logo
Ohio regulators begin House bill 6 hearings as lawmakers mull anti-corruption legislation

Ohio regulators begin House bill 6 hearings as lawmakers mull anti-corruption legislation

Yahoo11-06-2025
Aerial photograph of the OVEC-operated Kyger Creek Power Plant in Cheshire. (Getty Images.)
The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio on Tuesday kicked off several weeks of hearings related the House Bill 6 scandal. The proceedings braid together three different cases tied to FirstEnergy's scheme to bribe lawmakers and regulators to bail out nuclear and coal plants.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Meanwhile in Washington, D.C., an Ohio Congresswoman wants to expand the definition of an 'official act' to ensure corrupt politicians can't wriggle out of accountability.
At the same time, state lawmakers in Ohio are mulling campaign finance changes that would allow corporations and unions to make unlimited contributions to dark money groups like the ones at the center of the HB 6 scandal.
The HB 6 hearings bring together almost two dozen attorneys representing utilities, consumers, and several interested parties from the energy and manufacturing industry.
As part of the proceedings, each party gets a chance to cross examine witnesses. Several FirstEnergy officials who previously refused to testify citing their Fifth Amendment rights will take the stand in coming hearings.
State utility regulators preparing for Ohio House Bill 6 hearing
But after years in the works, the proceedings didn't exactly burst out of the gate. Attorneys sparred before starting about what evidence was admissible and the correct order of cross examination.
Once the show got on the road, an auditor from Blue Ridge Consulting named Donna Mullinax took the stand to discuss a 2021 report on FirstEnergy's capital recovery rider.
Utility companies in Ohio can get approval to state regulators to charge customers for investments in improving their infrastructure. The company recoups that investment by tacking a surcharge on consumers' bills known as a rider.
The Blue Ridge audit dug into FirstEnergy's books to determine whether the company's expenditures were reasonable. Auditors determined that the company's 'revenue requirements calculation is not unreasonable,' but state regulators later asked for a closer look.
In that expanded scope audit, Blue Ridge found more than 20 payments to organizations related to former PUCO Chairman Sam Randazzo.
'I didn't know who he was,' Mullinax told attorneys for the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.
In all, the report indicated FirstEnergy funneled roughly $14.4 million to the Randazzo-connected entities, and many of those payments lacked supporting documents like a contract or purchase order.
DeWine says Randazzo's ties to First Energy were well known, but the evidence of this is lacking
As part of a 2021 deferred prosecution agreement, FirstEnergy acknowledged paying a $4.3 million bribe to Randazzo, identified as 'public official B,' for 'performing official action in his capacity as PUCO Chairman to further FirstEnergy Corp.'s interests.'
This Friday, FirstEnergy's former Senior Vice President, Dennis Chack will testify. He's the first of six high ranking officials who used to worked at FirstEnergy who will take the stand. Chack previously pled the Fifth, but has been granted immunity from prosecution to share information relevant to the case.
Last week, U.S. Rep. Emilia Sykes, D-OH, joined six other lawmakers last week introducing what they're calling their 'End Corruption Now' agenda.
The proposals include a lifetime ban on members of congress lobbying and requiring members put investments in a blind trust, among others.
Sykes' Closing Bribery Loopholes Act zeroes in on the definition of an 'official act.' She pointed to charges against former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, who accepted lavish gifts from a political donor.
A federal district court convicted him of wire fraud among other charges and the appeals court affirmed the ruling. But in 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned his conviction.
'The court ruled that those favors did not meet the very narrow definition of an official act under federal law,' Sykes argued. 'That decision blew a hole in anti-corruption safeguards and set precedent that made it easier for public officials to sell access, influence and prestige without facing any consequences.'
She explained the issue is important to her in light of Ohio's recent history; Sykes was serving in the Ohio House at the time of HB 6's passage and voted against the bill. She argued Ohio 'had a lot of work to do' in the wake of the scandal that landed former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder behind bars.
Attorneys for Householder, Borges 'hopeful' following pardon for Cincinnati politician
'Unfortunately, that work has not started in the state house of Ohio,' Sykes argued, and so she's attempting to address the problem at the national level.
Just two months ago, state lawmakers finally approved legislation eliminating the HB 6 rider propping up aging coal plants.
More recently, the Senate's version of the state budget includes provisions allowing corporations and labor unions to make independent expenditures in political campaigns — like running ads for or against a given candidate.
Unlike donating directly to a candidate's campaign, which is capped, independent expenditures have no upper limit.
With the Senate's changes in place, the money FirstEnergy funneled to dark money groups controlled by Householder would be perfectly legal, so long as the expenditures were properly reported.
'Let me clear, when we allow public officials to use their power for personal gain and shield them from accountability, it undermines democracy itself,' Sykes insisted.
'This bill and the broader end corruption now agenda is about restoring public trust and ensuring that no one — no one — is above a law,' she said. 'Not a governor, not a president, not a Speaker of the House.'
Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Honduran family freed from detention after lawsuit against ICE courthouse arrests
Honduran family freed from detention after lawsuit against ICE courthouse arrests

