SC urged anew to junk Sara Duterte bid to dismiss impeach raps
In his motion to intervene, Cendaña said the Vice President's petition is legally infirm because only one impeachment complaint was initiated against her—a submission which he said is compliant with the Charter.
"The Vice President's petition is legally unsound. Ang reklamo nila, na-violate raw ang one-year ban on initiating impeachment complaints. Apat ang impeachment complaints na na-file, pero isa lang doon ang initiated, at 'yun ang verified complaint na ipinasa ng more than one-third ng House members," Ceñdana said in a statement.
(The Vice President's petition is legally unsound. They argue that the one-year ban on initiating impeachment complaints was violated. Four impeachment complaints were filed, but only one was initiated, and that is the verified complaint that was passed by more than one-third of House members.)
Cendaña cited the Supreme Court decision on the Francisco v. House of Representatives, wherein the High Court ruled that an impeachment complaint is initiated either by: (1) the act of filing a complaint and its referral or endorsement of the complaint to the House Committee on Justice, or (2) the filing by at least one-third of the members of the House of Representatives of a verified complaint or resolution of impeachment.
"Minabuti nating mag-file ng motion to intervene dahil malapit nang magsimula ang session ng 20th Congress. Naniniwala tayong sa Senado ang tamang venue para litisin ang impeachment complaint ni VP Sara—hindi sa Supreme Court. Kung dinidinig ng mataas na korte ang petition ng VP, dapat mas dinggin nila ang sambayanan," Cendaña said.
(We filed a motion to intervene because the 20th Congress is about to start. We believe that the Senate is the appropriate venue to try the impeachment case against the Vice President, not the Supreme Court. If the High Court is hearing out the Vice President, the more it should listen to the call of the people.)
"The three impeachment complaints were not referred to the Committee on Justice and do not qualify as initiated complaints since they were archived by the House plenary after the fourth impeachment complaint was endorsed by more than one-third of the House members. Only the fourth complaint qualifies as such. Therefore, lahat ng ginawa sa House ay ayon Rules of Impeachment na nakabatay sa Saligang Batas," Cendaña added.
(The House's actions on the impeachment complaints are all in accordance with the Constitution.)
GMA News Online has requested comment from Duterte's legal team and the Office of the Vice President, but these have yet to respond as of posting time.
Cendaña said the Supreme Court has the duty to ensure accountability of public officials.
"Will the Supreme Court uphold the Constitution and its doctrines? Or will it save Sara and other government officials who abuse power? Nagbabantay ang taumbayan (The people are watching)," Cendaña said.
Earlier, the House of Representatives also asked the Supreme Court to junk the Vice President's petition, arguing that questions about the impeachment are best discussed and resolved before the Senate impeachment court.
The SC required the House to submit information regarding the status of the first three impeachment complaints filed against Duterte, the exact dates these were endorsed, and whether the House Secretary General possesses discretion on when to transmit these to the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
In a notice dated July 8, the SC en banc consolidated the petition filed by Duterte against the validity and constitutionality of the fourth impeachment complaint against her and the petition filed by lawyer Israelito Torreon and others seeking to declare the articles of impeachment null and void. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
an hour ago
- GMA Network
Senate to hold hearing on online gambling
Senator Erwin Tulfo announced Wednesday that he will spearhead a Senate investigation into the proliferation of online gambling in the country, as he joined calls in Congress for its total ban. Tulfo, chairman of the Senate games and amusement committee, said that he will invite the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) and Department of Finance (DOF) to the hearing which may begin early next week. He also said he wants to hear the stance of his fellow senators and other stakeholders regarding online gaming, as some have been pushing for its total prohibition, while others only want its strict regulation. 'But if I can have it my way, kung ako ang tatanungin personally, I want this online gambling stopped. Kung ako po ang masusunod, ora mismo, dapat itigil na ang online gambling because of the fact na masama na po ang nangyayari,' Tulfo said in a press conference. (But if I can have it my way, if I'm asked personally, I want this online gambling stopped. If I am the one to be followed, then we should ban online gambling right now because what is happening right now is bad.) The first-termer senator also expressed disappointment with the congressman who was seen watching e-sabong on his phone while members of the lower chamber were voting for House Speaker during Monday's session. The younger Tulfo said that the congressman should apologize or explain why he was doing such while the House session was ongoing. 