Supreme Court to consider reviving Mississippi evangelist's challenge to protest ordinance
Gabriel Olivier, a self-described Christian called to evangelize, asked the justices to let his lawsuit challenging an ordinance barring him from demonstrating outside a Brandon, Miss., amphitheater move forward.
The city, in its opposition to Olivier's petition, said the ordinance was passed after Olivier, with a group, called passersby 'whores,' 'Jezebels,' 'sissies' and other derogatory names over a loudspeaker at the amphitheater's busiest intersection.
The ordinance redirects protests and demonstrations to a nearby designated area for three hours before an event and one hour after and bans the use of loudspeakers that are 'clearly audible' more than 100 feet from the protest area, the city says.
Olivier claimed in his petition to the court that the ordinance 'forbids him' from sharing his faith with fellow citizens outside the amphitheater. He filed suit after being charged with and pleading no contest to violating the ordinance, after he left the protest area because it was 'too isolated for attendees to hear his message.' He paid a $304 fine.
A federal judge threw out his case, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed, citing Supreme Court precedent that people convicted of a crime can't file civil lawsuits against police or other officials. The full appeals court declined to rehear the case by a one-vote margin, over several dissenting opinions.
'It sends an odd message to citizens who care about defending their constitutional rights,' Judge James Ho wrote in one dissent. 'On the one hand, we tell citizens that you can't sue if you're not injured. But on the other hand, we tell them that you can't sue if you are injured.'
Olivier asked the justices to clarify whether the high court's 1994 decision in Heck v. Humphrey bars lawsuits like his. A decision is expected by next summer.
'Every American has First Amendment rights to free speech; and every American has a right to their day in court,' said Kelly Shackelford, president, CEO and chief counsel for First Liberty Institute, which is representing Olivier. 'Both of these rights were violated for Gabe Olivier. The Supreme Court will now decide whether those rights will be protected for all Americans.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
28 minutes ago
- CBS News
Democratic lawmakers denied entry to Alligator Alcatraz immigration detention site
A group of Florida Democratic state lawmakers was blocked from entering the Alligator Alcatraz immigrant detention facility in the Everglades Thursday, despite citing legal authority for an official legislative site visit. Florida Democratic Party Chair Nikki Fried issued a statement following the incident, saying, "Lawmakers on the ground were just blocked from entering a state-funded detention site because of so-called 'safety concerns.' This is a taxpayer-funded facility, run by the State of Florida. Our elected officials have every legal right to walk through those gates." Fried added, "What are Ron DeSantis and his administration trying to hide? If it's unsafe for lawmakers to visit, how is it safe for anyone inside?" Democrats raise concerns over conditions Ahead of the attempted site visit, the Democratic lawmakers said in a joint statement, "As lawmakers, we have both the legal right and moral responsibility to inspect this site, demand answers, and expose this abuse before it becomes the national blueprint." They also voiced concerns about conditions for detainees. First group of detainees arrives The first group of detainees arrived at the facility, according to a spokesperson for Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier. "Detainees began arriving last night. Under President Trump's leadership, we are working at turbo speed on cost-effective and innovative ways to deliver on the American people's mandate for mass deportations of criminal illegal aliens," said Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. "We will expand facilities and bed space in just days, thanks to our partnership with Florida." The facility, located at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, is expected to house up to thousands when fully operational. Built in just eight days across 10 miles of Everglades terrain, the center includes more than 200 security cameras, over 28,000 feet of barbed wire and 400 security personnel, according to state officials.
CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
Video: George Takei draws parallels between 1940's Japanese-American internment camps and ICE detentions
"Star Trek" actor and activist George Takei tells CNN's Audie Cornish about his family's experience in a 1940's Japanese-American internment camp, saying Americans "need to speak out" as he sees what is happening with ICE detentions today as "the same thing" as what he experienced.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Want Cheaper Solar Panels, Home Batteries or a Heat Pump? Better Act Soon
(Bloomberg) -- The Republican-led US Senate's passage of legislation to eliminate incentives for clean energy means homeowners likely have until the end of the year to install solar panels, batteries and heat pumps before costs soar. NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees California Exempts Building Projects From Environmental Law The bill must still be reconciled with the House of Representatives version and signed into law by President Donald Trump. But the Senate action has dashed advocates' hopes that it might restore some Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) subsidies, or at least give people more time to claim a 30% tax credit on the five-figure cost of installing rooftop solar and home battery storage systems. The Senate bill terminates those subsidies, along with a $2,000 tax credit for buying heat pumps, after Dec. 31 and repeals a $7,500 tax credit for the purchase of some electric vehicles after Sept. 30. A loophole that allowed carmakers to pass that savings to customers who lease EVs also would end then. 'The repeal of the credits takes away an option for households to gain not just climate friendly appliances but appliances and systems that effectively enabled them to cut their energy bills,' said Ari Matusiak, chief executive officer of Rewiring America, a nonprofit that advocates for community electrification. He noted that 3.4 million households claimed IRA tax credits in 2023. Matusiak said the subsidies' original expiration in 2032 gave homeowners long-term assurance that when a fossil fuel furnace or water heater suddenly failed, they would receive financial help to replace them with high-efficiency but more expensive electric versions and could install subsidized solar panels to power the devices. Now with those tax credits disappearing, homeowners and installers are scrambling. Martyna Kowalczyk, chief executive officer of Solartime, a family-owned Dallas area solar installer, said she's been interviewing prospective project managers to handle an expected influx of customers in the coming months. 'I am trying to prepare for the rabbit race,' said Kowalczyk. 'Everyone who is considering solar will try to get in this year. And next year will be a drought.' For homeowners, there's reason to rush to their local installer. The tax credits would save more than $10,000 on an average $35,000 system. Most solar panels and home batteries are imported and their cost is likely to rise due to US tariffs. But the looming deadline to claim the tax credits means it's crucial to choose an installer with the capacity to design a rooftop array and battery system, obtain the necessary permits and complete the job in a matter of months. Under the House version of the tax legislation, only systems installed and 'placed in service' by a utility before the tax credits' expiration qualify for the incentives. That raises an issue beyond the control of the installer — the time it takes for your local utility to connect a completed solar array to the grid. In Northern California, for instance, utility Pacific Gas & Electric says it usually flips the switch on a new solar system in five to 10 business days but the process can take up to a month. The Senate bill softens the blow a bit by deleting the 'placed into service' requirement. But homeowners would have to pay for solar and battery systems by Dec. 31 to be eligible for the tax credit. The risk is that delays push completion and activation of a solar and battery array beyond the deadline to claim tax credits and a homeowner is left on the hook for the full cost of the system. Other factors to consider include the age of your roof and whether it needs to be replaced before installing solar panels. Also, make sure your home's electrical panel has sufficient capacity to accommodate a solar and battery system or heat pumps. Even before the tax bill, A1 Sun, a Berkeley, California-based installer, was already booked through the end of 2025. 'We are placed in the unfortunate position of both not being able to take advantage of any sort of 'gold rush' for new contracts this year, and also having a lot of anxiety about being able to meet our commitments to install those customers who already had contracts in place,' said Reuben Ly, sales manager for family owned A1 Sun. 'It's just pulling the rug out from underneath us,' he said of the tax bill. SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
