Long-awaited Stormont anti-poverty plan criticised as ‘underwhelming'
He described it as being based on three pillars of minimising risks of falling into poverty, minimising the impact of poverty on people's lives and working to help people get out of poverty.
Figures indicated that around 18% of those in Northern Ireland live in relative poverty, and 15% live in absolute poverty, with 25% of children living in relative poverty and 21% of children living in absolute poverty.
The strategic commitments from across departments include continuing the Extended Schools Programme, working with partners to scope out an NI Debt Relief Scheme, a commitment to develop an Executive Disability Strategy and a Fuel Poverty Strategy.
Speaking in the Assembly, Mr Lyons described a 'legacy of delay' in taking forward an anti-poverty strategy.
'When I took office, I made it clear that one of my priorities would be tackling poverty,' he told MLAs.
'After a legacy of delay in taking this work forward, I wanted to work at pace to develop a strategy which could help make a meaningful difference to those experiencing socio-economic disadvantage in our society.
'I and my Executive colleagues have worked to develop a strategy which we will make progress against and can and will make a difference to people's lives.
'This strategy is the culmination of considerable hard work, collaboration and co-design, and I want to thank all those stakeholders, in particular the members of the anti-poverty co-design group, who have worked with my department in providing their input.
'We often hear about the silo approach in government, but I know that ministers and officials across the executive departments have worked together on the draft in a spirit of co-operation and collective ownership.'
He added that targets will come later with an action plan.
SDLP MLA Mark H Durkan described the strategy as 'underwhelming' (Liam McBurney/PA)
Mark H Durkan from the official Opposition at Stormont described the document as 'underwhelming'.
He contended it didn't just 'call into question the Executive's ability to tackle poverty', but also their appetite and ambition to do so.
Mr Lyons hit back, claiming Mr Durkan was 'wrong on every point that he made'.
'It has been 17 years that we have been waiting for this document, and after 17 months in office, I have been able to bring this forward,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Belfast Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Public services watchdog drops probe into conduct allegations against Alliance councillor
Two Newry, Mourne and Down District Council elected members had made claim and counter-claim against one another over conduct allegations. The Local Democracy Reporting Service contacted the Local Government Commissioner for Standards for an update to its conduct assessment of Mournes rep Jill Truesdale. A spokesperson said: 'The case against the councillor in Newry, Mourne and Down District Council was closed at assessment with a decision of no further action.' Alliance councillor Ms Truesdale initially made an official complaint against NMDDC's now former chairperson Pete Byrne of the SDLP. The alleged conduct was said to have occurred during an emergency Mourne Gateway programme board meeting on Friday May 2. However, the Commissioner's Office dropped the matter following assessment. The Slieve Gullion SDLP rep then launched a complaint against the Alliance councillor, which has now also been 'closed'. Watch: Plane lands in Belfast during Storm Floris The LDRS contacted Cllr Truesdale, but she did not want to comment. Cllr Byrne was also contacted without response. However, speaking previously on the matter he said: 'I've no further comment to make on whether a complaint has been made or not, but I am disappointed to be contacted by the media on something that is confidential.'
ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
Stormont minister advised Belfast Grand Central Irish signs decision should have gone to Executive
UTV has seen correspondence between the Communities minister Gordon Lyons and the Infrastructure minister Liz Kimmins which shows government solicitors believe introducing Irish language signage at Grand Central Station in Belfast is a cross-cutting and controversial decision, which should have been referred to the Executive. Back in March new-in-post Infrastructure minister Liz Kimmins announced she was to introduce Irish Language signage at Grand Central Station at a cost of £150,000. DUP ministers reacted furiously to the announcement, insisting the matter was controversial and cross-cutting - ie. its impact cuts across two or more government departments. In those circumstances, Stormont ministers are required to bring matter to the Executive for agreement from other ministers. When the matter was discussed at the Executive days later, the deputy First Minister Emma Little Pengelly branded the move "utterly shambolic". At the time she told the post-meeting press conference: "I reaffirmed our clear view that this issue is controversial. Therefore it should have been brought to the Executive Committee for agreement. We will be seeking additional information and considering the way forward." She added: 'All controversial, significant or cross-cutting matters do have that legal responsibility in terms of ministers bringing that to the Executive." But it didn't end there. Loyalist activist Jamie Bryson announced he was launching a legal challenge to the decision. UTV later revealed the Communities minister Gordon Lyons had also decided to legally challenge the move and so had intervened in the Bryson case. Now UTV has seen correspondence which reveals Liz Kimmins and Gordon Lyons were at odds from the moment the announcement was made. In no less than seven letters, exchanged