitted in 2015, and several other terror accused have had to install multiple CCTVs inside and outside their homes to simply shield themselves from police harassment. 'Since release, every experience feels new' On July 21, when the high court acquitted the 12 men, their release orders were immediately executed – an unusual move. In many cases, even after the court order reaches jail authorities, releases are delayed, just to allow the state to file an appeal in the higher court. 'Maybe they just wanted us out. The Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta, stating before the Supreme Court that the state no longer wanted us in jail is quite telling,' Siddiqui points out. Since his release, every experience feels 'new,' Siddiqui says. He and his co-defendant, Shaikh Mohammed Ali Alam Shaikh, boarded a flight from Nagpur to Mumbai. ' Hairaan kar diya Mohammed Ali ne (Mohammed Ali exhausted me),' he laughingly shares, as he narrates the experience of tasting freedom for the first time in two decades. 'He was so excited he simply couldn't stop talking. I worried his chatter would draw attention. I told him, ' Bhai, agle ek ghanta shaant rehna (Brother, stay calm for the next hour)." At Mumbai airport, they were met by a media frenzy. 'We didn't know how to handle this sudden attention; the last time we experienced anything like this was two decades ago at the time of our arrest,' Siddiqui says. In Mumbai, they had the chance to take a train to reach the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind (an organisation that provided legal aid to the men all along) office but chose not to. When asked why, Siddiqui pauses but says nothing. At the time of his arrest, Siddiqui lived in Mira Road, but he now stays with his family in Younuspur, Jaunpur district, Uttar Pradesh, where his parents, four siblings, and, most importantly, his wife, Sabina, reside. Siddiqui and Sabina were married for less than a year at the time of his arrest in 2006. Siddiqui was only 23 at the time of his arrest, Sabina even younger. 'She stood by me, and my parents cared for her as their own' 'In those 19 years, I must have told her many times this could be an endless wait and that I wouldn't hold it against her if she sought a divorce. But she was steadfast. She stood by me, and my parents cared for her as their own,' Siddiqui says. He calls Sabina the 'real hero' of his story. 'Her resilience and trust in me was so deep.I can't express my gratitude enough,' he tells The Wire. Returning to Younuspur was an emotional homecoming. 'When I got home, we just cried. We barely talked; we just cried for many hours.' Relatives and well-wishers have been visiting non-stop. 'I don't recall most faces, but it would be rude to say so, so I simply nod. When I was behind bars, these individuals offered support and solidarity to my family. Now they are here again to celebrate my freedom. It's all too surreal,' he says. Siddiqui might have returned with close to two dozen degrees, but the future still looks 'uncertain,' he admits. 'Finding a job might not be possible. Maybe I will consider pursuing a legal profession,' he thinks aloud. But for now, he says he wants to just return to writing those many stories he has. 'The ones I've safely kept locked inside me for so many years.' The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
The Hindu
13 hours ago
- The Hindu
Delhi High Court upholds action against assistant professor at DU in sexual harassment case
The Delhi High Court has upheld the compulsory retirement of an assistant professor of political science in Delhi University's Bharati College over multiple allegations of sexual harassment by students. The Court described the accused's conduct as 'so profane' that it refrained from reproducing in its judgment the objectionable messages he sent to the complainants. In the July 17 judgment, Justice Subramonium Prasad observed that, 'Teachers shape the career of young aspiring students for a better future... The act of sexual harassment done by these very teachers, who are considered our guides and mentors, against young female students who have just attained majority, has a deleterious effect on the psyche of such students.' The accused had challenged the orders of compulsory retirement issued by the college's governing body in December 2020. Four complaints were filed against him — three by current students of Bharati College and one by a former student — alleging sexual innuendoes/advances through Facebook chats and WhatsApp messages. The complaints surfaced in February 2018, shortly after a video of students confronting the professor about his conduct became public. The video sparked student protests and demands for an inquiry. The matter was referred to the college's Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), in line with the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), and UGC regulations. The Court noted that the ICC's inquiry report of August 28, 2018, found all charges against the professor to be substantiated through both documentary and oral evidence. 'The testimony of each of the complainants remained unimpeached and resultantly, this Court finds no reason to question the veracity of the ICC's analysis of the evidence and statements,' the Court held. The Court rejected the professor's arguments of procedural impropriety, noting that it found no violation of rules in how the ICC was constituted or how the inquiry was conducted.