'Tapos the Congress should ask for an explanation. Why? Imbes na magtrabaho sila, nagbobotohan sila, serious business 'yung araw na 'yun diba, nagbobotohan ng Speaker. Bakit ka nagsusugal? Number two, bawal naman 'yun. First place, bawal talaga 'yung sugal. Ano explanation? There's no explanation,' Erwin Tulfo said. (Then the Congress should ask for an explanation. Instead of working since that day was a serious business, why were they gambling? Number two, that's not allowed. In the first place, gambling is really not allowed. What's the explanation? There's no explanation.) 'Gambling capital of Asia' In his privilege speech during Wednesday's session, Senator Juan Miguel 'Migz' Zubiri also put on record that he was 'extremely disappointed' that President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. did not mention anything about the ills of online gambling during his fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) on Monday, July 28. 'Shame on you PAGCOR, shame on you operators of online gambling. Kung may isang Pilipino tayong tinutulungan dahil sa kinikita ng bayan dahil sa online gambling, panigurado ako na libo libong Pilipino ang nagdurusa ngayon at lubog sa utang dahil nalulong sa gambling,' he said. (Shame on you PAGCOR, shame on you operators of online gambling. If we're helping one Filipino because of the benefits of online gambling, I'm sure that thousands of Filipinos are suffering now and drowning in debt because they are addicted to it.) To recall, Zubiri filed a bill seeking an outright ban on all forms of online gambling, including digital betting platforms, mobile applications, and websites that allow users to place wagers through electronic devices. He said that the Philippines is now the 'gambling capital of Asia,' besting Macau and Cambodia. Several senators such as Loren Legarda, Raffy Tulfo, Risa Hontiveros, and Francis Pangilinan expressed manifestations of support for the total ban of online gambling during the ongoing plenary session. Flood control Further, Erwin Tulfo also filed a resolution directing the appropriate Senate committee to conduct an investigation, in aid of legislation, into the reported abuse of flood control programs and related projects, in a bid to address the country's flooding problem. In proposed Senate Resolution No. 31, the younger Tulfo emphasized that despite the continuous implementation of flood control projects funded under the General Appropriations Act (GAA), widespread and severe flooding continues to affect many areas. 'Considering the persistent and widespread occurrence of flooding nationwide, despite significant budgetary allocation, there exists a compelling and immediate necessity to develop and execute a comprehensive, integrated flood control master plan,' the resolution read. 'Moreover, it is imperative to assess and determine flood control projects that are inconsistent with the administration's infrastructure priorities, with due regard to the urgency of need, implementation readiness, and the absorptive capacity of DPWH (Department of Public Works and Highways) and other concerned agencies,' it added. During his fourth SONA, Marcos ordered the DPWH to submit a list of flood control projects in the last three years. The President said there will be a regional monitoring committee that will examine the projects to see their progress and if they exist. "We will publish this list so that the public can see it," Marcos said. "At the same time, there will be an audit and performance review of these projects to check and make sure and to know how your money was spent." "Sa mga susunod na buwan, makakasuhan ang mga lalabas na maysala mula sa imbestigasyon pati na ang kasabwat na kontratista sa buong bansa. Kailangan malaman ng taumbayan and katotohanan, kailangan may managot sa matinding pinsala at katiwalian," the President added. (In the next few months, those found guilty based on the investigation will be charged, as well as their accomplice contractor. The people need to know the truth, someone needs to be held accountable for their consequences and corruption.) —LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Chiz: Minority senators will have committee chairmanships
Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Esucero said Wednesday that all the four other members of the Senate minority bloc, except Senate Minority Leader Senator Vicente 'Tito' Sotto III, will be given respective committees to lead in the 20th Congress. Escudero explained that usually, only the Senate President, Majority Leader, Minority Leader, and Senate President Pro Tempore do not have committee chairmanships because they are officers of the Senate. This means that all the 41 permanent committees of the upper chamber will be distributed to the 20 other senators, including those from the minority bloc. 'Lahat sila magkakaroon ng komite… Inuuna lamang mag-organize ang majority, kapag natapos mag-organize ang majority, ang minority naman ang io-organize,' Escudero said in a Balitanghali interview. (All of them will be given a committee. The majority just has to organize first, and then the minority will organize after.) 