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea day ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Honduran family freed from detention after lawsuit against ICE courthouse arrests

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A mother and her two young children from Honduras who had filed what was believed to be the first lawsuit involving children challenging the Trump administration's policy on immigrant arrests at courthouses have been released from detention, civil rights groups and attorneys for the family said Thursday. The lawsuit filed on behalf of the mother identified as 'Ms. Z,' her 6-year-old son and her 9-year-old daughter, said they were arrested outside the courtroom after an immigration court hearing in Los Angeles. They had been held for weeks in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Texas. Their identities have not been released because of concerns for their safety. The lawsuit said that the family entered the U.S. legally using a Biden-era appointment app and that their arrest violated their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizure and their Fifth Amendment right to due process. The family's lawyers said the boy had also recently undergone chemotherapy treatment for leukemia and his mother feared his health was declining while in detention. The family was released late Wednesday while their lawsuit was still pending, and they went to a shelter in South Texas before they plan to return to their lives in the Los Angeles area, said Columbia Law School professor Elora Mukherjee, one of the lawyers representing the family. 'They will go back to their lives, to church, and school, and the family will continue to pursue their asylum case. And hopefully the little boy will get the medical attention he needs,' Mukherjee said. 'They never should have been arrested and detained in the first place. We are grateful they have been released.' Department of Homeland Security officials did not immediately respond to an email request for comment. Last week, the agency posted on social media that the boy 'has been seen regularly by medical personnel since arriving at the Dilley facility.' Starting in May, the country has seen large-scale arrests in which asylum-seekers appearing at routine hearings have been arrested outside courtrooms as part of the White House's mass deportation effort. In many cases, a judge will grant a government lawyer's request to dismiss deportation proceedings and then U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers will arrest the person and place them on 'expedited removal,' a fast track to deportation. Lawyers for the 'Z' family said their lawsuit was the first one filed on behalf of children to challenge the ICE courthouse arrest policy. There have been other similar lawsuits, including in New York, where a federal judge ruled last month that federal immigration authorities can't make civil arrests at the state's courthouses or arrest anyone going there for a proceeding. 'The Z family's release demonstrates the power we have when we fight back against harmful, un-American policies," said Kate Gibson Kumar, staff attorney for the Beyond Borders Program of the Texas Civil Rights Project. The family's lawyers have said that during their hearing before a judge, the mother said they wished to continue their cases for asylum. Homeland Security moved to dismiss their cases, and the judge immediately granted that motion. When they stepped out of the courtroom, they found men in civilian clothing believed to be ICE agents who arrested the family, Mukherjee said. They spent about 11 hours at an immigrant processing center in Los Angeles and were each only given an apple, a small packet of cookies, a juice box and water. At one point, an officer near the boy lifted his shirt, revealing his gun. The boy urinated on himself and was left in wet clothing until the next morning, Mukherjee said.

Honduran family freed from detention after lawsuit against ICE courthouse arrests
Honduran family freed from detention after lawsuit against ICE courthouse arrests

Hamilton Spectator

timea day ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Honduran family freed from detention after lawsuit against ICE courthouse arrests

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A mother and her two young children from Honduras who had filed what was believed to be the first lawsuit involving children challenging the Trump administration's policy on immigrant arrests at courthouses have been released from detention, civil rights groups and attorneys for the family said Thursday. The lawsuit filed on behalf of the mother identified as 'Ms. Z,' her 6-year-old son and her 9-year-old daughter, said they were arrested outside the courtroom after an immigration court hearing in Los Angeles. They had been held for weeks in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Texas . Their identities have not been released because of concerns for their safety. The lawsuit said that the family entered the U.S. legally using a Biden-era appointment app and that their arrest violated their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizure and their Fifth Amendment right to due process. The family's lawyers said the boy had also recently undergone chemotherapy treatment for leukemia and his mother feared his health was declining while in detention. The family was released late Wednesday while their lawsuit was still pending, and they went to a shelter in South Texas before they plan to return to their lives in the Los Angeles area, said Columbia Law School professor Elora Mukherjee, one of the lawyers representing the family. 'They will go back to their lives, to church, and school, and the family will continue to pursue their asylum case. And hopefully the little boy will get the medical attention he needs,' Mukherjee said. 'They never should have been arrested and detained in the first place. We are grateful they have been released.' Department of Homeland Security officials did not immediately respond to an email request for comment. Last week, the agency posted on social media that the boy 'has been seen regularly by medical personnel since arriving at the Dilley facility.' Starting in May, the country has seen large-scale arrests in which asylum-seekers appearing at routine hearings have been arrested outside courtrooms as part of the White House's mass deportation effort. In many cases, a judge will grant a government lawyer's request to dismiss deportation proceedings and then U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers will arrest the person and place them on 'expedited removal,' a fast track to deportation. Lawyers for the 'Z' family said their lawsuit was the first one filed on behalf of children to challenge the ICE courthouse arrest policy. There have been other similar lawsuits, including in New York, where a federal judge ruled last month that federal immigration authorities can't make civil arrests at the state's courthouses or arrest anyone going there for a proceeding. 'The Z family's release demonstrates the power we have when we fight back against harmful, un-American policies,' said Kate Gibson Kumar, staff attorney for the Beyond Borders Program of the Texas Civil Rights Project. The family's lawyers have said that during their hearing before a judge, the mother said they wished to continue their cases for asylum. Homeland Security moved to dismiss their cases, and the judge immediately granted that motion. When they stepped out of the courtroom, they found men in civilian clothing believed to be ICE agents who arrested the family, Mukherjee said. They spent about 11 hours at an immigrant processing center in Los Angeles and were each only given an apple, a small packet of cookies, a juice box and water. At one point, an officer near the boy lifted his shirt, revealing his gun. The boy urinated on himself and was left in wet clothing until the next morning, Mukherjee said. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

