Stormont minister advised Belfast Grand Central Irish signs decision should have gone to Executive
Back in March new-in-post Infrastructure minister Liz Kimmins announced she was to introduce Irish Language signage at Grand Central Station at a cost of £150,000.
DUP ministers reacted furiously to the announcement, insisting the matter was controversial and cross-cutting - ie. its impact cuts across two or more government departments.
In those circumstances, Stormont ministers are required to bring matter to the Executive for agreement from other ministers.
When the matter was discussed at the Executive days later, the deputy First Minister Emma Little Pengelly branded the move "utterly shambolic".
At the time she told the post-meeting press conference: "I reaffirmed our clear view that this issue is controversial. Therefore it should have been brought to the Executive Committee for agreement. We will be seeking additional information and considering the way forward."
She added: 'All controversial, significant or cross-cutting matters do have that legal responsibility in terms of ministers bringing that to the Executive."
But it didn't end there. Loyalist activist Jamie Bryson announced he was launching a legal challenge to the decision.
UTV later revealed the Communities minister Gordon Lyons had also decided to legally challenge the move and so had intervened in the Bryson case.
Now UTV has seen correspondence which reveals Liz Kimmins and Gordon Lyons were at odds from the moment the announcement was made.
In no less than seven letters, exchanged between March and and June, the two ministers disagreed over whether the decision was cross cutting and controversial.
Finally on 28th May the Communities minister wrote to his Infrastructure counterpart saying he had received legal advice from the Departmental Solicitor's Office.
He writes: "That advice confirms that your decision meets the test for 'controversial' and 'cross cutting' and should have been referred to the Executive for discussion and agreement prior to being made."
He again urges Mrs Kimmins to bring the matter to the Executive for discussion.
On June 20th Mrs Kimmins replied insisting, again, that as Infrastructure minister "any decision in relation to the provision of public transport clearly falls within my remit."
In reference to the legal action she went on to say it would be "preferable if we discussed the matter to reach a better mutual understanding of our positions before escalating this matter unnecessarily".
When UTV asked Mrs Kimmins about the correspondence the minister stuck to her position.
She said: "I wasn't advised to go to the Executive but I am confident, and still am confident, that it didn't need to happen. However as there are legal proceedings and the minister for Communities has joined the legal proceedings I think that's all I can really say at this stage as it is now in the hands of the court."
If the court finds in favour of the Infrastructure minister the work to introduce Irish language signage will go ahead unimpeded.
However, if the matter is resolved in favour of Mr Bryson and the Communities minister, the Infrastructure minister will come under considerable pressure to bring to matter to the Executive for agreement.
The High Court hearing is due to take place on September 25th.
Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
Readers' letters: We must not return to the days of Mary Whitehouse
A reader says freedom of expression should be defended, even if it might offend some people Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Speaking as someone who is usually in agreement with Susan Dalgety, it's also necessary to agree with her when she admits to being at risk of 'sounding like Mary Whitehouse' (Scotsman, 2 August) when criticising Channel 4's recent documentary on Tia Billinger – aka 'Bonnie Blue'. Such a broadcast might well make Ms Dalgety's 'skin crawl', but in a liberal democracy freedom of expression (within reason) must be respected even if it might offend some of us. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Those taking part in the event Ms Dalgety describes were all consenting adults participating in an entirely legal activity. Thankfully, we are not living in Franco's Spain or the repressive Roman Catholic Ireland of the 1930s-1980s as portrayed in Edna O'Brian's novels, once banned by Irish censors. Mary Whitehouse, as president of the National Viewers' and Listeners' Association, was a vigorous campaigner against what she perceived to be excessive sex, violence and bad language on screen and stage (Picture: Les Lee/Daily Express/) Radical feminists might wish to reflect on the irony that those countries which prohibit pornography (such as Iran and Afghanistan) are the very same states where women are most oppressed and are denied human rights. By objecting to this Bonnie Blue documentary, Susan Dalgety unwittingly aligns herself not only with Mrs Whitehouse's campaign to 'clean up' television, but also President Ronald Reagan's failed attempt to close down America's adult entertainment industry back in the 1980s. Martin O'Gorman, Edinburgh Spanish Inquisition Jenny Lindsay (Scotsman, 2 August) quite correctly criticises John Swinney's reference to Scotland as 'the birthplace of the Enlightenment" when he and his government and his acolytes, have spent years introducing and enacting laws to strangle freedom of thought and expression in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I'd add to Ms Lindsay's list ot taboo subjects any hint of challenge to the current diktats on measures to live with climate change, as Christine Jardine points out in her article, 'Milliband's moving to end North Sea oil too quickly' (Scotsman, 4 August). Also that successive governments' policies on housing the increasing number of asylum seekers entering the country illegally have driven so many people to protest in public, often for the first time in their lives, and are dismissed as being members of 'the far right'. As Ms Lindsay notes, in the context of gender issues and Israel/Palestine, 'perfectly ordinary viewpoints are twisted erroneously by people seeming incapable of critically analysing anything other than cereal packets'. The 1998 romcom Sliding Doors had a running trope: 'No-one expects the Spanish Inquisition.' Little did we think when we laughed then that we'd be living through a modern version of the Inquisition in 2025. Lovina Roe, Perth, Perth & Kinross Bank balance I agree with the granting of consent to Berwick Bank wind farm. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Two correspondents to your letters page (2 August) mention an estimate of 31,000 bird deaths over the wind farm's 30-year life span. This is about 1,033 a year, averaging 2.83 bird deaths a day. For perspective, estimates of the number of garden birds killed by domestic cats in the UK each year are in a range of 40 to 70 million. The Mammal Society's study in 2003 estimated UK cats kill 55 million birds annually. That's an average of 150,684 bird deaths a day. The Civil Aviation Authority's 2017 report on 'Wildlife hazard management at aerodromes' shows that where deterrence fails to reduce the risk of birds to aircraft, birds will be shot. So human desires to have cats and to fly in aircraft have priority over the lives of birds. SSE Renewables said on 31 July that Berwick Bank has secured two connection points, at Dunbar and Blyth in Northumberland, to the UK electricity grid, and the trade association Renewable UK said on 31 July 'the approval of Berwick Bank Offshore Wind Farm is a pivotal milestone for Britain's energy transition'. Berwick Bank wind farm will benefit people in Scotland and England, and I think many of your correspondents and readers will agree with that. E Campbell, Newton Mearns, East Renfrewshire Sheer madness I recently read in horror that the Berwick Bank wind farm array had been provisionally approved despite the number of complaints and the fact that it will kill thousands of seabirds, (some breeds of which are in decline), due to the relative proximity of the array to their breeding sites. I can also only assume that the decision-maker have not seen, or totally ignored the figures being produced on the Octopus Energy 'UK's Wasted Windpower tracker' site which not only shows that as I write, to date this year more than £716m in wind power has been wasted but also that the nearby Seagreen array (also owned by SSE) has been closed down 71 per cent of the time because the grid cannot handle the amount of energy generated in higher wind situations. Although producing nothing, SSE is paid millions of pounds in 'constraints payments' which are added to every electrical bill. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is widely accepted that Scotland has a major issue with the amount of energy it can handle from its wind farms and that this issue will take years to resolve. In the interim adding another extremely large array. which will only increase energy bills and kill thousands of seabirds when it is operating, is sheer madness. Ralph Bebbington, Crediton, Devon Not so green In an open letter to John Swinney, signed by 18 environmental and civic groups including Friends of the Earth and Stop Climate Chaos Scotland, he was asked to stop the increasing level of plastic pollution in Scotland (Scotsman, 4 August). It is quite ironic that just days before, permission was given for the world's largest wind farm consisting of 307 turbines at Berwick Bank. These turbines will have plastic components: plastic coating on the copper wires and the turbine blades are made of polymer composite materials – plastics within which fibres or particles are embedded as reinforcement. These blades cannot be recycled but end up in landfill. With 100,000 tons of turbine blades disposed of annually in the UK and 329,000 wind turbines globally there is a huge environmental problem that Friends of the Earth etc dare not mention. Clark Cross, Linlithgow, West Lothian Pope for peace Pope Leo XVI celebrated his three months in office with a youth mass on the theme of peace (Scotsman, 4 August). He's fast making a reputation of being a peacemaking Pope. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Quietly, he's negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine, having twice met with Vlodomir Zelensky and phoned Vladimir Putin. As a long-serving member of the Augustinian fraternity, his watch words are unity and peace. One of his first acts as Pope, was to visit the fraternity, which he had led prior to becoming Pope, assuring his former colleagues that 'they were still his brothers'. In contrast to his predecessor, the charismatic Pope Francis, Pope Leo has been described as an introvert, who is very much a team player. Much of his papacy is spent listening and, as he said to the young people, patiently and tirelessly, trying to resolve conflict by, not fearsome weapons, but long-term negotiation, a quality, much needed in our war-torn world. We are blessed to have such a Pope. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Dual purpose Rachel Amery (Scotsman, 4 August) writes about the dualling of the A1. Yes, a need not just for those that use the A1 from Alnwick to Dunbar which is the only part not a dual carriageway at present, but for the whole transport industry which over uses the M74 and A66. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What she fails to highlight is that it was Conservative Ian Lang. as Scottish Secretary, who stopped the programme to dual the A1 between Newcastle and Edinburgh in the early 1990s. Robert Anderson, Dunning, Perth & Kinross Don't be fooled The latest misguided ruse of Robert IG Scott (Letters, 2 August), with the aim of having Holyrood abolished in favour of direct rule from Westminster, is to promote a unionist cabal offering 'radical changes' in order to defeat the SNP. While recent polling has shown consistent support for independence at around 50 per cent or greater, one suspects that the polling levels of support would be significantly higher if the BBC and much of the media in Scotland were not seemingly preoccupied with seeking stories to denigrate the Scottish Government and the SNP. What is certain is that a clear majority, possibly approaching the 75 per cent of the devolution referendum, think that the people of Scotland should be able to determine their own future (even if individually some might not yet be ready to vote for independence in a referendum). Those who still think that Scotland should remain in a dysfunctional Union and believe that they represent the majority view of the people of Scotland should be prepared to back that belief in a democratic manner and support calls for a constitutional referendum should Scotland, in 2026, again elect a majority of MSPs supporting independence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad With Brexit, Covid, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the ongoing slaughter in Gaza there have been significant changes in the UK and around the world. Those who would deny the people of Scotland from having a second constitutional referendum at the earliest realistic date of 2028 (14 years after 2014 and double the period available to the UK citizens of Northern Ireland) seek not only to deny democracy but to deny human evolution. Stan Grodynski, Longniddry, East Lothian Write to The Scotsman
ITV News
16 hours ago
- ITV News
Stormont minister advised Belfast Grand Central Irish signs decision should have gone to Executive
UTV has seen correspondence between the Communities minister Gordon Lyons and the Infrastructure minister Liz Kimmins which shows government solicitors believe introducing Irish language signage at Grand Central Station in Belfast is a cross-cutting and controversial decision, which should have been referred to the Executive. Back in March new-in-post Infrastructure minister Liz Kimmins announced she was to introduce Irish Language signage at Grand Central Station at a cost of £150,000. DUP ministers reacted furiously to the announcement, insisting the matter was controversial and cross-cutting - ie. its impact cuts across two or more government departments. In those circumstances, Stormont ministers are required to bring matter to the Executive for agreement from other ministers. When the matter was discussed at the Executive days later, the deputy First Minister Emma Little Pengelly branded the move "utterly shambolic". At the time she told the post-meeting press conference: "I reaffirmed our clear view that this issue is controversial. Therefore it should have been brought to the Executive Committee for agreement. We will be seeking additional information and considering the way forward." She added: 'All controversial, significant or cross-cutting matters do have that legal responsibility in terms of ministers bringing that to the Executive." But it didn't end there. Loyalist activist Jamie Bryson announced he was launching a legal challenge to the decision. UTV later revealed the Communities minister Gordon Lyons had also decided to legally challenge the move and so had intervened in the Bryson case. Now UTV has seen correspondence which reveals Liz Kimmins and Gordon Lyons were at odds from the moment the announcement was made. In no less than seven letters, exchanged between March and and June, the two ministers disagreed over whether the decision was cross cutting and controversial. Finally on 28th May the Communities minister wrote to his Infrastructure counterpart saying he had received legal advice from the Departmental Solicitor's Office. He writes: "That advice confirms that your decision meets the test for 'controversial' and 'cross cutting' and should have been referred to the Executive for discussion and agreement prior to being made." He again urges Mrs Kimmins to bring the matter to the Executive for discussion. On June 20th Mrs Kimmins replied insisting, again, that as Infrastructure minister "any decision in relation to the provision of public transport clearly falls within my remit." In reference to the legal action she went on to say it would be "preferable if we discussed the matter to reach a better mutual understanding of our positions before escalating this matter unnecessarily". When UTV asked Mrs Kimmins about the correspondence the minister stuck to her position. She said: "I wasn't advised to go to the Executive but I am confident, and still am confident, that it didn't need to happen. However as there are legal proceedings and the minister for Communities has joined the legal proceedings I think that's all I can really say at this stage as it is now in the hands of the court." If the court finds in favour of the Infrastructure minister the work to introduce Irish language signage will go ahead unimpeded. However, if the matter is resolved in favour of Mr Bryson and the Communities minister, the Infrastructure minister will come under considerable pressure to bring to matter to the Executive for agreement. The High Court hearing is due to take place on September 25th. Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know.
