
Democrats retreat on the Green New Deal
Why it matters: Democrats aren't explicitly disavowing the Green New Deal, but they've abruptly stopped talking about it as they scramble to find new ways to talk about climate change.
Over the past three months, Democrats in Congress collectively said "Green New Deal" only six times across social media and on the floor.
That's the fewest mentions since the proposal rose to prominence in the fall of 2018, according to data from the legislative tracking service Quorum.
Over the same 3-month period, Republicans mentioned "Green New Deal" 337 times as they continue to believe that what President Trump calls the "Green New Scam" is a losing issue for Democrats.
Zoom in: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts have not reintroduced their Green New Deal resolution that had become one of their signature initiatives (they introduced it in April 2023 of the last Congress).
Spokespeople for Markey and Ocasio-Cortez did not respond for comment.
In attacking the GOP's "one big, beautiful bill," Democrats and many groups have focused on claims it will drive up energy costs and cost jobs from scuttled projects rather than focus on it exacerbating climate change.
Other Democrats eyeing presidential runs have signaled they aren't purists on climate change in the way some Democrats did during Trump's first term.
Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona told The New York Times earlier this year: "Every Latino man wants a big-ass truck, which, nothing wrong with that."
After Elon Musk called Sen. Mark Kelly a "traitor," the Arizona senator traded in his Tesla for a Chevy Tahoe SUV (he noted he had two of them: one in D.C. and another in Arizona).
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro has continued to be supportive of natural gas projects in his state.
Flashback: Many 2020 Democratic presidential candidates embraced the "Green New Deal" and put forward multitrillion-dollar proposals.
When then-Sen. Kamala Harris ran for president in 2020, her Green New Deal agenda called for mandating automakers to only make electric or hydrogen cars by 2035.
Between the lines: The tide against far-reaching Green New Deal-esque proposals began before Trump won in 2024.
Then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) dismissed it in 2019 as the "green dream, or whatever they call it."
When Vice President Harris was running for president last fall, her campaign equivocated and dodged on the issue.
In October, Harris said in Michigan: "Let us be clear, contrary to what my opponent is suggesting, I will never tell you what kind of car you have to drive."
The intrigue: Some Democratic leaders are increasingly skeptical that liberal climate advocacy groups can deliver the voters they claim to represent.
Former President Biden passed one of the most ambitious and expensive climate-focused bills in history, and voters did not appear to reward him.
Josh Feed, who leads the Climate and Energy Program at the moderate think tank Third Way, said: "The groups wouldn't or couldn't sell the IRA, and promised they'd deliver young voters on climate. They didn't deliver on selling the IRA, and Democrats did worse with young voters. A lot of elected officials' faith and trust in that apparatus has been shaken."
Some of those groups are having trouble raising money in the Trump era. The Sunrise Movement, which has been one of the most aggressive advocates for a Green New Deal, raised less than $30,000 over the first six months of 2025.
By the numbers: Wind and solar remain the most popular forms of energy, but popular support has declined significantly over the past decade, especially among Republicans, according to a Pew Research poll published in June.
"Republicans' views on the nation's energy priorities are now the reverse of what they were in 2020," Pew wrote.
"Today, 67% of Republicans and Republican leaners say the country should give priority to developing fossil fuel sources like oil, coal and natural gas."
The bottom line: Some Democrats think that the party is overreacting to Trump's victory in what was ultimately a close presidential race after the party swapped out Joe Biden last summer.
