logo
Future of Israel's plan to force Gazans to southern city hangs in balance

Future of Israel's plan to force Gazans to southern city hangs in balance

Irish Times7 hours ago
As contacts continue aimed at clinching a
Gaza
ceasefire
and hostage release deal, the future of
Israel
's planned 'humanitarian city' in Rafah hangs in the balance.
The plan, outlined by defence minister Israel Katz, envisages the forced transfer of Gaza's population to a tent city to be built on the ruins of the southern city of Rafah, now largely destroyed, beginning with the approximately 600,000 war refugees from the adjacent Muwasi humanitarian zone.
Israel hopes international aid agencies will provide food, water and medical supplies to the area while the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will secure the approach routes.
The residents will be screened on entry and will not be allowed to leave. Israel argues that the plan will separate innocent civilians from Hamas fighters in other areas, who will no longer be able to surround themselves with civilian human shields.
READ MORE
At a tense security cabinet meeting on Sunday night, prime minister
Binyamin Netanyahu
and several other ministers criticised the IDF plan to establish the humanitarian city after military planners warned that it could take up to a year to build and cost €3.5 billion.
Mr Netanyahu told IDF chief of staff Ltn Gen Eyal Zamir: 'I asked for a realistic plan,' telling him to draw up an alternative plan that would be faster and cheaper.
Israeli experts in international law and the laws of war have warned that the humanitarian city constitutes a war crime and a crime against humanity, claiming that under certain conditions, it could also be considered genocide.
Unrwa, the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, says the plan would create 'de facto massive concentration camps at the border with Egypt'.
Hamas
negotiators have rejected the idea as part of an Israeli plan to continue the war after an initial 60-day ceasefire, leading to a forced transfer of Gaza residents to Egypt or other countries.
IDF officials have warned that Hamas opposition to the plan could topple a ceasefire deal and endanger the lives of the 20 hostages still believed to be alive.
The Palestinian foreign ministry also rejected the plan, saying: 'The humanitarian city has nothing to do with humanity.'
Israel's opposition leader Yair Lapid termed the plan an expensive fantasy of Mr Netanyahu's far-right coalition partners, who favour the re-establishment of Israeli settlements in Gaza. Former prime minister Ehud Olmert described the humanitarian city as a 'concentration camp'.
The Israeli military launched a campaign to destroy Hamas in response to an unprecedented cross-border attack on October 7th, 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 were taken hostage. More than 58,000 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Irish Times view on Trump and Ukraine: a step in the right direction
The Irish Times view on Trump and Ukraine: a step in the right direction

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on Trump and Ukraine: a step in the right direction

Reflecting his 'disappointment' with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, US president Donald Trump has thrown his weight behind Ukraine with a commitment of 'billions' of dollars of US weapons that he said Europe would pay for. He also pledged to impose 'secondary' sanctions of 100 per cent on countries that bought Russian oil and gas, unless Putin agrees to a ceasefire within 50 days. Trump's about-turn on Russia was welcomed effusively by Nato secretary general Mark Rutte at a meeting in the White House on Monday. Rutte said it was 'completely logical' for Europe to pick up the tab for the weapons, including Patriot air defence missile systems, unspecified long-range missiles and munitions, much of which would be supplied quickly from European stocks and then replenished by the US. Trump's commitment to new sanctions on Russia and those trading with it echo provisions in a bipartisan bill before Congress. His insistence that the US will not pay for the weapons will do much to quieten the vocal opposition within his Maga movement to any direct US engagement in the war – and also provide a huge business opportunity for the country's defence industry. The Patriot systems are crucial to Ukraine's air defences against Russia's increasing use of hypersonic ballistic missiles in attacks on Kyiv and other cities. Long-range missiles will give the Ukrainians an enhanced ability to strike weapons factories and storage facilities deep inside Russia. READ MORE In recent weeks, Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with his Russian counterpart over the lack of progress on a ceasefire, which he had promised to broker during his presidential campaign. Exasperated with the Russian president's continued refusal to contemplate an unconditional ceasefire and the escalation of Russian bombing, he told reporters last week that it was necessary to bolster Ukraine's defences and resumed the delivery of US weapons to the country that had been temporarily paused. 'Putin really surprised a lot of people,' the US president said, explaining his volte face. But the only one surprised by his intransigence was Trump himself – although no-one yesterday was going to point that out. Praise for his wisdom and enlightened insight was the order of the day from the Nato chief, who listened straight-faced as Trump boasted of his diplomatic achievements. Europeans and other western allies will take comfort from the reality that Trump's new policy appears to return the US to the common front against Russia that Joe Biden had forged, and to the US traditional commitment to Nato. Although Trump has yet to recognise the justice of Ukraine's demand for the full restoration of its territory and seems to be motivated, in part at least, by pique over Putin's tactics, this latest move is an important step in the right direction.

