
Swami Vivekananda for beginners: The orator who taught the world tolerance
Except, of course, for that other 9/11 in 1893, when a saffron-robed monk stood before the World's Parliament of Religions in Chicago, folded his hands, and thundered:
'Sisters and brothers of America…'
It was the first time an Indian addressed the West as an equal, not as a subordinate.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The applause thundered for two minutes. In that instant, Swami Vivekananda became the roaring voice of a civilisation long silenced.
And today, July 4, 2025, is his 162nd birthday. A day that reminds India not just of a monk in ochre robes, but of the lion who taught her to roar again.
For beginners, Swami Vivekananda was born as Narendranath Datta in 1863, in a Calcutta teeming with imperial arrogance and native despair.
He was no child saint meditating under a peepal tree. He was the neighbourhood terror: fighting wrestling bouts, belting out classical ragas, and interrogating priests on whether they had actually seen God.
His restlessness led him to Dakshineswar, to a mystic named Ramakrishna. Narendra asked the question burning within him: 'Have you seen God?'
Ramakrishna smiled and replied, 'Yes, I see Him as clearly as I see you.'
That answer set Narendra on fire. Under Ramakrishna, he discovered that God was not a faraway being in the clouds but the living divinity within every creature. When his guru passed, Narendra renounced his identity as a lawyer's son and became Swami Vivekananda – bliss of discernment, the monk with a thunderbolt mind.
He walked barefoot across India. He slept under trees, shared stale rotis with starving farmers, listened to the cries of widows, and saw the real India – not the British caricature of snake-charmers and famine skeletons, but a civilisation wounded yet radiating eternal wisdom.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
His travels birthed an unbreakable conviction: India's rebirth would not come from imported ideologies or borrowed revolutions. It would come when her people realised their own inherent strength.
'Arise, awake, and stop not till the goal is reached,' he said. For Vivekananda, this was not a motivational slogan. It was a civilisational commandment.
When he arrived in Chicago for the Parliament of Religions, he had no formal invitation, no wealthy patron.
Yet his presence was magnetic. On September 11, 1893, he rose to speak – not to convert, but to awaken.
'We believe not only in universal tolerance, but we accept all religions as true,' he declared.
His words were like a Himalayan breeze cutting through the stale air of Western supremacy. Here was a man who spoke with the confidence of a civilisation that had pondered infinity while Europe was still painting itself blue to hunt mammoths.
Swami Vivekananda's genius lay in his simplicity. He took the dense verses of Vedanta and distilled them into blazing truths:
Each soul is potentially divine.
Religion is the manifestation of this divinity within.
For him, religion was not ritual. It was strength, action, and fearless pursuit of truth. He once said, 'You will be nearer to Heaven through football than through the Bhagavad Gita.'
Imagine that. In an India where boys were scolded for playing in the sun, here was a monk telling them to build biceps before quoting shlokas.
Because he knew spirituality without strength becomes escapism. A nation of cowards chanting Sanskrit verses cannot uplift itself.
Another story often forgotten is how, during his travels, he stayed with people of all castes, eating with scavengers and sleeping in huts. When orthodox critics attacked him, he replied:
'
Call me whatever you like. I am only the servant of the poor, the downtrodden, the oppressed.'
He saw India's future in education – but not rote learning that produced clerks. He wanted an education that built character, inspired fearlessness, and created men and women with nerves of steel and hearts of compassion.
He said: 'Give me a few men and women who are pure and selfless and I shall shake the world.'
For the West, Vivekananda was the first Hindu monk they could not patronise. They invited him to lecture at Harvard and meet industrialists.
Yet he never once fawned or flattered. He told them that while their material prosperity was admirable, their spiritual poverty was glaring.
He saw India as the lighthouse of spiritual knowledge. Not in arrogance, but as a duty to share what was universal. And yet, he never romanticised poverty. He called for industries, science, technology – but rooted in Dharma, so India would never become a third-rate clone of Europe.
Today, when you see his images circulating on WhatsApp, know that he was not just a quote bank for gym bros and motivational speakers. He was the blazing force that ignited India's psychological independence decades before political freedom came.
