Republicans move to revive Trump's 'beautiful clean coal industry' after Biden shut it down
Committee Chairman Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., told Fox News Digital the National Coal Council legislation will successfully pass out of his committee Wednesday and have a good chance of passing the full House.
Reps. Michael Rulli, R-Ohio, and Riley Moore, R-W.V., are leading the legislation to reestablish the council, effectively canceled by former President Joe Biden, and support the clean coal industry for a multitude of reasons, including energy security at a time of Middle East uncertainty.
Rulli told Fox News Digital the Biden administration's endeavors against the council and the coal industry writ-large were a "deliberate" effort to "wipe out coal, kill jobs, and make America dependent on foreign energy."
The National Coal Council was key to improving lower-emissions technology and a crucial piece of the Energy Department's toolkit. It was disbanded in 2021 after the Biden administration allowed its charter to lapse.
Originally formed in the 1980s as a 50-member advisory committee, it has guided government on the coal market and coal-sector technologies through five administrations.
The Biden administration let the council's charter lapse during his term. Then-Rep. David McKinley, R-W.V., also confirmed such at the time.
"Time and time again, we see that energy security is national security," Guthrie told Fox News Digital on Tuesday.
"In order to protect American families and businesses and insulate ourselves from adversarial nations, it's time to take action to secure our grid and promote the production of baseload American energy."
Guthrie added the Iran situation is another reminder of why Congress must act to "unleash American energy and ensure that we can produce domestically the power our communities rely on."
Domestically, coal power supports hundreds of thousands of jobs, including in Guthrie's Kentucky, Rulli's Ohio and Moore's West Virginia.
"President Trump knows that coal is the key to unleashing American energy dominance, reindustrializing the heartland, and winning the AI arms race. The National Coal Council will play a vital role in those efforts," Moore told Fox News Digital.
"With our global competitors constantly bringing new coal plants online to power their economies, we can't afford to fall behind," he added.
The bill further acts on Trump's Executive Order 14241 focusing on clean coal and will help meet the rise in electricity demand needed for the exponential projected growth in AI data centers around the country.
Proponents also hope it will bolster coal as the power source needed to onshore manufacturing and supply chains; another goal of the political right.
Rulli said the original council was a "pillar" of U.S. energy policy and a "voice for an industry whose workers built this nation and powered our economy. Its elimination was no accident."
"The left wants to shut it all down for good," he said.
"This bill won't let that happen … We must restore the National Coal Council and defend the energy backbone of this country—before it's too late."
Rulli said just as in West Virginia and Kentucky, where his colleagues hail from, Ohio's coal industry drove its manufacturing sector for decades, providing thousands of good-paying jobs in his Youngstown district.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's how Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene described support for Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
As President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' returns to the U.S. House of Representatives after passing by a single vote in the U.S. Senate, one prominent Republican supporter of the president called it a 's***show.' Speaking with Trump ally Steve Bannon on his podcast 'War Room' on Tuesday, U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., does not have the votes to pass Trump's budget reconciliation bill in the House on Wednesday. 'I can't imagine they have the votes,' Greene told Bannon. 'There's no way that Johnson has the votes in the House for this. We're supposed to be back Wednesday morning to start voting at 9 a.m. I think that is not realistic. I just don't see how that's possible. So this is, I think it's far from over.' She called the situation 'dire,' and added that 'it's hard for us to get to an agreement on anything.' 'It's a s***show,' Greene said. 'And I'm sorry for saying that. I know we're not supposed to say that on the air, but that's really what it is.' Republican lawmakers are working to meet Trump's July 4 deadline in passing the bill before he signs it into law. Three Republicans joined Democrats in voting against the Senate version of the bill, which included cuts to federal spending on Medicaid and Affordable Care Act marketplaces by about $1 trillion over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office on Monday. This could leave 12 million more people without health insurance by 2034. With a 50-50 split, Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote to pass the bill before it was handed back to the House. Before the Senate vote, Greene didn't back the bill due to a provision that would have placed a moratorium on states regulating AI. In a post on X on Tuesday, she called the provision 'a gift to Big Tech and a disaster for American workers and states' rights.' After voting for the House version last month, Greene previously admitted that she missed the section that 'strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years.' Had she seen it, she said she would have voted no. In a 99-1 vote, senators removed the provision from the bill, which Greene subsequently called a 'huge win for federalism,' The Hill reported. The House Rules Committee is leading the debate on Wednesday on a rule to advance the legislation and consider final passage of the bill, ABC News reported. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., told ABC News that all 212 Democrats in the House will vote no on the bill. 