between March and and June, the two ministers disagreed over whether the decision was cross cutting and controversial. Finally on 28th May the Communities minister wrote to his Infrastructure counterpart saying he had received legal advice from the Departmental Solicitor's Office. He writes: "That advice confirms that your decision meets the test for 'controversial' and 'cross cutting' and should have been referred to the Executive for discussion and agreement prior to being made." He again urges Mrs Kimmins to bring the matter to the Executive for discussion. On June 20th Mrs Kimmins replied insisting, again, that as Infrastructure minister "any decision in relation to the provision of public transport clearly falls within my remit." In reference to the legal action she went on to say it would be "preferable if we discussed the matter to reach a better mutual understanding of our positions before escalating this matter unnecessarily". When UTV asked Mrs Kimmins about the correspondence the minister stuck to her position. She said: "I wasn't advised to go to the Executive but I am confident, and still am confident, that it didn't need to happen. However as there are legal proceedings and the minister for Communities has joined the legal proceedings I think that's all I can really say at this stage as it is now in the hands of the court." If the court finds in favour of the Infrastructure minister the work to introduce Irish language signage will go ahead unimpeded. However, if the matter is resolved in favour of Mr Bryson and the Communities minister, the Infrastructure minister will come under considerable pressure to bring to matter to the Executive for agreement. The High Court hearing is due to take place on September 25th. Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know.
ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins confirms A5 court judgment will be appealed
A court ruling that the new A5 road in the west of Northern Ireland should not go ahead is to be appealed, Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins has confirmed. Speaking during a visit to Ballygawley, Co Tyrone, Ms Kimmins said her department would be pushing forward imminently ahead of the deadline for an appeal on Friday. In June, High Court judge Mr Justice McAlinden quashed the Executive move to approve the roads project following a legal challenge from a group including residents, farmers and landowners. The judge said the proposed scheme breached sections of Stormont's Climate Change Act as it did not demonstrate how it would comply with the commitment to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. There have been more than 50 deaths on the A5, which links Londonderry with Aughnacloy in Co Tyrone, since 2006 leading it to be branded Northern Ireland's most dangerous. Ms Kimmins said: 'I certainly will not be found wanting in terms of the work that has gone into this and that will continue to go into this to ensure that we get this road built and get it built in the shortest possible time. 'Just today we have heard of another collision. That is at the forefront of my mind in absolutely everything we do. 'We have been working across the weekend, this is the priority every single day and will continue to be. I will ensure that we present the most robust case.' Ms Kimmins said her department would be working closely with the Enough is Enough group, which has campaigned for the road to be upgraded, as part of the appeal. She said: 'This was the very first test of the (Climate Change) Act and officials are working very closely with officials in Daera to look at this and looking at how we can rectify that. 'We are looking at everything here and an appeal is our first step.' DUP MLA Deborah Erskine said the appeal was a 'valid legal route', but it would 'inevitably take time'. She added: 'What is unclear from the minister is how the appeal will address Justice McAlinden's clear reference to climate targets supported by Sinn Fein, the Alliance Party and the SDLP in his ruling. 'These targets were a key factor in the project being blocked by the court, and unless those parties act to resolve the consequences of their own policies, they risk holding up not just the A5 but a range of vital infrastructure projects across Northern Ireland.' Mr Esrkine said: 'The reality is that work on the A5 is not going to commence any time soon. 'These legal processes are lengthy, and the minister should also be looking urgently at what other steps can be taken now to make the A5 safer for all road users, and how to deal fairly with landowners impacted by the failures of DfI.' Campaign group A5 Enough is Enough have welcomed the announcement. Niall McKenna stated: "The announcement today that DfI have lodged an appeal to the recent A5 decision is very much welcomed by the A5 Enough Is Enough group. "It will also come as a relief to the families of victims of this road and will be very much supported by them. At our recent meeting, we implored the Department to act decisively in pursuing an appeal and we agree with this course of action. "Justice McAlinden's comments in his judgement are chilling, 'It is likely that delays in the progression of this scheme will coincide with the occurrence of further loss of life and serious injury.' Despite the so-called constraints and minutiae of statutes, legal precedents and caselaw, we still believe that fundamentally the law and the legal system are there to protect and serve the people. "The ultimate protection and service to the wider public is to save human life. We trust that the appeals court will reassert this sacrosanct right to life and bring back perspective to the matter. Enough people have died on the A5. It is high time the courts stopped future lives being lost on this cruel road.'