'Itong Senadong 'to, nagdaang Senado man, merong komite 'yung mga miyembro ng minority except for the minority leader dahil by tradition, 'yung apat na officers ng Senado us usually walang komite, maliban na lamang kung may gusto sila,' he added. (In this Senate, even the previous one, the members of the minority were given a committee except for the minority leader because by tradition, the four officers of the Senate usually do not have a committee, unless they want something to lead.) The five-man Senate minority bloc is composed of Senators Risa Hontiveros, Juan Miguel 'Migz' Zubiri, Loren Legarda, Panfilo "Ping" Lacson. The group is led by Sotto. On Tuesday's Senate plenary session, 32 of the 41 committee chairmanships were filled, including the significant ones like the blue ribbon committee that will be led by first-termer Senator Rodante Marcoleta; Committee on Finance by Senator Sherwin Gatchalian; and Committee on Constitutional Amendments and Revision of Codes by Senator Robin Padilla. Other senators were also given two or more committees to chair this 20th Congress, such as Senators Alan Peter Cayetano (Accounts; Science and Technology; Higher, Technical and Vocational Education; and Justice and Human Rights), Imee Marcos (Labor, Employment & Human Resource Development; Cooperatives; and Foreign Relations); Pia Cayetano (Energy; Sustainable Development Goals, Innovation and Futures Thinking; and Ways and Means); and Bong Go (Health and Demography; Sports; and Youth). Lacson committee Meanwhile, Lacson said that the chairmanship of the Senate Committee on Electoral Reforms and People's Participation had been offered to him. In a statement, Lacson said he accepted the chairmanship, stressing that he will push for the passage of the Anti-Political Dynasty Act which is included in his priority bills in the 20th Congress. 'I will schedule as soon as possible my Anti-Political Dynasty bill and another bill also referred to that committee,' Lacson said. Escudero pointed out that the distribution of committee chairmanships does not depend on the seniority or length of service of a senator. 'Walang kinalaman 'yan. Lahat kami ay pare-parehong senador—matanda man o bata, matagal nang nanilbihan o bago lang. Hindi sinusukat ang kakayahan ng isang senador base sa haba ng oras o ikli ng oras ng kanyang paninilbihan dahil pare-pareho lamang naman kaming binoto ng sambayanan at pare-pareho kaming tigi-tigisa lamang ang boto sa Senado,' the Senate president said. (That has nothing to do with the chairmanship. We are all senators—old or young, whether serving for long or not. The ability of a senator is not measured based on the length of his/her service because we were all voted by the people and each of us has a vote in the Senate.) — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Carpio: SC may still reverse decision on Sara Duterte's impeachment
Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio said Wednesday that there is still a possibility that the high court will reverse its decision declaring the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. Carpio said this, hinging on the plan of the House of Representatives to file a motion for reconsideration on the SC decision as the lower chamber argued that the ruling was based on incorrect findings that contradict official records. 'Theoretically, pwede [it's possible]. I mean, there's no rule or law, constitutional provision that say that they [cannot] correct themselves,' Carpio said at the Kapihan sa Manila Bay forum when asked of the possibility of the decision getting reversed even as the SC justices voted unanimously on it. According to the former SC associate justice, there had been many instances in the past when the high court 'completely reversed itself.' Meanwhile, Christian Monsod, one of the framers of the 1987 Constitution, said that the SC may 'correct itself on some parts' of their decision. 'It's not yet final, it's only executory but not yet final because the House still has motion for reconsideration. So I would think that the Senate should hold in abeyance any action because it's not yet final,' Carpio explained. 'Normally, you act when it's already final. Because it's not yet final, there's still a chance it could be reversed or changed because there's a motion for reconsideration,' he added. Carpio, however, emphasized that if the decision becomes final, the ruling must be followed because the Supreme Court is the final arbiter 'whether it's correct or not.' Voting 13-0, the Supreme Court earlier declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte as unconstitutional, saying that it was barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. The high court also found that the articles violated Duterte's right to due process. The SC decision is immediately executory but a motion for reconsideration may be filed. The high court also emphasized that it is not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her, but any subsequent impeachment complaint may only be filed starting February 6, 2026. House of Representatives spokesperson Princess Abante said the lower chamber is preparing to file a motion for reconsideration of the SC decision, noting that upon studying, the House found that the bases for it were alarming. 'Ang Kamara, matapos ang masusing pag-aaral, ay maghahain ng motion for reconsideration dahil ang desisyon na nagsasabing ang Articles of Impeachment na ipinadala sa Senado ay barred or unconstitutional ay nakaangkla sa mga factual premises o findings na mali at salungat sa opisyal na record ng Kamara,' Abante said. (The House, after thorough study, will file a motion for reconsideration because the decision declaring that the Articles of Impeachment transmitted to the Senate are barred or unconstitutional is based on factual premises or findings that are incorrect and contrary to the official records of the House.) Meanwhile, Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero announced Tuesday that the Senate will discuss the SC decision on August 6, 2025, 'in order to afford ample and sufficient time to the members to study the 97-page Supreme Court decision, excluding the concurring and separate opinions filed by five or six additional magistrates of the Supreme Court.'—AOL, GMA Integrated News