'And all we need are four House Republicans to join us in defense of their constituents, who will suffer mightily from this bill,' Jeffries said. All told, the Senate bill includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, according to the latest CBO analysis, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits, which Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide. It would impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements on able-bodied people, including some parents and older Americans, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Mass. senators blast Trump settlement with Paramount: 'Bribery in plain sight' Trump's antisemitism probe mostly relies on Harvard's own report, Harvard claims Trump threatens arrest of NYC mayoral candidate during visit to 'Alligator Alcatraz' Mass. has an on-time(ish) state budget: 3 big things to know about the $61B plan Group behind MCAS ballot question broke campaign finance law, state says Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court to consider reviving Mississippi evangelist's challenge to protest ordinance
The Supreme Court said Thursday it will consider reviving an evangelist's challenge to a Mississippi city's protest ordinance. Gabriel Olivier, a self-described Christian called to evangelize, asked the justices to let his lawsuit challenging an ordinance barring him from demonstrating outside a Brandon, Miss., amphitheater move forward. The city, in its opposition to Olivier's petition, said the ordinance was passed after Olivier, with a group, called passersby 'whores,' 'Jezebels,' 'sissies' and other derogatory names over a loudspeaker at the amphitheater's busiest intersection. The ordinance redirects protests and demonstrations to a nearby designated area for three hours before an event and one hour after and bans the use of loudspeakers that are 'clearly audible' more than 100 feet from the protest area, the city says. Olivier claimed in his petition to the court that the ordinance 'forbids him' from sharing his faith with fellow citizens outside the amphitheater. He filed suit after being charged with and pleading no contest to violating the ordinance, after he left the protest area because it was 'too isolated for attendees to hear his message.' He paid a $304 fine. A federal judge threw out his case, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed, citing Supreme Court precedent that people convicted of a crime can't file civil lawsuits against police or other officials. The full appeals court declined to rehear the case by a one-vote margin, over several dissenting opinions. 'It sends an odd message to citizens who care about defending their constitutional rights,' Judge James Ho wrote in one dissent. 'On the one hand, we tell citizens that you can't sue if you're not injured. But on the other hand, we tell them that you can't sue if you are injured.' Olivier asked the justices to clarify whether the high court's 1994 decision in Heck v. Humphrey bars lawsuits like his. A decision is expected by next summer. 'Every American has First Amendment rights to free speech; and every American has a right to their day in court,' said Kelly Shackelford, president, CEO and chief counsel for First Liberty Institute, which is representing Olivier. 'Both of these rights were violated for Gabe Olivier. The Supreme Court will now decide whether those rights will be protected for all Americans.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Air Force to manage new militarized zone along US-Mexico border
The U.S. Air Force is slated to manage a new militarized border zone in Texas along the southern border with Mexico, the service announced. The stretch of land, known as a national defense area, spans 250 miles of the Rio Grande River through Hidalgo and Cameron counties, and will be administered as an extension of Joint Base San Antonio. This NDA is the third established by the Defense Department along the southern border, with the first being sited in New Mexico on April 21 and the second in west Texas on May 1. The secretary of the Air Force and the commander of U.S. Northern Command will collaborate closely to manage the area, according to a service release. The establishment of the NDAs come in response to several executive orders by President Donald Trump to secure the southern border, as the administration aims to reduce not only illegal immigration but also clamp down on illegal narcotics trafficking by cartels throughout the area. In response to heightened border security, narcotics traffickers have sought alternative smuggling routes to escape detection, including maritime routes that have prompted the dispatch of naval warships with Coast Guard LEDET teams aboard to the southern border area to patrol and perform interdictions. This month, a law enforcement operation in Cameron County, Texas — near the location of the new NDA — resulted in the seizure of over 100 pounds of marijuana in an area described as a 'hotspot' of drug trafficking under the influence of the Gulf Cartel. In another recent interdiction, smugglers from Mexico were foiled in an attempt to drive bundles of illicit drug products across the Rio Grande River into South Texas. The new NDA will be manned by personnel serving in Joint Task Force-Southern Border who will monitor the area, install barriers and signage, conduct patrols and stop any trespassers. The military's duty will be to detain trespassers only temporarily and transfer them to the custody of law enforcement authorities. A wide array of technology is being put into use at the southern border to establish control over swathes of vast and challenging terrain. To cut costs of constantly deploying aircraft, JTF-SB has been using 3-D printing to build drones for surveillance. In South Texas, soldiers are using ground-based radar to detect suspicious movement in remote areas and provide warning to law enforcement of potentially harmful activities — including a sharp spike in drone use by narcotics traffickers. Additionally, Stryker vehicles have been fielded due to their maneuverability and camera systems. Trespassers into military zones potentially face prosecution for two federal offenses — illegally entering the county and trespassing on U.S. military property. As of May, illegal border crossings overall were reported to be in decline.