ITV News
19 hours ago
- ITV News
Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins confirms A5 court judgment will be appealed
A court ruling that the new A5 road in the west of Northern Ireland should not go ahead is to be appealed, Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins has confirmed. Speaking during a visit to Ballygawley, Co Tyrone, Ms Kimmins said her department would be pushing forward imminently ahead of the deadline for an appeal on Friday. In June, High Court judge Mr Justice McAlinden quashed the Executive move to approve the roads project following a legal challenge from a group including residents, farmers and landowners. The judge said the proposed scheme breached sections of Stormont's Climate Change Act as it did not demonstrate how it would comply with the commitment to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. There have been more than 50 deaths on the A5, which links Londonderry with Aughnacloy in Co Tyrone, since 2006 leading it to be branded Northern Ireland's most dangerous. Ms Kimmins said: 'I certainly will not be found wanting in terms of the work that has gone into this and that will continue to go into this to ensure that we get this road built and get it built in the shortest possible time. 'Just today we have heard of another collision. That is at the forefront of my mind in absolutely everything we do. 'We have been working across the weekend, this is the priority every single day and will continue to be. I will ensure that we present the most robust case.' Ms Kimmins said her department would be working closely with the Enough is Enough group, which has campaigned for the road to be upgraded, as part of the appeal. She said: 'This was the very first test of the (Climate Change) Act and officials are working very closely with officials in Daera to look at this and looking at how we can rectify that. 'We are looking at everything here and an appeal is our first step.' DUP MLA Deborah Erskine said the appeal was a 'valid legal route', but it would 'inevitably take time'. She added: 'What is unclear from the minister is how the appeal will address Justice McAlinden's clear reference to climate targets supported by Sinn Fein, the Alliance Party and the SDLP in his ruling. 'These targets were a key factor in the project being blocked by the court, and unless those parties act to resolve the consequences of their own policies, they risk holding up not just the A5 but a range of vital infrastructure projects across Northern Ireland.' Mr Esrkine said: 'The reality is that work on the A5 is not going to commence any time soon. 'These legal processes are lengthy, and the minister should also be looking urgently at what other steps can be taken now to make the A5 safer for all road users, and how to deal fairly with landowners impacted by the failures of DfI.' Campaign group A5 Enough is Enough have welcomed the announcement. Niall McKenna stated: "The announcement today that DfI have lodged an appeal to the recent A5 decision is very much welcomed by the A5 Enough Is Enough group. "It will also come as a relief to the families of victims of this road and will be very much supported by them. At our recent meeting, we implored the Department to act decisively in pursuing an appeal and we agree with this course of action. "Justice McAlinden's comments in his judgement are chilling, 'It is likely that delays in the progression of this scheme will coincide with the occurrence of further loss of life and serious injury.' Despite the so-called constraints and minutiae of statutes, legal precedents and caselaw, we still believe that fundamentally the law and the legal system are there to protect and serve the people. "The ultimate protection and service to the wider public is to save human life. We trust that the appeals court will reassert this sacrosanct right to life and bring back perspective to the matter. Enough people have died on the A5. It is high time the courts stopped future lives being lost on this cruel road.'