"Some Democrats are so stuck in the fetal position post-2024 that they might miss an opportunity to go on offense in 2025 on clean energy cost savings and job creation," said Jared Leopold, a strategist and co-founder of Evergreen Action.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nexus card applications no longer accepting 'X' gender marker
Canadians who apply for a new or renewed Nexus card can no longer select an "X" gender marker on their applications, and instead must choose either "M" or "F." The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) confirmed the change in a statement on Tuesday, saying it followed U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order in January that the U.S. will only recognize male or female on documents such as visas and passports. The corresponding changes by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also changed the application process for Nexus cards, the CBSA said in an email to CBC News. The change went into effect in February, it said. The Nexus program, run jointly by the CBSA and CBP, allows card holders to fast-track through customs and security lines at airports and land crossings. While many use the cards for cross-border travel, some use them primarily for shorter wait times while travelling within Canada. The CBSA says there were more than 1.8 million program members in April 2024, "with the majority of members being Canadian." WATCH | Transgender people in the U.S. say they're worried: The agency says Canadians who currently have a valid Nexus card with an "X" will still have the document recognized, but they will no longer be able to choose "X" when it comes time to renew or replace their cards. Trump's executive order declared federal agencies will only recognize "two sexes, male and female," which "are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality." The presidential order said passports and other forms of government-issued identification must reflect the sex assigned at birth. The website for the U.S. Bureau of Consular Affairs, the agency that issues passports, said it will "only issue passports with an 'M' or 'F' sex marker that match the customer's biological sex at birth" and will no longer use the "X" marker for nonbinary people, citing Trump's order. Canada began recognizing the "X" marker on passports for those who don't identify as male or female in 2019. About 3,600 Canadians had the marker on their passports as of 2021, according to the federal government. The CBSA says Canadians with an "X" marker on their passport can continue to use it to apply for a Nexus card, even though that marker cannot be used on the card itself. Statistics Canada data shows there are more than 100,000 transgender or non-binary people across the country. The Canadian government website warns people with gender-neutral passports they "may face entry restrictions into some countries that do not recognize your gender." LISTEN | Advocacy group on what Canadians should know for travel:


New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump envoy Witkoff urged to take tough approach with Putin in make-or-break meeting to end Ukraine war before sanctions
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is giving Russian President Vladimir Putin one more chance to show he's serious about ending his 41-month-old invasion of Ukraine. As more than six months have passed with no diplomatic progress, well-placed sources tell The Post special envoy Steve Witkoff has been encouraged to take a sterner approach with Moscow's leader ahead of Wednesday's make-or-break meeting — in line with President Trump's recent expressions of disgust at Putin's continued attacks on Ukrainian civilians. Whether Witkoff will take that advice remains unclear. Advertisement 3 President Trump is giving Russian President Vladimir Putin one last chance to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine that started over 3 years ago. via REUTERS A spokesperson for the special envoy declined to comment on the record for this story. Meanwhile, the White House national security team responsible for the Ukraine war held multiple meetings on Tuesday, trying to work out how Washington might best persuade Russia to silence its guns, according to people familiar with the matter. Advertisement Trump himself said Tuesday he would wait to see how the sitdown went before making a final decision on whether to enact secondary sanctions and slapping more tariffs on countries that provide Russia with its main source of income: oil purchases. 'We have a meeting with Russia tomorrow, we're going to see what happens. We'll make a determination at that time,' said the president, before denying that he had promised to set the additional rates at 100% — as he appeared to suggest last month. 'I never said a percentage, but we'll be doing quite a bit of that. We'll see what happens over the next fairly short period of time.' 3 U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff will allegedly take a sterner approach in the crucial make-or-break meeting on Wednesday in an effort for the war in Ukraine to end for good. Getty Images Advertisement A source familiar with discussions insisted that sanctions are not inevitable when Trump's deadline is reached Friday, saying the administration is 'pushing hard for a deal. That's always the president's preferred outcome.' As part of his prep, Witkoff has been briefed on the historical motivations behind Putin's war on Ukraine — namely his desire to reconstitute as much of the former Soviet Union as possible, according to a US official. Last month, as Trump's rhetoric toward Moscow began to toughen, Special Presidential Envoy to Ukraine retired Gen. Keith Kellogg said that the president 'now realizes that Putin is not a business partner.' 3 President Trump said he'll see if tomorrow's sit-down will be effective before making a final decision on whether he'll slap more tariffs on Russia. REUTERS Advertisement The commander in chief — so often praised for his businesslike, transactional approach to politics — is up against a ruler who represents the opposite of that approach. That's why the earlier, more cordial approach — complete with Witkoff jovially greeting Putin at the Kremlin — did not work, according to one source. Subsequent offers of reduced sanctions and off-ramps for Russia to end its war were also not enough to persuade Moscow to change its calculus. Russia, for its part, is hoping for more of the same. Witkoff's Wednesday trip comes at the behest of the Kremlin, which invited the envoy after Trump threatened to levy the secondary sanctions. Meanwhile, as Trump's words toward Putin have grown increasingly harsh, Kremlin thought leaders have been denigrating the US president on X. Russian philosopher and Putin confidant Alexander Dugin declared Monday that Trump was crazy, an about-face from a year ago, when Dugin — nicknamed 'Putin's brain' for his purported heavy influence on the Russian leader — endorsed Trump for president in 2024. 'I come to very sad conclusion: Donald Trump is totally mad. It is the shame. We loved him,' Dugin posted to X. Last week, ex-Russian president and current deputy chair of the Kremlin's security council Dmitry Medvedev also blasted Trump for threatening sanctions.


The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump Creates Task Force For 2028 Olympics In LA, Predicts USA Victories And Gold Medals
President Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order establishing a task force to oversee the 2028 Summer Olympics, which will be held in Los Angeles.