S.F. drag performer detained by ICE after asylum hearing
S.F. drag performer detained by ICE after asylum hearing

San Francisco Chronicle​

time6 days ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

S.F. drag performer detained by ICE after asylum hearing

A San Francisco drag performer was detained by immigration enforcement officers after his asylum hearing in immigration court Thursday morning, one of the latest among at least 20 people in San Francisco to be subject to a new Trump administration practice of courthouse arrests. The man, an immigrant from Central America who performs under the drag name Hilary Rivers, is gay and has a pending asylum application based on 'traumatic and severe' persecution he experienced in his home country that led him to flee to the U.S., according to Milli Atkinson, legal director at the San Francisco Immigrant Legal Defense Collaborative, who heads up the city's Rapid Response Network that responds to immigration enforcement actions. At Rivers' immigration hearing, the government attorney moved for the case to be dismissed, but the judge denied it. Rivers was arrested as he was leaving court, Atkinson said. A Rapid Response Network attorney on site was able to advise Rivers on his rights to prevent the government deporting him in error, Atkinson said. His attorney has since located him at an ICE detention facility in Bakersfield, she said. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Hilary-River's (@hilary_riversh) The Chronicle has reached out to Immigration and Customs Enforcement for comment. U.S. law grants asylum seekers like Rivers the right to remain in the United States while their asylum claim is pending, but the government has argued that it has the right to detain such individuals, which has been challenged in court before. Under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment's right to due process, immigrants also generally have the right to a hearing in front of an immigration judge before they're deported, with some exceptions. However, since late May, federal immigration authorities under President Donald Trump's administration have started a new practice where the government attorney in an immigration hearing would file a motion for the judge to dismiss the case so that the person would lose protections from deportation afforded to those with pending immigration proceedings. After the judge dismisses it, ICE agents would arrest the immigrant and detain them for expedited removal, or deportation without a hearing, a federal power that's under Biden was reserved for those arrested at the border within two weeks of their arrival. Authorities have also been detaining people whose cases were not dismissed by immigration judges, including Rivers, Atkinson said. Of the, at least 20, people who the San Francisco Rapid Response Network confirmed had been subject to 'courthouse arrests,' she said only two of them had cases dismissed by judges. The rest, she said, are still in active proceedings and the majority have a pending asylum application. Atkinson said she has confirmed that the government then moves a person's case to appear before an immigration judge who is more willing to grant the motion to dismiss, so they can deport the person. 'It's a complete, flagrant violation of what our asylum system was built on,' Atkinson said. 'He was doing everything, complying with every rule there could possibly be. Every day he's been in the U.S. has been lawful.' Rivers was paroled — legally admitted — into the U.S. through a Biden-era program called CBP One, which granted permission to about 900,000 migrants to enter the U.S.-Mexico border. Trump has since cancelled the program and revoked parole from those who entered through it, but the move is facing legal challenges. The Trump administration justified the mass revocation of parole as a way to secure U.S. borders and protect nation security. Trump has argued the program was illegal in the first place. The night before he was detained, Rivers performed at a long-running queer pride pageant event called Miss & Mr. Safe Latino, started 30 years ago in response to the HIV epidemic at the now-closed Mission District bar Esta Noche, which had been a hub for queer Latinos. 'There's not a more textbook case of what asylum was created for than a case like his,' Atkinson said. 'To have them take him away from his community during Pride Week, when he's fleeing persecution for his queer identity, and when he had just participated in that pageant … is just horrific to me, is just a disgrace, and people should really be outraged and ashamed by what our government is doing.' Advocates have voiced concern over bad conditions in overcrowded ICE detention facilities as the Trump administration detained a record 56,000 people as of June 15, about 72% of whom have no criminal records, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a data organization. The courthouse arrests have caused a 'real panic' in the undocumented immigrant community, causing people to be afraid to go to their hearings, Atkinson said. But if they fail to appear for their hearings, they can be ordered deported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store