He was the monk who made India see herself not as a victim, but as a Vishwa Guru – a teacher to the world.
On his birthday today, it is worth remembering what he really stood for:
Strength, not sentimentality.
Universalism, not narrowness.
Fearless enquiry, not blind faith.
Action, not escapism.
Service, not selfishness.
He said, 'They alone live who live for others, the rest are more dead than alive.'
And he lived those words till his last breath at the age of 39. In four short decades, he compressed centuries of wisdom into a life that continues to inspire revolutionaries, scientists, monks, and students alike.
9/11 may have become a symbol of hate in modern history. But that other 9/11 in 1893 gave humanity a message it still struggles to practise:
That the world is one family, and each of us carries within a spark of the infinite.
For beginners, this is Swami Vivekananda:
The lion who taught India to roar – with strength, wisdom, and unbreakable dignity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
23 minutes ago
- United News of India
NDA is best place to install statue of warrior Bajirao Peshwa: Amit Shah
Pune, July 4 (UNI) Union Home Minister Amit Shah today said that National Defence Academy (NDA) is the best place for installing the statue of great warrior, Bajirao Peshwa. Shah was speaking to a gathering after unveiling the statue of Thorle Bajirao Peshwa within the NDA premises. "Peshwa was entrusted with the title by Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj at the age of just nineteen. He transformed Swarajya into an empire," Shah said. "Bajirao Peshwa fought 41 wars in his 20-year tenure and won all of them. I don't think any other warrior has such a history", Shah said. The war strategy of the great Bajirao Peshwa is timeless, he said. "If we study it and decide our strategy, no one will look at India with an evil eye", said Union Home Minister. He said Punyanagari (Pune) is the land of heroes. "Lokmanya Tilak gave the first call to fight against the British for freedom from Pune. Veer Savarkar showed how much a single person can do for the country," he added. UNI SP PRS


News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Explained: What Russia's Recognition Of Taliban Government Means For Afghan Diplomacy
Last Updated: Sources told News18 that Russia's recognition is considered a step in the right direction for the Taliban regime but short of full international legitimacy. Russia officially recognised the Taliban government of Afghanistan on July 3, 2025, becoming the first nation to do so and signaling a major diplomatic change in the region. The step, which was announced following a meeting in Kabul between Russian Ambassador Dmitry Zhirnov and Afghanistan's Acting Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi, has been labeled by Afghan officials as a 'historic step" and the start of a new era in bilateral relations. But the significance of this recognition remains complicated, since formal international validation of the Taliban is still dependent upon the United Nations and global opinion. Sources told News18 that Russia's recognition is considered a step in the right direction for the Taliban regime but short of full international legitimacy. Sources highlight that formal recognition from the UN protocol division is required, and until that time comes, the Taliban will be diplomatically isolated. The development is considered part of a larger trend with most nations interacting with the Taliban at various levels to secure their interests and ensure regional stability. India has followed a watchful but pragmatic policy towards the Taliban regime. Although New Delhi has not officially recognised the Taliban, it has resumed a diplomatic mission in Kabul and permitted the Taliban to send a Consul General to Mumbai. Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri just held talks with Taliban representatives, which was the highest level of interaction since the Taliban came to power. India's engagement is motivated by security interests, competition for influence in the region against China, and an interest in keeping a handle on Afghanistan. Russia's Diplomatic Revitalisation: From Isolation to Engagement Russia's relationship with the Taliban has evolved dramatically over the past two decades. In 2003, Russia designated the Taliban as a terrorist organisation due to its support for separatists in the North Caucasus. However, the Taliban's resurgence in 2021 and the shifting geopolitical landscape prompted Moscow to reassess its stance. In April 2025, Russia's Supreme Court removed the Taliban from its list of banned organizations, paving the way for official recognition. The Announcement and What It Means Russia's Foreign Ministry made the announcement that it accepted credentials from Afghanistan's newly appointed Ambassador Gul Hassan Hassan, marking the beginning of 'productive bilateral cooperation." The ministry highlighted that this acknowledgement would promote cooperation in the fields of energy, agriculture, and anti-terrorism. Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi welcomed the move, terming it a 'good example for other countries" and hoping that it would spur further global involvement. Why did Russia Embrace the Taliban? Strategic Interests Russia's move is based on pragmatic reasons. Moscow considers the Taliban a ground reality and feels that talking to them is necessary in order to protect its interests in Central Asia. The Kremlin is seriously troubled by the ISKP threat, which carried out attacks in Afghanistan as well as Russia. By accepting the Taliban, Russia hopes to enhance security cooperation and counter-terrorism. Economic Opportunities Russia is also interested in huge economic benefits that can be derived from Afghanistan, especially in areas like energy, transportation, and agriculture. The Russian Foreign Ministry pointed to the promise of trade and infrastructure initiatives, which could be mutually advantageous for both nations. This economic aspect is a major reason Moscow is ready to normalise relations with the Taliban. Regional Influence By assuming the lead in recognising the Taliban, Russia becomes a central figure in deciding Afghanistan's future. This decision is most probably aimed at projecting greater Russian influence in the region and establishing a precedent for other nations to do the same. It also constitutes part of Russia's larger policy of interacting with regimes that risk being isolated by the West and thus increasing its diplomatic presence. Engagement Without Recognition: The Global Approach China has also dealt with the Taliban at multiple levels. Beijing has entertained Taliban ambassadors and permitted them to hold sway over Afghanistan's embassy in China, but not formal recognition. China is guided by economic interests, security concerns, and also a reluctance to be seen as the first major power to recognise the Taliban's controversial policies. top videos View all Other Countries Some other nations, such as Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan, have established diplomatic ties with the Taliban but stopped short of conferring formal recognition. Such engagement is usually driven by regional, economic, or security interests, but all fall short of overt diplomatic support. First Published:


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Govt doesn't take stand on matters of faith, says MEA on Dalai succession issue
NEW DELHI: Following remarks by Union minister Kiren Rijiju backing the Dalai Lama's announcement about his succession, including the statement that China will have no role in it, India on Friday said it had taken no position on what was an issue concerning faith and religion. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Interestingly, the Chinese foreign ministry, after cautioning India at a media briefing, according to agency reports from Beijing, against interfering in Tibetan affairs at the expense of Sino-India ties, omitted its comments objecting to Rijiju's remarks from the official transcript of the briefing. "Govt of India does not take any position or speak on matters concerning beliefs and practices of faith and religion," foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, responding to media queries. Govt committed to protecting freedom of religion for everyone in India, says MEA The MEA spokesperson added that Indian govt has always upheld freedom of religion for all in India and would continue to do so. India's ties with China have shown signs of improvement in the past nine months, since they resolved the almost-five-year-long border stand-off in eastern Ladakh, leading to resumption of high-level bilateral visits. Amid global uncertainties, both sides seem keen to maintain a steady working relationship. Defence minister Rajnath Singh visited China last month for a meeting of the SCO defence ministers. NSA Ajit Doval has twice visited China since PM Modi's meeting with President Xi Jinping in Oct last year on the margins of the Brics summit in Russia. As special representative for boundary talks, Wang himself is likely to visit India this month for talks with Doval. India, however, is yet to confirm Modi's participation in the SCO summit in China in Sept. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Unlike the US, which officially maintains that China has no role to play in the Dalai Lama's succession, India has never taken any position on the issue. China maintains that the successor to the 14th Dalai Lama can only be appointed through the "traditional" process that includes approval by the central govt. In rare remarks by an Indian minister, Rijiju had backed the spiritual leader's assertion that no one else other than his trust would help choose his successor. The minister clarified on Friday that he wasn't speaking on behalf of the Indian govt but as a devotee himself, expressing the perspective of the Dalai Lama's followers. "All over the world, the people who follow Buddhism and who believe in the sacred, supreme Dalai Lama-ji... it is everyone's wish that the Dalai Lama-ji himself will decide. There is no need for govt of India or for me to say anything. I am speaking as a follower. I am not saying anything on... the Chinese govt's statement," the minister said.