BBC staff who had authority to cut Bob Vylan livestream 'were at Glastonbury'
BBC staff who had authority to cut Bob Vylan livestream 'were at Glastonbury'

RTÉ News​

time3 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

BBC staff who had authority to cut Bob Vylan livestream 'were at Glastonbury'

Hundreds of BBC staff were working for the broadcaster at Glastonbury with individuals who had the authority to cut the Bob Vylan livestream present during the controversial performance, the BBC director-general has said. It comes after the frontman of the punk rap duo, Bob Vylan, led crowds in chants of "death, death to the IDF (Israeli Military Force)" during their set at the Somerset music festival. Police have since launched an investigation into the group with the BBC issuing an apology for the livestream and promising to no longer broadcast live acts they deem "high risk". In a letter responding to questions sent by British MP Caroline Dinenage, chairwoman of the Culture Media and Sport Committee, the director-general of the BBC, Tim Davie said: "Cutting the livestream was an option open to those on the ground on the day. "There were 550 personnel working for the BBC at Glastonbury. Of these 328 were working for BBC Studios (camera crew, rigging, technical and production roles), 35 providing coverage for BBC News, and 187 other BBC public service, working across a wide range of roles, including technical crew, producers, presenters, engineers, runners, commissioners and compliance staff." He added: "There were failures in our coverage which led to offensive content being broadcast live. I deeply regret that such deplorable behaviour appeared on the BBC and want to apologise to our viewers and listeners and in particular the Jewish community. "In considering what to learn from this, my immediate priority was to take swift actions, as detailed above, to mitigate against anything similar happening in the future. "At the same time we are taking actions to ensure there is proper accountability for those found to be responsible for the failings in the live broadcast; and we are urgently reviewing our guidelines to see if any further measures are needed." Since their Glastonbury set, Bob Vylan, made up of frontman Bobby Vylan, whose real name is reportedly Pascal Robinson-Foster, and drummer Bobbie Vylan, have reportedly been dropped by their agency, United Talent Agency (UTA), which appears to have removed the group from their website, and have also been pulled from a number of concerts – including their US tour after having their visas revoked. The group announced on Monday, in a post on Instagram, that they were unable to join rock band, Gogol Bordello, on their European Tour. The statement said: "Due to logistical complications, we have decided not to join our friends Gogol Bordello on their upcoming European Tour. However, we will be heading to Europe in the coming months for both festivals and headline shows." It comes after the group performed a sold-out gig in London last week where Bobby Vylan said: "We are a loving band, we love you lot for being here with us. We love the Palestinian people. "Their strength, their resilience, their ability to keep on going in the face of it all is a beautiful and inspiring thing. "So as hard as this week may have been for us, it has been nothing in comparison to what the Palestinian people are going through right now."

BBC ‘failed' to ask the right questions regarding Gaza documentary, says executive
BBC ‘failed' to ask the right questions regarding Gaza documentary, says executive

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

BBC ‘failed' to ask the right questions regarding Gaza documentary, says executive

A senior BBC News executive has said the broadcaster 'failed' to ask the right questions regarding the documentary Gaza : How To Survive A Warzone. It comes after a report looking into the documentary, which was removed from BBC iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator was the son of a Hamas official, found that it breached BBC editorial guidelines on accuracy. The review, published on Monday, was conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews which is independent of BBC News, and found that the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'. It did not, however, find any other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that 'outside interests' 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'. READ MORE Speaking on BBC's Radio 4 World At One programme, Deborah Turness, chief executive of BBC News, said: 'Our current affairs teams, day in, day out, week in, week out, are creating and pushing out incredibly controversial, difficult, complex documentaries. 'We have really good, best-in-class systems in place, but in this we failed, and we must put in place new processes which will enable us to continue with our courageous journalism with confidence.' She also added: 'It's about accountability. And I think what you can see today is that the BBC has taken this incredibly seriously. We have led a full and thorough investigation, which we are publishing full and transparently. 'Everything is out there, and we share the action plan that we're now putting into place to prevent this kind of mistake happening again. 'We are responsible for everything that we publish and everything we broadcast. We take it incredibly seriously, and we didn't run those questions to ground.' Ms Turness also addressed a second Gaza documentary, Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, which was originally commissioned by the broadcaster from an independent production company called Basement Films. However, the corporation delayed airing it until the review into Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone was released. The documentary, which includes witness accounts from frontline Palestinian health workers in Gaza and documents attacks on hospitals and clinics, was later pulled entirely and aired on Channel 4 earlier this month. Ms Turness said: 'We want to tell the stories of Gaza. We are telling the stories of Gaza. 'We've got long form projects in the pipeline. We are covering Gaza, and we're covering it with courage and without fear or favour. 'During that production, the BBC raised concerns around the social media activity of one of the journalists. Obviously, we are incredibly protective and conscious of our impartiality and our very high standards of impartiality, and we were concerned about the activity of the journalist concerned. 'We decided, in the light of those concerns, that we would pause broadcast of that documentary while waiting to see what the Peter Johnston report would bring us. 'The film company weren't happy with that pause, and they wanted the journalism to air sooner. So we were trying to find a way around that, trying to find a way without airing the documentary, to put the journalism and the voice of the doctors on our platforms. 'And then came a moment where the lead journalist went on the Today programme to talk about Israel's attacks on Iran and used language around Israel that was really not compatible with the BBC standards of impartiality and made it impossible for us to continue with the project. 'It was very difficult to imagine that it could meet the BBC standards of impartiality, and that it would have created at least a perception of partiality, had we aired it. 'And the right thing to do at that time was to walk away, because no BBC journalist could have said what that journalist said on air, and therefore we have to apply some of the same standards to those who work with us from the outside.' – PA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store